<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MovieTally: Netflix&#8217;s Missing Features</title>
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/02/movietally-netflixs-missing-features/</link>
	<description>Startup and Tech News</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 09:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Netflix Prize: une philosophie de l&#8217;innovation &#187; Assonances</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/02/movietally-netflixs-missing-features/#comment-2284809</link>
		<dc:creator>Netflix Prize: une philosophie de l&#8217;innovation &#187; Assonances</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 11:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/02/movietally-netflixs-missing-features/#comment-2284809</guid>
		<description>[...] génome musical de Pandora) ou bien de tagging (qui pourrait s&#8217;apparenter aux moods de IMDB) sur techcrunch le content based est totalement évacué du Netflix [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] génome musical de Pandora) ou bien de tagging (qui pourrait s&#8217;apparenter aux moods de IMDB) sur techcrunch le content based est totalement évacué du Netflix [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennings Rountree</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/02/movietally-netflixs-missing-features/#comment-254664</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennings Rountree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 03:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/02/movietally-netflixs-missing-features/#comment-254664</guid>
		<description>Netflix does throttle and often I have notice dvds are supposed to be shipped one day and then it is changed to the next.  Customer service is not great at all, but the software  for selecting movies is the best I have seen.  I tried Blockbuster on line and it was okay, but selection software was not as good and due to location, a day was added each way for receiving and returning movies.  (Their free instore rental did me no good as the nearest stoe was 23 miles away) INTELLIFLIX WAS THE WORST.  They double charged me and kept $177 of my money for days.  I cancelled the account and ended up be charged over $40 for 3 movie rentals even though the crooks had illeaglly kept $177 of my money for days when they had no way of knowing if I might have needed that money for rent, a car payment, etc.  It could have even caused checks to bounce.  Fortunately it did not, but it could have.  BEWARE OF INTELLIFLIX.  Do not try it as a alternative to Netflix!
 Netflix has its problems, but it is the best of the three online dvd rentals I've tried.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Netflix does throttle and often I have notice dvds are supposed to be shipped one day and then it is changed to the next.  Customer service is not great at all, but the software  for selecting movies is the best I have seen.  I tried Blockbuster on line and it was okay, but selection software was not as good and due to location, a day was added each way for receiving and returning movies.  (Their free instore rental did me no good as the nearest stoe was 23 miles away) INTELLIFLIX WAS THE WORST.  They double charged me and kept $177 of my money for days.  I cancelled the account and ended up be charged over $40 for 3 movie rentals even though the crooks had illeaglly kept $177 of my money for days when they had no way of knowing if I might have needed that money for rent, a car payment, etc.  It could have even caused checks to bounce.  Fortunately it did not, but it could have.  BEWARE OF INTELLIFLIX.  Do not try it as a alternative to Netflix!<br />
 Netflix has its problems, but it is the best of the three online dvd rentals I&#8217;ve tried.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Things Considered &#187; Movietally - keep track of movies you&#8217;ve watched</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/02/movietally-netflixs-missing-features/#comment-242153</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Things Considered &#187; Movietally - keep track of movies you&#8217;ve watched</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 03:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/02/movietally-netflixs-missing-features/#comment-242153</guid>
		<description>[...] Update MovieTally got written up by TechCrunch this week. Turns out it was built by a 15-year old. Nice work. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Update MovieTally got written up by TechCrunch this week. Turns out it was built by a 15-year old. Nice work. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techbits</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/02/movietally-netflixs-missing-features/#comment-239453</link>
		<dc:creator>Techbits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 14:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/02/movietally-netflixs-missing-features/#comment-239453</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Esqueça o outsourcing. O negócio agora é o crowdsourcing...&lt;/strong&gt;

Claro, estou exagerando. Há alguns meses um artigo na revista Wired chamado The Rise of Crowdsourcing mostrou como a multidão pode ajudar organizações a completar tarefas e diminuir custos. O crowdsourcing é o &#8220;novo lugar da mão-de-obra bar...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Esqueça o outsourcing. O negócio agora é o crowdsourcing&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Claro, estou exagerando. Há alguns meses um artigo na revista Wired chamado The Rise of Crowdsourcing mostrou como a multidão pode ajudar organizações a completar tarefas e diminuir custos. O crowdsourcing é o &#8220;novo lugar da mão-de-obra bar&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; The Netflix prize - Possibility And Probability</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/02/movietally-netflixs-missing-features/#comment-239451</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; The Netflix prize - Possibility And Probability</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 14:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/02/movietally-netflixs-missing-features/#comment-239451</guid>
		<description>[...] Everyone is talking about the offer put up by Netflix yesterday. Basically if you can improve their movie recommendations, you win a million big ones. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Everyone is talking about the offer put up by Netflix yesterday. Basically if you can improve their movie recommendations, you win a million big ones. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: overcast</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/02/movietally-netflixs-missing-features/#comment-239199</link>
		<dc:creator>overcast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 12:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/02/movietally-netflixs-missing-features/#comment-239199</guid>
		<description>ABCota  - You saved me from writing my own response this morning. Thank You.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ABCota  - You saved me from writing my own response this morning. Thank You.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Chen Thinks Aloud - Innovation, Personal Finance, Digital Life, Internet, Technology &#38; Current Affairs &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why Netflix movie recommendation doesn&#8217;t work</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/02/movietally-netflixs-missing-features/#comment-239190</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Chen Thinks Aloud - Innovation, Personal Finance, Digital Life, Internet, Technology &#38; Current Affairs &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why Netflix movie recommendation doesn&#8217;t work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 12:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/02/movietally-netflixs-missing-features/#comment-239190</guid>
		<description>[...] MovieTally: Netflix&#8217;s Missing Features (TechCrunch)  Sharing is Good.These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] MovieTally: Netflix&#8217;s Missing Features (TechCrunch)  Sharing is Good.These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Chen</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/02/movietally-netflixs-missing-features/#comment-239184</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Chen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 12:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/02/movietally-netflixs-missing-features/#comment-239184</guid>
		<description>Though I think it's a great opportunity for research, but I doubt that it will lead to any major changes in its current implementation. User rating data is insufficient for building an intelligent recommendation system. 

http://harry.hchen1.com/2006/10/03/391

What do you guys think? - HC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though I think it&#8217;s a great opportunity for research, but I doubt that it will lead to any major changes in its current implementation. User rating data is insufficient for building an intelligent recommendation system. </p>
<p><a href="http://harry.hchen1.com/2006/10/03/391" rel="nofollow">http://harry.hchen1.com/2006/10/03/391</a></p>
<p>What do you guys think? - HC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechnoCloud &#187; Who wants to be a millionaire?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/02/movietally-netflixs-missing-features/#comment-238981</link>
		<dc:creator>TechnoCloud &#187; Who wants to be a millionaire?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 09:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/02/movietally-netflixs-missing-features/#comment-238981</guid>
		<description>[...] Neflix are offering a $1m prize to the first person who can achieve a 10%+ improvement in their recommendation engine. They are making available sections of their ratings database and stress that all data is anonymous - after all they wouldn&#8217;t want an AOL data leak on their hands&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Neflix are offering a $1m prize to the first person who can achieve a 10%+ improvement in their recommendation engine. They are making available sections of their ratings database and stress that all data is anonymous - after all they wouldn&#8217;t want an AOL data leak on their hands&#8230; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Forsooth</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/02/movietally-netflixs-missing-features/#comment-238662</link>
		<dc:creator>Forsooth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/02/movietally-netflixs-missing-features/#comment-238662</guid>
		<description>The bummer is that there is no user attributes. Simply the age and gender would probably improve recommendations greatly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bummer is that there is no user attributes. Simply the age and gender would probably improve recommendations greatly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ABCota</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/02/movietally-netflixs-missing-features/#comment-238646</link>
		<dc:creator>ABCota</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 05:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/02/movietally-netflixs-missing-features/#comment-238646</guid>
		<description>nemrut:  "Not great but good enough"?  Sorry, I would still prefer to watch a movie on the tool that was designed to show video content...  TV (preferable my plasma)  I've neither the tiime nor the patience to wait for video download.  It take me hardly any time to order a movie from Netflix.  Not sure about you but my time is worth more to me than to go through the hassle of downloading video.

Mark Cuban has written about this with considerably more insight than those that have no experence in this medium but think they do.

http://www.blogmaverick.com/2006/09/08/internet-movie-downloads-vs-store-dvds-a-quick-biz-lesson/

Here's the money shot from Cuban's post:

"And as far as the perspective of giving users what they want and they want downloads. If we dont offer them downloads, they will find downloads on their own , just as we saw in the music business... Nope. This aint the music business. This aint 3 minute songs that download in under a minute and allow users the option of getting the 1 song they like instead of a package of 10. IF movies were sold in prepackaged albums of 10 movies. Maybe. If movies were 3 minutes in length. Maybe. If watching on a computer or on an Ipod was as good an experience and often better than watching on the smallest TV in the house, maybe. But its not.

Watching video on a computer or on a PDA/Ipod is a 2nd class experience. It works amazingly well as a time killer on a bus, plane, lunchroom. It works good enough in a dorm room or your apartment bedroom, but its not going to replace watching on a real tv. It will always be a niche market in every manner.

and for all you "but i can and do download everything " types. Good for you. Get up and away from your computer and go see how the rest of the country lives. And when you hit 27, get a real job or move out of your parents house, whichever comes first, tell me if you are still downloading 10 movies and burning them for your friends and creating 10 playlists for Itunes every week like you did in college or when you first graduated. At some point you realize the time you spend downloading and burning to a DVD is worth more than the 10 bucks to go to a movie or 20 bucks or less to buy the movie. When that happens you will have figured out that all that time you spend burning DVDs and trying to manage space on your hard drive wasnt worth it"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nemrut:  &#8220;Not great but good enough&#8221;?  Sorry, I would still prefer to watch a movie on the tool that was designed to show video content&#8230;  TV (preferable my plasma)  I&#8217;ve neither the tiime nor the patience to wait for video download.  It take me hardly any time to order a movie from Netflix.  Not sure about you but my time is worth more to me than to go through the hassle of downloading video.</p>
<p>Mark Cuban has written about this with considerably more insight than those that have no experence in this medium but think they do.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.blogmaverick.com/2006/09/08/internet-movie-downloads-vs-store-dvds-a-quick-biz-lesson/" rel="nofollow">http://www.blogmaverick.com/20.....iz-lesson/</a></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the money shot from Cuban&#8217;s post:</p>
<p>&#8220;And as far as the perspective of giving users what they want and they want downloads. If we dont offer them downloads, they will find downloads on their own , just as we saw in the music business&#8230; Nope. This aint the music business. This aint 3 minute songs that download in under a minute and allow users the option of getting the 1 song they like instead of a package of 10. IF movies were sold in prepackaged albums of 10 movies. Maybe. If movies were 3 minutes in length. Maybe. If watching on a computer or on an Ipod was as good an experience and often better than watching on the smallest TV in the house, maybe. But its not.</p>
<p>Watching video on a computer or on a PDA/Ipod is a 2nd class experience. It works amazingly well as a time killer on a bus, plane, lunchroom. It works good enough in a dorm room or your apartment bedroom, but its not going to replace watching on a real tv. It will always be a niche market in every manner.</p>
<p>and for all you &#8220;but i can and do download everything &#8221; types. Good for you. Get up and away from your computer and go see how the rest of the country lives. And when you hit 27, get a real job or move out of your parents house, whichever comes first, tell me if you are still downloading 10 movies and burning them for your friends and creating 10 playlists for Itunes every week like you did in college or when you first graduated. At some point you realize the time you spend downloading and burning to a DVD is worth more than the 10 bucks to go to a movie or 20 bucks or less to buy the movie. When that happens you will have figured out that all that time you spend burning DVDs and trying to manage space on your hard drive wasnt worth it&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hatim</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/02/movietally-netflixs-missing-features/#comment-238368</link>
		<dc:creator>Hatim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 00:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/02/movietally-netflixs-missing-features/#comment-238368</guid>
		<description>For something that made Amazon what it is now (the recommendation engine) I think a million dollar is pretty cheap. 

It will be interesting to see what brilliant ideas will come out of this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For something that made Amazon what it is now (the recommendation engine) I think a million dollar is pretty cheap. </p>
<p>It will be interesting to see what brilliant ideas will come out of this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jitendra</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/02/movietally-netflixs-missing-features/#comment-238294</link>
		<dc:creator>Jitendra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 23:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/02/movietally-netflixs-missing-features/#comment-238294</guid>
		<description>Very good move on the part of Netflix to engage the community...

It time to move beyond the various extensions of collaborative filtering mechanisms. I would imagine that the way to improve upon the existing recommendations is by breaking the movies down along a lot richer set of attributes (similar to the Music Genome project http://pandora.com/mgp.shtml). Based on better understanding of movies,  better recommendations should be possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good move on the part of Netflix to engage the community&#8230;</p>
<p>It time to move beyond the various extensions of collaborative filtering mechanisms. I would imagine that the way to improve upon the existing recommendations is by breaking the movies down along a lot richer set of attributes (similar to the Music Genome project <a href="http://pandora.com/mgp.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://pandora.com/mgp.shtml</a>). Based on better understanding of movies,  better recommendations should be possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noname</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/02/movietally-netflixs-missing-features/#comment-238288</link>
		<dc:creator>noname</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 23:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/02/movietally-netflixs-missing-features/#comment-238288</guid>
		<description>movietally seems pretty trivial - it's yet another collaborative filtering system with tags in addition to simple ratings. highly doubt it's anywhere near as sophisticated as netflix's system. not every problem can be solved with tags, sometimes you need good old fashioned real computer science. the average netflix user probably wouldn't bother with tags anyway - it's far simpler to rate 1-5, so given that that's the bulk of the data netflix has, they want to maximize the efficacy of their recommendation system that uses that data. the contest is a great idea, and will attract the right minds. no, it's not web 2.0, no there's no nifty ajax, but it has the potential to contribute important results to further research. this is an artificial intelligence problem, and web 2.0 junkies need to get over themselves - grouping and matching with tags is too shallow to do anything special.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>movietally seems pretty trivial - it&#8217;s yet another collaborative filtering system with tags in addition to simple ratings. highly doubt it&#8217;s anywhere near as sophisticated as netflix&#8217;s system. not every problem can be solved with tags, sometimes you need good old fashioned real computer science. the average netflix user probably wouldn&#8217;t bother with tags anyway - it&#8217;s far simpler to rate 1-5, so given that that&#8217;s the bulk of the data netflix has, they want to maximize the efficacy of their recommendation system that uses that data. the contest is a great idea, and will attract the right minds. no, it&#8217;s not web 2.0, no there&#8217;s no nifty ajax, but it has the potential to contribute important results to further research. this is an artificial intelligence problem, and web 2.0 junkies need to get over themselves - grouping and matching with tags is too shallow to do anything special.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nemrut</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/02/movietally-netflixs-missing-features/#comment-238283</link>
		<dc:creator>nemrut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 23:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/02/movietally-netflixs-missing-features/#comment-238283</guid>
		<description>_70% of Americans are online and growing
_TV is no longer the sole medium for passive video consumption
_Streaming video quality via Movielink, Cinemanow, YouTude, etc is not great, but good enough

These are a few reasons i can think of for Netflix' demise if they don't get with the program.  Granted they won't go out of business anytime soon, but their current busines model is on a path to incrmental if non-existent growth.

With the popularity of the svcs mentioned, people want video on-demand now and without a lot of fuss.  This is made even more convenient with the popularity of laptops surpassing that of desktops.

I used to think tht Netflix was the next best thing to apple pie, but with the inconvenience of physical delivery, returns, late,misplaced,wrong disks it's just not worth the time and effort.  with so much quality video on the net competing for eyeballs along with limited time and bandwidth, who wants to deal with the hassles of 'physical delivery/fulfillment'...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>_70% of Americans are online and growing<br />
_TV is no longer the sole medium for passive video consumption<br />
_Streaming video quality via Movielink, Cinemanow, YouTude, etc is not great, but good enough</p>
<p>These are a few reasons i can think of for Netflix&#8217; demise if they don&#8217;t get with the program.  Granted they won&#8217;t go out of business anytime soon, but their current busines model is on a path to incrmental if non-existent growth.</p>
<p>With the popularity of the svcs mentioned, people want video on-demand now and without a lot of fuss.  This is made even more convenient with the popularity of laptops surpassing that of desktops.</p>
<p>I used to think tht Netflix was the next best thing to apple pie, but with the inconvenience of physical delivery, returns, late,misplaced,wrong disks it&#8217;s just not worth the time and effort.  with so much quality video on the net competing for eyeballs along with limited time and bandwidth, who wants to deal with the hassles of &#8216;physical delivery/fulfillment&#8217;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; MovieTally、Netflixに欠けている機能を提供</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/02/movietally-netflixs-missing-features/#comment-238237</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; MovieTally、Netflixに欠けている機能を提供</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 22:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/02/movietally-netflixs-missing-features/#comment-238237</guid>
		<description>[...] [原文へ]  MovieTally [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] [原文へ]  MovieTally [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: overcast</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/02/movietally-netflixs-missing-features/#comment-238216</link>
		<dc:creator>overcast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 21:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/02/movietally-netflixs-missing-features/#comment-238216</guid>
		<description>nemrut...I'd love to hear the rational behind anything you just said. Because it's a bunch of baloney. Granted, this may be some marketing ploy. But if you're  implying streaming video rentals are going to take over standard rentals, at any point in the near future. Then you've lost it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nemrut&#8230;I&#8217;d love to hear the rational behind anything you just said. Because it&#8217;s a bunch of baloney. Granted, this may be some marketing ploy. But if you&#8217;re  implying streaming video rentals are going to take over standard rentals, at any point in the near future. Then you&#8217;ve lost it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nemrut</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/02/movietally-netflixs-missing-features/#comment-238210</link>
		<dc:creator>nemrut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 21:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/02/movietally-netflixs-missing-features/#comment-238210</guid>
		<description>This is clearly an inexpensive mktg ploy by Netflix or a disillusional attempt to garner developer support for a service that is past it's prime.

While competitors, upstarts and the likes of YouTube et al compete for eyeballs and mktshare, Netflix is still in the 'bricks &#38; morter' mode of video distribution.  Unless they get their act together fast, they will likely fade into oblivion as more efficient means of video consumption gain critical mass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is clearly an inexpensive mktg ploy by Netflix or a disillusional attempt to garner developer support for a service that is past it&#8217;s prime.</p>
<p>While competitors, upstarts and the likes of YouTube et al compete for eyeballs and mktshare, Netflix is still in the &#8216;bricks &amp; morter&#8217; mode of video distribution.  Unless they get their act together fast, they will likely fade into oblivion as more efficient means of video consumption gain critical mass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Awesom-o</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/02/movietally-netflixs-missing-features/#comment-238093</link>
		<dc:creator>Awesom-o</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 20:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/02/movietally-netflixs-missing-features/#comment-238093</guid>
		<description>The website for more information is http://www.netflixprize.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The website for more information is <a href="http://www.netflixprize.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.netflixprize.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diogo Azevedo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/02/movietally-netflixs-missing-features/#comment-238064</link>
		<dc:creator>Diogo Azevedo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 20:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/02/movietally-netflixs-missing-features/#comment-238064</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Netflix cria prêmio de $1 mi. Quem se habilita?...&lt;/strong&gt;


Você conhece o Netflix? Se trata de um serviço de aluguel online de DVDs. Funciona da seguinte maneira:

Eu assino um dos planos
Crio uma lista dos DVDs que desejo assistir
Eles me enviam os DVDs via correio de acordo com o plano (3 DVDs, 1 DVD, 2 D...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Netflix cria prêmio de $1 mi. Quem se habilita?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Você conhece o Netflix? Se trata de um serviço de aluguel online de DVDs. Funciona da seguinte maneira:</p>
<p>Eu assino um dos planos<br />
Crio uma lista dos DVDs que desejo assistir<br />
Eles me enviam os DVDs via correio de acordo com o plano (3 DVDs, 1 DVD, 2 D&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JpMaxMan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/02/movietally-netflixs-missing-features/#comment-238046</link>
		<dc:creator>JpMaxMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 20:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/02/movietally-netflixs-missing-features/#comment-238046</guid>
		<description>I think this is much more of a marketing effort than a serious attempt to find better recommendation logic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is much more of a marketing effort than a serious attempt to find better recommendation logic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos Granier-Phelps</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/02/movietally-netflixs-missing-features/#comment-238005</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos Granier-Phelps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 19:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/02/movietally-netflixs-missing-features/#comment-238005</guid>
		<description>The problem I see with using websites such as MovieTally for recommendations, is that in the end you tend to end up mirroring the box-office hits: what most people watch, most people recommend.

So, unless there's an additional user-controlled component, such as "show me only recommendations from these group of users," you'll only get junk.

A "circles-of-trust" algorithm, where users give a particular user's recommendation more (or less) weight would work best. I have very good friends who's recommendations I don't follow at all. Some other friends, I know I can trust for certain genres only. Some mere acquaintances give wonderful movie suggestions. Now, if I could call on them while at the video store... that would be great. I'm sure Netflix could pull this off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem I see with using websites such as MovieTally for recommendations, is that in the end you tend to end up mirroring the box-office hits: what most people watch, most people recommend.</p>
<p>So, unless there&#8217;s an additional user-controlled component, such as &#8220;show me only recommendations from these group of users,&#8221; you&#8217;ll only get junk.</p>
<p>A &#8220;circles-of-trust&#8221; algorithm, where users give a particular user&#8217;s recommendation more (or less) weight would work best. I have very good friends who&#8217;s recommendations I don&#8217;t follow at all. Some other friends, I know I can trust for certain genres only. Some mere acquaintances give wonderful movie suggestions. Now, if I could call on them while at the video store&#8230; that would be great. I&#8217;m sure Netflix could pull this off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sophie</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/02/movietally-netflixs-missing-features/#comment-237984</link>
		<dc:creator>Sophie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 19:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/02/movietally-netflixs-missing-features/#comment-237984</guid>
		<description>It seems that Blabbit.com has some of their answers already. I agree with Michael about checking out the web to see what's out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that Blabbit.com has some of their answers already. I agree with Michael about checking out the web to see what&#8217;s out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Brodsky</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/02/movietally-netflixs-missing-features/#comment-237970</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Brodsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 19:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/02/movietally-netflixs-missing-features/#comment-237970</guid>
		<description>in response to Patrick: they are giving out "annonymized data". In light of the AOL search debacle, this may not seem too smart, but you have to register for the contest before you get access to the data, and they don't rent porn, so I can't imagine that anyone would be too embarrased.

there are more details on the site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in response to Patrick: they are giving out &#8220;annonymized data&#8221;. In light of the AOL search debacle, this may not seem too smart, but you have to register for the contest before you get access to the data, and they don&#8217;t rent porn, so I can&#8217;t imagine that anyone would be too embarrased.</p>
<p>there are more details on the site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos Granier-Phelps</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/02/movietally-netflixs-missing-features/#comment-237968</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos Granier-Phelps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 19:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/02/movietally-netflixs-missing-features/#comment-237968</guid>
		<description>That should be "allmovie.com" (singular). Allmovies.com (plural) goes to some kind of spam/aggregator website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That should be &#8220;allmovie.com&#8221; (singular). Allmovies.com (plural) goes to some kind of spam/aggregator website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.368 seconds -->
