July 28, 2006

Sphere Nails Long Term Deal With About.com

Michael Arrington

8 comments »

San Francisco-based Sphere’s only been around for three months, but it’s already locked down two important deals. Both deals leverage its “Sphere It” technology, which performs a semantic analysis on the text within the page being searched and returns blog results that it finds relevant to the article.

In May we wrote about Sphere’s deal with Time.com. Next week, Sphere will announce a deal with the New York Times subsidiary About.com to embed the core Sphere It technology within About.com articles.

Unlike the Time.com deal, About.com will only use the technology to sort through it’s own content. The results can be seen under the main text of articles, under the heading “Related Articles.” See here for an example.

The two companies have been in an extended year long paid test of the technology (using it long before the core Sphere search engine launched). According to Sphere CEO Tony Conrad, the test performed so far above expectations that About.com has agreed to a long term deal to license the technology.

Competitor Technorati has its own deals with major partnerships like the Wall Street Journal Online, Washington Post and Newsweek. Those deals, however, point to blogs posting on a specific article, whereas Sphere It focuses on the content itself, finding similar articles regardless of whether or not they’ve linked to the original source. See this post for a longer description of the difference between what the two companies offer (frankly, both are useful, although Sphere It is better for newer content that has few links in).

  • Sphere It

Trackbacks/Pings (Trackback URL)

  1. About.com says just “Sphere It!”
  2. About Sphere, what am I missing? « SEND IT!!!

Comments

RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. Innovation Zen

    Searching through blogs and other “text” media is useful, although not technologically complex. In a few years (perhaps earlier) I think you will have companies and technologies enabling us to search “inside” any type of content – text, audio, video or any combination of them.

    Imagine being able to search all the podcasts that mentioned the phrase “it is a series of tubes” during one of their episodes. It would be very useful, and there are already scientists and organizations trying to develop such technology.

  2. Innovation Zen

    For the info you can check:

    http://www.podscope.com/
    http://www.tveyes.com/

    some of the services are in beta but you can already taste it.

  3. Frank Gruber

    Congrats to Sphere - Tony Conrad and company!

  4. tony conrad

    just wanted to add that the deal was done in partnership with clickability, our first and a long time partner who has done an amazing job of creating exposure for the sphere it technology. noah, john and their team have a suite of publisher tools neatly bundled in a cms platform - great stuff. we’re working closely with them on a number of opportunities, so look for some more deal announcements shortly.

  5. Dark Scorpion

    I dislike Sphere for several reasons:

    1. Their search results are much worse than the search results of http://www.bloglines.com because Bloglines has real readership information. When you sort by popularity, Bloglines really knows which blogs are most read and which aren’t read at all, so it usually returns very relevant results.

    2. Sphere seems to be the kind of company which gets by on personal relationships and business deals instead of technical excellence. There’s nothing wrong with that, but I prefer to use products from companies which really have (gasp) excellent products.

    3. The web design of their site is simply very bad. They claim they have worked with a good web designer, but their web design is like a bad site from 1998-1999.

    4. Their search results are very rarely good. But they keep claiming the search results are good.

  6. Mike Bijon

    Congratulations to the blogosphere too. Anytime a major web publisher displays related blog posts it’s a good thing, no matter how good or bad the relevance of what’s shown. At least About.com had the brains to send the task out to a company that’s actually involved and “gets” bloggers instead of hacking together a Franken-list of blog results.

    That being said, Sphere’s results leave a lot to be desired. Unlike Technorati, TechMeme, or Bloglines (even Google for that matter) Sphere doesn’t seem to take popularity (inbound links) into account - and although popularity-based algos seem to have a bit of lag before the rankings get settled out, popularity is a clear indicator of readability and relevance. Unfortuantely Sphere’s formula is faster but seems to yield a lot of poorly written, wandering, or even splog posts.

    -Mike