<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AOL: &#8220;This was a screw up&#8221;</title>
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/07/aol-this-was-a-screw-up/</link>
	<description>Startup and Tech News</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 08:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: SEM Consultant &#187; The 15 Biggest Screw-ups in Internet History</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/07/aol-this-was-a-screw-up/#comment-2061061</link>
		<dc:creator>SEM Consultant &#187; The 15 Biggest Screw-ups in Internet History</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 06:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/07/aol-this-was-a-screw-up/#comment-2061061</guid>
		<description>[...] AOL Releases Search Data for 650,000 Users: In an effort to provide research tools to the academic community, AOL accidentally released search data on more than 650,000 users. Although it was anonymized, it showed searches for murder, incest, and other unpleasantries. You could also find names, Social Security numbers, addresses, and more. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] AOL Releases Search Data for 650,000 Users: In an effort to provide research tools to the academic community, AOL accidentally released search data on more than 650,000 users. Although it was anonymized, it showed searches for murder, incest, and other unpleasantries. You could also find names, Social Security numbers, addresses, and more. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; AOL Proudly Releases Massive Amounts of Private Data</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/07/aol-this-was-a-screw-up/#comment-1555549</link>
		<dc:creator>techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; AOL Proudly Releases Massive Amounts of Private Data</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 11:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/07/aol-this-was-a-screw-up/#comment-1555549</guid>
		<description>[...] Yet Another Update: AOL: “This was a screw up” [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Yet Another Update: AOL: “This was a screw up” [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Humiliated</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/07/aol-this-was-a-screw-up/#comment-862177</link>
		<dc:creator>Humiliated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 16:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/07/aol-this-was-a-screw-up/#comment-862177</guid>
		<description>Everything about me and my children was realeased by AOL I have a son that Died and I am going thru a nasty custody battle and all my serachs personal and private were released</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everything about me and my children was realeased by AOL I have a son that Died and I am going thru a nasty custody battle and all my serachs personal and private were released</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AOL releases search queries of users at Analytic Insight</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/07/aol-this-was-a-screw-up/#comment-157545</link>
		<dc:creator>AOL releases search queries of users at Analytic Insight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 03:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/07/aol-this-was-a-screw-up/#comment-157545</guid>
		<description>[...] Tech Crunch called this release a screw up and staggering utter stupidity. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Tech Crunch called this release a screw up and staggering utter stupidity. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Fletch Blog &#187; Better Browsing</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/07/aol-this-was-a-screw-up/#comment-153011</link>
		<dc:creator>The Fletch Blog &#187; Better Browsing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 16:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/07/aol-this-was-a-screw-up/#comment-153011</guid>
		<description>[...] I have been using the Mozilla Firefox browser for a long time now. I can&#8217;t remember the date, but as soon as the first official release was out I was using it (unlike Thunderbird and Mozilla Calendar both of which I adopted during their beta phases). Despite using the program daily for all this time, I am still finding new ways to get more out of it, mostly in the form of &#8220;extensions&#8221; written by wonderful people around the globe with great insight and talent. Yesterday I installed a new extension called Track Me Not. This extension addresses the recently brought to life concern of search sites tracking your search habits and the potential to actually be able to identify an individual through enough saved data. (read about this AOL fiasco if you don&#8217;t believe me) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I have been using the Mozilla Firefox browser for a long time now. I can&#8217;t remember the date, but as soon as the first official release was out I was using it (unlike Thunderbird and Mozilla Calendar both of which I adopted during their beta phases). Despite using the program daily for all this time, I am still finding new ways to get more out of it, mostly in the form of &#8220;extensions&#8221; written by wonderful people around the globe with great insight and talent. Yesterday I installed a new extension called Track Me Not. This extension addresses the recently brought to life concern of search sites tracking your search habits and the potential to actually be able to identify an individual through enough saved data. (read about this AOL fiasco if you don&#8217;t believe me) [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke Metcalfe</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/07/aol-this-was-a-screw-up/#comment-151768</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke Metcalfe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 21:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/07/aol-this-was-a-screw-up/#comment-151768</guid>
		<description>Shlomo, another way researchers could get such data would be an opt-in proxy service. You could then monitor all traffic, not just what AOL sees. Though this data is nice in that you see what sites people end up on too. http://www.seosleuth.com/site/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shlomo, another way researchers could get such data would be an opt-in proxy service. You could then monitor all traffic, not just what AOL sees. Though this data is nice in that you see what sites people end up on too. <a href="http://www.seosleuth.com/site/" rel="nofollow">http://www.seosleuth.com/site/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Heads Roll At AOL</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/07/aol-this-was-a-screw-up/#comment-148967</link>
		<dc:creator>Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Heads Roll At AOL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 20:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/07/aol-this-was-a-screw-up/#comment-148967</guid>
		<description>[...] The heads are rolling at AOL over the recent search engine data clusterfuck (see here, here, here and here). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The heads are rolling at AOL over the recent search engine data clusterfuck (see here, here, here and here). [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goobii.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/07/aol-this-was-a-screw-up/#comment-134711</link>
		<dc:creator>Goobii.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Aug 2006 12:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/07/aol-this-was-a-screw-up/#comment-134711</guid>
		<description>[...] Yet Another Update: AOL: “This was a screw up” [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Yet Another Update: AOL: “This was a screw up” [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ty</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/07/aol-this-was-a-screw-up/#comment-133665</link>
		<dc:creator>ty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Aug 2006 16:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/07/aol-this-was-a-screw-up/#comment-133665</guid>
		<description>A site where you can search this data is here:

http://www.datablunder.com/logitems/query/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A site where you can search this data is here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.datablunder.com/logitems/query/" rel="nofollow">http://www.datablunder.com/logitems/query/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OBinario - Podcast sobre novidades da tecnologia e links interessantes &#187; Obinario episodio 7</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/07/aol-this-was-a-screw-up/#comment-131907</link>
		<dc:creator>OBinario - Podcast sobre novidades da tecnologia e links interessantes &#187; Obinario episodio 7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 02:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/07/aol-this-was-a-screw-up/#comment-131907</guid>
		<description>[...] AOL se desculpa [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] AOL se desculpa [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: within / without &#187; Blog Archive &#187; AOL: %u201CThis was a screw up%u201D</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/07/aol-this-was-a-screw-up/#comment-131156</link>
		<dc:creator>within / without &#187; Blog Archive &#187; AOL: %u201CThis was a screw up%u201D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 15:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/07/aol-this-was-a-screw-up/#comment-131156</guid>
		<description>[...] source    NowPublic [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] source    NowPublic [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TipsyTech &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why you should be concerned&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/07/aol-this-was-a-screw-up/#comment-130501</link>
		<dc:creator>TipsyTech &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why you should be concerned&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 04:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/07/aol-this-was-a-screw-up/#comment-130501</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;m not exactly sure where I first read about AOL&#8217;s most recent &#8220;screw-up&#8221;, but ever since it happened this past Sunday (Aug. 6), it has been all over the Internet. TechCrunch has followed the story from day one, so if you would like all the details I would suggest starting there. But, if you would like me to summarize, AOL (like all other major search engines) keeps records of exactly all queries made by their users. Approximately 20 million of these queries, from over 650 thousand users, was voluntarily released for academic use. They did remove the user&#8217;s names, but they were given anonymous numbers so that researchers could look at all of the queries for a particular user. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I&#8217;m not exactly sure where I first read about AOL&#8217;s most recent &#8220;screw-up&#8221;, but ever since it happened this past Sunday (Aug. 6), it has been all over the Internet. TechCrunch has followed the story from day one, so if you would like all the details I would suggest starting there. But, if you would like me to summarize, AOL (like all other major search engines) keeps records of exactly all queries made by their users. Approximately 20 million of these queries, from over 650 thousand users, was voluntarily released for academic use. They did remove the user&#8217;s names, but they were given anonymous numbers so that researchers could look at all of the queries for a particular user. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Widder</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/07/aol-this-was-a-screw-up/#comment-130190</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Widder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 23:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/07/aol-this-was-a-screw-up/#comment-130190</guid>
		<description>Maybe what AOL did is just a new Web 2.0 notion.
I've made a cartoon:
http://geekandpoke.blogspot.com/2006/08/aol-disclosure-was-just-good-intention.html

Bye,
Oliver</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe what AOL did is just a new Web 2.0 notion.<br />
I&#8217;ve made a cartoon:<br />
<a href="http://geekandpoke.blogspot.com/2006/08/aol-disclosure-was-just-good-intention.html" rel="nofollow">http://geekandpoke.blogspot.co.....ntion.html</a></p>
<p>Bye,<br />
Oliver</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shlomo Argamon</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/07/aol-this-was-a-screw-up/#comment-130117</link>
		<dc:creator>Shlomo Argamon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 21:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/07/aol-this-was-a-screw-up/#comment-130117</guid>
		<description>In all the current discussion about AOL's sharing of the query-log
data, there has been little emphasis on the importance of such data to
research on information retrieval.  In addition to the real privacy
concerns, a key point that must be considered is the fact that if
useable data is not made available to the wider research community,
only the big search companies will be able to analyze that data.  We
academic researchers are increasingly dependent upon industry for this
sort of data to do research; the sort of small-scale data that can be
gathered in a university-based setting is simply insufficient for
obtaining reliable experimental results.

Should companies be prevented from sharing data with the research
community (either by law or public outcry), research progress will be
greatly reduced, as it will be impossible to compare different studies
with one another, since each study's data will be proprietary, and
thus no one will be able to trust any research result from another
lab.  All non-industrial research in this area will more-or-less dry
up, and search technology will tend more and more to be developed in
"closed-shop" efforts within the large firms; innovative startups and
open-source hacking will not exist, since the research projects that
serve as launching pads for such technological innovation will not
exist.  This prospect should disturb us all, as search technology
(broadly construed) is more and more the vehicle that people use to
gain information about their society and the world.

All of this is not meant to ignore the real privacy issues that can be
involved in the preparation and release of such data.  It appears to
me that there was little real privacy risk in the data released by
AOL, but it is clear that policies and practices need to be debated
and developed that accomplish two essential goals: (a) to protect the
privacy of individuals in any sharing of research data, and (b) to
ensure that as much useful data can be shared by companies with the
greater research community.  In this effort researchers and privacy
experts must collaborate to ensure that all sides of these important
issues are properly addressed.

Shlomo Argamon, Associate Professor
Department of Computer Science
Illinois Institute of Technology
Chicago, IL 60616</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In all the current discussion about AOL&#8217;s sharing of the query-log<br />
data, there has been little emphasis on the importance of such data to<br />
research on information retrieval.  In addition to the real privacy<br />
concerns, a key point that must be considered is the fact that if<br />
useable data is not made available to the wider research community,<br />
only the big search companies will be able to analyze that data.  We<br />
academic researchers are increasingly dependent upon industry for this<br />
sort of data to do research; the sort of small-scale data that can be<br />
gathered in a university-based setting is simply insufficient for<br />
obtaining reliable experimental results.</p>
<p>Should companies be prevented from sharing data with the research<br />
community (either by law or public outcry), research progress will be<br />
greatly reduced, as it will be impossible to compare different studies<br />
with one another, since each study&#8217;s data will be proprietary, and<br />
thus no one will be able to trust any research result from another<br />
lab.  All non-industrial research in this area will more-or-less dry<br />
up, and search technology will tend more and more to be developed in<br />
&#8220;closed-shop&#8221; efforts within the large firms; innovative startups and<br />
open-source hacking will not exist, since the research projects that<br />
serve as launching pads for such technological innovation will not<br />
exist.  This prospect should disturb us all, as search technology<br />
(broadly construed) is more and more the vehicle that people use to<br />
gain information about their society and the world.</p>
<p>All of this is not meant to ignore the real privacy issues that can be<br />
involved in the preparation and release of such data.  It appears to<br />
me that there was little real privacy risk in the data released by<br />
AOL, but it is clear that policies and practices need to be debated<br />
and developed that accomplish two essential goals: (a) to protect the<br />
privacy of individuals in any sharing of research data, and (b) to<br />
ensure that as much useful data can be shared by companies with the<br />
greater research community.  In this effort researchers and privacy<br />
experts must collaborate to ensure that all sides of these important<br />
issues are properly addressed.</p>
<p>Shlomo Argamon, Associate Professor<br />
Department of Computer Science<br />
Illinois Institute of Technology<br />
Chicago, IL 60616</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Commerce360 Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/07/aol-this-was-a-screw-up/#comment-129687</link>
		<dc:creator>The Commerce360 Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 16:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/07/aol-this-was-a-screw-up/#comment-129687</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Opting Out of the Database of Intentions...&lt;/strong&gt;

The AOL/Thelma Arnold fiasco has proven the risk and potential value of what John Battelle called the 'Database of Intentions'. The implications of the issues surrounding this database will be discussed and debated for days and weeks to come. Jason.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Opting Out of the Database of Intentions&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The AOL/Thelma Arnold fiasco has proven the risk and potential value of what John Battelle called the &#8216;Database of Intentions&#8217;. The implications of the issues surrounding this database will be discussed and debated for days and weeks to come. Jason&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teklow Enterprises &#187; The AOL thing</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/07/aol-this-was-a-screw-up/#comment-129501</link>
		<dc:creator>Teklow Enterprises &#187; The AOL thing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 13:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/07/aol-this-was-a-screw-up/#comment-129501</guid>
		<description>[...] Yeah, so eh AOL released what reportedly amounted to &#8220;search data for roughly 658,000 anonymized (US) users over a three month period from March to May.&#8221; They&#8217;ve already apologized and while it&#8217;s fairly amusing to think they thought of this as a good idea and altough human nature teaches us that there&#8217;s sure to be some interesting stuff in there, I&#8217;m not sure how big a deal it is. Or how all the public mirrors of that oh so sensitive data are helping anyone. Funniest information to come out of this so far is how often AOL users search for Google. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Yeah, so eh AOL released what reportedly amounted to &#8220;search data for roughly 658,000 anonymized (US) users over a three month period from March to May.&#8221; They&#8217;ve already apologized and while it&#8217;s fairly amusing to think they thought of this as a good idea and altough human nature teaches us that there&#8217;s sure to be some interesting stuff in there, I&#8217;m not sure how big a deal it is. Or how all the public mirrors of that oh so sensitive data are helping anyone. Funniest information to come out of this so far is how often AOL users search for Google. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AOL release a crap load of search data at newvibes.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/07/aol-this-was-a-screw-up/#comment-129140</link>
		<dc:creator>AOL release a crap load of search data at newvibes.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 09:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/07/aol-this-was-a-screw-up/#comment-129140</guid>
		<description>[...] AOL have been quite to release an apology and an explanation as to how this error could have occured in the first place.     419 419 eater aa batteries Adam adsense advertising adverts advice Alex Reece Allergo America Annoyances aol apache APB Aphex Twin Apple Apple. PC art Article asian Asides Australia Auth Bad Podcast of the Week Balcony Bar bandwidth birds Black Hat blackberry Blake Ross blog blog roll blog sites bloggers blogging blogs Blood Money Blu ray Boards of Canada Bollywood Books boredom Brain Age Brazil breakbeat Bush California Canada cars charity Chelsea cinema cocaine coding coffee colleague comedy communication conflict contact lenses Costa Rica Counter Strike Covent Garden crime CRT cruise CSS dance Darth Vader data De Phazz Dell desk digg discussion boards diving Doc Scott downloads drugs drum n bass DS DS Lite dundee DVD Eclipse Ecuador education Eidos email emergencies emo Emulation encryption encryption tool England environment Etch A Sketch eyes family fat feedburner film financial reports firefox flaming flight flyers food football forums frames framework France free stuff friends FW: games Gaming Gang Starr geeks George Galloway Germany Ghana glasses google graduations Graphic Design Guides hackers hacking hacks hair half life 2 Hardware Harrods HD DVD health heat Hezbollah hip hop Hitman Holand holiday hot hotels household HP Humor Humour ideas idiots IE Immortal Technique India Indiana Jones install installer Intense intense pressure interviews ipod Iran Iraq Israel Isreal Italy Japan java Johnny Depp Jurassic Park Kensington Keywords Kylie last.fm Lebanon Leicester Life Life hacks links linux Lion King livejournal LiveUser localhost London London Eye look a like LTJ Bukem lyceum Madame Tussauds mashups memory MF Doom Michelin Challenge Design microchips Microsoft middle east models moderators money monitors Motion motorbike movies mp3 mugs music myspace mysql n00bs National Portrait Gallery nerds networking News newsvine newsvine.com Nigeria Nintendo Nobody Likes Onions non phixion Nu Tone office Opera opinion Orbital OSX packages palestine paper Paraguay passwords Patrick PC PEAR people performance phone photography photosynth php php5 piracy pirates of the caribbean Pirates of theCaribbean Playstation plugins Podcast Podcasts Poland police politics Portugal posters predictions privacy pro evo projects promotion PSP racism Real Time Worlds recycling Religion review Ricoh Ronaldo Rooney Royal Albert Hall RSS Samuel L Jackson Saudi Arabia scam Scotland search security server sex shaving short sighted sites sky news sleep Software Sony Sophos Spain spam speed Spielberg sport SQL Star Wars statistics stats statues stress stressful life summer sun Super Mario Superman Sweden Switzerland t shirts tags talib kweli tanks tea team work Tech technology technorati teenagers The Interweb The Prodigy time management tips tired toaster Togo Tokyo tokyo institute of technology tool Toshiba toys tracks Trafalgar Square training trains transformers tricks Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia tv UGS Ukraine Ultimate Tag Warrior Uncategorized undergroundscene university US Army UTW vbulletin Video Clips virus Vista Vivek Oberoi wamp5 war Weather Web Design web dev weight WGA Wicked Wench Wii Windows Windows Genuine Advantage wireless Word Wordpress work workfriendly World Cup World Cup Football xbox xbox360 XML XP XPath XSL XSLT Yahoo yahoo! You Tube YouTube Zune [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] AOL have been quite to release an apology and an explanation as to how this error could have occured in the first place.     419 419 eater aa batteries Adam adsense advertising adverts advice Alex Reece Allergo America Annoyances aol apache APB Aphex Twin Apple Apple. PC art Article asian Asides Australia Auth Bad Podcast of the Week Balcony Bar bandwidth birds Black Hat blackberry Blake Ross blog blog roll blog sites bloggers blogging blogs Blood Money Blu ray Boards of Canada Bollywood Books boredom Brain Age Brazil breakbeat Bush California Canada cars charity Chelsea cinema cocaine coding coffee colleague comedy communication conflict contact lenses Costa Rica Counter Strike Covent Garden crime CRT cruise CSS dance Darth Vader data De Phazz Dell desk digg discussion boards diving Doc Scott downloads drugs drum n bass DS DS Lite dundee DVD Eclipse Ecuador education Eidos email emergencies emo Emulation encryption encryption tool England environment Etch A Sketch eyes family fat feedburner film financial reports firefox flaming flight flyers food football forums frames framework France free stuff friends FW: games Gaming Gang Starr geeks George Galloway Germany Ghana glasses google graduations Graphic Design Guides hackers hacking hacks hair half life 2 Hardware Harrods HD DVD health heat Hezbollah hip hop Hitman Holand holiday hot hotels household HP Humor Humour ideas idiots IE Immortal Technique India Indiana Jones install installer Intense intense pressure interviews ipod Iran Iraq Israel Isreal Italy Japan java Johnny Depp Jurassic Park Kensington Keywords Kylie last.fm Lebanon Leicester Life Life hacks links linux Lion King livejournal LiveUser localhost London London Eye look a like LTJ Bukem lyceum Madame Tussauds mashups memory MF Doom Michelin Challenge Design microchips Microsoft middle east models moderators money monitors Motion motorbike movies mp3 mugs music myspace mysql n00bs National Portrait Gallery nerds networking News newsvine newsvine.com Nigeria Nintendo Nobody Likes Onions non phixion Nu Tone office Opera opinion Orbital OSX packages palestine paper Paraguay passwords Patrick PC PEAR people performance phone photography photosynth php php5 piracy pirates of the caribbean Pirates of theCaribbean Playstation plugins Podcast Podcasts Poland police politics Portugal posters predictions privacy pro evo projects promotion PSP racism Real Time Worlds recycling Religion review Ricoh Ronaldo Rooney Royal Albert Hall RSS Samuel L Jackson Saudi Arabia scam Scotland search security server sex shaving short sighted sites sky news sleep Software Sony Sophos Spain spam speed Spielberg sport SQL Star Wars statistics stats statues stress stressful life summer sun Super Mario Superman Sweden Switzerland t shirts tags talib kweli tanks tea team work Tech technology technorati teenagers The Interweb The Prodigy time management tips tired toaster Togo Tokyo tokyo institute of technology tool Toshiba toys tracks Trafalgar Square training trains transformers tricks Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia tv UGS Ukraine Ultimate Tag Warrior Uncategorized undergroundscene university US Army UTW vbulletin Video Clips virus Vista Vivek Oberoi wamp5 war Weather Web Design web dev weight WGA Wicked Wench Wii Windows Windows Genuine Advantage wireless Word Wordpress work workfriendly World Cup World Cup Football xbox xbox360 XML XP XPath XSL XSLT Yahoo yahoo! You Tube YouTube Zune [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; First person identified from AOL Data: Thelma Arnold</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/07/aol-this-was-a-screw-up/#comment-128864</link>
		<dc:creator>Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; First person identified from AOL Data: Thelma Arnold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 04:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/07/aol-this-was-a-screw-up/#comment-128864</guid>
		<description>[...] On Sunday the news broke that AOL purposefully released 20 million partially anonymized search queries. On Monday AOL apologized, and later that evening the first web interface to the data went up. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] On Sunday the news broke that AOL purposefully released 20 million partially anonymized search queries. On Monday AOL apologized, and later that evening the first web interface to the data went up. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ramblings of a 21st Century Digital Boy &#187; All Your Searches Are Belong to Us</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/07/aol-this-was-a-screw-up/#comment-127961</link>
		<dc:creator>Ramblings of a 21st Century Digital Boy &#187; All Your Searches Are Belong to Us</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 15:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/07/aol-this-was-a-screw-up/#comment-127961</guid>
		<description>[...] Some of you might have heard that AOL published the search histories of 65,000 of its users. [AOL has since apologized (profusely) and claimed it was a mistake]. Regardless, AOL cannot unring the bell, and the data has been widely propagated on the web. News.com analyzed a swath of data and came up with some interesting things about certain AOL users (Users are not personally identified, but are instead denoted by a unique ID). Some are amusing, while others are downright disturbing. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Some of you might have heard that AOL published the search histories of 65,000 of its users. [AOL has since apologized (profusely) and claimed it was a mistake]. Regardless, AOL cannot unring the bell, and the data has been widely propagated on the web. News.com analyzed a swath of data and came up with some interesting things about certain AOL users (Users are not personally identified, but are instead denoted by a unique ID). Some are amusing, while others are downright disturbing. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sitestone &#187; Blog Archive &#187; AOL gaat grof de fout in</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/07/aol-this-was-a-screw-up/#comment-127959</link>
		<dc:creator>Sitestone &#187; Blog Archive &#187; AOL gaat grof de fout in</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 15:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/07/aol-this-was-a-screw-up/#comment-127959</guid>
		<description>[...] Edit: AOL geeft toe dat ze een vergissing gemaakt hebben. Te laat, de data staat al elders, handig doorzoekbaar volgens verschillende criteria.     &#171; 15 jaar web [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Edit: AOL geeft toe dat ze een vergissing gemaakt hebben. Te laat, de data staat al elders, handig doorzoekbaar volgens verschillende criteria.     &laquo; 15 jaar web [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pl0g.de</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/07/aol-this-was-a-screw-up/#comment-127898</link>
		<dc:creator>pl0g.de</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 14:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/07/aol-this-was-a-screw-up/#comment-127898</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;AOL präsentiert: Die dümmsten Momente in der Geschichte des Internets &#8230; live!...&lt;/strong&gt;

AOL (USA) stirbt, langsam und vermutlich nicht ohne Qualen. Wie sehr und mit welchen Mitteln man um jeden Kunden kämpft wurde ja schon vor Kurzem öffentlich gemacht. AOL hat sich nicht nur auf Grund solcher Publicity binnen der letzten Jahre vom welt...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>AOL präsentiert: Die dümmsten Momente in der Geschichte des Internets &#8230; live!&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>AOL (USA) stirbt, langsam und vermutlich nicht ohne Qualen. Wie sehr und mit welchen Mitteln man um jeden Kunden kämpft wurde ja schon vor Kurzem öffentlich gemacht. AOL hat sich nicht nur auf Grund solcher Publicity binnen der letzten Jahre vom welt&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meltin' Posts</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/07/aol-this-was-a-screw-up/#comment-127877</link>
		<dc:creator>Meltin' Posts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 14:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/07/aol-this-was-a-screw-up/#comment-127877</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;AOL data leak: consequences and opinions...&lt;/strong&gt;

&#8220;I&#8217;m just a soul whose intentions are good
Oh Lord, please don&#8217;t let me be misunderstood&#8221;
(&#8221;Don&#8217;t let me be misunderstood&#8221;, The Animals)
As the AOL data leak makes blogs still buzz and users make - again and ag...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>AOL data leak: consequences and opinions&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>&#8220;I&#8217;m just a soul whose intentions are good<br />
Oh Lord, please don&#8217;t let me be misunderstood&#8221;<br />
(&#8221;Don&#8217;t let me be misunderstood&#8221;, The Animals)<br />
As the AOL data leak makes blogs still buzz and users make - again and ag&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sökmotorer och forskningsetik at Det perfekta tomrummet</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/07/aol-this-was-a-screw-up/#comment-127871</link>
		<dc:creator>Sökmotorer och forskningsetik at Det perfekta tomrummet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 14:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/07/aol-this-was-a-screw-up/#comment-127871</guid>
		<description>[...] Ur AOLs uttalande: &#8220;This was a screw up, and we’re angry and upset about it. It was an innocent enough attempt to reach out to the academic community with new research tools&#8221;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Ur AOLs uttalande: &#8220;This was a screw up, and we’re angry and upset about it. It was an innocent enough attempt to reach out to the academic community with new research tools&#8221;. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Online Keywords Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why would AOL release the search data</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/07/aol-this-was-a-screw-up/#comment-127864</link>
		<dc:creator>Online Keywords Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why would AOL release the search data</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 14:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/07/aol-this-was-a-screw-up/#comment-127864</guid>
		<description>[...] Update: just came across another TechCrunch article that quotes an open apology from an AOL spokesperson [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Update: just came across another TechCrunch article that quotes an open apology from an AOL spokesperson [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T. Longren</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/07/aol-this-was-a-screw-up/#comment-127793</link>
		<dc:creator>T. Longren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 13:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/07/aol-this-was-a-screw-up/#comment-127793</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Web Interface for AOL Data...&lt;/strong&gt;

A commenter over at Techcrunch put together a simple little web interface to the AOL search data.
Michael Arrington from Techcrunch spoke with Andrew Weinstein over the phone lastnight about this.  Andrew is the AOL employee who first issued the apolog...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Web Interface for AOL Data&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>A commenter over at Techcrunch put together a simple little web interface to the AOL search data.<br />
Michael Arrington from Techcrunch spoke with Andrew Weinstein over the phone lastnight about this.  Andrew is the AOL employee who first issued the apolog&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.512 seconds -->
