<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: XHTMLized Turns Your Design into Code</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/03/xhtmlized-turns-designs-into-css-xhtml/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/03/xhtmlized-turns-designs-into-css-xhtml/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 17:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cost effective way to fastrack your design success &#124; Virtual Impax</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/03/xhtmlized-turns-designs-into-css-xhtml/#comment-1739975</link>
		<dc:creator>Cost effective way to fastrack your design success &#124; Virtual Impax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 17:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/03/xhtmlized-turns-designs-into-css-xhtml/#comment-1739975</guid>
		<description>[...] $650-$750 range for custom coding of a design as well. One site, recommended by Tech Crunch is&#160; XHTMLized Turns Your Design into Code. When you choose &#34;WP Theme&#34; at XHTMLized the price automatically jumps to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] $650-$750 range for custom coding of a design as well. One site, recommended by Tech Crunch is&nbsp; XHTMLized Turns Your Design into Code. When you choose &quot;WP Theme&quot; at XHTMLized the price automatically jumps to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ulises</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/03/xhtmlized-turns-designs-into-css-xhtml/#comment-1474449</link>
		<dc:creator>Ulises</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 09:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/03/xhtmlized-turns-designs-into-css-xhtml/#comment-1474449</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Ulises...&lt;/strong&gt;

 As the proud owner of a laptop computer, you'll want to keep your...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ulises&#8230;</strong></p>
<p> As the proud owner of a laptop computer, you&#8217;ll want to keep your&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sterona.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/03/xhtmlized-turns-designs-into-css-xhtml/#comment-1258205</link>
		<dc:creator>sterona.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 21:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/03/xhtmlized-turns-designs-into-css-xhtml/#comment-1258205</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;zabity.com...&lt;/strong&gt;

nakrema.com...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>zabity.com&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>nakrema.com&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zabrima.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/03/xhtmlized-turns-designs-into-css-xhtml/#comment-1257469</link>
		<dc:creator>zabrima.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 17:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/03/xhtmlized-turns-designs-into-css-xhtml/#comment-1257469</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;bisena.com...&lt;/strong&gt;

pinemi.com...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>bisena.com&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>pinemi.com&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: publicits de prozac</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/03/xhtmlized-turns-designs-into-css-xhtml/#comment-1201011</link>
		<dc:creator>publicits de prozac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 18:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/03/xhtmlized-turns-designs-into-css-xhtml/#comment-1201011</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;expired allegra...&lt;/strong&gt;

info fioricet...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>expired allegra&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>info fioricet&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xerago</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/03/xhtmlized-turns-designs-into-css-xhtml/#comment-599765</link>
		<dc:creator>Xerago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2006 12:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/03/xhtmlized-turns-designs-into-css-xhtml/#comment-599765</guid>
		<description>80 comments many months ago, but the time has come now to go to the source. Design is culture-sensitive. Mark-up is not. It can be validated and necessarily needs to comply to established standards. This is what is going to make the big difference.
Designers in developed (read expensive) markets need not go to these middlemen anymore. Thats the real power of the internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>80 comments many months ago, but the time has come now to go to the source. Design is culture-sensitive. Mark-up is not. It can be validated and necessarily needs to comply to established standards. This is what is going to make the big difference.<br />
Designers in developed (read expensive) markets need not go to these middlemen anymore. Thats the real power of the internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: First Tech Infos</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/03/xhtmlized-turns-designs-into-css-xhtml/#comment-218371</link>
		<dc:creator>First Tech Infos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Sep 2006 12:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/03/xhtmlized-turns-designs-into-css-xhtml/#comment-218371</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;pepsi india...&lt;/strong&gt;

Can u provide more information about this ?...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>pepsi india&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Can u provide more information about this ?&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Craven</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/03/xhtmlized-turns-designs-into-css-xhtml/#comment-153202</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Craven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 21:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/03/xhtmlized-turns-designs-into-css-xhtml/#comment-153202</guid>
		<description>Dave and his team are offering a good service. If anything, I believe they are underselling themselves. 

I bet you find that doing single page jobs make less profit than doing multiple pages by far.

Best of luck,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave and his team are offering a good service. If anything, I believe they are underselling themselves. </p>
<p>I bet you find that doing single page jobs make less profit than doing multiple pages by far.</p>
<p>Best of luck,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stranflow</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/03/xhtmlized-turns-designs-into-css-xhtml/#comment-147009</link>
		<dc:creator>stranflow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Aug 2006 13:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/03/xhtmlized-turns-designs-into-css-xhtml/#comment-147009</guid>
		<description>So far, it's been disappointing. I sent XHTMLized a PSD last week Saturday and haven't heard back from them. Oh, the automated response from the server came...yeah, that was helpful. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So far, it&#8217;s been disappointing. I sent XHTMLized a PSD last week Saturday and haven&#8217;t heard back from them. Oh, the automated response from the server came&#8230;yeah, that was helpful. <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dimitri</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/03/xhtmlized-turns-designs-into-css-xhtml/#comment-138463</link>
		<dc:creator>Dimitri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 10:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/03/xhtmlized-turns-designs-into-css-xhtml/#comment-138463</guid>
		<description>Xumequinho: Hey, here is psd2html.com.  We do this for 1.5 years. Our service seems to be a bit faster, we usually take 8 business-hours to deliver the order. We also provide our clients with more options. Check this out: www.psd2html.com/order-now.html.

Also, we have all 20 developers in-house :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Xumequinho: Hey, here is psd2html.com.  We do this for 1.5 years. Our service seems to be a bit faster, we usually take 8 business-hours to deliver the order. We also provide our clients with more options. Check this out: <a href="http://www.psd2html.com/order-now.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.psd2html.com/order-now.html</a>.</p>
<p>Also, we have all 20 developers in-house <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Rosen</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/03/xhtmlized-turns-designs-into-css-xhtml/#comment-99943</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Rosen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 03:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/03/xhtmlized-turns-designs-into-css-xhtml/#comment-99943</guid>
		<description>@stugahtz

Appreciate it! Thanks for giving us a go!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@stugahtz</p>
<p>Appreciate it! Thanks for giving us a go!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stugahtz</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/03/xhtmlized-turns-designs-into-css-xhtml/#comment-99920</link>
		<dc:creator>stugahtz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 02:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/03/xhtmlized-turns-designs-into-css-xhtml/#comment-99920</guid>
		<description>We just received the coded design back today, and our entire team is extremely impressed.

We will be sending another design tomorrow.

cheers~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We just received the coded design back today, and our entire team is extremely impressed.</p>
<p>We will be sending another design tomorrow.</p>
<p>cheers~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stugahtz</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/03/xhtmlized-turns-designs-into-css-xhtml/#comment-98003</link>
		<dc:creator>stugahtz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 22:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/03/xhtmlized-turns-designs-into-css-xhtml/#comment-98003</guid>
		<description>Wow, this thread is outa hand.

Kudos to the crew at xhtmlized. This is certainly a great example of how sourcing benefits all involved and equalizes the playing field in a market which has become more and more commoditized.

For you laggards out there you may want to pick up "The World is Flat" by Thomas Friedman.

We sent our first design today and look forward to reviewing the code.

namaste~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, this thread is outa hand.</p>
<p>Kudos to the crew at xhtmlized. This is certainly a great example of how sourcing benefits all involved and equalizes the playing field in a market which has become more and more commoditized.</p>
<p>For you laggards out there you may want to pick up &#8220;The World is Flat&#8221; by Thomas Friedman.</p>
<p>We sent our first design today and look forward to reviewing the code.</p>
<p>namaste~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Rosen</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/03/xhtmlized-turns-designs-into-css-xhtml/#comment-96095</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Rosen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 05:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/03/xhtmlized-turns-designs-into-css-xhtml/#comment-96095</guid>
		<description>@ Xumequinho 

I'm not sure why you think the pricing system is ad-hoc? It's fixed price! Can't really get less ad-hoc than that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Xumequinho </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure why you think the pricing system is ad-hoc? It&#8217;s fixed price! Can&#8217;t really get less ad-hoc than that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xumequinho</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/03/xhtmlized-turns-designs-into-css-xhtml/#comment-96062</link>
		<dc:creator>Xumequinho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 03:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/03/xhtmlized-turns-designs-into-css-xhtml/#comment-96062</guid>
		<description>Who else does this besides these guys?  They are inventing their pricing scheme in an ad-hoc way and I would prefer someone reasonable, reliable, with good quality, and a better understanding of theor own rates.  Anyone know anyone off shore?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who else does this besides these guys?  They are inventing their pricing scheme in an ad-hoc way and I would prefer someone reasonable, reliable, with good quality, and a better understanding of theor own rates.  Anyone know anyone off shore?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael A.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/03/xhtmlized-turns-designs-into-css-xhtml/#comment-94610</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jul 2006 04:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/03/xhtmlized-turns-designs-into-css-xhtml/#comment-94610</guid>
		<description>WOW! such a passionate discussion. As many have pointed out, this certainly suggests that this is a "big idea" and in my opinion, a good one. 

However, I'm shocked that only one person mentioned (implied, actually) a very important issue that was the subject of hundreds, if not thousands, of discussions just like this one only a short time ago.

Yup, you got it one the first guess (I have faith in people): WEB STANDARDS. 

I'm not certain if the services meets the requirements, but if the XHTML and CSS are valid, you're half way there. You see, It is my belief that Web Standards will never come to be unless there is a free-or very inexpensive service or software-that will convert a design or an already coded site to meet code complaint Web Standards; there's just no way it will happen by any other means. So for the supporters of Web Standards, be grateful.

And for those of us who design and code but have found that the move to CSS and XHTML means 20% design time and 80% coding (hacks, bugs, simple two and three column layouts that still have problems in some browsers, etc..), I say thank god. The best way to learn good front end programming is to see it applied to your own design or reworked code. 

If you think of this service as partly educational, it changes the conversation completely. Bravo!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW! such a passionate discussion. As many have pointed out, this certainly suggests that this is a &#8220;big idea&#8221; and in my opinion, a good one. </p>
<p>However, I&#8217;m shocked that only one person mentioned (implied, actually) a very important issue that was the subject of hundreds, if not thousands, of discussions just like this one only a short time ago.</p>
<p>Yup, you got it one the first guess (I have faith in people): WEB STANDARDS. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not certain if the services meets the requirements, but if the XHTML and CSS are valid, you&#8217;re half way there. You see, It is my belief that Web Standards will never come to be unless there is a free-or very inexpensive service or software-that will convert a design or an already coded site to meet code complaint Web Standards; there&#8217;s just no way it will happen by any other means. So for the supporters of Web Standards, be grateful.</p>
<p>And for those of us who design and code but have found that the move to CSS and XHTML means 20% design time and 80% coding (hacks, bugs, simple two and three column layouts that still have problems in some browsers, etc..), I say thank god. The best way to learn good front end programming is to see it applied to your own design or reworked code. </p>
<p>If you think of this service as partly educational, it changes the conversation completely. Bravo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abowlofcereal.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Optimism</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/03/xhtmlized-turns-designs-into-css-xhtml/#comment-93695</link>
		<dc:creator>abowlofcereal.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Optimism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 06:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/03/xhtmlized-turns-designs-into-css-xhtml/#comment-93695</guid>
		<description>[...] I would like to thank Yorkali for the comment on the TechCrunch posting about XHTMLized. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I would like to thank Yorkali for the comment on the TechCrunch posting about XHTMLized. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sarahintampa</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/03/xhtmlized-turns-designs-into-css-xhtml/#comment-93586</link>
		<dc:creator>sarahintampa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 04:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/03/xhtmlized-turns-designs-into-css-xhtml/#comment-93586</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Make Your Site Web 2.0ish for Cheap...&lt;/strong&gt;

Sweet! I saw this over at TechCrunch a few days ago, but have been too busy to post: XHTMLized is a new service that will turn your site into CSS or XHTML by outsourcing your design to coders around the...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Make Your Site Web 2.0ish for Cheap&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Sweet! I saw this over at TechCrunch a few days ago, but have been too busy to post: XHTMLized is a new service that will turn your site into CSS or XHTML by outsourcing your design to coders around the&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ish</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/03/xhtmlized-turns-designs-into-css-xhtml/#comment-93450</link>
		<dc:creator>ish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2006 20:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/03/xhtmlized-turns-designs-into-css-xhtml/#comment-93450</guid>
		<description>Would love to see it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would love to see it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xumequinho</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/03/xhtmlized-turns-designs-into-css-xhtml/#comment-93227</link>
		<dc:creator>Xumequinho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2006 12:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/03/xhtmlized-turns-designs-into-css-xhtml/#comment-93227</guid>
		<description>Where do you think the $150 limit is?  Is it a per design ?(some designs are complicated to slice up).  Is it per page (obviously 50 pages should not be $150 unless they are all exactly the same).  How is proce determined?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where do you think the $150 limit is?  Is it a per design ?(some designs are complicated to slice up).  Is it per page (obviously 50 pages should not be $150 unless they are all exactly the same).  How is proce determined?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Caldwell</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/03/xhtmlized-turns-designs-into-css-xhtml/#comment-93046</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Caldwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2006 04:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/03/xhtmlized-turns-designs-into-css-xhtml/#comment-93046</guid>
		<description>Dave, 

I'm a bit embarrased to admit that your post (at 51) not only made me rethink my criticism of your service to contemplating signing up!  For the record, I'm not one of the "arrg! sweatshop!" commentators.  In my modestly lefty-social-democratic-overly utopian opinion, one of the joys of the Internet is the way that artisans and professionals in different cultures and at economic strata can co-operate and interact without the corrosive influence of multi-national corporations.  And certainly, I know there are many talented designers out there who should never be let near a text editor or copy of Dreamweaver.  

So consider this a qualified retraction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, </p>
<p>I&#8217;m a bit embarrased to admit that your post (at 51) not only made me rethink my criticism of your service to contemplating signing up!  For the record, I&#8217;m not one of the &#8220;arrg! sweatshop!&#8221; commentators.  In my modestly lefty-social-democratic-overly utopian opinion, one of the joys of the Internet is the way that artisans and professionals in different cultures and at economic strata can co-operate and interact without the corrosive influence of multi-national corporations.  And certainly, I know there are many talented designers out there who should never be let near a text editor or copy of Dreamweaver.  </p>
<p>So consider this a qualified retraction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Notes &#124; Blog Archive &#187; XHTMLized</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/03/xhtmlized-turns-designs-into-css-xhtml/#comment-92969</link>
		<dc:creator>Notes &#124; Blog Archive &#187; XHTMLized</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2006 02:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/03/xhtmlized-turns-designs-into-css-xhtml/#comment-92969</guid>
		<description>[...] Link &#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Link &nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/03/xhtmlized-turns-designs-into-css-xhtml/#comment-92739</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 19:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/03/xhtmlized-turns-designs-into-css-xhtml/#comment-92739</guid>
		<description>I'm sure Dave it going to make it big, this is a grewat idea. For those who want to walk away with the design - (forget them, hope there are not as many people there to worry about). All the best Dave :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure Dave it going to make it big, this is a grewat idea. For those who want to walk away with the design - (forget them, hope there are not as many people there to worry about). All the best Dave <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/03/xhtmlized-turns-designs-into-css-xhtml/#comment-92588</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 16:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/03/xhtmlized-turns-designs-into-css-xhtml/#comment-92588</guid>
		<description>Wow. All the concern for the XHTMLized business plan seems off the point. Great service, great price - so what's the prob. Use them or don't. I did, and my client and I are very happy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. All the concern for the XHTMLized business plan seems off the point. Great service, great price - so what&#8217;s the prob. Use them or don&#8217;t. I did, and my client and I are very happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shelley</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/03/xhtmlized-turns-designs-into-css-xhtml/#comment-92535</link>
		<dc:creator>Shelley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 14:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/07/03/xhtmlized-turns-designs-into-css-xhtml/#comment-92535</guid>
		<description>Dave Rosen, don't take offense, but I personally care if this story was pulled from Digg or not. That's nothing but PR. I'm surprised it was pulled, because I don't tink that Digg is into marketing, and this is a marketing post. Michael is marketing your service.

If you were offering a tool, it most likely wouldn't have 'dropped' off the page, because it would be tech, and it would be usable by many folk. Not surprising there.  And we would also like tools that could take what we sketch and make it real. 

As for the discussions of 'jealousy'--please stop attributing negative emotional context to critical discussion. I won't speak for others, but I'm critical of outsourcing (or offshoring) primarily because it is a spiraling effect that can only lead to adverse effects globally: corporations and business gets richer, temporarily, workers get poorer, eventually stop buying anything but essentials, and corps come crashing down.

It's not sustainable in the long run. And it's a decent discussion to have. Also one that was triggered by the phrase mentioned earlier. It's very difficult, though, to have a discussion when the only commentary is focus on being Digged, and a deliberate attempt to make this into a controversy in order for the company to be Digged.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave Rosen, don&#8217;t take offense, but I personally care if this story was pulled from Digg or not. That&#8217;s nothing but PR. I&#8217;m surprised it was pulled, because I don&#8217;t tink that Digg is into marketing, and this is a marketing post. Michael is marketing your service.</p>
<p>If you were offering a tool, it most likely wouldn&#8217;t have &#8216;dropped&#8217; off the page, because it would be tech, and it would be usable by many folk. Not surprising there.  And we would also like tools that could take what we sketch and make it real. </p>
<p>As for the discussions of &#8216;jealousy&#8217;&#8211;please stop attributing negative emotional context to critical discussion. I won&#8217;t speak for others, but I&#8217;m critical of outsourcing (or offshoring) primarily because it is a spiraling effect that can only lead to adverse effects globally: corporations and business gets richer, temporarily, workers get poorer, eventually stop buying anything but essentials, and corps come crashing down.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not sustainable in the long run. And it&#8217;s a decent discussion to have. Also one that was triggered by the phrase mentioned earlier. It&#8217;s very difficult, though, to have a discussion when the only commentary is focus on being Digged, and a deliberate attempt to make this into a controversy in order for the company to be Digged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.098 seconds -->
