<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social network Xuqa&#8217;s in the black</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/11/social-network-xuqas-in-the-black/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/11/social-network-xuqas-in-the-black/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:44:56 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tiffany Gilbeert</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/11/social-network-xuqas-in-the-black/comment-page-2/#comment-2683348</link>
		<dc:creator>Tiffany Gilbeert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 16:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/11/social-network-xuqas-in-the-black/#comment-2683348</guid>
		<description>Hey whats up Life is so great when you fall in love</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey whats up Life is so great when you fall in love</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: serdar</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/11/social-network-xuqas-in-the-black/comment-page-2/#comment-2584387</link>
		<dc:creator>serdar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 08:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/11/social-network-xuqas-in-the-black/#comment-2584387</guid>
		<description>http://www.xuqa.com/kaymakam1 
VİEW VİEW :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.xuqa.com/kaymakam1" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.xuqa.com/kaymakam1'>http://www.xuqa.com/kaymakam1</a><br />
VİEW VİEW <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Respectance.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Social network Xuqa’s in the black</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/11/social-network-xuqas-in-the-black/comment-page-2/#comment-727108</link>
		<dc:creator>Respectance.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Social network Xuqa’s in the black</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 19:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/11/social-network-xuqas-in-the-black/#comment-727108</guid>
		<description>[...] (Techcrunch) Cynics take note, social networking and online game startup Xuqa has announced that their daily revenue has exceeded their operating costs and that they will take no more VC funding. They’ve raised $1.3 million from BV Capital and Skype investor Morten Lund; about half of that funding is left a year after launch. More&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (Techcrunch) Cynics take note, social networking and online game startup Xuqa has announced that their daily revenue has exceeded their operating costs and that they will take no more VC funding. They’ve raised $1.3 million from BV Capital and Skype investor Morten Lund; about half of that funding is left a year after launch. More&hellip; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guven</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/11/social-network-xuqas-in-the-black/comment-page-2/#comment-529087</link>
		<dc:creator>guven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/11/social-network-xuqas-in-the-black/#comment-529087</guid>
		<description>hiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web2.0 - not Bubble2.0 (yet) &#187; Finance2.0: The Finance Huddle</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/11/social-network-xuqas-in-the-black/comment-page-2/#comment-447413</link>
		<dc:creator>Web2.0 - not Bubble2.0 (yet) &#187; Finance2.0: The Finance Huddle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 22:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/11/social-network-xuqas-in-the-black/#comment-447413</guid>
		<description>[...] Gone are the days when startups raise $10&#8217;s of millions of dollars and spend it on low returning assets like TV advertising and posh offices. Today, a &#8216;web&#8217; company should be able to get to product with less than $1MM and get to significant traction with less than $5MM. I would also put out there that really well managed companies should also be able to get to profitability with about $5MM in capital. See here for Digg and Xuqa. An interesting quote from Rolling Stone: As these post-crash babies understand, the future isn&#8217;t necessarily boundless. Though most were barely out of high school at the time, they all know what happened in the first Silicon Valley boom of the 1990s. Wide-eyed startups like Pets.com, Kozmo and Napster burned through hype and money without serving up that one crucial thing &#8212; a viable business plan. This new crew is struggling to avoid the same mistakes of excess, indulgence, selling out too soon. &#8220;We know the reasons the generation before us went over the cliff,&#8221; offers Zuckerberg. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Gone are the days when startups raise $10&#8217;s of millions of dollars and spend it on low returning assets like TV advertising and posh offices. Today, a &#8216;web&#8217; company should be able to get to product with less than $1MM and get to significant traction with less than $5MM. I would also put out there that really well managed companies should also be able to get to profitability with about $5MM in capital. See here for Digg and Xuqa. An interesting quote from Rolling Stone: As these post-crash babies understand, the future isn&#8217;t necessarily boundless. Though most were barely out of high school at the time, they all know what happened in the first Silicon Valley boom of the 1990s. Wide-eyed startups like Pets.com, Kozmo and Napster burned through hype and money without serving up that one crucial thing &#8212; a viable business plan. This new crew is struggling to avoid the same mistakes of excess, indulgence, selling out too soon. &#8220;We know the reasons the generation before us went over the cliff,&#8221; offers Zuckerberg. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean ;)</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/11/social-network-xuqas-in-the-black/comment-page-2/#comment-402017</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean ;)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 04:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/11/social-network-xuqas-in-the-black/#comment-402017</guid>
		<description>Is it getting easier to get funding thse days? I&#039;ve got to start looking into spending other peoples money.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.roofcontractor.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.RoofContractor.com&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it getting easier to get funding thse days? I&#8217;ve got to start looking into spending other peoples money.  <a href="http://www.roofcontractor.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.RoofContractor.com'>http://www.RoofContractor.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; さらに買収のウワサ走る―Xuqa, Dovetail, Zooomr</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/11/social-network-xuqas-in-the-black/comment-page-2/#comment-214450</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; さらに買収のウワサ走る―Xuqa, Dovetail, Zooomr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 15:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/11/social-network-xuqas-in-the-black/#comment-214450</guid>
		<description>[...] Xuqa：複数のソースの証言によると、黒字転換したと発表したソーシャルネットワークXuqaが3000万ドルクラスで売れるかもしれないという。確定申し込みが１社あるほか、いくつかの申し込みがあるもよう。. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Xuqa：複数のソースの証言によると、黒字転換したと発表したソーシャルネットワークXuqaが3000万ドルクラスで売れるかもしれないという。確定申し込みが１社あるほか、いくつかの申し込みがあるもよう。. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noah Kronemeyer</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/11/social-network-xuqas-in-the-black/comment-page-2/#comment-193417</link>
		<dc:creator>Noah Kronemeyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 10:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/11/social-network-xuqas-in-the-black/#comment-193417</guid>
		<description>I love Xuqa. I&#039;ve been a loyal follower since they first launched. The reason I love Xuqa so much is because it brings out the best in all the other competition (namely Facebook). Do you know why Facebook started offering Photo Galleries? It was because of Xuqa. True story.

Xuqa has made not only a great site themselves, but also spurred other sites to add new features to try and keep up.

Kudos to you guys!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love Xuqa. I&#8217;ve been a loyal follower since they first launched. The reason I love Xuqa so much is because it brings out the best in all the other competition (namely Facebook). Do you know why Facebook started offering Photo Galleries? It was because of Xuqa. True story.</p>
<p>Xuqa has made not only a great site themselves, but also spurred other sites to add new features to try and keep up.</p>
<p>Kudos to you guys!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monetize Traffic</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/11/social-network-xuqas-in-the-black/comment-page-2/#comment-192330</link>
		<dc:creator>Monetize Traffic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 01:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/11/social-network-xuqas-in-the-black/#comment-192330</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Good Monetization Strategy at XuQa...&lt;/strong&gt;



TechCrunch has a post that touches XuQa&#8217;s monetization strategy. The social networking site has developed a mini-economy centered on earning peanuts. One way that users can earn peanuts is to complete CPA offers. They must be doing pretty well ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Good Monetization Strategy at XuQa&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>TechCrunch has a post that touches XuQa&#8217;s monetization strategy. The social networking site has developed a mini-economy centered on earning peanuts. One way that users can earn peanuts is to complete CPA offers. They must be doing pretty well &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter T.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/11/social-network-xuqas-in-the-black/comment-page-2/#comment-189753</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 04:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/11/social-network-xuqas-in-the-black/#comment-189753</guid>
		<description>Answer is simple, they can not stay in business after VC funding runs out. And that is actually the way it should be, natural market selection. Though Tagworld and Tagged do have enough VC funding to stay in business for a while, even at that burn rate. During which they might/might not figure out sufficient revenue streams. 

About those numbers, most major investment banking research divisions do cover many tech start-ups&#039; fundamental studies, please request one of those if you know anyone there, they usually have pdf versions for internal distribution. Although these resarch reports tend to be conservative, but they speak with numbers and fundamental information, of course numbers can tell everything, but at least they are relatively more objective that guessing and rumors.  But anyhow, these reports usually serve as  information analysis other than a recommendation or conclusion, so it is up to you how to interpret these numbers. After all, many of those start-ups could be their potential clients for IPO and M&amp;A, investment banks do need to know as much as possible who they are dealing with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Answer is simple, they can not stay in business after VC funding runs out. And that is actually the way it should be, natural market selection. Though Tagworld and Tagged do have enough VC funding to stay in business for a while, even at that burn rate. During which they might/might not figure out sufficient revenue streams. </p>
<p>About those numbers, most major investment banking research divisions do cover many tech start-ups&#8217; fundamental studies, please request one of those if you know anyone there, they usually have pdf versions for internal distribution. Although these resarch reports tend to be conservative, but they speak with numbers and fundamental information, of course numbers can tell everything, but at least they are relatively more objective that guessing and rumors.  But anyhow, these reports usually serve as  information analysis other than a recommendation or conclusion, so it is up to you how to interpret these numbers. After all, many of those start-ups could be their potential clients for IPO and M&amp;A, investment banks do need to know as much as possible who they are dealing with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whatshisname</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/11/social-network-xuqas-in-the-black/comment-page-2/#comment-189104</link>
		<dc:creator>whatshisname</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 23:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/11/social-network-xuqas-in-the-black/#comment-189104</guid>
		<description>i cannot believe it costs that much (60-80k) per month for 1 mill members SNS.  Do you have any links where I can dig into those numbers? At that rate, how can many of these secondary SNS (tagworld, tagged, etc.) stay in business after VC funding runs out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i cannot believe it costs that much (60-80k) per month for 1 mill members SNS.  Do you have any links where I can dig into those numbers? At that rate, how can many of these secondary SNS (tagworld, tagged, etc.) stay in business after VC funding runs out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dead2.0 &#187; Is Facebook the new Webvan?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/11/social-network-xuqas-in-the-black/comment-page-2/#comment-189089</link>
		<dc:creator>Dead2.0 &#187; Is Facebook the new Webvan?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 23:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/11/social-network-xuqas-in-the-black/#comment-189089</guid>
		<description>[...] I don&#8217;t know what Facebook&#8217;s revenue numbers are, but it appears that they have overhired and spent money like there&#8217;s no tomorrow. I guess $35+ million in VC money gives you an incentive to go on a shopping spree. As a comparison, MySpace reportedly has 300 employees. Employee/user ratio: 1:333,333. As of May 25, Bebo reportedly had 10 employees. Let&#8217;s assume that they now have 20. Employee/user ratio: 1:1.25 million. Xuqa (who?), which yesterday announced &#8220;daily profitability&#8221;, reportedly has 5 employees and 1 million users. Employee/user ratio: 1:200,000. With 140 employees (according to a recent Craigslist ad) and 9.5 million users, Facebook&#8217;s employee/user ratio is 1:68,000. Of course, a better measure would be revenues per employee, but this will have to suffice and it looks like Facebook is out of line with the other players, especially when you consider that MySpace and Bebo have a much larger number of users and significantly more features. Facebook offers all their employees: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I don&#8217;t know what Facebook&#8217;s revenue numbers are, but it appears that they have overhired and spent money like there&#8217;s no tomorrow. I guess $35+ million in VC money gives you an incentive to go on a shopping spree. As a comparison, MySpace reportedly has 300 employees. Employee/user ratio: 1:333,333. As of May 25, Bebo reportedly had 10 employees. Let&#8217;s assume that they now have 20. Employee/user ratio: 1:1.25 million. Xuqa (who?), which yesterday announced &#8220;daily profitability&#8221;, reportedly has 5 employees and 1 million users. Employee/user ratio: 1:200,000. With 140 employees (according to a recent Craigslist ad) and 9.5 million users, Facebook&#8217;s employee/user ratio is 1:68,000. Of course, a better measure would be revenues per employee, but this will have to suffice and it looks like Facebook is out of line with the other players, especially when you consider that MySpace and Bebo have a much larger number of users and significantly more features. Facebook offers all their employees: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter T.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/11/social-network-xuqas-in-the-black/comment-page-2/#comment-188240</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 16:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/11/social-network-xuqas-in-the-black/#comment-188240</guid>
		<description>Well, I do understand that XuQa is probably doing some form of outsourcing, to some hot IT sourcing spots, therefore, my guess of 60K-80K burn rate has already included this factor. TagWorld is also having substantial development done in Russia. If a SNS is purely a US based operation, I would probably say the burn rate in &gt;100K rage. Besides, my point is that, you can not build a great company simply by cutting down costs: XuQa does not only need to worry when to break even, but also how to become highly profitable very soon in the near future. Breaking even is simply not good enough to compete with other rivals, which are making lots of money or over just-breaking-even stage already. In this market, running damn fast isnt good enough, u gotta run FASTER than others.

It is, however, not my intent to criticize XuQa here. Many young SNS start-ups are gone already. XuQa is still alive, that alone shows it has potential. Just after all the early SNS mania, remaining smart players should learn that  there is still a long way to go before their early start-ups can become  mature and sustainable companies. Hope XuQa will be one of them eventually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I do understand that XuQa is probably doing some form of outsourcing, to some hot IT sourcing spots, therefore, my guess of 60K-80K burn rate has already included this factor. TagWorld is also having substantial development done in Russia. If a SNS is purely a US based operation, I would probably say the burn rate in &gt;100K rage. Besides, my point is that, you can not build a great company simply by cutting down costs: XuQa does not only need to worry when to break even, but also how to become highly profitable very soon in the near future. Breaking even is simply not good enough to compete with other rivals, which are making lots of money or over just-breaking-even stage already. In this market, running damn fast isnt good enough, u gotta run FASTER than others.</p>
<p>It is, however, not my intent to criticize XuQa here. Many young SNS start-ups are gone already. XuQa is still alive, that alone shows it has potential. Just after all the early SNS mania, remaining smart players should learn that  there is still a long way to go before their early start-ups can become  mature and sustainable companies. Hope XuQa will be one of them eventually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Coll</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/11/social-network-xuqas-in-the-black/comment-page-2/#comment-187509</link>
		<dc:creator>David Coll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 12:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/11/social-network-xuqas-in-the-black/#comment-187509</guid>
		<description>http://www.inf.aber.ac.uk/news/computing/xuqa.asp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.inf.aber.ac.uk/news/computing/xuqa.asp" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.inf.aber.ac.uk/news/computing/xuqa.asp'>http://www.inf....puting/xuqa.asp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Coll</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/11/social-network-xuqas-in-the-black/comment-page-2/#comment-187507</link>
		<dc:creator>David Coll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 12:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/11/social-network-xuqas-in-the-black/#comment-187507</guid>
		<description>XuQa Web Site : Blocking   

Early in March U.W.A staff received a number of complaints about material being posted on the XuQa web site. On examination it was found that a number of postings were personal attacks on members of U.W.A, and that even though they were posted anonymously they will have been written by other members of U.W.A. 

It was clear that a number of these items were defamatory. The data network at U.W.A is connected to the Internet via the UK Universities JANET network, and continuing to allow its transmission to Aberystwyth would have constituted a breach of the JANET Acceptable Use policy the University have signed up to. As such access to XuQa was blocked on 9th March. 

Shortly after this, XuQa contacted Information Services to say that they agreed there were problems with the site and that they were taking steps to rectify this. On 23rd March they supplied U.W.A with Moderator Guidelines that they were distributing, and confirmed that they had appointed a number of local moderators. 

However, evidence presented by members of UWA since that time clearly shows that defamatory material remains available and that, if the site is unblocked, further highly offensive material is immediately posted. As such UWA currently contemplates no change in policy, and do not expect to be reviewing the matter again in the near future. This issue has taken considerable staff time - time which would be better spent in providing robust networking for academic purposes.

The material on this page was last reviewed on 27th March 2006 
The page is maintained by Jeremy Perkins.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>XuQa Web Site : Blocking   </p>
<p>Early in March U.W.A staff received a number of complaints about material being posted on the XuQa web site. On examination it was found that a number of postings were personal attacks on members of U.W.A, and that even though they were posted anonymously they will have been written by other members of U.W.A. </p>
<p>It was clear that a number of these items were defamatory. The data network at U.W.A is connected to the Internet via the UK Universities JANET network, and continuing to allow its transmission to Aberystwyth would have constituted a breach of the JANET Acceptable Use policy the University have signed up to. As such access to XuQa was blocked on 9th March. </p>
<p>Shortly after this, XuQa contacted Information Services to say that they agreed there were problems with the site and that they were taking steps to rectify this. On 23rd March they supplied U.W.A with Moderator Guidelines that they were distributing, and confirmed that they had appointed a number of local moderators. </p>
<p>However, evidence presented by members of UWA since that time clearly shows that defamatory material remains available and that, if the site is unblocked, further highly offensive material is immediately posted. As such UWA currently contemplates no change in policy, and do not expect to be reviewing the matter again in the near future. This issue has taken considerable staff time &#8211; time which would be better spent in providing robust networking for academic purposes.</p>
<p>The material on this page was last reviewed on 27th March 2006<br />
The page is maintained by Jeremy Perkins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Coll</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/11/social-network-xuqas-in-the-black/comment-page-2/#comment-187505</link>
		<dc:creator>David Coll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 11:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/11/social-network-xuqas-in-the-black/#comment-187505</guid>
		<description>The History of XuQa 

was just checking my email and was surprised to find this sitting in my spam folder:

Hello,
Somebody on XuQa.com has added you to their crush list.
Click on the link to learn more.
XuQa.com/joinit

Cheers,
The XuQa.com Team

If you do not want to get any further emails, follow this link:
XuQa.com/unsubscribe.php?go=7cb0726f

XuQa.com -
1 (413) 884-1046
feedback@XuQa.com
88 Linden St. Williamstown, MA 01267
www.XuQa.com 

I thought “hmmm,” I’d better check this out! So I did, only to discover that to find out “who” has a “crush” on my I would have to enter all my friends’ email addresses that I “have a crush” on and hope for a match:

How do I find out who my Secret Admirer is? Well if we simply told you, he or she wouldn’t be secret anymore  (hint: common friends between you &amp; your secret admirer are listed. going to each of your common friends profiles is a good way to start investigating)

What this is is not a viable way for people to connect, but an exponential disruptive mouth-to-mouth promotional scheme. If you can get people to keep referring all of their friends, you’ll soon have enough members to compete with the Facebook! Which leads me to the following theory:

In order to get mega-membership, why not send out crushlist invitations to everyone at Cornell? After all, unless all of them enter every other cornell student’s email address, they’ll never know that no one at Cornell actually sent a crush to them.

In other words, I don’t really trust XuQa. To take this even further, I have the suspicion that they’re harvesting data from TheFaceBook.com and using it to pre-populate their databases, as evidenced by the long lists of blank names of Cornell Students who all signed up on “Wednesday, Sep 21:”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The History of XuQa </p>
<p>was just checking my email and was surprised to find this sitting in my spam folder:</p>
<p>Hello,<br />
Somebody on XuQa.com has added you to their crush list.<br />
Click on the link to learn more.<br />
XuQa.com/joinit</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
The XuQa.com Team</p>
<p>If you do not want to get any further emails, follow this link:<br />
XuQa.com/unsubscribe.php?go=7cb0726f</p>
<p>XuQa.com -<br />
1 (413) 884-1046<br />
<a href="mailto:feedback@XuQa.com">feedback@XuQa.com</a><br />
88 Linden St. Williamstown, MA 01267<br />
<a href="http://www.XuQa.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.XuQa.com'>http://www.XuQa.com</a> </p>
<p>I thought “hmmm,” I’d better check this out! So I did, only to discover that to find out “who” has a “crush” on my I would have to enter all my friends’ email addresses that I “have a crush” on and hope for a match:</p>
<p>How do I find out who my Secret Admirer is? Well if we simply told you, he or she wouldn’t be secret anymore  (hint: common friends between you &amp; your secret admirer are listed. going to each of your common friends profiles is a good way to start investigating)</p>
<p>What this is is not a viable way for people to connect, but an exponential disruptive mouth-to-mouth promotional scheme. If you can get people to keep referring all of their friends, you’ll soon have enough members to compete with the Facebook! Which leads me to the following theory:</p>
<p>In order to get mega-membership, why not send out crushlist invitations to everyone at Cornell? After all, unless all of them enter every other cornell student’s email address, they’ll never know that no one at Cornell actually sent a crush to them.</p>
<p>In other words, I don’t really trust XuQa. To take this even further, I have the suspicion that they’re harvesting data from TheFaceBook.com and using it to pre-populate their databases, as evidenced by the long lists of blank names of Cornell Students who all signed up on “Wednesday, Sep 21:”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: XuQa Innovates &#171; Random Scribbles on New Business</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/11/social-network-xuqas-in-the-black/comment-page-1/#comment-187380</link>
		<dc:creator>XuQa Innovates &#171; Random Scribbles on New Business</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 10:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/11/social-network-xuqas-in-the-black/#comment-187380</guid>
		<description>[...] My friends, Murtaza, Ali and Prosper of XuQa.com announced something really cool today - they&#8217;ve broken even! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] My friends, Murtaza, Ali and Prosper of XuQa.com announced something really cool today &#8211; they&#8217;ve broken even! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Re</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/11/social-network-xuqas-in-the-black/comment-page-1/#comment-187352</link>
		<dc:creator>Re</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 10:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/11/social-network-xuqas-in-the-black/#comment-187352</guid>
		<description>Re the post above, they do outsource development to Pakistan. You can easily run a company with half that much (VERY EASILY) there.
\</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re the post above, they do outsource development to Pakistan. You can easily run a company with half that much (VERY EASILY) there.<br />
\</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter T.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/11/social-network-xuqas-in-the-black/comment-page-1/#comment-187264</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 09:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/11/social-network-xuqas-in-the-black/#comment-187264</guid>
		<description>Honestly, I remain very skeptical about the claim that XuQa breaks even already, by just revenues from survey and sponsored offers.  Reasons are simple, the fair market charge of a &gt;10K persons on-line survey would be around USD 0.05/complete response. If 10% of XuQa&#039;s users take the survey, that would be USD5,000/survey. Will there be more than ten &gt;10K survey cilents retain XuQa every month? I doubt. With a monthly revenue less than 50K, how would it possiblly break even, since the burn rate of a 1 million user SNS is very unlikely to be less than 60K-80K/month. While I personally like XuQa as a somewhat marginal SNS product, I suppose it still needs to push harder to find more revenue streams, no single company can survive without profit in long term nor they would be able to attract more venture capital to burn. After all, youth SNS market is somewhat getting saturated, and only the few largest players will stay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly, I remain very skeptical about the claim that XuQa breaks even already, by just revenues from survey and sponsored offers.  Reasons are simple, the fair market charge of a &gt;10K persons on-line survey would be around USD 0.05/complete response. If 10% of XuQa&#8217;s users take the survey, that would be USD5,000/survey. Will there be more than ten &gt;10K survey cilents retain XuQa every month? I doubt. With a monthly revenue less than 50K, how would it possiblly break even, since the burn rate of a 1 million user SNS is very unlikely to be less than 60K-80K/month. While I personally like XuQa as a somewhat marginal SNS product, I suppose it still needs to push harder to find more revenue streams, no single company can survive without profit in long term nor they would be able to attract more venture capital to burn. After all, youth SNS market is somewhat getting saturated, and only the few largest players will stay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mina</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/11/social-network-xuqas-in-the-black/comment-page-1/#comment-187007</link>
		<dc:creator>Mina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 07:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/11/social-network-xuqas-in-the-black/#comment-187007</guid>
		<description>no clue about all the gobbledygook going on here about 10k users and blitherblather but xuqa&#039;s popular and doing well so i suppose at the end of the day that&#039;s what matters, not how many people were around playing poker when someone logged on and then made a judgement about the entire set-up. la!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no clue about all the gobbledygook going on here about 10k users and blitherblather but xuqa&#8217;s popular and doing well so i suppose at the end of the day that&#8217;s what matters, not how many people were around playing poker when someone logged on and then made a judgement about the entire set-up. la!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murat Ralph Ersoy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/11/social-network-xuqas-in-the-black/comment-page-1/#comment-186965</link>
		<dc:creator>Murat Ralph Ersoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 07:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/11/social-network-xuqas-in-the-black/#comment-186965</guid>
		<description>I find the meaning of my life in xuqa. First thanx to god and then to admins :))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find the meaning of my life in xuqa. First thanx to god and then to admins <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ali</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/11/social-network-xuqas-in-the-black/comment-page-1/#comment-186928</link>
		<dc:creator>Ali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 06:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/11/social-network-xuqas-in-the-black/#comment-186928</guid>
		<description>though =RAWR= has said he charges more for a boob job. 

much more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>though =RAWR= has said he charges more for a boob job. </p>
<p>much more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ali</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/11/social-network-xuqas-in-the-black/comment-page-1/#comment-186926</link>
		<dc:creator>Ali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 06:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/11/social-network-xuqas-in-the-black/#comment-186926</guid>
		<description>we don&#039;t do boob jobs on xuqa.  

...unless you have 10 million peanuts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we don&#8217;t do boob jobs on xuqa.  </p>
<p>&#8230;unless you have 10 million peanuts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: =RAWR=</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/11/social-network-xuqas-in-the-black/comment-page-1/#comment-186924</link>
		<dc:creator>=RAWR=</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 06:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/11/social-network-xuqas-in-the-black/#comment-186924</guid>
		<description>rawr owns you all</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rawr owns you all</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marshall Kirkpatrick</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/11/social-network-xuqas-in-the-black/comment-page-1/#comment-186770</link>
		<dc:creator>Marshall Kirkpatrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 05:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/11/social-network-xuqas-in-the-black/#comment-186770</guid>
		<description>Well, I don&#039;t know about the boob jobs comment, but I do know that I&#039;ve been to Xuqa several times over the last few weeks and have found plenty of people to play poker with.

re this previous comment, you should get over it.  i look at the websites, i write about what I think is interesting, then commenters complain and some one else sells the ads.  besides, i said it was creepy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I don&#8217;t know about the boob jobs comment, but I do know that I&#8217;ve been to Xuqa several times over the last few weeks and have found plenty of people to play poker with.</p>
<p>re this previous comment, you should get over it.  i look at the websites, i write about what I think is interesting, then commenters complain and some one else sells the ads.  besides, i said it was creepy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
