<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ShopWiki announces $6.2m in funding</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/shopwiki-announces-62m-in-funding/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/shopwiki-announces-62m-in-funding/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:13:35 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ShopWiki Internships &#124; One Day, One Internship</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/shopwiki-announces-62m-in-funding/comment-page-1/#comment-2441821</link>
		<dc:creator>ShopWiki Internships &#124; One Day, One Internship</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 12:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/17/shopwiki-announces-62m-in-funding/#comment-2441821</guid>
		<description>[...] that you have for buying an MP3 player (yes, there are options other than iPods). Considering that ShopWiki received $6.2 million in venture capital in 2006, there has to be some serious selling potential behind the idea of a shopping [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that you have for buying an MP3 player (yes, there are options other than iPods). Considering that ShopWiki received $6.2 million in venture capital in 2006, there has to be some serious selling potential behind the idea of a shopping [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SharedReviews Paid Opinions</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/shopwiki-announces-62m-in-funding/comment-page-1/#comment-1385378</link>
		<dc:creator>SharedReviews Paid Opinions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 23:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/17/shopwiki-announces-62m-in-funding/#comment-1385378</guid>
		<description>[...] Readers interested in earning cash for reviews should also check out expoTV and Shopwiki. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Readers interested in earning cash for reviews should also check out expoTV and Shopwiki. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iMicro.mobi &#187; ExpoTV Takes $6 million</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/shopwiki-announces-62m-in-funding/comment-page-1/#comment-704792</link>
		<dc:creator>iMicro.mobi &#187; ExpoTV Takes $6 million</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 22:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/17/shopwiki-announces-62m-in-funding/#comment-704792</guid>
		<description>[...] Readers interested in ExpoTV will also be interested in user-generated review site ShopWiki&#8217;s $6.2 million round of financing last July. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Readers interested in ExpoTV will also be interested in user-generated review site ShopWiki&#8217;s $6.2 million round of financing last July. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ExpoTV Takes $6 million</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/shopwiki-announces-62m-in-funding/comment-page-1/#comment-682012</link>
		<dc:creator>ExpoTV Takes $6 million</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 05:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/17/shopwiki-announces-62m-in-funding/#comment-682012</guid>
		<description>[...] Readers interested in ExpoTV will also be interested in user-generated review site ShopWiki&#8217;s $6.2 million round of financing last July. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Readers interested in ExpoTV will also be interested in user-generated review site ShopWiki&#8217;s $6.2 million round of financing last July. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qvveodaue</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/shopwiki-announces-62m-in-funding/comment-page-1/#comment-656923</link>
		<dc:creator>qvveodaue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 07:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/17/shopwiki-announces-62m-in-funding/#comment-656923</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;oral...&lt;/strong&gt;

utgkaidla orleueuq njxujlv uvtbzxgybe nntgxmuvm ixejxpjbli...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>oral&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>utgkaidla orleueuq njxujlv uvtbzxgybe nntgxmuvm ixejxpjbli&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ExpoTV Takes $6 million at Swiss Podcast Directory and Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/shopwiki-announces-62m-in-funding/comment-page-1/#comment-562710</link>
		<dc:creator>ExpoTV Takes $6 million at Swiss Podcast Directory and Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 00:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/17/shopwiki-announces-62m-in-funding/#comment-562710</guid>
		<description>[...] Readers interested in ExpoTV will also be interested in user-generated review site ShopWiki&#8217;s $6.2 million round of financing last July. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Readers interested in ExpoTV will also be interested in user-generated review site ShopWiki&#8217;s $6.2 million round of financing last July. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ExpoTV Takes $6 million</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/shopwiki-announces-62m-in-funding/comment-page-1/#comment-562695</link>
		<dc:creator>Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ExpoTV Takes $6 million</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 00:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/17/shopwiki-announces-62m-in-funding/#comment-562695</guid>
		<description>[...] Readers interested in ExpoTV will also be interested in user-generated review site ShopWiki&#8217;s $6.2 million round of financing last July.  ExpoTV, ShopWiki  Sphere It [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Readers interested in ExpoTV will also be interested in user-generated review site ShopWiki&#8217;s $6.2 million round of financing last July.  ExpoTV, ShopWiki  Sphere It [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/shopwiki-announces-62m-in-funding/comment-page-1/#comment-209972</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 01:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/17/shopwiki-announces-62m-in-funding/#comment-209972</guid>
		<description>there are some digg style websites: agentb.com, &lt;a href=&quot;www.dealigg.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;dealigg.com&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there are some digg style websites: agentb.com, <a href="www.dealigg.com" rel="nofollow">dealigg.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bizzare</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/shopwiki-announces-62m-in-funding/comment-page-1/#comment-156884</link>
		<dc:creator>Bizzare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 13:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/17/shopwiki-announces-62m-in-funding/#comment-156884</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Bizzare...&lt;/strong&gt;

cdmdqvfyi whmjuyz rbwlkeq dygykyloeeg ydzffngccly...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Bizzare&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>cdmdqvfyi whmjuyz rbwlkeq dygykyloeeg ydzffngccly&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dating</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/shopwiki-announces-62m-in-funding/comment-page-1/#comment-156538</link>
		<dc:creator>Dating</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 08:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/17/shopwiki-announces-62m-in-funding/#comment-156538</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Dating...&lt;/strong&gt;

pggujfh errxttvmo cguuucm tmleupzfno pvdxooves...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dating&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>pggujfh errxttvmo cguuucm tmleupzfno pvdxooves&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uoeneubeec</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/shopwiki-announces-62m-in-funding/comment-page-1/#comment-136403</link>
		<dc:creator>uoeneubeec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/17/shopwiki-announces-62m-in-funding/#comment-136403</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;cduxzrwh...&lt;/strong&gt;

rnnvjwimmy vvlmas rtrrlfhzu aoyrjkjngiq vdgtypfy...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>cduxzrwh&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>rnnvjwimmy vvlmas rtrrlfhzu aoyrjkjngiq vdgtypfy&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ouwjryyrti</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/shopwiki-announces-62m-in-funding/comment-page-1/#comment-135182</link>
		<dc:creator>ouwjryyrti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Aug 2006 19:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/17/shopwiki-announces-62m-in-funding/#comment-135182</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;ozcrphgga...&lt;/strong&gt;

dgncrvioa fqvuak tdyjqihiu rqoapqpvm oyiqxuamwi...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>ozcrphgga&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>dgncrvioa fqvuak tdyjqihiu rqoapqpvm oyiqxuamwi&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ari Mir</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/shopwiki-announces-62m-in-funding/comment-page-1/#comment-103700</link>
		<dc:creator>Ari Mir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 18:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/17/shopwiki-announces-62m-in-funding/#comment-103700</guid>
		<description>One would think they would apply the wiki approach to their lack luster product specifications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One would think they would apply the wiki approach to their lack luster product specifications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/shopwiki-announces-62m-in-funding/comment-page-1/#comment-103655</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 16:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/17/shopwiki-announces-62m-in-funding/#comment-103655</guid>
		<description>As far as the &quot;neat&quot; shop by color functionality, yes it looks cool, BUT...  In categories such as apparel, where this functionality is (theoretically) really useful, it falls short because it is only pulling the hex color from the image they are spidering...  However, as we all know, a lot of pieces of clothing come in multiple colors and only one image is being pulled per item, so you can search for the color in the picture, but not for all colors in which an item is available...  So in reality, this is a feature with some cool factor, but not ultimately very useful...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as the &#8220;neat&#8221; shop by color functionality, yes it looks cool, BUT&#8230;  In categories such as apparel, where this functionality is (theoretically) really useful, it falls short because it is only pulling the hex color from the image they are spidering&#8230;  However, as we all know, a lot of pieces of clothing come in multiple colors and only one image is being pulled per item, so you can search for the color in the picture, but not for all colors in which an item is available&#8230;  So in reality, this is a feature with some cool factor, but not ultimately very useful&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/shopwiki-announces-62m-in-funding/comment-page-1/#comment-103643</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 16:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/17/shopwiki-announces-62m-in-funding/#comment-103643</guid>
		<description>Adrian,

That&#039;s my #1 concern for Shopwiki.  How can they legally publish copywrited product photos?  Especially with all of the problems between NetEnforcers and Amazon&#039;s affiliates.  NetEnforcers is going after affiliates with Cease &amp; Desist notices even though they are tied to Amazon by contract to use the marketing materials.  Shopwiki has no contract allowing them use of this information so they have no recourse when they do receive their Cease &amp; Desists.  Companies like Sony, Crutchfield, LG, and Mitsubishi who actively enforce their brand are going to give ShopWiki hell when they finally discover what&#039;s going on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adrian,</p>
<p>That&#8217;s my #1 concern for Shopwiki.  How can they legally publish copywrited product photos?  Especially with all of the problems between NetEnforcers and Amazon&#8217;s affiliates.  NetEnforcers is going after affiliates with Cease &amp; Desist notices even though they are tied to Amazon by contract to use the marketing materials.  Shopwiki has no contract allowing them use of this information so they have no recourse when they do receive their Cease &amp; Desists.  Companies like Sony, Crutchfield, LG, and Mitsubishi who actively enforce their brand are going to give ShopWiki hell when they finally discover what&#8217;s going on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skeptic</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/shopwiki-announces-62m-in-funding/comment-page-1/#comment-103601</link>
		<dc:creator>Skeptic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 16:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/17/shopwiki-announces-62m-in-funding/#comment-103601</guid>
		<description>Marshall,  I think it&#039;s great for you to take a step back on your glowingness of your review here. Personally, I have a policy of pointing out where my inspiration comes from...  
http://www.dead20.com/2006/06/28/shopwiki-a-not-so-new-way-to-clutter-up-online-shopping/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marshall,  I think it&#8217;s great for you to take a step back on your glowingness of your review here. Personally, I have a policy of pointing out where my inspiration comes from&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://www.dead20.com/2006/06/28/shopwiki-a-not-so-new-way-to-clutter-up-online-shopping/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.dead20.com/2006/06/28/shopwiki-a-not-so-new-way-to-clutter-up-online-shopping/'>http://www.dead...nline-shopping/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Starked SF &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Talk of the Town Tuesday</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/shopwiki-announces-62m-in-funding/comment-page-1/#comment-103598</link>
		<dc:creator>Starked SF &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Talk of the Town Tuesday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 16:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/17/shopwiki-announces-62m-in-funding/#comment-103598</guid>
		<description>[...] ShopWiki $6.2 million funding story in TechCrunch. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ShopWiki $6.2 million funding story in TechCrunch. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/shopwiki-announces-62m-in-funding/comment-page-1/#comment-103539</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 14:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/17/shopwiki-announces-62m-in-funding/#comment-103539</guid>
		<description>There is new Web2.0 social shopping community which combines Ben&#039;s Bargains and Digg.

http://www.dealspl.us

I really like its AJAX features.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is new Web2.0 social shopping community which combines Ben&#8217;s Bargains and Digg.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dealspl.us" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.dealspl.us'>http://www.dealspl.us</a></p>
<p>I really like its AJAX features.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; ShopWiki、620万ドルの資金調達を発表</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/shopwiki-announces-62m-in-funding/comment-page-1/#comment-103493</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; ShopWiki、620万ドルの資金調達を発表</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 14:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/17/shopwiki-announces-62m-in-funding/#comment-103493</guid>
		<description>[...] [原文へ]  ShopWiki [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [原文へ]  ShopWiki [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: d4rr3ll</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/shopwiki-announces-62m-in-funding/comment-page-1/#comment-103361</link>
		<dc:creator>d4rr3ll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 12:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/17/shopwiki-announces-62m-in-funding/#comment-103361</guid>
		<description>I like the whole concept of ShopWiki and the whole idea of &#039;social shopping&#039;, but I still find www.dealtagger.com a really useful site when comparing prices of products your are actually shopping for, or for products might be on some small site that doesn&#039;t get spidered by the bigger players.  Dealtagger allows you to create your own personal price comparison site, well worth a look next time your researching prices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the whole concept of ShopWiki and the whole idea of &#8217;social shopping&#8217;, but I still find <a href="http://www.dealtagger.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.dealtagger.com'>http://www.dealtagger.com</a> a really useful site when comparing prices of products your are actually shopping for, or for products might be on some small site that doesn&#8217;t get spidered by the bigger players.  Dealtagger allows you to create your own personal price comparison site, well worth a look next time your researching prices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Soltan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/shopwiki-announces-62m-in-funding/comment-page-1/#comment-103314</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Soltan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 11:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/17/shopwiki-announces-62m-in-funding/#comment-103314</guid>
		<description>I would love to know how it is legal for these guys to spider 1000s of e-commerce stores for product images, info and user reviews.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love to know how it is legal for these guys to spider 1000s of e-commerce stores for product images, info and user reviews.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Landon</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/shopwiki-announces-62m-in-funding/comment-page-1/#comment-103208</link>
		<dc:creator>Landon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 08:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/17/shopwiki-announces-62m-in-funding/#comment-103208</guid>
		<description>Is it a requirement that to own a Wiki you must first design a crappy logo?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it a requirement that to own a Wiki you must first design a crappy logo?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
