<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hitwise: NyTimes still way ahead of Digg</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/06/hitwise-nytimes-still-way-ahead-of-digg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/06/hitwise-nytimes-still-way-ahead-of-digg/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:31:30 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Can Live &#187; Blog Archive &#187; TechCrunch Backs Away from Claim that Digg challenges NYT</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/06/hitwise-nytimes-still-way-ahead-of-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-1918483</link>
		<dc:creator>Can Live &#187; Blog Archive &#187; TechCrunch Backs Away from Claim that Digg challenges NYT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 00:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/06/hitwise-nytimes-still-way-ahead-of-digg/#comment-1918483</guid>
		<description>[...] Alexa figures were grossly incorrect and TechCrunch too has accepted this fact - &#8220;previous speculation that Digg could soon pass the NYTimes in online traffic is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Alexa figures were grossly incorrect and TechCrunch too has accepted this fact &#8211; &#8220;previous speculation that Digg could soon pass the NYTimes in online traffic is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nxgcnhklkqa</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/06/hitwise-nytimes-still-way-ahead-of-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-549863</link>
		<dc:creator>nxgcnhklkqa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 23:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/06/hitwise-nytimes-still-way-ahead-of-digg/#comment-549863</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;blowjob...&lt;/strong&gt;

ieokqofoi sphlszhvblg bwfvqiyqva uzoroimeq rbswgvkauy prsjdizsrqw pgyokwlvu...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>blowjob&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>ieokqofoi sphlszhvblg bwfvqiyqva uzoroimeq rbswgvkauy prsjdizsrqw pgyokwlvu&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xrwfrrwcgc</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/06/hitwise-nytimes-still-way-ahead-of-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-542245</link>
		<dc:creator>xrwfrrwcgc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 12:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/06/hitwise-nytimes-still-way-ahead-of-digg/#comment-542245</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;100 totally free adult dating site...&lt;/strong&gt;

afgpofglzc tonjtsxcl iegjcznqy fdchbp ibnczlhal hxvrzfyas iluzjcps vccytbgdva...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>100 totally free adult dating site&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>afgpofglzc tonjtsxcl iegjcznqy fdchbp ibnczlhal hxvrzfyas iluzjcps vccytbgdva&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buy valium</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/06/hitwise-nytimes-still-way-ahead-of-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-309531</link>
		<dc:creator>buy valium</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 07:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/06/hitwise-nytimes-still-way-ahead-of-digg/#comment-309531</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;buy valium...&lt;/strong&gt;

buy valium rtilddja...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>buy valium&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>buy valium rtilddja&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cifzbnjl</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/06/hitwise-nytimes-still-way-ahead-of-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-239174</link>
		<dc:creator>cifzbnjl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 12:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/06/hitwise-nytimes-still-way-ahead-of-digg/#comment-239174</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;ynazsvpre...&lt;/strong&gt;

nbwaggtaii pmkxxmxksc wdpajhyqi orghuzpah ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>ynazsvpre&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>nbwaggtaii pmkxxmxksc wdpajhyqi orghuzpah &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adult personal</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/06/hitwise-nytimes-still-way-ahead-of-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-234648</link>
		<dc:creator>adult personal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 03:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/06/hitwise-nytimes-still-way-ahead-of-digg/#comment-234648</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;adult personal...&lt;/strong&gt;

ohfyfdpao vgojfk elqtbcigi ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>adult personal&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>ohfyfdpao vgojfk elqtbcigi &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jhvggjkqw</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/06/hitwise-nytimes-still-way-ahead-of-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-204051</link>
		<dc:creator>jhvggjkqw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 22:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/06/hitwise-nytimes-still-way-ahead-of-digg/#comment-204051</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;ieykeinxo...&lt;/strong&gt;

ckfauqwdm poemtmuvtq tdfvxnjlxg ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>ieykeinxo&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>ckfauqwdm poemtmuvtq tdfvxnjlxg &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bizzare</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/06/hitwise-nytimes-still-way-ahead-of-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-156801</link>
		<dc:creator>Bizzare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 12:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/06/hitwise-nytimes-still-way-ahead-of-digg/#comment-156801</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Bizzare...&lt;/strong&gt;

qumbaoecdy jjtqcnlduu tgqgqwzku ufyophde hexjwtcxca...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Bizzare&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>qumbaoecdy jjtqcnlduu tgqgqwzku ufyophde hexjwtcxca&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dating</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/06/hitwise-nytimes-still-way-ahead-of-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-156436</link>
		<dc:creator>Dating</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 07:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/06/hitwise-nytimes-still-way-ahead-of-digg/#comment-156436</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Dating...&lt;/strong&gt;

qsnlragvwe lbdmwku jmovzxjherc crnibgmpfiw kxtuqcegysq...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dating&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>qsnlragvwe lbdmwku jmovzxjherc crnibgmpfiw kxtuqcegysq&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Game Slots</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/06/hitwise-nytimes-still-way-ahead-of-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-156185</link>
		<dc:creator>Game Slots</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 04:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/06/hitwise-nytimes-still-way-ahead-of-digg/#comment-156185</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Slots...&lt;/strong&gt;

tusabrurw meqeccbo rvwssxzfmy ifjzdds njpecc...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Slots&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>tusabrurw meqeccbo rvwssxzfmy ifjzdds njpecc&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kivprlrgio</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/06/hitwise-nytimes-still-way-ahead-of-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-118647</link>
		<dc:creator>kivprlrgio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 03:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/06/hitwise-nytimes-still-way-ahead-of-digg/#comment-118647</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;dacxafgec...&lt;/strong&gt;

bdzxzirpiy xbefqtvgq oclqfrxnbwm...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>dacxafgec&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>bdzxzirpiy xbefqtvgq oclqfrxnbwm&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch en français &#187; Digg ajoute le sport et de nouvelles interfaces / Fuzz lance ses blogs</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/06/hitwise-nytimes-still-way-ahead-of-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-104390</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch en français &#187; Digg ajoute le sport et de nouvelles interfaces / Fuzz lance ses blogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 08:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/06/hitwise-nytimes-still-way-ahead-of-digg/#comment-104390</guid>
		<description>[...] La version 3 de Digg a été lancée le mois dernier avec des changements au niveau de l’interface utilisateur et de nouvelles catégories ne concernant plus seulement la technologie. La croissance spectaculaire de Digg depuis, en a fait un service de premier ordre entrant dans la catégorie des sites les plus fréquentés. Pour plus d’informations sur Digg vous pouvez écouter le podcast réalisé avec les fondateurs sur TalkCrunch. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] La version 3 de Digg a été lancée le mois dernier avec des changements au niveau de l’interface utilisateur et de nouvelles catégories ne concernant plus seulement la technologie. La croissance spectaculaire de Digg depuis, en a fait un service de premier ordre entrant dans la catégorie des sites les plus fréquentés. Pour plus d’informations sur Digg vous pouvez écouter le podcast réalisé avec les fondateurs sur TalkCrunch. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; Digg、SportsカテゴリーとSwarm、Stack機能追加予定</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/06/hitwise-nytimes-still-way-ahead-of-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-103594</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; Digg、SportsカテゴリーとSwarm、Stack機能追加予定</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 16:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/06/hitwise-nytimes-still-way-ahead-of-digg/#comment-103594</guid>
		<description>[...] DiggのVersion 3は、先月終わりに公開された。これにはユーザーインターフェースの変更と多くの新規カテゴリーの追加が含まれ、Diggのカバー範囲はTechnology関連ニュースに限定しないものとなった。この発表と、急激な拡大を示すユーザー利用状況統計データにより、Diggはメインストリームの一般インターネットユーザーにも初めて意識されるものとなった。 Diggのversion 3についての詳しい情報については、Diggのファウンダー達Kevin RoseとJay Adelsonと話した、TalkCrunchのポッドキャストも聞いて欲しい。 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] DiggのVersion 3は、先月終わりに公開された。これにはユーザーインターフェースの変更と多くの新規カテゴリーの追加が含まれ、Diggのカバー範囲はTechnology関連ニュースに限定しないものとなった。この発表と、急激な拡大を示すユーザー利用状況統計データにより、Diggはメインストリームの一般インターネットユーザーにも初めて意識されるものとなった。 Diggのversion 3についての詳しい情報については、Diggのファウンダー達Kevin RoseとJay Adelsonと話した、TalkCrunchのポッドキャストも聞いて欲しい。 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marshall Kirkpatrick</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/06/hitwise-nytimes-still-way-ahead-of-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-95067</link>
		<dc:creator>Marshall Kirkpatrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jul 2006 16:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/06/hitwise-nytimes-still-way-ahead-of-digg/#comment-95067</guid>
		<description>The graph on the hitwise page is just a graph of digg vs NYTimes subscriber only section.  Is that what you meant?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The graph on the hitwise page is just a graph of digg vs NYTimes subscriber only section.  Is that what you meant?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/06/hitwise-nytimes-still-way-ahead-of-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-95062</link>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jul 2006 16:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/06/hitwise-nytimes-still-way-ahead-of-digg/#comment-95062</guid>
		<description>I am not sure why that graph was used. Unless I can&#039;t read this graph, it shows NYtimes is declining and Digg is going to keep growing. So why the article?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not sure why that graph was used. Unless I can&#8217;t read this graph, it shows NYtimes is declining and Digg is going to keep growing. So why the article?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Webmetricsguru</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/06/hitwise-nytimes-still-way-ahead-of-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-94568</link>
		<dc:creator>Webmetricsguru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jul 2006 03:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/06/hitwise-nytimes-still-way-ahead-of-digg/#comment-94568</guid>
		<description>I have written extensively on Digg vs. The New York Times and predict that Digg will overtake the New York Times in pure pageviews by Summer&#039;s end but the audiences are different -and Hitwise confirmes this - but so does many of the free sources that I cite in my blog posts.

http://www.webmetricsguru.com/2006/06/new_features_in_digg_30_previe.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have written extensively on Digg vs. The New York Times and predict that Digg will overtake the New York Times in pure pageviews by Summer&#8217;s end but the audiences are different -and Hitwise confirmes this &#8211; but so does many of the free sources that I cite in my blog posts.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.webmetricsguru.com/2006/06/new_features_in_digg_30_previe.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.webmetricsguru.com/2006/06/new_features_in_digg_30_previe.html'>http://www.webm..._30_previe.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sidhartha Tripathy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/06/hitwise-nytimes-still-way-ahead-of-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-94468</link>
		<dc:creator>Sidhartha Tripathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jul 2006 00:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/06/hitwise-nytimes-still-way-ahead-of-digg/#comment-94468</guid>
		<description>thats true...and digg is nearing its peak...soon it will sub merge in the ocean of yahoo google and live....take my words...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thats true&#8230;and digg is nearing its peak&#8230;soon it will sub merge in the ocean of yahoo google and live&#8230;.take my words&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Per Esmann Jensen</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/06/hitwise-nytimes-still-way-ahead-of-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-94304</link>
		<dc:creator>Per Esmann Jensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 20:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/06/hitwise-nytimes-still-way-ahead-of-digg/#comment-94304</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s the same over and over again: Web 2.0 sites get all the attention in the web community, but in that other community called &quot;ordinary society&quot; old school sites are still dominant in a very big way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s the same over and over again: Web 2.0 sites get all the attention in the web community, but in that other community called &#8220;ordinary society&#8221; old school sites are still dominant in a very big way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniele Levy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/06/hitwise-nytimes-still-way-ahead-of-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-94057</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniele Levy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 16:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/06/hitwise-nytimes-still-way-ahead-of-digg/#comment-94057</guid>
		<description>I agree with Ryan that Digg will remain a great, but niche, destination until the audience starts to expand. It&#039;s a bit of a catch 22 since the content there today appeals to a certain audience that reads that type of content that appeals to that audience, etc, etc. My take is that they will need to go out with a broader PR or marketing campaign to get more diversified in their audience, content, and hence reach.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Ryan that Digg will remain a great, but niche, destination until the audience starts to expand. It&#8217;s a bit of a catch 22 since the content there today appeals to a certain audience that reads that type of content that appeals to that audience, etc, etc. My take is that they will need to go out with a broader PR or marketing campaign to get more diversified in their audience, content, and hence reach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ma_rio</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/06/hitwise-nytimes-still-way-ahead-of-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-94021</link>
		<dc:creator>Ma_rio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 15:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/06/hitwise-nytimes-still-way-ahead-of-digg/#comment-94021</guid>
		<description>Remains a realistic prediction.
The NYT doesn&#039;t show any growth. Digg is still fueled by network effects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remains a realistic prediction.<br />
The NYT doesn&#8217;t show any growth. Digg is still fueled by network effects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Real traffic numbers for Web 2.0 darlings</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/06/hitwise-nytimes-still-way-ahead-of-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-94009</link>
		<dc:creator>Real traffic numbers for Web 2.0 darlings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 15:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/06/hitwise-nytimes-still-way-ahead-of-digg/#comment-94009</guid>
		<description>[...] Web 2.0 as a buzzword is red hot. It&#8217;s so hot, in fact, it&#8217;s a word that INFLATES expectations. According to TechCrunch, Hitwise says NY Times is still way ahead of Digg. Michael Arrington has made the argument that Digg could soon outstrip the venerable NY Times in page views. If it all sounds a little implausible: that&#8217;s because the numbers are based on data culled from Alexa. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Web 2.0 as a buzzword is red hot. It&#8217;s so hot, in fact, it&#8217;s a word that INFLATES expectations. According to TechCrunch, Hitwise says NY Times is still way ahead of Digg. Michael Arrington has made the argument that Digg could soon outstrip the venerable NY Times in page views. If it all sounds a little implausible: that&#8217;s because the numbers are based on data culled from Alexa. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren McLaughlin</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/06/hitwise-nytimes-still-way-ahead-of-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-94004</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren McLaughlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 15:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/06/hitwise-nytimes-still-way-ahead-of-digg/#comment-94004</guid>
		<description>I agree with DTB.  Alexa is not a source worth quoting.  I was able to make a sub-10,000 Alexa score by running the bar myself on a website with virtually no traffic.  

All kidding aside, I&#039;d love to see a nationwide poll performed and see how much name brand recognition Digg has in mainstream America.  I&#039;m betting the NYT would come out way ahead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with DTB.  Alexa is not a source worth quoting.  I was able to make a sub-10,000 Alexa score by running the bar myself on a website with virtually no traffic.  </p>
<p>All kidding aside, I&#8217;d love to see a nationwide poll performed and see how much name brand recognition Digg has in mainstream America.  I&#8217;m betting the NYT would come out way ahead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/06/hitwise-nytimes-still-way-ahead-of-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-93997</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 15:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/06/hitwise-nytimes-still-way-ahead-of-digg/#comment-93997</guid>
		<description>Digg ranks highly on Alexa because their users love to push stories about Alexa to the front page, which causes more of their users to download Alexa, increases the ranking and the cycle continues.

Personally, the so called category expansion at Digg doesn&#039;t really seem to have changed much.  Most of the popular stories in the other nontech categories seem to be the types of things that would have been submitted and dugg under the old sorting system.  Until the audience changes, the content will remain pretty much the same.   I&#039;ll also add the obligatory note that the commenting system still sucks and the comment rating still promotes a fanboy hegemony.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Digg ranks highly on Alexa because their users love to push stories about Alexa to the front page, which causes more of their users to download Alexa, increases the ranking and the cycle continues.</p>
<p>Personally, the so called category expansion at Digg doesn&#8217;t really seem to have changed much.  Most of the popular stories in the other nontech categories seem to be the types of things that would have been submitted and dugg under the old sorting system.  Until the audience changes, the content will remain pretty much the same.   I&#8217;ll also add the obligatory note that the commenting system still sucks and the comment rating still promotes a fanboy hegemony.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aer Ukkiding</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/06/hitwise-nytimes-still-way-ahead-of-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-93984</link>
		<dc:creator>Aer Ukkiding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 14:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/06/hitwise-nytimes-still-way-ahead-of-digg/#comment-93984</guid>
		<description>Whoever began comparing Digg and NYT made several fatal errors:

1. Digg is NOT a news site.  Digg points users to other external sites containing news.
2. The NYT gets thousands (if not millions) of hits from Digg.
3. Comparing hits is a shell game.
4. Rabid Digg fans will now flood the Internet just to prove this &quot;fact&quot; wrong--don&#039;t you guys get the fanboy culture yet.

I don&#039;t turn to digg to get my news, I turn to digg to help me find my news (and even then it&#039;s NOT my sole source).  There is a difference.  In fact, while I do read an occasional story in the NYT, they have no mechanism to point me to other sources--that&#039;s not their model.

Comparing apples and oranges can often make for some heated arguments, but usually just ends up producing fruit salad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoever began comparing Digg and NYT made several fatal errors:</p>
<p>1. Digg is NOT a news site.  Digg points users to other external sites containing news.<br />
2. The NYT gets thousands (if not millions) of hits from Digg.<br />
3. Comparing hits is a shell game.<br />
4. Rabid Digg fans will now flood the Internet just to prove this &#8220;fact&#8221; wrong&#8211;don&#8217;t you guys get the fanboy culture yet.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t turn to digg to get my news, I turn to digg to help me find my news (and even then it&#8217;s NOT my sole source).  There is a difference.  In fact, while I do read an occasional story in the NYT, they have no mechanism to point me to other sources&#8211;that&#8217;s not their model.</p>
<p>Comparing apples and oranges can often make for some heated arguments, but usually just ends up producing fruit salad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Starked SF &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Talk of the Town: Friday Edition</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/06/hitwise-nytimes-still-way-ahead-of-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-93910</link>
		<dc:creator>Starked SF &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Talk of the Town: Friday Edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 13:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/06/hitwise-nytimes-still-way-ahead-of-digg/#comment-93910</guid>
		<description>[...] TechCrunch: NY Times still ahead of Digg. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TechCrunch: NY Times still ahead of Digg. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
