<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Huge Red Flag at Netscape</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/19/huge-red-flag-at-netscape/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/19/huge-red-flag-at-netscape/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 10:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Propeller 2.0 Launches: Ditching The Vote Count, Adding A Mascot</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/19/huge-red-flag-at-netscape/#comment-2415833</link>
		<dc:creator>Propeller 2.0 Launches: Ditching The Vote Count, Adding A Mascot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 10:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/19/huge-red-flag-at-netscape/#comment-2415833</guid>
		<description>[...] in that paid editors chose the top stories from user-submitted and voted links. Soon the site was paying top Digg users to move to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in that paid editors chose the top stories from user-submitted and voted links. Soon the site was paying top Digg users to move to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ximmy: A Digg Clone That Offers Users Money To Participate &#124; Social CMS Buzz</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/19/huge-red-flag-at-netscape/#comment-2391007</link>
		<dc:creator>Ximmy: A Digg Clone That Offers Users Money To Participate &#124; Social CMS Buzz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 20:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/19/huge-red-flag-at-netscape/#comment-2391007</guid>
		<description>[...] sites. Propeller (previously Netscape) offered money to top Digg users to participate on it site in July 2006. However, new service Ximmy aims to take compensation for participation to the general [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] sites. Propeller (previously Netscape) offered money to top Digg users to participate on it site in July 2006. However, new service Ximmy aims to take compensation for participation to the general [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ximmy: A Digg Clone That Offers Users Money To Participate</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/19/huge-red-flag-at-netscape/#comment-1924432</link>
		<dc:creator>Ximmy: A Digg Clone That Offers Users Money To Participate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/19/huge-red-flag-at-netscape/#comment-1924432</guid>
		<description>[...] sites. Propeller (previously Netscape) offered money to top Digg users to participate on it site in July 2006. However, new service Ximmy aims to take compensation for participation to the general [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] sites. Propeller (previously Netscape) offered money to top Digg users to participate on it site in July 2006. However, new service Ximmy aims to take compensation for participation to the general [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johny</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/19/huge-red-flag-at-netscape/#comment-886817</link>
		<dc:creator>Johny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 13:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/19/huge-red-flag-at-netscape/#comment-886817</guid>
		<description>Netscape has got it wrong. But not in the way you’re probably thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Netscape has got it wrong. But not in the way you’re probably thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin www.reality-eu.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/19/huge-red-flag-at-netscape/#comment-700228</link>
		<dc:creator>admin www.reality-eu.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 23:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/19/huge-red-flag-at-netscape/#comment-700228</guid>
		<description>Very pathetic Netscape!  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very pathetic Netscape!  <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaitlin Cooper</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/19/huge-red-flag-at-netscape/#comment-554825</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaitlin Cooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 18:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/19/huge-red-flag-at-netscape/#comment-554825</guid>
		<description>So what's the outcome? Netscape dooown! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what&#8217;s the outcome? Netscape dooown! <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Turner</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/19/huge-red-flag-at-netscape/#comment-517797</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/19/huge-red-flag-at-netscape/#comment-517797</guid>
		<description>And Calcanis confirms:
http://www.calacanis.com/2006/12/11/digg-users-are-getting-paid/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And Calcanis confirms:<br />
<a href="http://www.calacanis.com/2006/12/11/digg-users-are-getting-paid/" rel="nofollow">http://www.calacanis.com/2006/.....ting-paid/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/19/huge-red-flag-at-netscape/#comment-517412</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 13:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/19/huge-red-flag-at-netscape/#comment-517412</guid>
		<description>Great collection of posts and thanks for recognizing the ethics issue. We are starting the discussion on what, if any, standards should be developed. Please weigh in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great collection of posts and thanks for recognizing the ethics issue. We are starting the discussion on what, if any, standards should be developed. Please weigh in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Blogger Wars: How Jason Calacanis Gets Even</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/19/huge-red-flag-at-netscape/#comment-426185</link>
		<dc:creator>Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Blogger Wars: How Jason Calacanis Gets Even</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 03:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/19/huge-red-flag-at-netscape/#comment-426185</guid>
		<description>[...] Yesterday Denton used fuzzy math and incorrect statements of fact to suggest that Jason&#8217;s most recent project, a relaunch of Netscape, is falling apart. It turns out Denton forgot to factor in the fact that Netscape moved millions of email accounts over to a new domain name, which resulted in the drop in traffic. Denton was wrong, but didn&#8217;t correct the post even after Jason left comment corrections. We have certainly taken our own shots at the new Netscape here at TechCrunch, but Denton&#8217;s post just reeks of a poorly researched hit job. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Yesterday Denton used fuzzy math and incorrect statements of fact to suggest that Jason&#8217;s most recent project, a relaunch of Netscape, is falling apart. It turns out Denton forgot to factor in the fact that Netscape moved millions of email accounts over to a new domain name, which resulted in the drop in traffic. Denton was wrong, but didn&#8217;t correct the post even after Jason left comment corrections. We have certainly taken our own shots at the new Netscape here at TechCrunch, but Denton&#8217;s post just reeks of a poorly researched hit job. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vishal Lamba</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/19/huge-red-flag-at-netscape/#comment-388490</link>
		<dc:creator>Vishal Lamba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 15:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/19/huge-red-flag-at-netscape/#comment-388490</guid>
		<description>Here's a site that is going to change the way Web2.0 content is created by rewarding / sharing the wealth of ad revenue generated directly with the creator / aggregator.... www.valuepay2.com

Its what netscape is doing - but with all strata of social media websites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a site that is going to change the way Web2.0 content is created by rewarding / sharing the wealth of ad revenue generated directly with the creator / aggregator&#8230;. <a href="http://www.valuepay2.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.valuepay2.com</a></p>
<p>Its what netscape is doing - but with all strata of social media websites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Markiewicz &#187; The new Netscape is a joke</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/19/huge-red-flag-at-netscape/#comment-261225</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Markiewicz &#187; The new Netscape is a joke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 23:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/19/huge-red-flag-at-netscape/#comment-261225</guid>
		<description>[...] First paying top Digg users to switch over to their site and now this. What kind of community and service are they trying to create? My recommendation - stick with Digg and Reddit. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] First paying top Digg users to switch over to their site and now this. What kind of community and service are they trying to create? My recommendation - stick with Digg and Reddit. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Online Fandom &#187; Rewarding top social media users</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/19/huge-red-flag-at-netscape/#comment-260363</link>
		<dc:creator>Online Fandom &#187; Rewarding top social media users</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 14:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/19/huge-red-flag-at-netscape/#comment-260363</guid>
		<description>[...] Techcrunch had a piece up a few weeks ago about whether or not top contributors to social media ought to get paid for the work they do, which I strongly recommend reading. It discusses the blurring boundaries between amateurs and professionals: Recent events are proving that top contributors to social media sites need recognition and approval, if not payment, in order to continue doing the hard work required to make a social site vibrant. Mike Arrington has called Calacanis’s move to hire top users away from other sites by offering to pay them a huge red flag for Netscape, but I disagree with Mike and think current developments in spaces like social news but especially video sharing indicate that rewarding top users may be a solid strategy. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Techcrunch had a piece up a few weeks ago about whether or not top contributors to social media ought to get paid for the work they do, which I strongly recommend reading. It discusses the blurring boundaries between amateurs and professionals: Recent events are proving that top contributors to social media sites need recognition and approval, if not payment, in order to continue doing the hard work required to make a social site vibrant. Mike Arrington has called Calacanis’s move to hire top users away from other sites by offering to pay them a huge red flag for Netscape, but I disagree with Mike and think current developments in spaces like social news but especially video sharing indicate that rewarding top users may be a solid strategy. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Militant Geek Custom Shirts &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Militant Geek: Rapid Fire</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/19/huge-red-flag-at-netscape/#comment-245851</link>
		<dc:creator>Militant Geek Custom Shirts &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Militant Geek: Rapid Fire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 18:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/19/huge-red-flag-at-netscape/#comment-245851</guid>
		<description>[...] AOL&#8217;s &#8217;savior&#8217; Jason Calacanis claims that attractive women have no business podcasting and should display their assets. *Yikes*. Considering that his Diggification of the Netscape homepage is a bust he&#8217;s the last one that should be dishing out Internet strategy, sexist or otherwise. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] AOL&#8217;s &#8217;savior&#8217; Jason Calacanis claims that attractive women have no business podcasting and should display their assets. *Yikes*. Considering that his Diggification of the Netscape homepage is a bust he&#8217;s the last one that should be dishing out Internet strategy, sexist or otherwise. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bas van Westrenen</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/19/huge-red-flag-at-netscape/#comment-239548</link>
		<dc:creator>Bas van Westrenen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 16:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/19/huge-red-flag-at-netscape/#comment-239548</guid>
		<description>I vote for the old skool Netscape ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I vote for the old skool Netscape <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top social media users getting paid; is the balance shifting? &#187; JenIT</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/19/huge-red-flag-at-netscape/#comment-192852</link>
		<dc:creator>Top social media users getting paid; is the balance shifting? &#187; JenIT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 05:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/19/huge-red-flag-at-netscape/#comment-192852</guid>
		<description>[...] Jason Calacanis says in an AOL memo he&#8217;s posted that his model for Netscape has been vindicated by the recent conflagration at Digg and rapid growth of page views at Netscape. He says recent events are proving that top contributors to social media sites need recognition and approval, if not payment, in order to continue doing the hard work required to make a social site vibrant. Mike Arrington has called Calacanis&#8217;s move to hire top users away from other sites by offering to pay them a huge red flag for Netscape, but I disagree with Mike and think current developments in spaces like social news but especially video sharing indicate that rewarding top users may be a solid strategy. I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s as clear yet as Calacanis does, but I can&#8217;t think of a more interesting question to look at. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jason Calacanis says in an AOL memo he&#8217;s posted that his model for Netscape has been vindicated by the recent conflagration at Digg and rapid growth of page views at Netscape. He says recent events are proving that top contributors to social media sites need recognition and approval, if not payment, in order to continue doing the hard work required to make a social site vibrant. Mike Arrington has called Calacanis&#8217;s move to hire top users away from other sites by offering to pay them a huge red flag for Netscape, but I disagree with Mike and think current developments in spaces like social news but especially video sharing indicate that rewarding top users may be a solid strategy. I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s as clear yet as Calacanis does, but I can&#8217;t think of a more interesting question to look at. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top social media users getting paid; is the balance shifting? &#171; Everything Under The Sun..</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/19/huge-red-flag-at-netscape/#comment-184705</link>
		<dc:creator>Top social media users getting paid; is the balance shifting? &#171; Everything Under The Sun..</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 06:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/19/huge-red-flag-at-netscape/#comment-184705</guid>
		<description>[...] Jason Calacanis says in an AOL memo he’s posted that his model for Netscape has been vindicated by the recent conflagration at Digg and rapid growth of page views at Netscape. He says recent events are proving that top contributors to social media sites need recognition and approval, if not payment, in order to continue doing the hard work required to make a social site vibrant. Mike Arrington has called Calacanis’s move to hire top users away from other sites by offering to pay them a huge red flag for Netscape, but I disagree with Mike and think current developments in spaces like social news but especially video sharing indicate that rewarding top users may be a solid strategy. (Update: See comments below where Mike says I’ve inaccurately described his position and he clarifies.) I don’t think it’s as clear yet as Calacanis does, but I can’t think of a more interesting question to look at. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jason Calacanis says in an AOL memo he’s posted that his model for Netscape has been vindicated by the recent conflagration at Digg and rapid growth of page views at Netscape. He says recent events are proving that top contributors to social media sites need recognition and approval, if not payment, in order to continue doing the hard work required to make a social site vibrant. Mike Arrington has called Calacanis’s move to hire top users away from other sites by offering to pay them a huge red flag for Netscape, but I disagree with Mike and think current developments in spaces like social news but especially video sharing indicate that rewarding top users may be a solid strategy. (Update: See comments below where Mike says I’ve inaccurately described his position and he clarifies.) I don’t think it’s as clear yet as Calacanis does, but I can’t think of a more interesting question to look at. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Top social media users getting paid; is the balance shifting?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/19/huge-red-flag-at-netscape/#comment-183997</link>
		<dc:creator>Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Top social media users getting paid; is the balance shifting?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Sep 2006 22:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/19/huge-red-flag-at-netscape/#comment-183997</guid>
		<description>[...] Jason Calacanis is claiming in an AOL memo he&#8217;s posted that his model for Netscape has been vindicated by the recent conflagration at Digg and rapid growth of page views at Netscape. He says recent events are proving that top contributors to social media sites need recognition and approval, if not payment, in order to continue doing the hard work required to make a social site vibrant. Mike Arrington has called Calacanis&#8217;s move a huge red flag for Netscape, but I disagree with Mike and think current developments in spaces like social news and video sharing indicate that rewarding top users may be a solid strategy. I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s as clear yet as Calacanis does, but I can&#8217;t think of a more interesting question to look at. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jason Calacanis is claiming in an AOL memo he&#8217;s posted that his model for Netscape has been vindicated by the recent conflagration at Digg and rapid growth of page views at Netscape. He says recent events are proving that top contributors to social media sites need recognition and approval, if not payment, in order to continue doing the hard work required to make a social site vibrant. Mike Arrington has called Calacanis&#8217;s move a huge red flag for Netscape, but I disagree with Mike and think current developments in spaces like social news and video sharing indicate that rewarding top users may be a solid strategy. I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s as clear yet as Calacanis does, but I can&#8217;t think of a more interesting question to look at. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: businessclock</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/19/huge-red-flag-at-netscape/#comment-157744</link>
		<dc:creator>businessclock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 08:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/19/huge-red-flag-at-netscape/#comment-157744</guid>
		<description>[...] People love Digg so much that ever since Netscape launched its new website in beta, people literally started hating Netscape, rare are the blog posts in which the blogger supports what Netscape is doing. After the relaunch, netscape&#8217;s audience started shrinking (see here), probably the reason why Jason Calacanis has recently offered to pay the top Digg users to move over to Netscape. That move hurt Netscape more than it helped, Netscape received a lot of criticism after it, some of those are here, here, and here. Jason Calacanis received so much criticism over this that now when you google his name, the second result would be his post offering to pay top Digg users (because of all the people linking there). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] People love Digg so much that ever since Netscape launched its new website in beta, people literally started hating Netscape, rare are the blog posts in which the blogger supports what Netscape is doing. After the relaunch, netscape&#8217;s audience started shrinking (see here), probably the reason why Jason Calacanis has recently offered to pay the top Digg users to move over to Netscape. That move hurt Netscape more than it helped, Netscape received a lot of criticism after it, some of those are here, here, and here. Jason Calacanis received so much criticism over this that now when you google his name, the second result would be his post offering to pay top Digg users (because of all the people linking there). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Future of Real Estate Marketing &#187; New Real Estate Navigator Wanted</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/19/huge-red-flag-at-netscape/#comment-140998</link>
		<dc:creator>The Future of Real Estate Marketing &#187; New Real Estate Navigator Wanted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 21:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/19/huge-red-flag-at-netscape/#comment-140998</guid>
		<description>[...] If you follow the online social news site Digg, you&#8217;ll recall there was quite a stir recently when revived portal Netscape.com relaunched itself as a virtual clone of the popular site. Netscape boss, Weblogs Inc. CEO and TWIT alumni Jason Calacanis even offered to pay to the top users on other sites $1000 a month to post new stories on Netscape, an offer that incited Digg founder (and BusinessWeek cover boy) Kevin Rose to melt down on a broadcast of his weekly podcast Digg Nation. Since then, much has been written back and forth on the ethics and merits of paying bookmarkers. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If you follow the online social news site Digg, you&#8217;ll recall there was quite a stir recently when revived portal Netscape.com relaunched itself as a virtual clone of the popular site. Netscape boss, Weblogs Inc. CEO and TWIT alumni Jason Calacanis even offered to pay to the top users on other sites $1000 a month to post new stories on Netscape, an offer that incited Digg founder (and BusinessWeek cover boy) Kevin Rose to melt down on a broadcast of his weekly podcast Digg Nation. Since then, much has been written back and forth on the ethics and merits of paying bookmarkers. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Less Than 3 &#187; Less Than 3 - Episode 2 - Interview with Jason Calacanis</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/19/huge-red-flag-at-netscape/#comment-132811</link>
		<dc:creator>Less Than 3 &#187; Less Than 3 - Episode 2 - Interview with Jason Calacanis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 21:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/19/huge-red-flag-at-netscape/#comment-132811</guid>
		<description>[...] 5:05 Jason explains that he had always planned to hire Navigators. He says Mike Arrinton was wrong in saying that it was move of desperation. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 5:05 Jason explains that he had always planned to hire Navigators. He says Mike Arrinton was wrong in saying that it was move of desperation. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the submate experience &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The right crowd</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/19/huge-red-flag-at-netscape/#comment-130023</link>
		<dc:creator>the submate experience &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The right crowd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 20:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/19/huge-red-flag-at-netscape/#comment-130023</guid>
		<description>[...] Taking a few examples, like Digg, Flickr or YouTube (I am trying to find the ration between people uploading videos and people watching them &#8230; any idea?), the services that innovate by improvements in sharing, coding or decoding video streams, managing yours or others&#8217; rss feeds succeed by reaching a specific crowd and giving them the opportunity to do what they want to do in an eased up way. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Taking a few examples, like Digg, Flickr or YouTube (I am trying to find the ration between people uploading videos and people watching them &#8230; any idea?), the services that innovate by improvements in sharing, coding or decoding video streams, managing yours or others&#8217; rss feeds succeed by reaching a specific crowd and giving them the opportunity to do what they want to do in an eased up way. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tallerd3: Creatividad Internet Marketing Publicidad &#8230; &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ¿Qué es Digg?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/19/huge-red-flag-at-netscape/#comment-120099</link>
		<dc:creator>Tallerd3: Creatividad Internet Marketing Publicidad &#8230; &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ¿Qué es Digg?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 12:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/19/huge-red-flag-at-netscape/#comment-120099</guid>
		<description>[...] Sin embargo, no todos los usuarios de Digg son iguales. La aplicacción web se rige por ciertos criterios meritocráticos para asignar un valor a los usuarios. Esa puntuación que Digg asigna a cada usuario determina el valor de sus votos cuando recomiendan noticias. Así pues, los 100 primeros usuarios de Digg son los que envían la mayor parte de las historias que llegan a la portada de la aplicación y aquellos cuyo voto es más valioso. Tanto es así que Netscape llego a ofrecer dinero a los usuarios VIP de Digg (1000$ al mes) para que se cambiaran a su plataforma de noticias (construida a imagen y semejanza de Digg). De ahí que, quizá, alguien esté dispuesto a comprar el perfil de un usuario VIP de Digg para introduccir sus propias noticias. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sin embargo, no todos los usuarios de Digg son iguales. La aplicacción web se rige por ciertos criterios meritocráticos para asignar un valor a los usuarios. Esa puntuación que Digg asigna a cada usuario determina el valor de sus votos cuando recomiendan noticias. Así pues, los 100 primeros usuarios de Digg son los que envían la mayor parte de las historias que llegan a la portada de la aplicación y aquellos cuyo voto es más valioso. Tanto es así que Netscape llego a ofrecer dinero a los usuarios VIP de Digg (1000$ al mes) para que se cambiaran a su plataforma de noticias (construida a imagen y semejanza de Digg). De ahí que, quizá, alguien esté dispuesto a comprar el perfil de un usuario VIP de Digg para introduccir sus propias noticias. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: גיקים - הפודקאסט &#187; ארכיון &#187; גיקים - פרק 1</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/19/huge-red-flag-at-netscape/#comment-119871</link>
		<dc:creator>גיקים - הפודקאסט &#187; ארכיון &#187; גיקים - פרק 1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 07:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/19/huge-red-flag-at-netscape/#comment-119871</guid>
		<description>[...] מלחמה 2.0. כתבות של אילנה - אמץ לך לבנוני, וחלאס, רוצים לחיות. העתיד של יוטיוב. וואליוואג מסבירים למה יוטיוב גוסס. ג&#8216;ון באטל תוהה מי יקנה את יוטיוב. חדשות עולם המעבדים. AMD קונה את ATI. אינטל משיקה מעבדים חדשים. אינטל ו-AMD מוזילות מחירים. האייפוד של מיקרוסופט. אנגדג&#8216;ט מסכמים את כל מה שהם יודעים על הזון. נטסקייפ נגד דיגג. ההצעה בבלוג של ג&#8216;ייסון קלקאניס. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] מלחמה 2.0. כתבות של אילנה - אמץ לך לבנוני, וחלאס, רוצים לחיות. העתיד של יוטיוב. וואליוואג מסבירים למה יוטיוב גוסס. ג&#8216;ון באטל תוהה מי יקנה את יוטיוב. חדשות עולם המעבדים. AMD קונה את ATI. אינטל משיקה מעבדים חדשים. אינטל ו-AMD מוזילות מחירים. האייפוד של מיקרוסופט. אנגדג&#8216;ט מסכמים את כל מה שהם יודעים על הזון. נטסקייפ נגד דיגג. ההצעה בבלוג של ג&#8216;ייסון קלקאניס. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; eBayに”Diggのプロフィール売ります”</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/19/huge-red-flag-at-netscape/#comment-117666</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; eBayに”Diggのプロフィール売ります”</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 02:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/19/huge-red-flag-at-netscape/#comment-117666</guid>
		<description>[...] ソーシャル・ニュース・サイトのNetscapeが、競合相手のプラットフォームDiggのトップユーザーに現ナマ一本釣り作戦をかけ大騒ぎになっているが、とうとうDiggのTop 100のプロフィールをeBayで競売に出すDiggユーザーが登場した。まあ、これだけの騒ぎだから今さら驚くことではないけどね。数日前から入札が始まったこのオークション。出品者はDiggのユーザーネームGeekForLifeという人物で、これまで748件の記事をDiggし、うち39件がトップページの殿堂入りを果たしている。日曜(米国時間7/30)午後4時(PST)現在、まだ入札はゼロ。 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ソーシャル・ニュース・サイトのNetscapeが、競合相手のプラットフォームDiggのトップユーザーに現ナマ一本釣り作戦をかけ大騒ぎになっているが、とうとうDiggのTop 100のプロフィールをeBayで競売に出すDiggユーザーが登場した。まあ、これだけの騒ぎだから今さら驚くことではないけどね。数日前から入札が始まったこのオークション。出品者はDiggのユーザーネームGeekForLifeという人物で、これまで748件の記事をDiggし、うち39件がトップページの殿堂入りを果たしている。日曜(米国時間7/30)午後4時(PST)現在、まだ入札はゼロ。 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SilverFusion.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Digg Profile For Sale on eBay</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/19/huge-red-flag-at-netscape/#comment-117622</link>
		<dc:creator>SilverFusion.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Digg Profile For Sale on eBay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 01:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/19/huge-red-flag-at-netscape/#comment-117622</guid>
		<description>[...] With all of the recent news about top Digg users being offered cash by Netscape to move over to their competing platform, I&#8217;m not surprised to see that someone has apparently placed their top 100 Digg profile up for sale on eBay. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] With all of the recent news about top Digg users being offered cash by Netscape to move over to their competing platform, I&#8217;m not surprised to see that someone has apparently placed their top 100 Digg profile up for sale on eBay. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.100 seconds -->
