<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dazzle Us Again, Del.icio.us</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/dazzle-us-again-delicious/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/dazzle-us-again-delicious/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:19:46 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 10 Başarılı Web 2.0 Sitesi &#171; Kıssadan Hisse</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/dazzle-us-again-delicious/comment-page-2/#comment-2428885</link>
		<dc:creator>10 Başarılı Web 2.0 Sitesi &#171; Kıssadan Hisse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 01:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/dazzle-us-again-delicious/#comment-2428885</guid>
		<description>[...] Approximate Users: 1 million (as of September 2006) Approximate Pageviews: 4 million (peak, as of August 2006) Acquisition/Valuation: Bought by Yahoo! in December 2005 for estimated $30 - $40 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Approximate Users: 1 million (as of September 2006) Approximate Pageviews: 4 million (peak, as of August 2006) Acquisition/Valuation: Bought by Yahoo! in December 2005 for estimated $30 &#8211; $40 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cragin Burton &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Better news about delicious</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/dazzle-us-again-delicious/comment-page-2/#comment-2226893</link>
		<dc:creator>Cragin Burton &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Better news about delicious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 01:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/dazzle-us-again-delicious/#comment-2226893</guid>
		<description>[...] is an update on the post I wrote about del.icio.us earlier today that showed massively decreasing traffic on the site according to Comscore, and flat traffic from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is an update on the post I wrote about del.icio.us earlier today that showed massively decreasing traffic on the site according to Comscore, and flat traffic from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 随意商业评论 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; &#187; 10个最成功的web2.0站点</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/dazzle-us-again-delicious/comment-page-2/#comment-1825449</link>
		<dc:creator>随意商业评论 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; &#187; 10个最成功的web2.0站点</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 05:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/dazzle-us-again-delicious/#comment-1825449</guid>
		<description>[...] 1 million (as of September 2006)页面浏览量: 4 million (peak, as of August 2006)估价: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 1 million (as of September 2006)页面浏览量: 4 million (peak, as of August 2006)估价: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cya</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/dazzle-us-again-delicious/comment-page-2/#comment-1484778</link>
		<dc:creator>cya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 17:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/dazzle-us-again-delicious/#comment-1484778</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;grassrootsyouth...&lt;/strong&gt;

cya...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>grassrootsyouth&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>cya&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mediahead - блог о новых media. Интернет-реклама, медиа, pr, деньги, web 2.0, интернет, социальные сети, блоггинг.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/dazzle-us-again-delicious/comment-page-2/#comment-1333571</link>
		<dc:creator>Mediahead - блог о новых media. Интернет-реклама, медиа, pr, деньги, web 2.0, интернет, социальные сети, блоггинг.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 14:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/dazzle-us-again-delicious/#comment-1333571</guid>
		<description>[...] страниц, приблизительно: 4 миллиона (пик, на август 2006 года)Приобретения/оценка стоимости: Приобретён Yahoo! в [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] страниц, приблизительно: 4 миллиона (пик, на август 2006 года)Приобретения/оценка стоимости: Приобретён Yahoo! в [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 無料画像配布.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/dazzle-us-again-delicious/comment-page-2/#comment-1327909</link>
		<dc:creator>無料画像配布.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 15:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/dazzle-us-again-delicious/#comment-1327909</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;無料画像　花　ピンク31...&lt;/strong&gt;

 淡いピンク、かわいいです。......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>無料画像　花　ピンク31&#8230;</strong></p>
<p> 淡いピンク、かわいいです。&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brand meridia</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/dazzle-us-again-delicious/comment-page-2/#comment-1264558</link>
		<dc:creator>brand meridia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 23:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/dazzle-us-again-delicious/#comment-1264558</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bloggerblast.com/bestpropecia/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; brand meridia &lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.bloggerblast.com/bestpropecia/" rel="nofollow"> brand meridia </a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Multimedias.mobi &#187; Google v. Technorati (and Hitwise v. Comscore)</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/dazzle-us-again-delicious/comment-page-2/#comment-617993</link>
		<dc:creator>Multimedias.mobi &#187; Google v. Technorati (and Hitwise v. Comscore)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 10:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/dazzle-us-again-delicious/#comment-617993</guid>
		<description>[...] We&#8217;ve seen situations where Comscore showed erratic traffic swings before. In August Comscore showed a significant decline in Del.icio.us traffic, when Hitwise said it was increasing. Yahoo showed disclosed some internal traffic stats and it turned out Comscore was dead wrong. In the case of Technorati v. Google, it looks to be wrong again. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We&#8217;ve seen situations where Comscore showed erratic traffic swings before. In August Comscore showed a significant decline in Del.icio.us traffic, when Hitwise said it was increasing. Yahoo showed disclosed some internal traffic stats and it turned out Comscore was dead wrong. In the case of Technorati v. Google, it looks to be wrong again. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google v. Technorati (and Hitwise v. Comscore) at Swiss Podcast Directory and Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/dazzle-us-again-delicious/comment-page-2/#comment-617022</link>
		<dc:creator>Google v. Technorati (and Hitwise v. Comscore) at Swiss Podcast Directory and Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 06:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/dazzle-us-again-delicious/#comment-617022</guid>
		<description>[...] We&#8217;ve seen situations where Comscore showed erratic traffic swings before. In August Comscore showed a significant decline in Del.icio.us traffic, when Hitwise said it was increasing. Yahoo showed disclosed some internal traffic stats and it turned out Comscore was dead wrong. In the case of Technorati v. Google, it looks to be wrong again. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We&#8217;ve seen situations where Comscore showed erratic traffic swings before. In August Comscore showed a significant decline in Del.icio.us traffic, when Hitwise said it was increasing. Yahoo showed disclosed some internal traffic stats and it turned out Comscore was dead wrong. In the case of Technorati v. Google, it looks to be wrong again. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chinarut</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/dazzle-us-again-delicious/comment-page-2/#comment-386870</link>
		<dc:creator>Chinarut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 07:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/dazzle-us-again-delicious/#comment-386870</guid>
		<description>After using furl for quite some time, Flock also drove me to try Shadows - if anything - to go with the underdog and see what they&#039;ve brewed up.

Chris shares:
&gt; Flock offers complete, native integration with both Del.icio.us and Shadows. If only Del.icio.us had been available, I would probably have stuck with it for ease of use.

What do you mean by &quot;had been available?&quot;   did the integration fail or not work or something?

If anyone has a pointer to a comparitive analysis of these 3 social bookmarking sites (and any others that have cropped up), please let us know!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After using furl for quite some time, Flock also drove me to try Shadows &#8211; if anything &#8211; to go with the underdog and see what they&#8217;ve brewed up.</p>
<p>Chris shares:<br />
&gt; Flock offers complete, native integration with both Del.icio.us and Shadows. If only Del.icio.us had been available, I would probably have stuck with it for ease of use.</p>
<p>What do you mean by &#8220;had been available?&#8221;   did the integration fail or not work or something?</p>
<p>If anyone has a pointer to a comparitive analysis of these 3 social bookmarking sites (and any others that have cropped up), please let us know!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goran Zec</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/dazzle-us-again-delicious/comment-page-2/#comment-301811</link>
		<dc:creator>Goran Zec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 06:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/dazzle-us-again-delicious/#comment-301811</guid>
		<description>The problem seems to be that the most vocal users don&#039;t want a simple tool, but a constantly evolving toy. I guess you can call me a hardcore user - with 837 bookmarks and a network I read over RSS - and in terms of functionality, there is really nothing I would like added to del.icio.us. I wouldn&#039;t mind seeing some new ideas / technology well implemented, but at the moment there is just nothing lacking.

Synchronization with the browser is irrelevant - who the hell wants to do that? And why? Bookmarks in your browser are an anachronism, nowadays you should just use ScrapBook for Firefox, instantly saving the contents with the webpage link and having it all searchable. Because otherwise, you have to remember WHERE you&#039;ve seen the content that you most often just vaguely remember seeing somewhere.

Also, I have to laugh at the &quot;design is in the rut&quot; crowd. Firstly, if you are seeing the webpage design all the time, you are not doing things right. Secondly, more color does not equal a better interface.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem seems to be that the most vocal users don&#8217;t want a simple tool, but a constantly evolving toy. I guess you can call me a hardcore user &#8211; with 837 bookmarks and a network I read over RSS &#8211; and in terms of functionality, there is really nothing I would like added to del.icio.us. I wouldn&#8217;t mind seeing some new ideas / technology well implemented, but at the moment there is just nothing lacking.</p>
<p>Synchronization with the browser is irrelevant &#8211; who the hell wants to do that? And why? Bookmarks in your browser are an anachronism, nowadays you should just use ScrapBook for Firefox, instantly saving the contents with the webpage link and having it all searchable. Because otherwise, you have to remember WHERE you&#8217;ve seen the content that you most often just vaguely remember seeing somewhere.</p>
<p>Also, I have to laugh at the &#8220;design is in the rut&#8221; crowd. Firstly, if you are seeing the webpage design all the time, you are not doing things right. Secondly, more color does not equal a better interface.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: del.icio.us la joue StumbleUpon &#171; arnet&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/dazzle-us-again-delicious/comment-page-2/#comment-243811</link>
		<dc:creator>del.icio.us la joue StumbleUpon &#171; arnet&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 20:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/dazzle-us-again-delicious/#comment-243811</guid>
		<description>[...] Surprenant et sans doute moins drole que stumbleupon del.icio.us propose depuis hier un bouton del.icio.us/help/randombuttons pour touver des liens de manière aléatoire. Mais contrairement à stumbleupon aucun filtre n&#8217;est encore possible. Un petit gadget après les articles de techcrunch sur les problèmes de popularité de ce service. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Surprenant et sans doute moins drole que stumbleupon del.icio.us propose depuis hier un bouton del.icio.us/help/randombuttons pour touver des liens de manière aléatoire. Mais contrairement à stumbleupon aucun filtre n&#8217;est encore possible. Un petit gadget après les articles de techcrunch sur les problèmes de popularité de ce service. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: haunted_castle &#187; Little Guys, Deal in Data Not in Eyes</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/dazzle-us-again-delicious/comment-page-2/#comment-177903</link>
		<dc:creator>haunted_castle &#187; Little Guys, Deal in Data Not in Eyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 16:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/dazzle-us-again-delicious/#comment-177903</guid>
		<description>[...] The movement towards clean data is also making traditional web metrics obsolete.  For example, Mike Arrington of Techcrunch claimed that del.icio.us traffic stats went stagnant after the site was acquired by yahoo.  However del.icio.us lets it&#8217;s users leverage web tools (such as browser scripts, feed readers, and bookmarklets) that don&#8217;t require folks to explicitly access the del.icio.us website.  So Arrington was using traditional web metrics that were tracking pageviews and reach, and ignoring the various off-portal ways del.icio.us can be used.  Evan Williams notes that the combination of new web technologies like ajax and rss are forcing the development new metrics are needed to calculate the health of various websites.  Number of blog posts is a fair metric for a blogging site, while maybe the number of urls bookmarked would be fair for del.icio.us.  Better estimates for youtube&#8217;s growth could be measured by the bandwidth they&#8217;re eating up (which is estimated to run them 1mil/month) or by the number of videos they serve.  So as new web metrics are developed to quantify the health of sites that deal in data, these sites and companies might be better to quantify their value, and be able to survive. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The movement towards clean data is also making traditional web metrics obsolete.  For example, Mike Arrington of Techcrunch claimed that del.icio.us traffic stats went stagnant after the site was acquired by yahoo.  However del.icio.us lets it&#8217;s users leverage web tools (such as browser scripts, feed readers, and bookmarklets) that don&#8217;t require folks to explicitly access the del.icio.us website.  So Arrington was using traditional web metrics that were tracking pageviews and reach, and ignoring the various off-portal ways del.icio.us can be used.  Evan Williams notes that the combination of new web technologies like ajax and rss are forcing the development new metrics are needed to calculate the health of various websites.  Number of blog posts is a fair metric for a blogging site, while maybe the number of urls bookmarked would be fair for del.icio.us.  Better estimates for youtube&#8217;s growth could be measured by the bandwidth they&#8217;re eating up (which is estimated to run them 1mil/month) or by the number of videos they serve.  So as new web metrics are developed to quantify the health of sites that deal in data, these sites and companies might be better to quantify their value, and be able to survive. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: תוספות מעניינות ל-del.icio.us &#183; הפרדוקס</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/dazzle-us-again-delicious/comment-page-2/#comment-165590</link>
		<dc:creator>תוספות מעניינות ל-del.icio.us &#183; הפרדוקס</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 20:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/dazzle-us-again-delicious/#comment-165590</guid>
		<description>[...] del.icio.us יצרו בזמנו באזז מוצדק בהחלט ברשת בעקבות פתיחת שירות התגיות הסוציאלי, ומעטים הם עכברי הרשת המאגניבים שאינם מקפידים לשמור את הדפים המאגניבים שלהם עם תגיות בדלישס. אך נראה שהזוהר של דלישס עומעם לאחרונה, כאשר סטטיסטיקות הראו צניחה במספר ההרשמות לדלישס - ככל הנראה בעקבות המצב הקבוע בו נשאר השירות, ללא הוספת פיצ&#8216;רים חדשים. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] del.icio.us יצרו בזמנו באזז מוצדק בהחלט ברשת בעקבות פתיחת שירות התגיות הסוציאלי, ומעטים הם עכברי הרשת המאגניבים שאינם מקפידים לשמור את הדפים המאגניבים שלהם עם תגיות בדלישס. אך נראה שהזוהר של דלישס עומעם לאחרונה, כאשר סטטיסטיקות הראו צניחה במספר ההרשמות לדלישס &#8211; ככל הנראה בעקבות המצב הקבוע בו נשאר השירות, ללא הוספת פיצ&#8216;רים חדשים. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EveryDigg &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Del.icio.us Traffic Plummets</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/dazzle-us-again-delicious/comment-page-2/#comment-161920</link>
		<dc:creator>EveryDigg &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Del.icio.us Traffic Plummets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/dazzle-us-again-delicious/#comment-161920</guid>
		<description>[...] read more&#160;&#124;&#160;digg story [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read more&nbsp;|&nbsp;digg story [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DIO</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/dazzle-us-again-delicious/comment-page-2/#comment-132601</link>
		<dc:creator>DIO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 17:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/dazzle-us-again-delicious/#comment-132601</guid>
		<description>From the comments here, looks like the old first-mover disadvantage from the Web 1.0 is at work here  again! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the comments here, looks like the old first-mover disadvantage from the Web 1.0 is at work here  again! <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Traffic fight: Hitwise says Del.icio.us is soaring at backwhack - tech news web 2.0 style</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/dazzle-us-again-delicious/comment-page-2/#comment-131704</link>
		<dc:creator>Traffic fight: Hitwise says Del.icio.us is soaring at backwhack - tech news web 2.0 style</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 00:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/dazzle-us-again-delicious/#comment-131704</guid>
		<description>[...] Last week Mike Arrington made a series of posts here about some contested traffic stats on the popular social bookmarking service del.cio.us. His initial post focused on Comscore data, which showed traffic to the site declining (&#8221;Dazzle us again, Del.icio.us&#8220;) and Alexa data that was showing flatlined traffic. After a conversation with del.icio.us founder Joshua Schacter and Eckart Walther, VP Product for Search and Melissa Rische, PR Manager for Yahoo Search he posted a follow up on the post with information from Yahoo! claiming that del.icio.us growth was going strong. He said he had every reason to believe that the company was telling the truth and was thus most concerned about Comscore&#8217;s inability to get the numbers right. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Last week Mike Arrington made a series of posts here about some contested traffic stats on the popular social bookmarking service del.cio.us. His initial post focused on Comscore data, which showed traffic to the site declining (&#8221;Dazzle us again, Del.icio.us&#8220;) and Alexa data that was showing flatlined traffic. After a conversation with del.icio.us founder Joshua Schacter and Eckart Walther, VP Product for Search and Melissa Rische, PR Manager for Yahoo Search he posted a follow up on the post with information from Yahoo! claiming that del.icio.us growth was going strong. He said he had every reason to believe that the company was telling the truth and was thus most concerned about Comscore&#8217;s inability to get the numbers right. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Traffic fight: Hitwise says Del.icio.us is soaring</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/dazzle-us-again-delicious/comment-page-2/#comment-131702</link>
		<dc:creator>Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Traffic fight: Hitwise says Del.icio.us is soaring</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 00:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/dazzle-us-again-delicious/#comment-131702</guid>
		<description>[...] Last week Mike Arrington made a series of posts here about some contested traffic stats on the popular social bookmarking service del.cio.us. His initial post focused on Comscore data, which showed traffic to the site declining (&#8221;Dazzle us again, Del.icio.us&#8220;) and Alexa data that was showing flatlined traffic. After a conversation with del.icio.us founder Joshua Schacter and Eckart Walther, VP Product for Search and Melissa Rische, PR Manager for Yahoo Search he posted a follow up on the post with information from Yahoo! claiming that del.icio.us growth was going strong. He said he had every reason to believe that the company was telling the truth and was thus most concerned about Comscore&#8217;s inability to get the numbers right. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Last week Mike Arrington made a series of posts here about some contested traffic stats on the popular social bookmarking service del.cio.us. His initial post focused on Comscore data, which showed traffic to the site declining (&#8221;Dazzle us again, Del.icio.us&#8220;) and Alexa data that was showing flatlined traffic. After a conversation with del.icio.us founder Joshua Schacter and Eckart Walther, VP Product for Search and Melissa Rische, PR Manager for Yahoo Search he posted a follow up on the post with information from Yahoo! claiming that del.icio.us growth was going strong. He said he had every reason to believe that the company was telling the truth and was thus most concerned about Comscore&#8217;s inability to get the numbers right. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the Wandering Author</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/dazzle-us-again-delicious/comment-page-2/#comment-131301</link>
		<dc:creator>the Wandering Author</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 17:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/dazzle-us-again-delicious/#comment-131301</guid>
		<description>Why would anyone bother to use del.icio.us, or Furl, or any other of those sites, when you can use Diigo and get all the functionality of any other site, plus a whole lot more. Diigo www.diigo.com is a social bookmarking service that also lets you highlight, clip, and comment upon Web content, right on-screen. In other words, Diigo is the first true Web research tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would anyone bother to use del.icio.us, or Furl, or any other of those sites, when you can use Diigo and get all the functionality of any other site, plus a whole lot more. Diigo <a href="http://www.diigo.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.diigo.com'>http://www.diigo.com</a> is a social bookmarking service that also lets you highlight, clip, and comment upon Web content, right on-screen. In other words, Diigo is the first true Web research tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BillyWarhol</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/dazzle-us-again-delicious/comment-page-2/#comment-129702</link>
		<dc:creator>BillyWarhol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 16:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/dazzle-us-again-delicious/#comment-129702</guid>
		<description>i used to like Delicious a lot in the Early Halcyon daze of finding out about cool Web2.0 stuff*

there was always one or 2 good nuggets of useful info*  Now i find going direct to the Source TechCrunch is the way to travel!!  

i also find the stuff on the main page to be boring geeky programmer type stuff*  Not the FUN stuff*

;))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i used to like Delicious a lot in the Early Halcyon daze of finding out about cool Web2.0 stuff*</p>
<p>there was always one or 2 good nuggets of useful info*  Now i find going direct to the Source TechCrunch is the way to travel!!  </p>
<p>i also find the stuff on the main page to be boring geeky programmer type stuff*  Not the FUN stuff*</p>
<p> <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike mo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/dazzle-us-again-delicious/comment-page-2/#comment-128002</link>
		<dc:creator>mike mo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 16:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/dazzle-us-again-delicious/#comment-128002</guid>
		<description>Interesting from the LookSmart earnings conference call last week.  The CEO Hills indicated their Furl property is gaining traffic/use at 1% per week.
He did not elaborate how much of it was from their deal with the NYTimes.
Furl remains my &quot;social bookmarking&quot; site of choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting from the LookSmart earnings conference call last week.  The CEO Hills indicated their Furl property is gaining traffic/use at 1% per week.<br />
He did not elaborate how much of it was from their deal with the NYTimes.<br />
Furl remains my &#8220;social bookmarking&#8221; site of choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch dans le brouillard</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/dazzle-us-again-delicious/comment-page-2/#comment-125104</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch dans le brouillard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2006 20:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/dazzle-us-again-delicious/#comment-125104</guid>
		<description>[...] TechCrunch parle beaucoup de del.icio.us en ce moment. Dans un premier post, Michael Arrington [1] indique que la fréquentation de delicious ne serait pas si bonne que ça, elle serait même en train de chuter. Quelques heures après, suite à un entretien avec Joshua Schacter [2], Michael Arrington publie un autre billet dans lequel il indique que en fait, si, d&#8217;après les chiffres donnés par Yahoo [3], delicious casse la baraque niveau fréquentation. Arf arf arf. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TechCrunch parle beaucoup de del.icio.us en ce moment. Dans un premier post, Michael Arrington [1] indique que la fréquentation de delicious ne serait pas si bonne que ça, elle serait même en train de chuter. Quelques heures après, suite à un entretien avec Joshua Schacter [2], Michael Arrington publie un autre billet dans lequel il indique que en fait, si, d&#8217;après les chiffres donnés par Yahoo [3], delicious casse la baraque niveau fréquentation. Arf arf arf. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Oschler</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/dazzle-us-again-delicious/comment-page-2/#comment-124442</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Oschler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2006 08:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/dazzle-us-again-delicious/#comment-124442</guid>
		<description>Alexa shows a massive traffic jump for del.icio.us (*not* delicious.com) since April of 2006 and ranks it as the #146 most popular site on the web.  You draw your own conclusions:

http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details?q=&amp;url=del.icio.us</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alexa shows a massive traffic jump for del.icio.us (*not* delicious.com) since April of 2006 and ranks it as the #146 most popular site on the web.  You draw your own conclusions:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details?q=&amp;url=del.icio.us" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details?q=&amp;url=del.icio.us'>http://www.alex...url=del.icio.us</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate K</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/dazzle-us-again-delicious/comment-page-2/#comment-123705</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2006 14:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/dazzle-us-again-delicious/#comment-123705</guid>
		<description>Comscore and Alexa can only do so much - so I wouldn&#039;t put complete faith in them, the truth is in the server logs on the actual server. So, as others have said above - if they are accessing via RSS or a toolbar, alexa and comscore don&#039;t see this as traffifc (unless somehow they have super secret access to the raw server logs of every site). THIS is the innacurate part.

The domains can easily be aliased together, and then (as they are when you check), redirected with a 301 Moved Permanently redirect. So - the two domains are not separate anymore - but function as one entity - sharing stats and everything else. This part is not innacurate.

What WOULD be accurate is statistics from the actual domain. Something that is tracked. An analytics screenshot. Raw server stats. Anything but Alexa and Comscore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comscore and Alexa can only do so much &#8211; so I wouldn&#8217;t put complete faith in them, the truth is in the server logs on the actual server. So, as others have said above &#8211; if they are accessing via RSS or a toolbar, alexa and comscore don&#8217;t see this as traffifc (unless somehow they have super secret access to the raw server logs of every site). THIS is the innacurate part.</p>
<p>The domains can easily be aliased together, and then (as they are when you check), redirected with a 301 Moved Permanently redirect. So &#8211; the two domains are not separate anymore &#8211; but function as one entity &#8211; sharing stats and everything else. This part is not innacurate.</p>
<p>What WOULD be accurate is statistics from the actual domain. Something that is tracked. An analytics screenshot. Raw server stats. Anything but Alexa and Comscore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Data attraction: hard science, or numbers game? &#124; Digital Micro-Markets &#124; ZDNet.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/dazzle-us-again-delicious/comment-page-2/#comment-123567</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Data attraction: hard science, or numbers game? &#124; Digital Micro-Markets &#124; ZDNet.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2006 12:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/04/dazzle-us-again-delicious/#comment-123567</guid>
		<description>[...] This week, the risks of using publicly available Internet data for &#8220;headlining stories&#8221; are again illustrated via two posts at TechCrunch: Original Headling Story: &quot;Dazzle Us Again, Del.icio.us&quot; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This week, the risks of using publicly available Internet data for &ldquo;headlining stories&rdquo; are again illustrated via two posts at TechCrunch: Original Headling Story: &quot;Dazzle Us Again, Del.icio.us&quot; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
