<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Odeo Releases Twttr</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/15/is-twttr-interesting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/15/is-twttr-interesting/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:15:43 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: COP</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/15/is-twttr-interesting/comment-page-4/#comment-3118316</link>
		<dc:creator>COP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/15/is-twttr-interesting/#comment-3118316</guid>
		<description>COP was here. smiling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>COP was here. smiling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik Schmidt</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/15/is-twttr-interesting/comment-page-4/#comment-3117746</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik Schmidt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/15/is-twttr-interesting/#comment-3117746</guid>
		<description>If Twitter was litigious, Odeo could wind up receiving a trademark nastygram from Twitter&#039;s lawyers. The name Twttr is more than likely to generate confusion with Twitter.

To see what I mean, click on the Twttr link in the first sentence of this article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Twitter was litigious, Odeo could wind up receiving a trademark nastygram from Twitter&#8217;s lawyers. The name Twttr is more than likely to generate confusion with Twitter.</p>
<p>To see what I mean, click on the Twttr link in the first sentence of this article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Umang</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/15/is-twttr-interesting/comment-page-4/#comment-3117438</link>
		<dc:creator>Umang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/15/is-twttr-interesting/#comment-3117438</guid>
		<description>India has had this for a few years now - http://www.smsgupshup.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>India has had this for a few years now &#8211; <a href="http://www.smsgupshup.com/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.smsgupshup.com/'>http://www.smsgupshup.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Nation</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/15/is-twttr-interesting/comment-page-4/#comment-3117340</link>
		<dc:creator>James Nation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/15/is-twttr-interesting/#comment-3117340</guid>
		<description>Glad they changed the logo...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad they changed the logo&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Arrington</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/15/is-twttr-interesting/comment-page-4/#comment-3084051</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Arrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/15/is-twttr-interesting/#comment-3084051</guid>
		<description>well, they were all cashed out of the company, so they don&#039;t own any part of twitter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, they were all cashed out of the company, so they don&#8217;t own any part of twitter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Galt</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/15/is-twttr-interesting/comment-page-4/#comment-3084044</link>
		<dc:creator>John Galt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/15/is-twttr-interesting/#comment-3084044</guid>
		<description>&quot;How do their shareholders feel about side projects like Twttr when their primary product line is, besides the excellent design, a total snoozer?&quot;

I guess they didn&#039;t mind too much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;How do their shareholders feel about side projects like Twttr when their primary product line is, besides the excellent design, a total snoozer?&#8221;</p>
<p>I guess they didn&#8217;t mind too much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitt Sex: Because Everything Popular Needs A Sex Clone</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/15/is-twttr-interesting/comment-page-4/#comment-2945209</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitt Sex: Because Everything Popular Needs A Sex Clone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 21:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/15/is-twttr-interesting/#comment-2945209</guid>
		<description>[...] references to Twittr.com, which may look like the old name for Twitter, but it&#8217;s not (that would be Twttr). While you might assume this is just an old site that never launched, the first tweets are from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] references to Twittr.com, which may look like the old name for Twitter, but it&#8217;s not (that would be Twttr). While you might assume this is just an old site that never launched, the first tweets are from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitt Sex: Because Everything Popular Needs A Sex Clone &#124; Spin Valley Post</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/15/is-twttr-interesting/comment-page-4/#comment-2943770</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitt Sex: Because Everything Popular Needs A Sex Clone &#124; Spin Valley Post</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 06:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/15/is-twttr-interesting/#comment-2943770</guid>
		<description>[...] references Twittr.com, which may look like the old name for Twitter, but it&#8217;s not (that would be Twttr). While you might assume this is just an old site that never launched, the first tweets are from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] references Twittr.com, which may look like the old name for Twitter, but it&#8217;s not (that would be Twttr). While you might assume this is just an old site that never launched, the first tweets are from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitt Sex: considering Everything Popular Needs A Sex Clone &#124; Cellphone Ultra</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/15/is-twttr-interesting/comment-page-4/#comment-2943763</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitt Sex: considering Everything Popular Needs A Sex Clone &#124; Cellphone Ultra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 06:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/15/is-twttr-interesting/#comment-2943763</guid>
		<description>[...] references Twittr.com, which may look like the old name for Twitter, but it&#8217;s not (that would be Twttr). While you might assume that is just an old site that never launched, the first tweets are from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] references Twittr.com, which may look like the old name for Twitter, but it&#8217;s not (that would be Twttr). While you might assume that is just an old site that never launched, the first tweets are from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ArticleSave :: Uncategorized :: Twitt Sex: Because Everything Popular Needs A Sex Clone</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/15/is-twttr-interesting/comment-page-4/#comment-2943746</link>
		<dc:creator>ArticleSave :: Uncategorized :: Twitt Sex: Because Everything Popular Needs A Sex Clone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 06:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/15/is-twttr-interesting/#comment-2943746</guid>
		<description>[...] references Twittr.com, which may look like the old name for Twitter, but it&#8217;s not (that would be Twttr). While you might assume this is just an old site that never launched, the first tweets are from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] references Twittr.com, which may look like the old name for Twitter, but it&#8217;s not (that would be Twttr). While you might assume this is just an old site that never launched, the first tweets are from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitt Sex: Because Everything Popular Needs A Sex Clone &#124; Anthonyrobinson.info</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/15/is-twttr-interesting/comment-page-4/#comment-2943725</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitt Sex: Because Everything Popular Needs A Sex Clone &#124; Anthonyrobinson.info</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 05:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/15/is-twttr-interesting/#comment-2943725</guid>
		<description>[...] references Twittr.com, which may look like the old name for Twitter, but it&#8217;s not (that would be Twttr). While you might assume this is just an old site that never launched, the first tweets are from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] references Twittr.com, which may look like the old name for Twitter, but it&#8217;s not (that would be Twttr). While you might assume this is just an old site that never launched, the first tweets are from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitt Sex: Because Everything Popular Needs A Sex Clone &#124; Stoth</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/15/is-twttr-interesting/comment-page-4/#comment-2943715</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitt Sex: Because Everything Popular Needs A Sex Clone &#124; Stoth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 05:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/15/is-twttr-interesting/#comment-2943715</guid>
		<description>[...] references Twittr.com, which may look like the old name for Twitter, but it&#8217;s not (that would be Twttr). While you might assume this is just an old site that never launched, the first tweets are from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] references Twittr.com, which may look like the old name for Twitter, but it&#8217;s not (that would be Twttr). While you might assume this is just an old site that never launched, the first tweets are from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitt Sex: Because Everything Popular Needs A Sex Clone</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/15/is-twttr-interesting/comment-page-4/#comment-2943692</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitt Sex: Because Everything Popular Needs A Sex Clone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 05:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/15/is-twttr-interesting/#comment-2943692</guid>
		<description>[...] references Twittr.com, which may look like the old name for Twitter, but it&#8217;s not (that would be Twttr). While you might assume this is just an old site that never launched, the first tweets are from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] references Twittr.com, which may look like the old name for Twitter, but it&#8217;s not (that would be Twttr). While you might assume this is just an old site that never launched, the first tweets are from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Before There Was Twitter, There Was Blogger. And It’s Turning 10. &#171; Computer 2000 Consulting Services</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/15/is-twttr-interesting/comment-page-3/#comment-2939210</link>
		<dc:creator>Before There Was Twitter, There Was Blogger. And It’s Turning 10. &#171; Computer 2000 Consulting Services</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 20:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/15/is-twttr-interesting/#comment-2939210</guid>
		<description>[...] team at Google before leaving with Williams in 2004 to start Obvious Corp. which would eventually birth and turn into Twitter. (An interesting side note is that Williams’ Pyra co-founder Meg Hourihan, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] team at Google before leaving with Williams in 2004 to start Obvious Corp. which would eventually birth and turn into Twitter. (An interesting side note is that Williams’ Pyra co-founder Meg Hourihan, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Before There Was Twitter, There Was Blogger. And It’s Turning 10. &#124; Twimmer.com :: Twitter News</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/15/is-twttr-interesting/comment-page-3/#comment-2930417</link>
		<dc:creator>Before There Was Twitter, There Was Blogger. And It’s Turning 10. &#124; Twimmer.com :: Twitter News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 01:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/15/is-twttr-interesting/#comment-2930417</guid>
		<description>[...] team at Google before leaving with Williams in 2004 to start Obvious Corp. which would eventually birth and turn into Twitter. (An interesting side note is that Williams&#8217; Pyra co-founder Meg [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] team at Google before leaving with Williams in 2004 to start Obvious Corp. which would eventually birth and turn into Twitter. (An interesting side note is that Williams&#8217; Pyra co-founder Meg [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Before There Was Twitter, There Was Blogger. And It’s Turning 10. &#124; Technology</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/15/is-twttr-interesting/comment-page-3/#comment-2930374</link>
		<dc:creator>Before There Was Twitter, There Was Blogger. And It’s Turning 10. &#124; Technology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 01:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/15/is-twttr-interesting/#comment-2930374</guid>
		<description>[...] team at Google before leaving with Williams in 2004 to start Obvious Corp. which would eventually birth and turn into Twitter. (An interesting side note is that Williams&#8217; Pyra co-founder Meg [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] team at Google before leaving with Williams in 2004 to start Obvious Corp. which would eventually birth and turn into Twitter. (An interesting side note is that Williams&#8217; Pyra co-founder Meg [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Before There Was Twitter, There Was Blogger. And It’s Turning 10. &#124; Posts MarketPlace</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/15/is-twttr-interesting/comment-page-3/#comment-2930268</link>
		<dc:creator>Before There Was Twitter, There Was Blogger. And It’s Turning 10. &#124; Posts MarketPlace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 00:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/15/is-twttr-interesting/#comment-2930268</guid>
		<description>[...] team at Google before leaving with Williams in 2004 to start Obvious Corp. which would eventually birth and turn into [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] team at Google before leaving with Williams in 2004 to start Obvious Corp. which would eventually birth and turn into [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Before There Was Twitter, There Was Blogger. And It&#8217;s Turning 10.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/15/is-twttr-interesting/comment-page-3/#comment-2930251</link>
		<dc:creator>Before There Was Twitter, There Was Blogger. And It&#8217;s Turning 10.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 00:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/15/is-twttr-interesting/#comment-2930251</guid>
		<description>[...] team at Google before leaving with Williams in 2004 to start Obvious Corp. which would eventually birth and turn into [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] team at Google before leaving with Williams in 2004 to start Obvious Corp. which would eventually birth and turn into [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lancer</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/15/is-twttr-interesting/comment-page-3/#comment-2894497</link>
		<dc:creator>Lancer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 14:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/15/is-twttr-interesting/#comment-2894497</guid>
		<description>twitter is very powerful in dominating the social networking industry.. it make faster and easier and saving more time to update your friend&#039;s doing..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>twitter is very powerful in dominating the social networking industry.. it make faster and easier and saving more time to update your friend&#8217;s doing..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter for Business: Should Your Company Twitter? &#171; HR, Training, and Leadership</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/15/is-twttr-interesting/comment-page-3/#comment-2872591</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter for Business: Should Your Company Twitter? &#171; HR, Training, and Leadership</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 20:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/15/is-twttr-interesting/#comment-2872591</guid>
		<description>[...] (twttr) was a kind of collaboration tool for the original business team. Speculation about its business [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (twttr) was a kind of collaboration tool for the original business team. Speculation about its business [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/15/is-twttr-interesting/comment-page-3/#comment-2850425</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 06:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/15/is-twttr-interesting/#comment-2850425</guid>
		<description>Sounds interesting, may hv 2 check ths twttr thing out :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds interesting, may hv 2 check ths twttr thing out <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="571865313">Luke Stanley</fb:name></title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/15/is-twttr-interesting/comment-page-3/#comment-2850275</link>
		<dc:creator><fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="571865313">Luke Stanley</fb:name></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 02:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/15/is-twttr-interesting/#comment-2850275</guid>
		<description>It will never take off</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will never take off</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Smalera</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/15/is-twttr-interesting/comment-page-3/#comment-2796752</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Smalera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 23:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/15/is-twttr-interesting/#comment-2796752</guid>
		<description>This is the official &quot;512k should be enough for anybody&quot; of the early 21st century.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the official &#8220;512k should be enough for anybody&#8221; of the early 21st century.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Time warp back to 2004: Twitter.com domain for sale at $4,500 &#187; VentureBeat</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/15/is-twttr-interesting/comment-page-3/#comment-2769508</link>
		<dc:creator>Time warp back to 2004: Twitter.com domain for sale at $4,500 &#187; VentureBeat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 00:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/15/is-twttr-interesting/#comment-2769508</guid>
		<description>[...] of course, didn&#8217;t even start with its current name. It launched with the more Web 2.0-y and much harder-to pronounce Twttr name, back in July of 2006. It changed [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of course, didn&#8217;t even start with its current name. It launched with the more Web 2.0-y and much harder-to pronounce Twttr name, back in July of 2006. It changed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chozen</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/15/is-twttr-interesting/comment-page-3/#comment-2751811</link>
		<dc:creator>Chozen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 14:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/15/is-twttr-interesting/#comment-2751811</guid>
		<description>I was just saying the same thing, it&#039;s like looking into a time capsule..All the comments about whether it can work or not. LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just saying the same thing, it&#8217;s like looking into a time capsule..All the comments about whether it can work or not. LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
