<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Stats on Del.icio.us, This Time Positive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/more-stats-on-delicious-this-time-positive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/more-stats-on-delicious-this-time-positive/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 05:45:16 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mkaz.com - Web Metrics Followup</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/more-stats-on-delicious-this-time-positive/comment-page-2/#comment-3043656</link>
		<dc:creator>mkaz.com - Web Metrics Followup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 16:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/more-stats-on-delicious-this-time-positive/#comment-3043656</guid>
		<description>[...] A quick follow up to my previous web metrics post. A few other people have something similar to say. I think we were all started off on it by the TechCrunch D.el.ici.o.us.. article [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A quick follow up to my previous web metrics post. A few other people have something similar to say. I think we were all started off on it by the TechCrunch D.el.ici.o.us.. article [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How to Make del.icio.us a Part of Your Online Marketing Strategy &#124; Cape Cod SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/more-stats-on-delicious-this-time-positive/comment-page-2/#comment-2045620</link>
		<dc:creator>How to Make del.icio.us a Part of Your Online Marketing Strategy &#124; Cape Cod SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 19:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/more-stats-on-delicious-this-time-positive/#comment-2045620</guid>
		<description>[...] million posts (on 25 million URLs) have been created on del.icio.us as of August 2006 (according to TechCrunch), and that post growth has increased 250% since December of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] million posts (on 25 million URLs) have been created on del.icio.us as of August 2006 (according to TechCrunch), and that post growth has increased 250% since December of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 無料画像配布.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/more-stats-on-delicious-this-time-positive/comment-page-2/#comment-1327910</link>
		<dc:creator>無料画像配布.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 15:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/more-stats-on-delicious-this-time-positive/#comment-1327910</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;無料画像　花　ピンク45...&lt;/strong&gt;

 バラの園。......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>無料画像　花　ピンク45&#8230;</strong></p>
<p> バラの園。&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: :: Information, Science and Technology :: :: Google v. Technorati (and Hitwise v. Comscore) :: January :: 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/more-stats-on-delicious-this-time-positive/comment-page-2/#comment-666049</link>
		<dc:creator>:: Information, Science and Technology :: :: Google v. Technorati (and Hitwise v. Comscore) :: January :: 2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 05:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/more-stats-on-delicious-this-time-positive/#comment-666049</guid>
		<description>[...] We&#8217;ve seen situations where Comscore showed erratic traffic swings before. In August Comscore showed a significant decline in Del.icio.us traffic, when Hitwise said it was increasing. Yahoo showed disclosed some internal traffic stats and it turned out Comscore was dead wrong. In the case of Technorati v. Google, it looks to be wrong again. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We&rsquo;ve seen situations where Comscore showed erratic traffic swings before. In August Comscore showed a significant decline in Del.icio.us traffic, when Hitwise said it was increasing. Yahoo showed disclosed some internal traffic stats and it turned out Comscore was dead wrong. In the case of Technorati v. Google, it looks to be wrong again. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google v. Technorati (and Hitwise v. Comscore) at Swiss Podcast Directory and Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/more-stats-on-delicious-this-time-positive/comment-page-2/#comment-617024</link>
		<dc:creator>Google v. Technorati (and Hitwise v. Comscore) at Swiss Podcast Directory and Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 06:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/more-stats-on-delicious-this-time-positive/#comment-617024</guid>
		<description>[...] We&#8217;ve seen situations where Comscore showed erratic traffic swings before. In August Comscore showed a significant decline in Del.icio.us traffic, when Hitwise said it was increasing. Yahoo showed disclosed some internal traffic stats and it turned out Comscore was dead wrong. In the case of Technorati v. Google, it looks to be wrong again. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We&#8217;ve seen situations where Comscore showed erratic traffic swings before. In August Comscore showed a significant decline in Del.icio.us traffic, when Hitwise said it was increasing. Yahoo showed disclosed some internal traffic stats and it turned out Comscore was dead wrong. In the case of Technorati v. Google, it looks to be wrong again. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google v. Technorati (and Hitwise v. Comscore)</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/more-stats-on-delicious-this-time-positive/comment-page-1/#comment-616904</link>
		<dc:creator>Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google v. Technorati (and Hitwise v. Comscore)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 06:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/more-stats-on-delicious-this-time-positive/#comment-616904</guid>
		<description>[...] We&#8217;ve seen situations where Comscore showed erratic traffic swings before. In August Comscore showed a significant decline in Del.icio.us traffic, when Hitwise said it was increasing. Yahoo showed disclosed some internal traffic stats and it turned out Comscore was dead wrong. In the case of Technorati v. Google, it looks to be wrong again. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We&#8217;ve seen situations where Comscore showed erratic traffic swings before. In August Comscore showed a significant decline in Del.icio.us traffic, when Hitwise said it was increasing. Yahoo showed disclosed some internal traffic stats and it turned out Comscore was dead wrong. In the case of Technorati v. Google, it looks to be wrong again. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is the Web bubble back? Ask Hitwise &#187; Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/more-stats-on-delicious-this-time-positive/comment-page-1/#comment-476147</link>
		<dc:creator>Is the Web bubble back? Ask Hitwise &#187; Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 02:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/more-stats-on-delicious-this-time-positive/#comment-476147</guid>
		<description>[...] Digg it &#160; &#124; &#160; Track with co.mments &#160; &#124; &#160; &#160; &#124; &#160; Cosmos &#160; &#124; &#160; Annotate this page     Click here for copyright permissions!   Copyright 2006 MathewIngram [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Digg it &nbsp; | &nbsp; Track with co.mments &nbsp; | &nbsp; &nbsp; | &nbsp; Cosmos &nbsp; | &nbsp; Annotate this page     Click here for copyright permissions!   Copyright 2006 MathewIngram [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Minty</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/more-stats-on-delicious-this-time-positive/comment-page-1/#comment-391094</link>
		<dc:creator>Minty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 04:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/more-stats-on-delicious-this-time-positive/#comment-391094</guid>
		<description>comScore screws the pooch again...

&quot;One point of controversy was around Digg&#039;s claim of 20 million unique monthly visitors and steep monthly growth, whereas the Comscore&#039;s most recent September report shows only 1.3 million monthly unique visitors and flat growth since April (see chart below). Comscore is notoriously flaky, and these numbers are for U.S. households only. Comscore is almost certainly significantly under-reporting Digg traffic.&quot;

http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/topnews/wpn-60-20061025DiggHuntsForNewsCorpTreasure.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>comScore screws the pooch again&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;One point of controversy was around Digg&#8217;s claim of 20 million unique monthly visitors and steep monthly growth, whereas the Comscore&#8217;s most recent September report shows only 1.3 million monthly unique visitors and flat growth since April (see chart below). Comscore is notoriously flaky, and these numbers are for U.S. households only. Comscore is almost certainly significantly under-reporting Digg traffic.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/topnews/wpn-60-20061025DiggHuntsForNewsCorpTreasure.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/topnews/wpn-60-20061025DiggHuntsForNewsCorpTreasure.html'>http://www.webp...rpTreasure.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: del.icio.us la joue StumbleUpon &#171; arnet&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/more-stats-on-delicious-this-time-positive/comment-page-1/#comment-243815</link>
		<dc:creator>del.icio.us la joue StumbleUpon &#171; arnet&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 20:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/more-stats-on-delicious-this-time-positive/#comment-243815</guid>
		<description>[...] Surprenant et sans doute moins drole que stumbleupon del.icio.us propose depuis hier un bouton del.icio.us/help/randombuttons pour touver des liens de manière aléatoire. Mais contrairement à stumbleupon aucun filtre n&#8217;est encore possible. Un petit gadget après les articles de techcrunch sur les problèmes de popularité de ce service. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Surprenant et sans doute moins drole que stumbleupon del.icio.us propose depuis hier un bouton del.icio.us/help/randombuttons pour touver des liens de manière aléatoire. Mais contrairement à stumbleupon aucun filtre n&#8217;est encore possible. Un petit gadget après les articles de techcrunch sur les problèmes de popularité de ce service. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tech Industry &#187; More Stats on Del.icio.us, This Time Positive</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/more-stats-on-delicious-this-time-positive/comment-page-1/#comment-193190</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech Industry &#187; More Stats on Del.icio.us, This Time Positive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 08:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/more-stats-on-delicious-this-time-positive/#comment-193190</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;This is an update on the post I wrote about del.icio.us earlier today that showed massively decreasing traffic on the site according to Comscore, and flat traffic from Alexa. Del.icio.us says that Comscore is &#8216;deeply flawed&#8217; in measuring del.icio.us and says &#8216;the actual stats are hugely up across the board.&#8217;&#8221;read more&#160;&#124;&#160;digg story [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;This is an update on the post I wrote about del.icio.us earlier today that showed massively decreasing traffic on the site according to Comscore, and flat traffic from Alexa. Del.icio.us says that Comscore is &#8216;deeply flawed&#8217; in measuring del.icio.us and says &#8216;the actual stats are hugely up across the board.&#8217;&#8221;read more&nbsp;|&nbsp;digg story [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EveryDigg &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More Stats on Del.icio.us, This Time Positive</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/more-stats-on-delicious-this-time-positive/comment-page-1/#comment-161923</link>
		<dc:creator>EveryDigg &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More Stats on Del.icio.us, This Time Positive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/more-stats-on-delicious-this-time-positive/#comment-161923</guid>
		<description>[...] &quot;This is an update on the post I wrote about del.icio.us earlier today that showed massively decreasing traffic on the site according to Comscore, and flat traffic from Alexa. Del.icio.us says that Comscore is &#8216;deeply flawed&#8217; in measuring del.icio.us and says &#8216;the actual stats are hugely up across the board.&#8217;&quot;read more&#160;&#124;&#160;digg story [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &quot;This is an update on the post I wrote about del.icio.us earlier today that showed massively decreasing traffic on the site according to Comscore, and flat traffic from Alexa. Del.icio.us says that Comscore is &#8216;deeply flawed&#8217; in measuring del.icio.us and says &#8216;the actual stats are hugely up across the board.&#8217;&quot;read more&nbsp;|&nbsp;digg story [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Comscore: MySpace Video traffic doubled in July</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/more-stats-on-delicious-this-time-positive/comment-page-1/#comment-139298</link>
		<dc:creator>Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Comscore: MySpace Video traffic doubled in July</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 19:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/more-stats-on-delicious-this-time-positive/#comment-139298</guid>
		<description>[...] Traffic numbers are a real stab in the dark, and the last time we reported on Comscore numbers it was regarding Del.icio.us. Comscore showed a decline in the site&#8217;s traffic, owner Yahoo! insisted that the data was incorrect and Hitwise backed up Yahoo! statements with numbers last week. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Traffic numbers are a real stab in the dark, and the last time we reported on Comscore numbers it was regarding Del.icio.us. Comscore showed a decline in the site&#8217;s traffic, owner Yahoo! insisted that the data was incorrect and Hitwise backed up Yahoo! statements with numbers last week. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Del.icio.us wächst und wächst - und wird abgeschaltet? &#124; agenturblog.de</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/more-stats-on-delicious-this-time-positive/comment-page-1/#comment-135092</link>
		<dc:creator>Del.icio.us wächst und wächst - und wird abgeschaltet? &#124; agenturblog.de</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Aug 2006 18:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/more-stats-on-delicious-this-time-positive/#comment-135092</guid>
		<description>[...] Im Gespr&#228;ch mit Michael Arrington verrieten Joshua Schacter und Eckart Walther (Yahoo VP Product for Search) noch einige weitere Details, so f&#228;llt nebenher auch der Satz: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Im Gespr&#228;ch mit Michael Arrington verrieten Joshua Schacter und Eckart Walther (Yahoo VP Product for Search) noch einige weitere Details, so f&#228;llt nebenher auch der Satz: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Traffic fight: Hitwise says Del.icio.us is soaring</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/more-stats-on-delicious-this-time-positive/comment-page-1/#comment-131723</link>
		<dc:creator>Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Traffic fight: Hitwise says Del.icio.us is soaring</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 00:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/more-stats-on-delicious-this-time-positive/#comment-131723</guid>
		<description>[...] Last week Michael Arrington made a series of posts here about some contested traffic stats on the popular social bookmarking service del.cio.us. His initial post focused on Comscore data, which showed traffic to the site declining (&#8221;Dazzle us again, Del.icio.us&#8220;) and Alexa data that was showing flatlined traffic. After a conversation with del.icio.us founder Joshua Schacter, Eckart Walther, VP Product for Search and Melissa Rische, PR Manager for Yahoo Search he posted a follow up on the post with information from Yahoo! claiming that del.icio.us growth was going strong. He said he had every reason to believe that the company was telling the truth and was thus most concerned about Comscore&#8217;s inability to get the numbers right. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Last week Michael Arrington made a series of posts here about some contested traffic stats on the popular social bookmarking service del.cio.us. His initial post focused on Comscore data, which showed traffic to the site declining (&#8221;Dazzle us again, Del.icio.us&#8220;) and Alexa data that was showing flatlined traffic. After a conversation with del.icio.us founder Joshua Schacter, Eckart Walther, VP Product for Search and Melissa Rische, PR Manager for Yahoo Search he posted a follow up on the post with information from Yahoo! claiming that del.icio.us growth was going strong. He said he had every reason to believe that the company was telling the truth and was thus most concerned about Comscore&#8217;s inability to get the numbers right. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeb</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/more-stats-on-delicious-this-time-positive/comment-page-1/#comment-131568</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 21:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/more-stats-on-delicious-this-time-positive/#comment-131568</guid>
		<description>Brian: I have no problem accepting the value of the clickstream data, but I operate in a market where each visitor is worth minimally $0.35.  So if comScore says we get 350k fewer visitors than we really do, then that&#039;s $1.4M less traffic value per year.  Multiply that by a valuation multiple and we&#039;re talking serious money, at least for a bootstrapped enterprise.

I think the problem is that bizdev and media people think that comScore is the final word on visitor counts, when it is not.

I disagree with the assertion that different analytics trackers like Google Analytics vs. Webtrends Live vs. Coremetrics vs. WebSideStory would produce as much variance.  Perhaps this is true if you&#039;re using web server log data, but results from cookie-based tracking is what it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian: I have no problem accepting the value of the clickstream data, but I operate in a market where each visitor is worth minimally $0.35.  So if comScore says we get 350k fewer visitors than we really do, then that&#8217;s $1.4M less traffic value per year.  Multiply that by a valuation multiple and we&#8217;re talking serious money, at least for a bootstrapped enterprise.</p>
<p>I think the problem is that bizdev and media people think that comScore is the final word on visitor counts, when it is not.</p>
<p>I disagree with the assertion that different analytics trackers like Google Analytics vs. Webtrends Live vs. Coremetrics vs. WebSideStory would produce as much variance.  Perhaps this is true if you&#8217;re using web server log data, but results from cookie-based tracking is what it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Webanalyticsbook.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/more-stats-on-delicious-this-time-positive/comment-page-1/#comment-131530</link>
		<dc:creator>Webanalyticsbook.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 21:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/more-stats-on-delicious-this-time-positive/#comment-131530</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Siliconbeat &#8220;beats&#8221; webanalytics industry...&lt;/strong&gt;

Today Matt Marshall at Siliconbeat wrote in his blog that webanalytics is back to square one. He points out that Hitwise, Comscore and Alexa show different numbers. Here the graphs that he was writing about:
I. Comscore - Unique visitors and tota...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Siliconbeat &#8220;beats&#8221; webanalytics industry&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Today Matt Marshall at Siliconbeat wrote in his blog that webanalytics is back to square one. He points out that Hitwise, Comscore and Alexa show different numbers. Here the graphs that he was writing about:<br />
I. Comscore &#8211; Unique visitors and tota&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Chumley</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/more-stats-on-delicious-this-time-positive/comment-page-1/#comment-126730</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Chumley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 21:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/more-stats-on-delicious-this-time-positive/#comment-126730</guid>
		<description>Thanks for looking into this one some more. Any update on the Google Talk stats?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for looking into this one some more. Any update on the Google Talk stats?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Before the bell 8-7-06: EBAY, GOOG, MSFT, YHOO - stocks blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/more-stats-on-delicious-this-time-positive/comment-page-1/#comment-126311</link>
		<dc:creator>Before the bell 8-7-06: EBAY, GOOG, MSFT, YHOO - stocks blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 14:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/more-stats-on-delicious-this-time-positive/#comment-126311</guid>
		<description>[...] Yahoo Inc (YHOO) is down 14 cents to $26.85 as of 8:01 a.m. Techcrunch had a few interesting posts last week about del.icio.us and its stats. According to Comscore, traffic is decreasing, according to Yahoo! it&#8217;s increasing. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Yahoo Inc (YHOO) is down 14 cents to $26.85 as of 8:01 a.m. Techcrunch had a few interesting posts last week about del.icio.us and its stats. According to Comscore, traffic is decreasing, according to Yahoo! it&#8217;s increasing. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/more-stats-on-delicious-this-time-positive/comment-page-1/#comment-125445</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 01:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/more-stats-on-delicious-this-time-positive/#comment-125445</guid>
		<description>Interestingly, 10% month on month growth is almost exactly the trend shown in the hitwise chart.

If the internal claim and one external source say the same thing, I have no trouble believing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interestingly, 10% month on month growth is almost exactly the trend shown in the hitwise chart.</p>
<p>If the internal claim and one external source say the same thing, I have no trouble believing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch dans le brouillard</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/more-stats-on-delicious-this-time-positive/comment-page-1/#comment-125105</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch dans le brouillard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2006 20:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/more-stats-on-delicious-this-time-positive/#comment-125105</guid>
		<description>[...] TechCrunch parle beaucoup de del.icio.us en ce moment. Dans un premier post, Michael Arrington [1] indique que la fréquentation de delicious ne serait pas si bonne que ça, elle serait même en train de chuter. Quelques heures après, suite à un entretien avec Joshua Schacter [2], Michael Arrington publie un autre billet dans lequel il indique que en fait, si, d&#8217;après les chiffres donnés par Yahoo [3], delicious casse la baraque niveau fréquentation. Arf arf arf. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TechCrunch parle beaucoup de del.icio.us en ce moment. Dans un premier post, Michael Arrington [1] indique que la fréquentation de delicious ne serait pas si bonne que ça, elle serait même en train de chuter. Quelques heures après, suite à un entretien avec Joshua Schacter [2], Michael Arrington publie un autre billet dans lequel il indique que en fait, si, d&#8217;après les chiffres donnés par Yahoo [3], delicious casse la baraque niveau fréquentation. Arf arf arf. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Mulvaney</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/more-stats-on-delicious-this-time-positive/comment-page-1/#comment-124858</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Mulvaney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2006 16:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/more-stats-on-delicious-this-time-positive/#comment-124858</guid>
		<description>Jeb:  31% lower projected unique user count may be plenty acceptable from panel based audience measurement.  You can get almost as much variance in uniques by using different web analytics tools on your own site.

The juice in Comscore is not in their estimate of the size of a given site&#039;s audience, but in the behavioral data: how people got to the site; what keywords they were searching on; how and whether they bought something; how much they bought; why they left the site and where they went afterwards; what other comparable sites they also visited; etc.  Think of it as clickstream analysis on your competitors&#039; websites.   In some markets, those insights are worth a lot of money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeb:  31% lower projected unique user count may be plenty acceptable from panel based audience measurement.  You can get almost as much variance in uniques by using different web analytics tools on your own site.</p>
<p>The juice in Comscore is not in their estimate of the size of a given site&#8217;s audience, but in the behavioral data: how people got to the site; what keywords they were searching on; how and whether they bought something; how much they bought; why they left the site and where they went afterwards; what other comparable sites they also visited; etc.  Think of it as clickstream analysis on your competitors&#8217; websites.   In some markets, those insights are worth a lot of money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goudaille &#187; Blog Archive &#187; La descente de del.icio.us</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/more-stats-on-delicious-this-time-positive/comment-page-1/#comment-124801</link>
		<dc:creator>goudaille &#187; Blog Archive &#187; La descente de del.icio.us</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2006 14:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/more-stats-on-delicious-this-time-positive/#comment-124801</guid>
		<description>[...] Techcrunch rapporte que Yahoo présente de bien meilleurs résultats que ceux proposés par Comscore.  par Olivier Niquet, le 04 / 08 / 2006 Mots-cl&#233;s: utile, web 2.0    0 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Techcrunch rapporte que Yahoo présente de bien meilleurs résultats que ceux proposés par Comscore.  par Olivier Niquet, le 04 / 08 / 2006 Mots-cl&eacute;s: utile, web 2.0    0 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esp</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/more-stats-on-delicious-this-time-positive/comment-page-1/#comment-124539</link>
		<dc:creator>Esp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2006 10:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/more-stats-on-delicious-this-time-positive/#comment-124539</guid>
		<description>One of the main reasons why d.i.o has increased user registrations and increased usage, is because of the many spammers who are creating dozens of accounts and putting in craploads of links in to the system in order to get exposure to their system...

I speak from experience. I have written and sold scripts that create multiple d.i.o accounts and post bookmarks to them...

Cheers,
Esp.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the main reasons why d.i.o has increased user registrations and increased usage, is because of the many spammers who are creating dozens of accounts and putting in craploads of links in to the system in order to get exposure to their system&#8230;</p>
<p>I speak from experience. I have written and sold scripts that create multiple d.i.o accounts and post bookmarks to them&#8230;</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Esp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeb</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/more-stats-on-delicious-this-time-positive/comment-page-1/#comment-124214</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2006 03:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/more-stats-on-delicious-this-time-positive/#comment-124214</guid>
		<description>comScore is terrible.  

I run a site that got 1.1M visitors in June (per Google Analytics &quot;absolute unique visitor&quot; count), but comScore (I&#039;m told by sources who can afford their reports) only showed us getting 750k visitors.

I was telling a VC about the descrepancy and he was like, &quot;yeah, comScore is way off because of their sampling method.&quot;  

A 31% lower count??? That is not acceptable.  It&#039;s practically defamation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>comScore is terrible.  </p>
<p>I run a site that got 1.1M visitors in June (per Google Analytics &#8220;absolute unique visitor&#8221; count), but comScore (I&#8217;m told by sources who can afford their reports) only showed us getting 750k visitors.</p>
<p>I was telling a VC about the descrepancy and he was like, &#8220;yeah, comScore is way off because of their sampling method.&#8221;  </p>
<p>A 31% lower count??? That is not acceptable.  It&#8217;s practically defamation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Otis</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/more-stats-on-delicious-this-time-positive/comment-page-1/#comment-124124</link>
		<dc:creator>Otis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2006 00:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/more-stats-on-delicious-this-time-positive/#comment-124124</guid>
		<description>Saket: they don&#039;t compete with each other.  They cover/attract mostly different segments of the population.  Same with Flickr and Y! Photos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saket: they don&#8217;t compete with each other.  They cover/attract mostly different segments of the population.  Same with Flickr and Y! Photos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
