<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Update: Technorati got $3 million more than previously reported</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/15/update-technorati-got-3-million-more-than-previously-reported/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/15/update-technorati-got-3-million-more-than-previously-reported/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 17:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Technorati Loses Key Developer to Google</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/15/update-technorati-got-3-million-more-than-previously-reported/#comment-1271556</link>
		<dc:creator>Technorati Loses Key Developer to Google</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 00:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/15/update-technorati-got-3-million-more-than-previously-reported/#comment-1271556</guid>
		<description>[...] releases very little information to the public about itself, leaving us to mostly speculate on their financial health. This move could be a sign of trouble. If Technorati were a public [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] releases very little information to the public about itself, leaving us to mostly speculate on their financial health. This move could be a sign of trouble. If Technorati were a public [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bloggers Buzz &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Technorati got $3 million more</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/15/update-technorati-got-3-million-more-than-previously-reported/#comment-140153</link>
		<dc:creator>Bloggers Buzz &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Technorati got $3 million more</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 08:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/15/update-technorati-got-3-million-more-than-previously-reported/#comment-140153</guid>
		<description>[...] Techcrunch reports that Technorati got $3 million more than previously reported in series C funding from investors. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Techcrunch reports that Technorati got $3 million more than previously reported in series C funding from investors. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sengan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/15/update-technorati-got-3-million-more-than-previously-reported/#comment-139854</link>
		<dc:creator>sengan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 03:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/15/update-technorati-got-3-million-more-than-previously-reported/#comment-139854</guid>
		<description>It would be nice if they could fix their bugs... Ever since I "claimed" my blog technorati seemed to have gotten a stuck cache and no longer sees any updates I make. It seems &lt;a href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/01/30/technorati-problems-update/" rel="nofollow"&gt;I am not the only one&lt;/a&gt;. Given that webscraping a w3 validated site isn't hard, I have to wonder at the quality of their code. Their service is abysmal (automatic "we got your email", but no human response). $10 million dollars for something that broke the first week I used it? Wow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be nice if they could fix their bugs&#8230; Ever since I &#8220;claimed&#8221; my blog technorati seemed to have gotten a stuck cache and no longer sees any updates I make. It seems <a href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2006/01/30/technorati-problems-update/" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/www.problogger.net');">I am not the only one</a>. Given that webscraping a w3 validated site isn&#8217;t hard, I have to wonder at the quality of their code. Their service is abysmal (automatic &#8220;we got your email&#8221;, but no human response). $10 million dollars for something that broke the first week I used it? Wow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; アップデート: Technorati、過去に報じた金額より300万ドル多く調達</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/15/update-technorati-got-3-million-more-than-previously-reported/#comment-139468</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; アップデート: Technorati、過去に報じた金額より300万ドル多く調達</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 22:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/15/update-technorati-got-3-million-more-than-previously-reported/#comment-139468</guid>
		<description>[...] [原文へ]  Technorati [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [原文へ]  Technorati [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: insurancetv1.com Blog &#187; Technorati got $3 million more</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/15/update-technorati-got-3-million-more-than-previously-reported/#comment-139365</link>
		<dc:creator>insurancetv1.com Blog &#187; Technorati got $3 million more</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 20:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/15/update-technorati-got-3-million-more-than-previously-reported/#comment-139365</guid>
		<description>[...] Technorati got $3 million more in VC funding then previously reported, according to TechCrunch&#8230;.. &#8220;&#8221;Now three years old, the site just released a major upgrade. We said last time that we assumed this round was done at a flat or down valuation. This may be a bet for the long haul and it may be an attempt to kick the site into action so it can raise more revenue. It’s hard to say, but today’s news that the round C funding was almost 50% larger than previously reported certainly makes things all the more interesting to watch. &#8230;.Technorati Funding [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Technorati got $3 million more in VC funding then previously reported, according to TechCrunch&#8230;.. &#8220;&#8221;Now three years old, the site just released a major upgrade. We said last time that we assumed this round was done at a flat or down valuation. This may be a bet for the long haul and it may be an attempt to kick the site into action so it can raise more revenue. It’s hard to say, but today’s news that the round C funding was almost 50% larger than previously reported certainly makes things all the more interesting to watch. &#8230;.Technorati Funding [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/15/update-technorati-got-3-million-more-than-previously-reported/#comment-139231</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/15/update-technorati-got-3-million-more-than-previously-reported/#comment-139231</guid>
		<description>technorati needs to do a better job of showing regular people why their service is relevant and important. You can find stuff in their index which is more useful and more up-to-date then Google-- how many other sites can say that? 

However their focus on bloggers and not searchers makes the site incomprensible for the type of users who they could realize contextual ad revenues from. They need to split off the essential app (search) from the tools for power users more effectively.

They also ought to make their licensing program easier to use and more transparant, extending their brand across the web. The APIs are great, but if you want to use their stuff commercially, you have to go through layer upon layer of people. A company I consulted for finally gave up and built their own RSS parser and spider, they would have been much happier to simply plop some technorati code into their existing site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>technorati needs to do a better job of showing regular people why their service is relevant and important. You can find stuff in their index which is more useful and more up-to-date then Google&#8211; how many other sites can say that? </p>
<p>However their focus on bloggers and not searchers makes the site incomprensible for the type of users who they could realize contextual ad revenues from. They need to split off the essential app (search) from the tools for power users more effectively.</p>
<p>They also ought to make their licensing program easier to use and more transparant, extending their brand across the web. The APIs are great, but if you want to use their stuff commercially, you have to go through layer upon layer of people. A company I consulted for finally gave up and built their own RSS parser and spider, they would have been much happier to simply plop some technorati code into their existing site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: www.techtagg.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/15/update-technorati-got-3-million-more-than-previously-reported/#comment-139215</link>
		<dc:creator>www.techtagg.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/15/update-technorati-got-3-million-more-than-previously-reported/#comment-139215</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Technorati got $3 million more than previously reported...&lt;/strong&gt;

We (TC)reported last month that blog search engine Technorati had raised $7.6 million in Series C funding in June from previous investors Draper Fisher Jurvetson and Mobius Venture Capital. Today’s PE Wire now says that Series C funding has hit $10.5...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Technorati got $3 million more than previously reported&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>We (TC)reported last month that blog search engine Technorati had raised $7.6 million in Series C funding in June from previous investors Draper Fisher Jurvetson and Mobius Venture Capital. Today’s PE Wire now says that Series C funding has hit $10.5&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/15/update-technorati-got-3-million-more-than-previously-reported/#comment-139201</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/15/update-technorati-got-3-million-more-than-previously-reported/#comment-139201</guid>
		<description>I agree, it will be interesting to see how all these "Web 2.0" companies will be able to survive in the long run. VC money only goes so far, and one day Google and Yahoo are going to stop outbidding themeselves for theses sites as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, it will be interesting to see how all these &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243; companies will be able to survive in the long run. VC money only goes so far, and one day Google and Yahoo are going to stop outbidding themeselves for theses sites as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Charles Morin</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/15/update-technorati-got-3-million-more-than-previously-reported/#comment-139180</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Charles Morin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/15/update-technorati-got-3-million-more-than-previously-reported/#comment-139180</guid>
		<description>A common flaw in most Web 2.0 businesses is the lack of profitability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A common flaw in most Web 2.0 businesses is the lack of profitability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.046 seconds -->
