<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Geesee to offer cross-site chat by tag</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/04/geesee-to-offer-cross-site-chat-by-tag/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/04/geesee-to-offer-cross-site-chat-by-tag/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 02:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Library clips :: Blog chats :: June :: 2006</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/04/geesee-to-offer-cross-site-chat-by-tag/#comment-484559</link>
		<dc:creator>Library clips :: Blog chats :: June :: 2006</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 00:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/04/geesee-to-offer-cross-site-chat-by-tag/#comment-484559</guid>
		<description>[...] [ADDED 07/09/06: Interaction Geesee] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [ADDED 07/09/06: Interaction Geesee] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geesee Launches Cross Site Chat &#187; JenIT</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/04/geesee-to-offer-cross-site-chat-by-tag/#comment-422579</link>
		<dc:creator>Geesee Launches Cross Site Chat &#187; JenIT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 09:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/04/geesee-to-offer-cross-site-chat-by-tag/#comment-422579</guid>
		<description>[...] We profiled Geesee prelaunch in September and I wrote that if the company could pull off what it aims to do, it could change the web chat world. Now that the site has gone live, most everything but scalability looks solid. I&#8217;ve embedded a Geesee chat window below this post so we can get some idea of the service&#8217;s scalability. (Jump on in, there&#8217;s an active conversation going on in the TechCrunch room right after I posted this.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We profiled Geesee prelaunch in September and I wrote that if the company could pull off what it aims to do, it could change the web chat world. Now that the site has gone live, most everything but scalability looks solid. I&#8217;ve embedded a Geesee chat window below this post so we can get some idea of the service&#8217;s scalability. (Jump on in, there&#8217;s an active conversation going on in the TechCrunch room right after I posted this.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geesee Launches Cross Site Chat at BJr</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/04/geesee-to-offer-cross-site-chat-by-tag/#comment-354347</link>
		<dc:creator>Geesee Launches Cross Site Chat at BJr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 05:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/04/geesee-to-offer-cross-site-chat-by-tag/#comment-354347</guid>
		<description>[...] We profiled Geesee prelaunch in September and I wrote that if the company could pull off what it aims to do, it could change the web chat world. Now that the site has gone live, most everything but scalability looks solid. I&#8217;ve embedded a Geesee chat window below this post so we can get some idea of the service&#8217;s scalability. (Jump on in, there&#8217;s an active conversation going on in the TechCrunch room right after I posted this. To see how you can enter one conversation from multiple sites, try coming in through Marshallk.com Update: The conversation may have devolved as the hour grew later, our apologies if that&#8217;s the case when you try it out.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We profiled Geesee prelaunch in September and I wrote that if the company could pull off what it aims to do, it could change the web chat world. Now that the site has gone live, most everything but scalability looks solid. I&#8217;ve embedded a Geesee chat window below this post so we can get some idea of the service&#8217;s scalability. (Jump on in, there&#8217;s an active conversation going on in the TechCrunch room right after I posted this. To see how you can enter one conversation from multiple sites, try coming in through Marshallk.com Update: The conversation may have devolved as the hour grew later, our apologies if that&#8217;s the case when you try it out.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Geesee Launches Cross Site Chat</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/04/geesee-to-offer-cross-site-chat-by-tag/#comment-330574</link>
		<dc:creator>Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Geesee Launches Cross Site Chat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 23:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/04/geesee-to-offer-cross-site-chat-by-tag/#comment-330574</guid>
		<description>[...] We profiled Geesee prelaunch in September and I wrote that if the company could pull off what it aims to do, it could change the web chat world. Now that the site has gone live, most everything but scalability looks solid. I&#8217;ve embedded a Geesee chat window below this post so we can get some idea of the service&#8217;s scalability. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We profiled Geesee prelaunch in September and I wrote that if the company could pull off what it aims to do, it could change the web chat world. Now that the site has gone live, most everything but scalability looks solid. I&#8217;ve embedded a Geesee chat window below this post so we can get some idea of the service&#8217;s scalability. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samer</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/04/geesee-to-offer-cross-site-chat-by-tag/#comment-321363</link>
		<dc:creator>Samer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 15:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/04/geesee-to-offer-cross-site-chat-by-tag/#comment-321363</guid>
		<description>you can always try:

web1.koolim.com

and

web2.koolim.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you can always try:</p>
<p>web1.koolim.com</p>
<p>and</p>
<p>web2.koolim.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eBuddy Announces 5 Million Euros from Lowland Capital &#187; JenIT</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/04/geesee-to-offer-cross-site-chat-by-tag/#comment-320069</link>
		<dc:creator>eBuddy Announces 5 Million Euros from Lowland Capital &#187; JenIT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 07:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/04/geesee-to-offer-cross-site-chat-by-tag/#comment-320069</guid>
		<description>[...] eBuddy&#8217;s primary competition is San Francisco&#8217;s Meebo, a startup backed by Sequoia Capital. That investment was for $3.5 million based on a pre-money valuation of about $9 million. eBuddy serves web chat sessions in a pop up window, Meebo in the primary browser window or in an embedded frame on other pages via their MeeboMe service. See our previous coverage of eBuddy here and of Meebo here. See also upcoming challenger Geesee. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] eBuddy&#8217;s primary competition is San Francisco&#8217;s Meebo, a startup backed by Sequoia Capital. That investment was for $3.5 million based on a pre-money valuation of about $9 million. eBuddy serves web chat sessions in a pop up window, Meebo in the primary browser window or in an embedded frame on other pages via their MeeboMe service. See our previous coverage of eBuddy here and of Meebo here. See also upcoming challenger Geesee. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch en français &#187; eBuddy lève 5 Millions d&#8217;Euros avec Lowland Capital</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/04/geesee-to-offer-cross-site-chat-by-tag/#comment-305780</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch en français &#187; eBuddy lève 5 Millions d&#8217;Euros avec Lowland Capital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 06:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/04/geesee-to-offer-cross-site-chat-by-tag/#comment-305780</guid>
		<description>[...] eBuddy fournit un service de messagerie qui opère au sein de votre navigateur et les sessions de chat apparaissent dans des popups. Meebo lui propose des session de chat au sein de la page du service ou sur votre site web grâce au service MeeboMe. Nos précédents billets sur eBuddy sont ici et ceux sur Meebo sont là. Un nouveau concurrent arrive bientôt du nom de Geesee. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] eBuddy fournit un service de messagerie qui opère au sein de votre navigateur et les sessions de chat apparaissent dans des popups. Meebo lui propose des session de chat au sein de la page du service ou sur votre site web grâce au service MeeboMe. Nos précédents billets sur eBuddy sont ici et ceux sur Meebo sont là. Un nouveau concurrent arrive bientôt du nom de Geesee. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; eBuddy Announces 5 Million Euros from Lowland Capital</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/04/geesee-to-offer-cross-site-chat-by-tag/#comment-304419</link>
		<dc:creator>Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; eBuddy Announces 5 Million Euros from Lowland Capital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 21:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/04/geesee-to-offer-cross-site-chat-by-tag/#comment-304419</guid>
		<description>[...] eBuddy&#8217;s primary competition is San Francisco&#8217;s Meebo, a startup backed by Sequoia Capital. That investment was for $3.5 million based on a pre-money valuation of about $9 million. eBuddy serves web chat sessions in a pop up window, Meebo in the primary browser window or in an embedded frame on other pages via their MeeboMe service. See our previous coverage of eBuddy here and of Meebo here. See also upcoming challenger Geesee. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] eBuddy&#8217;s primary competition is San Francisco&#8217;s Meebo, a startup backed by Sequoia Capital. That investment was for $3.5 million based on a pre-money valuation of about $9 million. eBuddy serves web chat sessions in a pop up window, Meebo in the primary browser window or in an embedded frame on other pages via their MeeboMe service. See our previous coverage of eBuddy here and of Meebo here. See also upcoming challenger Geesee. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/04/geesee-to-offer-cross-site-chat-by-tag/#comment-234903</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 06:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/04/geesee-to-offer-cross-site-chat-by-tag/#comment-234903</guid>
		<description>i use to use meebo me, now its blocked, i use koolim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i use to use meebo me, now its blocked, i use koolim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/04/geesee-to-offer-cross-site-chat-by-tag/#comment-234901</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 06:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/04/geesee-to-offer-cross-site-chat-by-tag/#comment-234901</guid>
		<description>is geese out of beta?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is geese out of beta?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/04/geesee-to-offer-cross-site-chat-by-tag/#comment-234899</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 06:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/04/geesee-to-offer-cross-site-chat-by-tag/#comment-234899</guid>
		<description>check out www.koolim.com, its nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>check out <a href="http://www.koolim.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.koolim.com</a>, its nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: katie</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/04/geesee-to-offer-cross-site-chat-by-tag/#comment-224451</link>
		<dc:creator>katie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 23:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/04/geesee-to-offer-cross-site-chat-by-tag/#comment-224451</guid>
		<description>im me lol i love this chatting crap!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>im me lol i love this chatting crap!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samer Bazzi</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/04/geesee-to-offer-cross-site-chat-by-tag/#comment-206215</link>
		<dc:creator>Samer Bazzi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 16:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/04/geesee-to-offer-cross-site-chat-by-tag/#comment-206215</guid>
		<description>it may also be better because the user usually has to only paste one line of code to his/her website, with ajax they may need to do much more depending on what the widget does. I still think ajax is much better at this stage as it keeps overhead and complexity down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it may also be better because the user usually has to only paste one line of code to his/her website, with ajax they may need to do much more depending on what the widget does. I still think ajax is much better at this stage as it keeps overhead and complexity down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samer Bazzi</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/04/geesee-to-offer-cross-site-chat-by-tag/#comment-206210</link>
		<dc:creator>Samer Bazzi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 16:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/04/geesee-to-offer-cross-site-chat-by-tag/#comment-206210</guid>
		<description>Meebome is flash based, flash is sometimes better because of cross domain security issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meebome is flash based, flash is sometimes better because of cross domain security issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geesee Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What is Geesee?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/04/geesee-to-offer-cross-site-chat-by-tag/#comment-195697</link>
		<dc:creator>Geesee Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What is Geesee?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 06:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/04/geesee-to-offer-cross-site-chat-by-tag/#comment-195697</guid>
		<description>[...] Want to know more? Find out why to use Geesee, what are its benefits for you, have a look at first screenshots of the service or read a techcrunch review of Geesee. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Want to know more? Find out why to use Geesee, what are its benefits for you, have a look at first screenshots of the service or read a techcrunch review of Geesee. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tech Industry &#187; Geesee to offer cross-site chat by tag</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/04/geesee-to-offer-cross-site-chat-by-tag/#comment-193227</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech Industry &#187; Geesee to offer cross-site chat by tag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 08:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/04/geesee-to-offer-cross-site-chat-by-tag/#comment-193227</guid>
		<description>[...] Geesee is an early stage startup from Slovakia that will combine topical web chat, tag search and widgets. If you â??ve seen MeeboMe, imagine instead a widget that connects a network of web chat rooms organized by tags with access points across many blogs and web pages.read more&#160;&#124;&#160;digg story [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Geesee is an early stage startup from Slovakia that will combine topical web chat, tag search and widgets. If you â??ve seen MeeboMe, imagine instead a widget that connects a network of web chat rooms organized by tags with access points across many blogs and web pages.read more&nbsp;|&nbsp;digg story [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geesee: I like to chat &#171; the 60 billion $$ man</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/04/geesee-to-offer-cross-site-chat-by-tag/#comment-178100</link>
		<dc:creator>Geesee: I like to chat &#171; the 60 billion $$ man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 19:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/04/geesee-to-offer-cross-site-chat-by-tag/#comment-178100</guid>
		<description>[...] Read [Via TechCrunch] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read [Via TechCrunch] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Library clips :: Geesee : cross blog chatting :: September :: 2006</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/04/geesee-to-offer-cross-site-chat-by-tag/#comment-176929</link>
		<dc:creator>Library clips :: Geesee : cross blog chatting :: September :: 2006</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 02:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/04/geesee-to-offer-cross-site-chat-by-tag/#comment-176929</guid>
		<description>[...] Now we have Geesee, if I&#8217;m correct Geesee will allow you to embed a chat box on your blog or blog posts, like the others your blog visitors can chat&#8230;where it shines is in cross blog chatting. Assign tags to your chat box, if your blog post is about &#8220;opml&#8221; then tag it with this label, blog posts on other blogs may also tag their Geesee chat box with the same label, this allows for people on different blogs to chat in the same topic room. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Now we have Geesee, if I&#8217;m correct Geesee will allow you to embed a chat box on your blog or blog posts, like the others your blog visitors can chat&#8230;where it shines is in cross blog chatting. Assign tags to your chat box, if your blog post is about &#8220;opml&#8221; then tag it with this label, blog posts on other blogs may also tag their Geesee chat box with the same label, this allows for people on different blogs to chat in the same topic room. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/04/geesee-to-offer-cross-site-chat-by-tag/#comment-176230</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 18:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/04/geesee-to-offer-cross-site-chat-by-tag/#comment-176230</guid>
		<description>why are all these "embedded" chat apps developed in flash, why not ajax?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why are all these &#8220;embedded&#8221; chat apps developed in flash, why not ajax?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/04/geesee-to-offer-cross-site-chat-by-tag/#comment-176226</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 18:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/04/geesee-to-offer-cross-site-chat-by-tag/#comment-176226</guid>
		<description>so meebome is IM based and this is chat based?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so meebome is IM based and this is chat based?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/04/geesee-to-offer-cross-site-chat-by-tag/#comment-176224</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 18:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/04/geesee-to-offer-cross-site-chat-by-tag/#comment-176224</guid>
		<description>Neat app.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neat app.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Milan Zigmond</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/04/geesee-to-offer-cross-site-chat-by-tag/#comment-175202</link>
		<dc:creator>Milan Zigmond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 08:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/04/geesee-to-offer-cross-site-chat-by-tag/#comment-175202</guid>
		<description>Thanks Nikolay, it's been fixed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Nikolay, it&#8217;s been fixed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikolay Kolev</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/04/geesee-to-offer-cross-site-chat-by-tag/#comment-174676</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikolay Kolev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 01:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/04/geesee-to-offer-cross-site-chat-by-tag/#comment-174676</guid>
		<description>If you try to sign up at http://geesee.com (no "www"), it will error out. But when you do it from http://www.geesee.com, then it works fine. It seems to be a browser security thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you try to sign up at <a href="http://geesee.com" rel="nofollow">http://geesee.com</a> (no &#8220;www&#8221;), it will error out. But when you do it from <a href="http://www.geesee.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.geesee.com</a>, then it works fine. It seems to be a browser security thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geesee to offer cross-site chat by tag &#187; News around the World</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/04/geesee-to-offer-cross-site-chat-by-tag/#comment-174592</link>
		<dc:creator>Geesee to offer cross-site chat by tag &#187; News around the World</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 00:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/04/geesee-to-offer-cross-site-chat-by-tag/#comment-174592</guid>
		<description>[...] Geesee is an early stage startup from Slovakia that will combine topical web chat, tag search and widgets. If you&#8217;ve seen MeeboMe, imagine instead a widget that connects a network of web chat rooms organized by tags with access points across many blogs and web pages.read more&#160;&#124;&#160;digg story [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Geesee is an early stage startup from Slovakia that will combine topical web chat, tag search and widgets. If you&#8217;ve seen MeeboMe, imagine instead a widget that connects a network of web chat rooms organized by tags with access points across many blogs and web pages.read more&nbsp;|&nbsp;digg story [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/04/geesee-to-offer-cross-site-chat-by-tag/#comment-174159</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 18:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/09/04/geesee-to-offer-cross-site-chat-by-tag/#comment-174159</guid>
		<description>I have a rather strong opinion that "page specific" chat/IM won't reach any sort of a mass market, other than in a customer support context. (I won't detail my reasons, but if you're interested &lt;a href="http://kickstand.typepad.com/metamuse/2006/08/why_chat_onpage.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;read them here&lt;/a&gt;.)

I very much believe there is a market for connecting strangers to each other via IM/Chat and their browser. But to reach a mass market, I think the following approach is necessary:

Connect people in the context of their Web browsing, but not on a per-page basis. I am a huge believer in connecting people by tag/interest (whatever you want to call it) ACROSS Web pages, instead. GeeSee takes this clever approach, as does Others Online. 
Make the "connection" as deep as possible, fully transparent to all parties, and controllable. It helps to know the other interests I share with you, other than "German Shepard", even if it isn't immediately pertinent.
Give users a reason to be both information providers and information seekers. Everyone wants promotion, give it to them. I don't see how GeeSee will attract those that have information to give. &lt;a href="http://www.othersonline.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Others Online&lt;/a&gt; has a good value prop for the "mavens" of the Web, or for bloggers who write on specific topics and are looking for like-minded readers.
Make it easy for users to associate themselves to tags/interests. People are lazy. It looks like with GeeSee, tags are entered explicitly by users. This will hinder the utility of the app. &lt;a href="http://www.othersonline.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Others Online&lt;/a&gt; captures this information implicitly, for instance while you're doing a google search, Others Online will show you people associated to those keywords -- you don't have to enter them in.
Make it worthwhile for publishers to buy-in. Give them a feature for their users AND a palpable revenue stream. What's the revenue model for GeeSee and is it strong enough so that a rev share means something to a publisher? Others Online offers &lt;a href="http://www.othersonline.com/partners.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;very interesting value props&lt;/a&gt; to publishers.
Don't require publisher buy-in. For instance, while looking at this TC post I can see 6 users on Others Online connected to me by the keywords "techcrunch, chat, social networking", view the blogs they listed, and chat if online, email if offline. These people are connecting with each other around the keyword "TechCrunch" even though Michael hasn't promoted Others Online. GeeSee could probably do the same thing.


Of course, GeeSee has 4 more months before release and a lot can happen in that time. Plus they're going for the widget implementation vs. a toolbar which presents both opportunities and challenges. We'll see!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a rather strong opinion that &#8220;page specific&#8221; chat/IM won&#8217;t reach any sort of a mass market, other than in a customer support context. (I won&#8217;t detail my reasons, but if you&#8217;re interested <a href="http://kickstand.typepad.com/metamuse/2006/08/why_chat_onpage.html" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/kickstand.typepad.com');">read them here</a>.)</p>
<p>I very much believe there is a market for connecting strangers to each other via IM/Chat and their browser. But to reach a mass market, I think the following approach is necessary:</p>
<p>Connect people in the context of their Web browsing, but not on a per-page basis. I am a huge believer in connecting people by tag/interest (whatever you want to call it) ACROSS Web pages, instead. GeeSee takes this clever approach, as does Others Online.<br />
Make the &#8220;connection&#8221; as deep as possible, fully transparent to all parties, and controllable. It helps to know the other interests I share with you, other than &#8220;German Shepard&#8221;, even if it isn&#8217;t immediately pertinent.<br />
Give users a reason to be both information providers and information seekers. Everyone wants promotion, give it to them. I don&#8217;t see how GeeSee will attract those that have information to give. <a href="http://www.othersonline.com" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/www.othersonline.com');">Others Online</a> has a good value prop for the &#8220;mavens&#8221; of the Web, or for bloggers who write on specific topics and are looking for like-minded readers.<br />
Make it easy for users to associate themselves to tags/interests. People are lazy. It looks like with GeeSee, tags are entered explicitly by users. This will hinder the utility of the app. <a href="http://www.othersonline.com" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/www.othersonline.com');">Others Online</a> captures this information implicitly, for instance while you&#8217;re doing a google search, Others Online will show you people associated to those keywords &#8212; you don&#8217;t have to enter them in.<br />
Make it worthwhile for publishers to buy-in. Give them a feature for their users AND a palpable revenue stream. What&#8217;s the revenue model for GeeSee and is it strong enough so that a rev share means something to a publisher? Others Online offers <a href="http://www.othersonline.com/partners.htm" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/www.othersonline.com');">very interesting value props</a> to publishers.<br />
Don&#8217;t require publisher buy-in. For instance, while looking at this TC post I can see 6 users on Others Online connected to me by the keywords &#8220;techcrunch, chat, social networking&#8221;, view the blogs they listed, and chat if online, email if offline. These people are connecting with each other around the keyword &#8220;TechCrunch&#8221; even though Michael hasn&#8217;t promoted Others Online. GeeSee could probably do the same thing.</p>
<p>Of course, GeeSee has 4 more months before release and a lot can happen in that time. Plus they&#8217;re going for the widget implementation vs. a toolbar which presents both opportunities and challenges. We&#8217;ll see!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.093 seconds -->
