<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OpenDNS wants to watch the web for you</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/opendns-wants-to-watch-the-web-for-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/opendns-wants-to-watch-the-web-for-you/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 12:49:34 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cristobal</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/opendns-wants-to-watch-the-web-for-you/comment-page-2/#comment-2996484</link>
		<dc:creator>Cristobal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 21:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/opendns-wants-to-watch-the-web-for-you/#comment-2996484</guid>
		<description>Lo utilizo y es un magnifico servicio se lo recomiendo a cualquiera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lo utilizo y es un magnifico servicio se lo recomiendo a cualquiera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ArticleSave :: Uncategorized :: Sequoia, Greylock Take Stake In OpenDNS</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/opendns-wants-to-watch-the-web-for-you/comment-page-2/#comment-2842518</link>
		<dc:creator>ArticleSave :: Uncategorized :: Sequoia, Greylock Take Stake In OpenDNS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 06:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/opendns-wants-to-watch-the-web-for-you/#comment-2842518</guid>
		<description>[...] which launched in 2006, is a DNS service provider for consumers and organizations. It has two main benefits. First, users [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] which launched in 2006, is a DNS service provider for consumers and organizations. It has two main benefits. First, users [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tech Fused &#187; Sequoia, Greylock Take Stake In OpenDNS</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/opendns-wants-to-watch-the-web-for-you/comment-page-2/#comment-2842088</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech Fused &#187; Sequoia, Greylock Take Stake In OpenDNS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 01:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/opendns-wants-to-watch-the-web-for-you/#comment-2842088</guid>
		<description>[...] which launched in 2006, is a DNS service provider for consumers and organizations. It has two main benefits. First, users [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] which launched in 2006, is a DNS service provider for consumers and organizations. It has two main benefits. First, users [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sequoia, Greylock Take Stake In OpenDNS &#124; Spin Valley Post</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/opendns-wants-to-watch-the-web-for-you/comment-page-2/#comment-2842050</link>
		<dc:creator>Sequoia, Greylock Take Stake In OpenDNS &#124; Spin Valley Post</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 01:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/opendns-wants-to-watch-the-web-for-you/#comment-2842050</guid>
		<description>[...] which launched in 2006, is a DNS service provider for consumers and organizations. It has two main benefits. First, users [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] which launched in 2006, is a DNS service provider for consumers and organizations. It has two main benefits. First, users [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sequoia, Greylock</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/opendns-wants-to-watch-the-web-for-you/comment-page-2/#comment-2841986</link>
		<dc:creator>Sequoia, Greylock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 00:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/opendns-wants-to-watch-the-web-for-you/#comment-2841986</guid>
		<description>[...] which launched in 2006, is a DNS service provider for consumers and organizations. It has two main benefits. First, users [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] which launched in 2006, is a DNS service provider for consumers and organizations. It has two main benefits. First, users [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cass</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/opendns-wants-to-watch-the-web-for-you/comment-page-2/#comment-2819009</link>
		<dc:creator>cass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/opendns-wants-to-watch-the-web-for-you/#comment-2819009</guid>
		<description>can any body tell me an alternative to opendns?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can any body tell me an alternative to opendns?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cass</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/opendns-wants-to-watch-the-web-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-2818788</link>
		<dc:creator>cass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 13:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/opendns-wants-to-watch-the-web-for-you/#comment-2818788</guid>
		<description>i really do not like opendns.
can u give me an alternative?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i really do not like opendns.<br />
can u give me an alternative?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cass</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/opendns-wants-to-watch-the-web-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-2818776</link>
		<dc:creator>cass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 13:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/opendns-wants-to-watch-the-web-for-you/#comment-2818776</guid>
		<description>can i get an alternative to opendns?
i really need it becos opendns is not all that it is said to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can i get an alternative to opendns?<br />
i really need it becos opendns is not all that it is said to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/opendns-wants-to-watch-the-web-for-you/comment-page-2/#comment-2587153</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 03:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/opendns-wants-to-watch-the-web-for-you/#comment-2587153</guid>
		<description>I came home early and found my teenage son surfing the web with his own router that he had purchased. Better make sure your family don&#039;t know your ISP username and password!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I came home early and found my teenage son surfing the web with his own router that he had purchased. Better make sure your family don&#8217;t know your ISP username and password!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OpenDNS Makes $20k/day Filtering Phishing And Porn Sites</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/opendns-wants-to-watch-the-web-for-you/comment-page-2/#comment-2414093</link>
		<dc:creator>OpenDNS Makes $20k/day Filtering Phishing And Porn Sites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 04:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/opendns-wants-to-watch-the-web-for-you/#comment-2414093</guid>
		<description>[...] a San Francisco based startup founded by Minor Ventures and David Ulevitch, first launched in mid-2006 as a free tool to speed up web surfing and protect users from phishing and other [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a San Francisco based startup founded by Minor Ventures and David Ulevitch, first launched in mid-2006 as a free tool to speed up web surfing and protect users from phishing and other [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; うちはブログでどう書かれている？　ブランドの評判が追跡できるScout Labs</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/opendns-wants-to-watch-the-web-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-1836032</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; うちはブログでどう書かれている？　ブランドの評判が追跡できるScout Labs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 18:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/opendns-wants-to-watch-the-web-for-you/#comment-1836032</guid>
		<description>[...] Publishing、Swivel、 Open DNSなどがある。Minor VenturesはCNET共同ファウンダーHalsey Minorが創業し、Ron [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Publishing、Swivel、 Open DNSなどがある。Minor VenturesはCNET共同ファウンダーHalsey Minorが創業し、Ron [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mohammado</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/opendns-wants-to-watch-the-web-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-796492</link>
		<dc:creator>mohammado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 01:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/opendns-wants-to-watch-the-web-for-you/#comment-796492</guid>
		<description>I need URL to my 
IP:http://212.38.140.54/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I need URL to my<br />
IP:http://212.38.140.54/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rav</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/opendns-wants-to-watch-the-web-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-150200</link>
		<dc:creator>Rav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 21:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/opendns-wants-to-watch-the-web-for-you/#comment-150200</guid>
		<description>I am using this service past 20 Days as far as  iam satisfied. My ISP Dns is really dropping client requests - I called them so many times - they weresaying problem at remote sites - sites like market kings yahoo!,MSN ... etc ..hummm..Non sense Now my problem solved. Becoz i tested with 2 systems -  First box with configured With My ISP DNS and 2 BOX with OpenDNS...
The difference is clearly visible. 

I may not say this service is suitable for all  .... But  Home users works !!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am using this service past 20 Days as far as  iam satisfied. My ISP Dns is really dropping client requests &#8211; I called them so many times &#8211; they weresaying problem at remote sites &#8211; sites like market kings yahoo!,MSN &#8230; etc ..hummm..Non sense Now my problem solved. Becoz i tested with 2 systems &#8211;  First box with configured With My ISP DNS and 2 BOX with OpenDNS&#8230;<br />
The difference is clearly visible. </p>
<p>I may not say this service is suitable for all  &#8230;. But  Home users works !!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaydee0007</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/opendns-wants-to-watch-the-web-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-113008</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaydee0007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 15:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/opendns-wants-to-watch-the-web-for-you/#comment-113008</guid>
		<description>All,

This service is all fine and all that but... all queries are paassing thru this server, that means that this business (it is after all here to make money and give a return to investors) is in a great position to find out EVERYTHING you do on the net: where you go, what you like, when you surf, what you are looking for, etc...  a perfect model to, in turn, collect demagraphics and then target adverts... or to target anything they want.  I&#039;m not very omfortable with that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All,</p>
<p>This service is all fine and all that but&#8230; all queries are paassing thru this server, that means that this business (it is after all here to make money and give a return to investors) is in a great position to find out EVERYTHING you do on the net: where you go, what you like, when you surf, what you are looking for, etc&#8230;  a perfect model to, in turn, collect demagraphics and then target adverts&#8230; or to target anything they want.  I&#8217;m not very omfortable with that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spamroll</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/opendns-wants-to-watch-the-web-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-105945</link>
		<dc:creator>Spamroll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 13:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/opendns-wants-to-watch-the-web-for-you/#comment-105945</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Email may be on the way out, thanks to spam...&lt;/strong&gt;

According to Postini, better than 85% of all email traffic is now spam. One of two things is going to happen here. Either internet users are going to adopt a new form of communication (and it isn&#039;t IM, as spam......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Email may be on the way out, thanks to spam&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>According to Postini, better than 85% of all email traffic is now spam. One of two things is going to happen here. Either internet users are going to adopt a new form of communication (and it isn&#8217;t IM, as spam&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IT Blogwatch</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/opendns-wants-to-watch-the-web-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-105790</link>
		<dc:creator>IT Blogwatch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 10:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/opendns-wants-to-watch-the-web-for-you/#comment-105790</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;OpenDNS opens for business (and Steve Jobs&#039; blog?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Namaste. This is IT Blogwatch, in which a very boring -- yet utterly vital -- part of the Internet infrastructure gets a kick in the pants. Not to mention The Secret Diary of Steve Jobs, Aged 51 1/2......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>OpenDNS opens for business (and Steve Jobs&#8217; blog?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Namaste. This is IT Blogwatch, in which a very boring &#8212; yet utterly vital &#8212; part of the Internet infrastructure gets a kick in the pants. Not to mention The Secret Diary of Steve Jobs, Aged 51 1/2&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Björn</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/opendns-wants-to-watch-the-web-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-105344</link>
		<dc:creator>Björn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 03:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/opendns-wants-to-watch-the-web-for-you/#comment-105344</guid>
		<description>WinXP works the other way around. If this wasn&#039;t the case, all &quot;adblocker&quot; HOSTS files on the web wouldn&#039;t work anymore.

Personally, I don&#039;t need to use a third party DNS since my ISP provided me with 2 rock solid and fast ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WinXP works the other way around. If this wasn&#8217;t the case, all &#8220;adblocker&#8221; HOSTS files on the web wouldn&#8217;t work anymore.</p>
<p>Personally, I don&#8217;t need to use a third party DNS since my ISP provided me with 2 rock solid and fast ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/opendns-wants-to-watch-the-web-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-104957</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 21:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/opendns-wants-to-watch-the-web-for-you/#comment-104957</guid>
		<description>OpenDNS messed with my home LAN.

I&#039;ve got a MAC and two PC&#039;s on my home LAN. On the MAC (my main machine) I have set up aliases for the other two machines and the router (similar to the way XP&#039;s hosts file works). This means for example I can type &#039;router&#039; into the Firefox address bar instead of &#039;192.168.2.1&#039; to get to the router configuration. I can also remote desktop to the other machines by specifying their aliases instead of IP addresses.

With OpenDNS set up in my router this no longer works. My suspicion is that OS/X queries the DNS service before looking in its own table or machine aliases. So, because OpenDNS returns a result for &#039;router&#039;, I get the OpenDNS page of adverts instead of my 192.168.2.1 router.

I wonder if WinXP hosts file works the same way but I don&#039;t have time to test it. Too bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OpenDNS messed with my home LAN.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got a MAC and two PC&#8217;s on my home LAN. On the MAC (my main machine) I have set up aliases for the other two machines and the router (similar to the way XP&#8217;s hosts file works). This means for example I can type &#8216;router&#8217; into the Firefox address bar instead of &#8216;192.168.2.1&#8242; to get to the router configuration. I can also remote desktop to the other machines by specifying their aliases instead of IP addresses.</p>
<p>With OpenDNS set up in my router this no longer works. My suspicion is that OS/X queries the DNS service before looking in its own table or machine aliases. So, because OpenDNS returns a result for &#8216;router&#8217;, I get the OpenDNS page of adverts instead of my 192.168.2.1 router.</p>
<p>I wonder if WinXP hosts file works the same way but I don&#8217;t have time to test it. Too bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/opendns-wants-to-watch-the-web-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-104840</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 18:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/opendns-wants-to-watch-the-web-for-you/#comment-104840</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m an OpenDNS user, and for me personally it&#039;s worked fine.  I&#039;m still a bit leery just because anything this nice has to have a catch.  In any case, if I was back in the states I probably wouldn&#039;t notice the increase in speed I have here.  Before switching, I used to get continuous DNS error pages on about 30% of the pages I would try to surf to.  I mean, these were the usual pages.. Yahoo, Google, Ebay, would almost half of the time give me a PLEX page error.  Even if I didn&#039;t get an error, it would take at least 10 seconds for the browser to display the page.  I&#039;ve tried a few of the other DNS servers, but none of them have the speed increase (for me personally) that this one does.  

Unless they do something monumentally stupid (Sorry David, but it&#039;s almost expected in today&#039;s business model) I&#039;ll continue to use OpenDNS.  Thanks for creating this, and I wish you continued success in it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m an OpenDNS user, and for me personally it&#8217;s worked fine.  I&#8217;m still a bit leery just because anything this nice has to have a catch.  In any case, if I was back in the states I probably wouldn&#8217;t notice the increase in speed I have here.  Before switching, I used to get continuous DNS error pages on about 30% of the pages I would try to surf to.  I mean, these were the usual pages.. Yahoo, Google, Ebay, would almost half of the time give me a PLEX page error.  Even if I didn&#8217;t get an error, it would take at least 10 seconds for the browser to display the page.  I&#8217;ve tried a few of the other DNS servers, but none of them have the speed increase (for me personally) that this one does.  </p>
<p>Unless they do something monumentally stupid (Sorry David, but it&#8217;s almost expected in today&#8217;s business model) I&#8217;ll continue to use OpenDNS.  Thanks for creating this, and I wish you continued success in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OpenDNS: A Valid Web 2.0 Business Model; Is It Good For you? -Simple Thoughts - Java and Web Technology Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/opendns-wants-to-watch-the-web-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-104834</link>
		<dc:creator>OpenDNS: A Valid Web 2.0 Business Model; Is It Good For you? -Simple Thoughts - Java and Web Technology Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 18:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/opendns-wants-to-watch-the-web-for-you/#comment-104834</guid>
		<description>[...] Marshall from TechCrunch thinks they do not have a viable business model. I disagree. Misspellings are much more common than anyone of use would care to admit. Serving ads on misspellings can provide significant revenue as you have dedicated users 24/7. Each user you convert to using your DNS is an user who allows you to correct his misspellings all the time. I have no doubt about the viability of their business model. The cost of running such business is small. You simply have to buy servers hosted in different countries. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Marshall from TechCrunch thinks they do not have a viable business model. I disagree. Misspellings are much more common than anyone of use would care to admit. Serving ads on misspellings can provide significant revenue as you have dedicated users 24/7. Each user you convert to using your DNS is an user who allows you to correct his misspellings all the time. I have no doubt about the viability of their business model. The cost of running such business is small. You simply have to buy servers hosted in different countries. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/opendns-wants-to-watch-the-web-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-104820</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 18:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/opendns-wants-to-watch-the-web-for-you/#comment-104820</guid>
		<description>OpenDNS might be something (as suggested) for say, my Mom, but probably not for me.  If you want to impress the tech crowd and get mass signups, figure out a way to give me shorter routes to gaming servers and things of that nature.

While I don&#039;t care if it takes .01s or .005s to lookup a name, it would be awesome to cut my # of hops down from 15 to 7 between me and a server I&#039;m gaming on!

Just my 2 cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OpenDNS might be something (as suggested) for say, my Mom, but probably not for me.  If you want to impress the tech crowd and get mass signups, figure out a way to give me shorter routes to gaming servers and things of that nature.</p>
<p>While I don&#8217;t care if it takes .01s or .005s to lookup a name, it would be awesome to cut my # of hops down from 15 to 7 between me and a server I&#8217;m gaming on!</p>
<p>Just my 2 cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/opendns-wants-to-watch-the-web-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-104812</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 17:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/opendns-wants-to-watch-the-web-for-you/#comment-104812</guid>
		<description>In reply to BlogReader&#039;s comment #9 re: alternic.  Alternic is defunct.  It&#039;s main guy got picked up for wire fraud in 97.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to BlogReader&#8217;s comment #9 re: alternic.  Alternic is defunct.  It&#8217;s main guy got picked up for wire fraud in 97.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Observer</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/opendns-wants-to-watch-the-web-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-104804</link>
		<dc:creator>Observer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 17:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/opendns-wants-to-watch-the-web-for-you/#comment-104804</guid>
		<description>Two things:

1) Since my ISP&#039;s DNS crashes ALL OF THE TIME, it&#039;s nice to have another address that I can use why they try to figure out WTF.  (Charter ay my home and BellSouth at my office.)

2) I don&#039;t really see a big performance improvement and have noticed that the ping times for the OpenDNS servers are actually longer than my local ISPs.  (I have  not researched lookup times.)  OTOH, it&#039;s isn&#039;t any worse.

So, if it weren&#039;t for item #1, I wouldn&#039;t bother.  Having a backup choice for DNS lookup is nice.  

Could somebody do some REAL benchmarks with different ISPs to see if there is an actual improvement?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two things:</p>
<p>1) Since my ISP&#8217;s DNS crashes ALL OF THE TIME, it&#8217;s nice to have another address that I can use why they try to figure out WTF.  (Charter ay my home and BellSouth at my office.)</p>
<p>2) I don&#8217;t really see a big performance improvement and have noticed that the ping times for the OpenDNS servers are actually longer than my local ISPs.  (I have  not researched lookup times.)  OTOH, it&#8217;s isn&#8217;t any worse.</p>
<p>So, if it weren&#8217;t for item #1, I wouldn&#8217;t bother.  Having a backup choice for DNS lookup is nice.  </p>
<p>Could somebody do some REAL benchmarks with different ISPs to see if there is an actual improvement?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OpenDNS speeds up my feed reader &#187; at Tom Raftery&#8217;s I.T. views</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/opendns-wants-to-watch-the-web-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-104774</link>
		<dc:creator>OpenDNS speeds up my feed reader &#187; at Tom Raftery&#8217;s I.T. views</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 17:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/opendns-wants-to-watch-the-web-for-you/#comment-104774</guid>
		<description>[...] They also claim to protect you against phishing by comparing sites you want to visit against their database of known phishing attacks. This strikes me as a dubious claim as these sites change daily and keeping up with phishing sites is a fast paced game of leapfrog. Marshal Kirkpatrick is equally skeptical (if not more so!). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] They also claim to protect you against phishing by comparing sites you want to visit against their database of known phishing attacks. This strikes me as a dubious claim as these sites change daily and keeping up with phishing sites is a fast paced game of leapfrog. Marshal Kirkpatrick is equally skeptical (if not more so!). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: saurab</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/opendns-wants-to-watch-the-web-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-104760</link>
		<dc:creator>saurab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 16:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/18/opendns-wants-to-watch-the-web-for-you/#comment-104760</guid>
		<description>This appears to me to be a more well-behaved &quot;tongue-in-cheek&quot; version of Verisign&#039;s SiteFinder, a program that was heavily opposed by ICANN and was eventually taken down. Of course, there are some major differences (but it smells the same on a smaller scale): 

1. Verisign being the traffic router for every single web address ending with .com or .net, was in a position to exploit ***ALL*** traffic to non-registered domains (often a result of mispelling popular ones) via pay-per-click. There was no way to opt out, as long as the service was online. With OpenDNS, there is an opt-in system in place. Big difference. 

2.  According to Comment #1: 
&quot;It should be mentioned that you only see advertisements when you really, really mangle a URL — as they say on their site, typing something like craigslist.og will automatically take you to craigslist.org&quot;

This was not the case with SiteFinder. Every single hit to a non-registered domain was redirected to Verisign&#039;s PPC-infested pages, even if the mispelling was on account of one incorrect character. OpenDNS is obviously proceeding more cautiously (as well they might).

3. SiteFinder disrupted the working of Whois programs, because every availability request for an unregistered domain actually resolved (to verisign&#039;s servers), so whois clients found it difficult to figure out whether the domain in question was actually registered, or was available for registration. I guess this wont be a problem with OpenDNS, because they&#039;re not operating the registry, only probably adding a proxy layer in between.

In any case, I think the business model of pay-per-click can net in big $$$
especially if ISPs make use of their services. Imagine a 6 year old kid typing in gogle.com and being taken to OpenDNS&#039;s PPC pages. Of course as comment #1 notes, this isnt happening now, but who knows what&#039;s going to happen after an year or so....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This appears to me to be a more well-behaved &#8220;tongue-in-cheek&#8221; version of Verisign&#8217;s SiteFinder, a program that was heavily opposed by ICANN and was eventually taken down. Of course, there are some major differences (but it smells the same on a smaller scale): </p>
<p>1. Verisign being the traffic router for every single web address ending with .com or .net, was in a position to exploit ***ALL*** traffic to non-registered domains (often a result of mispelling popular ones) via pay-per-click. There was no way to opt out, as long as the service was online. With OpenDNS, there is an opt-in system in place. Big difference. </p>
<p>2.  According to Comment #1:<br />
&#8220;It should be mentioned that you only see advertisements when you really, really mangle a URL — as they say on their site, typing something like craigslist.og will automatically take you to craigslist.org&#8221;</p>
<p>This was not the case with SiteFinder. Every single hit to a non-registered domain was redirected to Verisign&#8217;s PPC-infested pages, even if the mispelling was on account of one incorrect character. OpenDNS is obviously proceeding more cautiously (as well they might).</p>
<p>3. SiteFinder disrupted the working of Whois programs, because every availability request for an unregistered domain actually resolved (to verisign&#8217;s servers), so whois clients found it difficult to figure out whether the domain in question was actually registered, or was available for registration. I guess this wont be a problem with OpenDNS, because they&#8217;re not operating the registry, only probably adding a proxy layer in between.</p>
<p>In any case, I think the business model of pay-per-click can net in big $$$<br />
especially if ISPs make use of their services. Imagine a 6 year old kid typing in gogle.com and being taken to OpenDNS&#8217;s PPC pages. Of course as comment #1 notes, this isnt happening now, but who knows what&#8217;s going to happen after an year or so&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
