<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Heads Roll At AOL, Including CTO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/21/heads-roll-at-aol/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/21/heads-roll-at-aol/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:17:33 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: compare prices of lamisil in columbia tn</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/21/heads-roll-at-aol/comment-page-1/#comment-1207154</link>
		<dc:creator>compare prices of lamisil in columbia tn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 19:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/21/heads-roll-at-aol/#comment-1207154</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;buy cleocin online...&lt;/strong&gt;

aldactone rx...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>buy cleocin online&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>aldactone rx&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AOL’s New Private Information Harvester &#187; JenIT</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/21/heads-roll-at-aol/comment-page-1/#comment-258138</link>
		<dc:creator>AOL’s New Private Information Harvester &#187; JenIT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 15:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/21/heads-roll-at-aol/#comment-258138</guid>
		<description>[...] While we note some innovative features, the fact that AOL has recently proved to be more than unreliable in protecting its users&#8217; data leads us to strongly recommend users think twice before using this product and giving AOL access to yet more private data. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] While we note some innovative features, the fact that AOL has recently proved to be more than unreliable in protecting its users&#8217; data leads us to strongly recommend users think twice before using this product and giving AOL access to yet more private data. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AOL’s New Private Information Gatherer &#187; JenIT</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/21/heads-roll-at-aol/comment-page-1/#comment-258128</link>
		<dc:creator>AOL’s New Private Information Gatherer &#187; JenIT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 15:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/21/heads-roll-at-aol/#comment-258128</guid>
		<description>[...] While we note some innovative features, the fact that AOL has recently proved to be more than unreliable in protecting its users&#8217; data leads us to strongly recommend users think twice before using this product and giving AOL access to yet more private data. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] While we note some innovative features, the fact that AOL has recently proved to be more than unreliable in protecting its users&#8217; data leads us to strongly recommend users think twice before using this product and giving AOL access to yet more private data. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; AOL&#8217;s Snazzy New Private Information Gatherer</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/21/heads-roll-at-aol/comment-page-1/#comment-242113</link>
		<dc:creator>Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; AOL&#8217;s Snazzy New Private Information Gatherer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 03:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/21/heads-roll-at-aol/#comment-242113</guid>
		<description>[...] While we note some innovative features, the fact that AOL has recently proved to be more than unreliable in protecting its users&#8217; data leads us to strongly recommend users think twice before using this product and giving AOL access to yet more private data. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] While we note some innovative features, the fact that AOL has recently proved to be more than unreliable in protecting its users&#8217; data leads us to strongly recommend users think twice before using this product and giving AOL access to yet more private data. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 23rd World &#187; AOL - Bad News All Around</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/21/heads-roll-at-aol/comment-page-1/#comment-150355</link>
		<dc:creator>23rd World &#187; AOL - Bad News All Around</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 00:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/21/heads-roll-at-aol/#comment-150355</guid>
		<description>[...] Heads Roll At AOL - TechCrunch [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Heads Roll At AOL &#8211; TechCrunch [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IT Blogwatch</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/21/heads-roll-at-aol/comment-page-1/#comment-149790</link>
		<dc:creator>IT Blogwatch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/21/heads-roll-at-aol/#comment-149790</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;AOLers fall on swords (and browser choices)...&lt;/strong&gt;

You&#039;re fired! It&#039;s IT Blogwatch, in which AOL&#039;s CTO and others &quot;resign&quot; over its earlier privacy breach. Not to mention what your choice of browser says about you......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>AOLers fall on swords (and browser choices)&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>You&#8217;re fired! It&#8217;s IT Blogwatch, in which AOL&#8217;s CTO and others &#8220;resign&#8221; over its earlier privacy breach. Not to mention what your choice of browser says about you&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rxbbx</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/21/heads-roll-at-aol/comment-page-1/#comment-149497</link>
		<dc:creator>rxbbx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 06:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/21/heads-roll-at-aol/#comment-149497</guid>
		<description>It thought it was a problem with their own system? Anyhow.. fire some people is not a solution, it makes them only weaker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It thought it was a problem with their own system? Anyhow.. fire some people is not a solution, it makes them only weaker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Life is a venture &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The email that started the AOL search data firestorm</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/21/heads-roll-at-aol/comment-page-1/#comment-149493</link>
		<dc:creator>Life is a venture &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The email that started the AOL search data firestorm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 06:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/21/heads-roll-at-aol/#comment-149493</guid>
		<description>[...] (Update: three people were fired for their roles in the AOL data debacle, see here and here.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (Update: three people were fired for their roles in the AOL data debacle, see here and here.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anshul</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/21/heads-roll-at-aol/comment-page-1/#comment-149382</link>
		<dc:creator>Anshul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 04:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/21/heads-roll-at-aol/#comment-149382</guid>
		<description>This was bound to happen. With so much bad press that AOL got, they had to do something to negate that. Though firing the CTO might not help much, it could just calm the normal user that AOL takes data breaches seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was bound to happen. With so much bad press that AOL got, they had to do something to negate that. Though firing the CTO might not help much, it could just calm the normal user that AOL takes data breaches seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/21/heads-roll-at-aol/comment-page-1/#comment-149358</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 04:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/21/heads-roll-at-aol/#comment-149358</guid>
		<description>Do people still use aol? That&#039;s sad. Maybe this little episode will help people realize this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do people still use aol? That&#8217;s sad. Maybe this little episode will help people realize this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baher</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/21/heads-roll-at-aol/comment-page-1/#comment-149353</link>
		<dc:creator>Baher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 04:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/21/heads-roll-at-aol/#comment-149353</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s hope that they got fired because they deserve it, and not only as a way for AOL to get some of its reputation back, for dealing so strictly with privacy violations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s hope that they got fired because they deserve it, and not only as a way for AOL to get some of its reputation back, for dealing so strictly with privacy violations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technoogle &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Heads Roll at AOL over Data Disclosure</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/21/heads-roll-at-aol/comment-page-1/#comment-149352</link>
		<dc:creator>Technoogle &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Heads Roll at AOL over Data Disclosure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 03:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/21/heads-roll-at-aol/#comment-149352</guid>
		<description>[...] More Coverage: eWeek, Cnet, Techcrunch, Techdirt. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More Coverage: eWeek, Cnet, Techcrunch, Techdirt. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cruncher</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/21/heads-roll-at-aol/comment-page-1/#comment-149323</link>
		<dc:creator>Cruncher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 03:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/21/heads-roll-at-aol/#comment-149323</guid>
		<description>But somebody did not do their job proper.That is how the data was released.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But somebody did not do their job proper.That is how the data was released.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Search Engines WEB ۞</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/21/heads-roll-at-aol/comment-page-1/#comment-149318</link>
		<dc:creator>Search Engines WEB ۞</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 03:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/21/heads-roll-at-aol/#comment-149318</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;This is terribly WRONG to fire people over this incident&lt;/b&gt; :-(

Sure, that data should have been password/ log-in protected......BUT, this situation itself, is an abberation!

How often does this ocurr?????

The players involved ARE qualified - or else, they would&lt;b&gt; NOT &lt;/b&gt; have been hired, in this very competative market.

The players are SKILLED or else they would not have held their jobs!

People CAN learn from mistakes, or communication breakdowns, especially when the circumstances -themselves - are very unusual.

Ironically, having learned from this episode would probably have made everyone involved more capable as employees.

This IS obviously a Public Relations (scapegoat) ploy.............come now, are the new hirees going to be MORE qualified or skilled  than those terminated.  :D

Checks will be put in place, so that even those EQUALLY qualified replacements will never have the opportunity of make THOSE mistakes......but, statistically they have the same liklihood of  making others, where loopholes exist.  :?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>This is terribly WRONG to fire people over this incident</b> <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Sure, that data should have been password/ log-in protected&#8230;&#8230;BUT, this situation itself, is an abberation!</p>
<p>How often does this ocurr?????</p>
<p>The players involved ARE qualified &#8211; or else, they would<b> NOT </b> have been hired, in this very competative market.</p>
<p>The players are SKILLED or else they would not have held their jobs!</p>
<p>People CAN learn from mistakes, or communication breakdowns, especially when the circumstances -themselves &#8211; are very unusual.</p>
<p>Ironically, having learned from this episode would probably have made everyone involved more capable as employees.</p>
<p>This IS obviously a Public Relations (scapegoat) ploy&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.come now, are the new hirees going to be MORE qualified or skilled  than those terminated.  <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Checks will be put in place, so that even those EQUALLY qualified replacements will never have the opportunity of make THOSE mistakes&#8230;&#8230;but, statistically they have the same liklihood of  making others, where loopholes exist.  <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_confused.gif' alt=':?' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Small Perm</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/21/heads-roll-at-aol/comment-page-1/#comment-149309</link>
		<dc:creator>Small Perm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 02:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/21/heads-roll-at-aol/#comment-149309</guid>
		<description>&quot;PR nightmare&quot;.  I&#039;d agree with that.  It should have been Andrew Weinstein that got canned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;PR nightmare&#8221;.  I&#8217;d agree with that.  It should have been Andrew Weinstein that got canned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dillon Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/21/heads-roll-at-aol/comment-page-1/#comment-149285</link>
		<dc:creator>Dillon Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 02:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/21/heads-roll-at-aol/#comment-149285</guid>
		<description>What AOL did was a disgrace. Its good to see some internal changes.
Timothy, if your site looks like a Google killer, why hasn&#039;t it been featured on techcrunch?. &quot;If it ain&#039;t been techcrunched, it ain&#039;t worth using&quot;. With regard to your site I&#039;ve only ever seen it on here as spam comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What AOL did was a disgrace. Its good to see some internal changes.<br />
Timothy, if your site looks like a Google killer, why hasn&#8217;t it been featured on techcrunch?. &#8220;If it ain&#8217;t been techcrunched, it ain&#8217;t worth using&#8221;. With regard to your site I&#8217;ve only ever seen it on here as spam comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/21/heads-roll-at-aol/comment-page-1/#comment-149276</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 02:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/21/heads-roll-at-aol/#comment-149276</guid>
		<description>Nice language.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice language&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/21/heads-roll-at-aol/comment-page-1/#comment-149275</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 02:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/21/heads-roll-at-aol/#comment-149275</guid>
		<description>People still want google.  They just want it without the privacy invading user tracking scam.  If you could have that for free then why not?  Try this one.

Theres only like 20 search proxies out there but this one is just simple.

http://www.blackboxsearch.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People still want google.  They just want it without the privacy invading user tracking scam.  If you could have that for free then why not?  Try this one.</p>
<p>Theres only like 20 search proxies out there but this one is just simple.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.blackboxsearch.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.blackboxsearch.com'>http://www.blackboxsearch.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Burton</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/21/heads-roll-at-aol/comment-page-1/#comment-149243</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Burton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 01:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/21/heads-roll-at-aol/#comment-149243</guid>
		<description>OK everyone... time to googlebomb aol.com with the term &quot;clusterfuck&quot;

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK everyone&#8230; time to googlebomb aol.com with the term &#8220;clusterfuck&#8221;</p>
<p> <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Perm</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/21/heads-roll-at-aol/comment-page-1/#comment-149230</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Perm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 00:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/21/heads-roll-at-aol/#comment-149230</guid>
		<description>btw 
evaal
sux</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>btw<br />
evaal<br />
sux</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Perm</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/21/heads-roll-at-aol/comment-page-1/#comment-149229</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Perm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 00:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/21/heads-roll-at-aol/#comment-149229</guid>
		<description>AOL is in bad shape.  They are a PR nightmare and their service is terrible</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AOL is in bad shape.  They are a PR nightmare and their service is terrible</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; AOLでくび続出</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/21/heads-roll-at-aol/comment-page-1/#comment-149212</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; AOLでくび続出</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 00:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/21/heads-roll-at-aol/#comment-149212</guid>
		<description>[...] [原文へ]  AOL [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [原文へ]  AOL [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zoli Erdos</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/21/heads-roll-at-aol/comment-page-1/#comment-149197</link>
		<dc:creator>Zoli Erdos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 00:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/21/heads-roll-at-aol/#comment-149197</guid>
		<description>Gee, I didn&#039;t expect the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.technorati.com/tag/clusterfuck&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Technorati Tag &quot;clusterfuck&quot;&lt;/a&gt; to be so popular :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee, I didn&#8217;t expect the <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/clusterfuck" rel="nofollow">Technorati Tag &#8220;clusterfuck&#8221;</a> to be so popular <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan W.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/21/heads-roll-at-aol/comment-page-1/#comment-149174</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 23:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/21/heads-roll-at-aol/#comment-149174</guid>
		<description>Mike, can you please ban this timothy guy or something?

Timothy: How can I sign up to be an expert on the subject of building poor websites and spamming online communities for lack of decent marketing ideas?  Hopefully you&#039;ll search for that and I can give you some &quot;advice.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, can you please ban this timothy guy or something?</p>
<p>Timothy: How can I sign up to be an expert on the subject of building poor websites and spamming online communities for lack of decent marketing ideas?  Hopefully you&#8217;ll search for that and I can give you some &#8220;advice.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Lothian</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/21/heads-roll-at-aol/comment-page-1/#comment-149170</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Lothian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 23:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/21/heads-roll-at-aol/#comment-149170</guid>
		<description>&quot;From my discussion with Andrew Weinstein, the AOL spokesperson who apologized on behalf of AOL after the data dump, my understanding is that this entire event was caused by a single clueless researcher and a complete lack of oversight by his managers.&quot;

I&#039;ve heard another version. Erik Selberg (from MSN search) talked to some of the AOL researchers at SIGIR and has said:

&quot;you had better believe they had a reasonable amount of sign-off from people inside of AOL&quot;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.selberg.org/2006/08/13/query-logs-and-the-aol-controversy/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.selberg.org/2006/08/13/query-logs-and-the-aol-controversy/&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;From my discussion with Andrew Weinstein, the AOL spokesperson who apologized on behalf of AOL after the data dump, my understanding is that this entire event was caused by a single clueless researcher and a complete lack of oversight by his managers.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard another version. Erik Selberg (from MSN search) talked to some of the AOL researchers at SIGIR and has said:</p>
<p>&#8220;you had better believe they had a reasonable amount of sign-off from people inside of AOL&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.selberg.org/2006/08/13/query-logs-and-the-aol-controversy/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.selberg.org/2006/08/13/query-logs-and-the-aol-controversy/'>http://www.selb...ol-controversy/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
