<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Viewscore aggregates gadget reviews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscore-aggregates-gadget-reviews/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscore-aggregates-gadget-reviews/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 05:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Raj</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscore-aggregates-gadget-reviews/#comment-860259</link>
		<dc:creator>Raj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 11:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscore-aggregates-gadget-reviews/#comment-860259</guid>
		<description>Nothing new. A lot of sites have this. www.phonescoop.com and www.explore-mobiles.com also have something similar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing new. A lot of sites have this. <a href="http://www.phonescoop.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.phonescoop.com</a> and <a href="http://www.explore-mobiles.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.explore-mobiles.com</a> also have something similar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: An aggregate review of aggregate review services &#187; JenIT</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscore-aggregates-gadget-reviews/#comment-232063</link>
		<dc:creator>An aggregate review of aggregate review services &#187; JenIT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 18:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscore-aggregates-gadget-reviews/#comment-232063</guid>
		<description>[...] Viewscore currently offers 60,000 reviews from 1,000 sources. Blogs and other social media are not included. The company says it hopes to expand it&#8217;s basic formula beyond gadgets and into many other fields. See our initial review of Viewscore here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Viewscore currently offers 60,000 reviews from 1,000 sources. Blogs and other social media are not included. The company says it hopes to expand it&#8217;s basic formula beyond gadgets and into many other fields. See our initial review of Viewscore here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscore-aggregates-gadget-reviews/#comment-230267</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 02:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscore-aggregates-gadget-reviews/#comment-230267</guid>
		<description>It would be nice if this company took a moment or two to create their OWN "ABOUT US" section. It is a verbatim rip off of the Become.com site. Even to the extent of copying the Arbitration rules. 

I am sure you will hear from the lawyers soon enough. If you have the ethics to do that, I really wonder what other IP or proprietary information you have stolen for your use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be nice if this company took a moment or two to create their OWN &#8220;ABOUT US&#8221; section. It is a verbatim rip off of the Become.com site. Even to the extent of copying the Arbitration rules. </p>
<p>I am sure you will hear from the lawyers soon enough. If you have the ethics to do that, I really wonder what other IP or proprietary information you have stolen for your use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; An aggregate review of aggregate gadget review services</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscore-aggregates-gadget-reviews/#comment-229722</link>
		<dc:creator>Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; An aggregate review of aggregate gadget review services</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 21:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscore-aggregates-gadget-reviews/#comment-229722</guid>
		<description>[...] Viewscore currently offers 60,000 reviews from 1,000 sources. Blogs and other social media are not included. The company says it hopes to expand it&#8217;s basic formula beyond gadgets and into many other fields. See our initial review of Viewscore here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Viewscore currently offers 60,000 reviews from 1,000 sources. Blogs and other social media are not included. The company says it hopes to expand it&#8217;s basic formula beyond gadgets and into many other fields. See our initial review of Viewscore here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PixelFactor</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscore-aggregates-gadget-reviews/#comment-220213</link>
		<dc:creator>PixelFactor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 09:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscore-aggregates-gadget-reviews/#comment-220213</guid>
		<description>I dont understand what all the fuss is.....some people like it, some dont, but i see no problem with doing a little free advertising for a company, especially if you find the topic / information interesting and worth sharing.

For more updates check: 

http://www.pixelfactor.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont understand what all the fuss is&#8230;..some people like it, some dont, but i see no problem with doing a little free advertising for a company, especially if you find the topic / information interesting and worth sharing.</p>
<p>For more updates check: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.pixelfactor.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.pixelfactor.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: manu</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscore-aggregates-gadget-reviews/#comment-203093</link>
		<dc:creator>manu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 13:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscore-aggregates-gadget-reviews/#comment-203093</guid>
		<description>this site sucks!!!!!!!!!!who the **** made this site i wanna kick your ***</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this site sucks!!!!!!!!!!who the **** made this site i wanna kick your ***</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kidz Rage ! &#187; Google Announces Desktop Gadget Winners</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscore-aggregates-gadget-reviews/#comment-175912</link>
		<dc:creator>Kidz Rage ! &#187; Google Announces Desktop Gadget Winners</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 15:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscore-aggregates-gadget-reviews/#comment-175912</guid>
		<description>[...] Additional information can be found on TechCrunch’s weblog posting entitled, “Viewscore aggregates gadget reviews“. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Additional information can be found on TechCrunch’s weblog posting entitled, “Viewscore aggregates gadget reviews“. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Announces Desktop Gadget Winners &#171; TechAddress</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscore-aggregates-gadget-reviews/#comment-175164</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Announces Desktop Gadget Winners &#171; TechAddress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 08:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscore-aggregates-gadget-reviews/#comment-175164</guid>
		<description>[...] Additional information can be found on TechCrunch&#8217;s weblog posting entitled, &#8220;Viewscore aggregates gadget reviews&#8220;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Additional information can be found on TechCrunch&#8217;s weblog posting entitled, &#8220;Viewscore aggregates gadget reviews&#8220;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blueswarm.org &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Here&#8217;s a tiny hint&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscore-aggregates-gadget-reviews/#comment-166353</link>
		<dc:creator>blueswarm.org &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Here&#8217;s a tiny hint&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2006 03:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscore-aggregates-gadget-reviews/#comment-166353</guid>
		<description>[...] We can&#8217;t tell you exactly what we&#8217;re building yet (mostly because we don&#8217;t know), but this review of Viewscore by Techcrunch made us glad to know that someone else out there feels the same way we do.  More next week&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We can&#8217;t tell you exactly what we&#8217;re building yet (mostly because we don&#8217;t know), but this review of Viewscore by Techcrunch made us glad to know that someone else out there feels the same way we do.  More next week&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amiz - ViewScore.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscore-aggregates-gadget-reviews/#comment-164922</link>
		<dc:creator>Amiz - ViewScore.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 12:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscore-aggregates-gadget-reviews/#comment-164922</guid>
		<description>from ViewScore:
just quoting a message we got yesterday from one of the sources:

"I just got an email about your new site. My name is XYZ , I''m the publisher of XYZ.com and I noticed you guys are linking to our camcorder reviews - thank you! I would also like to suggest one of our other sites, XYZ2.com, which uses the same high quality standards for reviewing digital cameras as we use for reviewing camcorders. Good luck"

Jcar - i think it will answer your question and suggest that it is symbiotic relationship.

-Amiz</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>from ViewScore:<br />
just quoting a message we got yesterday from one of the sources:</p>
<p>&#8220;I just got an email about your new site. My name is XYZ , I&#8221;m the publisher of XYZ.com and I noticed you guys are linking to our camcorder reviews - thank you! I would also like to suggest one of our other sites, XYZ2.com, which uses the same high quality standards for reviewing digital cameras as we use for reviewing camcorders. Good luck&#8221;</p>
<p>Jcar - i think it will answer your question and suggest that it is symbiotic relationship.</p>
<p>-Amiz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sten Pittet</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscore-aggregates-gadget-reviews/#comment-164872</link>
		<dc:creator>Sten Pittet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 12:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscore-aggregates-gadget-reviews/#comment-164872</guid>
		<description>In my opinion I think that this website got it right.

First, the benefits go to the user. For a person who is not really used to hi-tech choosing a laptop can be quite difficult. A lot of buyers on the net may ask themselves "Is this what I need ?" "Is this a good product" and the problem on the net is that you can't ask an adviser to help you in your choicie. Few comparators have trustfull and interesting comments on products so if one of them is aggregating all the reviews to tell the visitors wich products are considered as the best ones than that's a pretty good service and a lot of people would see the benefits.

Secondly when you click on a review you are redirected on it (although you have a top bar with viewscore options). That means that Viewscore generates trafic for them (at least one page view). And most of the site editing content on the net expect a lot of these page views because their business is based on selling ads. The more page views they have the more ads they can sell. So I guess that sort of a way they get some benefits from it.

Finally if you're against the use of content coming from over website then what about Netvibes ? WebWag ? My Yahoo ? MSN Live ? Those sites are making money by providing contents coming from other websites....

Excuse me for all the mistakes I must have made. I'm french and still working on my english. I really think they have something here and I'd like to know more about the stats.... I doubt that the other companies will look at it saying "Oh just another web 2.0 site..."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion I think that this website got it right.</p>
<p>First, the benefits go to the user. For a person who is not really used to hi-tech choosing a laptop can be quite difficult. A lot of buyers on the net may ask themselves &#8220;Is this what I need ?&#8221; &#8220;Is this a good product&#8221; and the problem on the net is that you can&#8217;t ask an adviser to help you in your choicie. Few comparators have trustfull and interesting comments on products so if one of them is aggregating all the reviews to tell the visitors wich products are considered as the best ones than that&#8217;s a pretty good service and a lot of people would see the benefits.</p>
<p>Secondly when you click on a review you are redirected on it (although you have a top bar with viewscore options). That means that Viewscore generates trafic for them (at least one page view). And most of the site editing content on the net expect a lot of these page views because their business is based on selling ads. The more page views they have the more ads they can sell. So I guess that sort of a way they get some benefits from it.</p>
<p>Finally if you&#8217;re against the use of content coming from over website then what about Netvibes ? WebWag ? My Yahoo ? MSN Live ? Those sites are making money by providing contents coming from other websites&#8230;.</p>
<p>Excuse me for all the mistakes I must have made. I&#8217;m french and still working on my english. I really think they have something here and I&#8217;d like to know more about the stats&#8230;. I doubt that the other companies will look at it saying &#8220;Oh just another web 2.0 site&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcar</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscore-aggregates-gadget-reviews/#comment-164638</link>
		<dc:creator>jcar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 08:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscore-aggregates-gadget-reviews/#comment-164638</guid>
		<description>Botom line, have you had any sites threaten you with legal action?  If so what happened?  Have you gotten any advice from an attorney?  It's definately a grey area.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Botom line, have you had any sites threaten you with legal action?  If so what happened?  Have you gotten any advice from an attorney?  It&#8217;s definately a grey area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What a day for a crash...</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscore-aggregates-gadget-reviews/#comment-163897</link>
		<dc:creator>What a day for a crash...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 19:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscore-aggregates-gadget-reviews/#comment-163897</guid>
		<description>[...] It seems that yesterday was the day that my co-hosting provider was moving all of my Squishr boxes from one location to another, and our app got bonked. Of course, it's also the day a bunch of traffic comes in from a TechCrunch comment and then gets routed to an old landing page for the app that hasn't been up for months. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It seems that yesterday was the day that my co-hosting provider was moving all of my Squishr boxes from one location to another, and our app got bonked. Of course, it&#8217;s also the day a bunch of traffic comes in from a TechCrunch comment and then gets routed to an old landing page for the app that hasn&#8217;t been up for months. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Data Mining</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscore-aggregates-gadget-reviews/#comment-163359</link>
		<dc:creator>Data Mining</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 11:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscore-aggregates-gadget-reviews/#comment-163359</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;VIewScore - Consumer Facing Social Media Analytics...&lt;/strong&gt;

TechCrunch points to ViewScore, a site which aggregates reviews and review metrics. The cool thing is that for reviews that don't contain a metric (e.g. a star rating), the site infers one based on 'semantic analysis'.ViewScore has developed an inno...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>VIewScore - Consumer Facing Social Media Analytics&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>TechCrunch points to ViewScore, a site which aggregates reviews and review metrics. The cool thing is that for reviews that don&#8217;t contain a metric (e.g. a star rating), the site infers one based on &#8217;semantic analysis&#8217;.ViewScore has developed an inno&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ohad</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscore-aggregates-gadget-reviews/#comment-163272</link>
		<dc:creator>Ohad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 10:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscore-aggregates-gadget-reviews/#comment-163272</guid>
		<description>Jcar, I might have misunderstood your comment, and Amiz got it right, but as far as I see it, the question you ask is not relevant. 

ViewScore system doesn't copy the content of the review, it just process it. In order to read the review the visitor is pointed to the real site, thus rewarding more traffic to the original reviewer.

On a side note - I know we're all techies here and we all look for new technologies above all. But for the common user the technology is secondary to the content he gets. If viewscore, or any other site, would have a lousy backend but a good service that saves time and effort - that's more then enough. 

The thing is that once a couple of sites provide a similar - yet decent - service, the one that will become the popular is the one with the better marketing. Like it is for any product, real or online.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jcar, I might have misunderstood your comment, and Amiz got it right, but as far as I see it, the question you ask is not relevant. </p>
<p>ViewScore system doesn&#8217;t copy the content of the review, it just process it. In order to read the review the visitor is pointed to the real site, thus rewarding more traffic to the original reviewer.</p>
<p>On a side note - I know we&#8217;re all techies here and we all look for new technologies above all. But for the common user the technology is secondary to the content he gets. If viewscore, or any other site, would have a lousy backend but a good service that saves time and effort - that&#8217;s more then enough. </p>
<p>The thing is that once a couple of sites provide a similar - yet decent - service, the one that will become the popular is the one with the better marketing. Like it is for any product, real or online.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moshe Katzmann</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscore-aggregates-gadget-reviews/#comment-163228</link>
		<dc:creator>Moshe Katzmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 09:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscore-aggregates-gadget-reviews/#comment-163228</guid>
		<description>I like this site, normalisation is a good idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this site, normalisation is a good idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amiz - ViewScore.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscore-aggregates-gadget-reviews/#comment-163206</link>
		<dc:creator>Amiz - ViewScore.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 09:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscore-aggregates-gadget-reviews/#comment-163206</guid>
		<description>Jcar,

You have raised excellent question.

Let me start with a small question – isn't that exactly what Google is doing in their organic search results?

And to be more ViewScore.com specific – Our TextScore technology is generating a reflecting score for each review,And that new score is our intellectual property; you can think of this as abstract of the review that we generated.               http://www.viewscore.com/textscore.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jcar,</p>
<p>You have raised excellent question.</p>
<p>Let me start with a small question – isn&#8217;t that exactly what Google is doing in their organic search results?</p>
<p>And to be more ViewScore.com specific – Our TextScore technology is generating a reflecting score for each review,And that new score is our intellectual property; you can think of this as abstract of the review that we generated.               <a href="http://www.viewscore.com/textscore.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.viewscore.com/textscore.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcar</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscore-aggregates-gadget-reviews/#comment-163150</link>
		<dc:creator>jcar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 08:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscore-aggregates-gadget-reviews/#comment-163150</guid>
		<description>Does anyone know the legal ramifications of aggregating data from other sites in this fashion?  This company is making money from content that other sites had to earn by attracting users and getting the users to write reviews.  Now viewscore can send out a crawler, take the review and post it on their site.  Suddenly other people’s content is being used by viewscore without permission and viewscore is profiting from the users that click on the shopping.com provided links to buy the product.  Personally I like the idea of aggregation because it makes it easy for the user, but is it legal?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know the legal ramifications of aggregating data from other sites in this fashion?  This company is making money from content that other sites had to earn by attracting users and getting the users to write reviews.  Now viewscore can send out a crawler, take the review and post it on their site.  Suddenly other people’s content is being used by viewscore without permission and viewscore is profiting from the users that click on the shopping.com provided links to buy the product.  Personally I like the idea of aggregation because it makes it easy for the user, but is it legal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yaron</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscore-aggregates-gadget-reviews/#comment-163082</link>
		<dc:creator>yaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 07:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscore-aggregates-gadget-reviews/#comment-163082</guid>
		<description>If you are interested on reading another review on the product, but in Hebrew you are most welcome to read it here: http://www.thecoils.com/2006/08/03/viewscore/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are interested on reading another review on the product, but in Hebrew you are most welcome to read it here: <a href="http://www.thecoils.com/2006/08/03/viewscore/" rel="nofollow">http://www.thecoils.com/2006/08/03/viewscore/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amiz - ViewScore.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscore-aggregates-gadget-reviews/#comment-163081</link>
		<dc:creator>Amiz - ViewScore.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 07:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscore-aggregates-gadget-reviews/#comment-163081</guid>
		<description>We have also XML\API for product reviews feed that we offer in private label syndication.

as you can see on this israeli price comparsion engine link:

http://tinyurl.com/kc7nd</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have also XML\API for product reviews feed that we offer in private label syndication.</p>
<p>as you can see on this israeli price comparsion engine link:</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/kc7nd" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/kc7nd</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DigDude</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscore-aggregates-gadget-reviews/#comment-163080</link>
		<dc:creator>DigDude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 07:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscore-aggregates-gadget-reviews/#comment-163080</guid>
		<description>To be honest, I don't really care about their business model, this site saved me a lot of time when i went to buy my new PDA and that's enough for me.

All and all - quite usefull tool for online shopping, i would recommend it to my friends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be honest, I don&#8217;t really care about their business model, this site saved me a lot of time when i went to buy my new PDA and that&#8217;s enough for me.</p>
<p>All and all - quite usefull tool for online shopping, i would recommend it to my friends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amiz - ViewScore.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscore-aggregates-gadget-reviews/#comment-163079</link>
		<dc:creator>Amiz - ViewScore.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 07:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscore-aggregates-gadget-reviews/#comment-163079</guid>
		<description>From ViewScore:
The business model is revenue sharing agreements (PPC) with shopping comparison sites.(this has no influance on the product rankings and provided by third party)

example:

http://tinyurl.com/ep4ez
Cheers,

Amiz</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From ViewScore:<br />
The business model is revenue sharing agreements (PPC) with shopping comparison sites.(this has no influance on the product rankings and provided by third party)</p>
<p>example:</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/ep4ez" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/ep4ez</a><br />
Cheers,</p>
<p>Amiz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechWarrior</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscore-aggregates-gadget-reviews/#comment-162730</link>
		<dc:creator>TechWarrior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 03:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscore-aggregates-gadget-reviews/#comment-162730</guid>
		<description>You're absolutely right about data collection Taz. But will their ad revenue be sufficient enough for them to be around long enough to collect that data?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re absolutely right about data collection Taz. But will their ad revenue be sufficient enough for them to be around long enough to collect that data?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Pang</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscore-aggregates-gadget-reviews/#comment-162474</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Pang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 23:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscore-aggregates-gadget-reviews/#comment-162474</guid>
		<description>i like trustedreviews more than a normalized aggregated rating. why make it harder to decide on a gadget by giving too much data? "don't make me think" - quoting krug.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i like trustedreviews more than a normalized aggregated rating. why make it harder to decide on a gadget by giving too much data? &#8220;don&#8217;t make me think&#8221; - quoting krug.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marshall Kirkpatrick</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscore-aggregates-gadget-reviews/#comment-162403</link>
		<dc:creator>Marshall Kirkpatrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 22:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/30/viewscore-aggregates-gadget-reviews/#comment-162403</guid>
		<description>A relatively small percentage of stories are cross posted between this and the other blogs, and this was a story John Biggs and I both worked on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A relatively small percentage of stories are cross posted between this and the other blogs, and this was a story John Biggs and I both worked on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.099 seconds -->
