<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A look inside PeopleAggregator</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/27/a-look-inside-peopleaggregator/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/27/a-look-inside-peopleaggregator/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 22:14:26 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: vashok@in.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/27/a-look-inside-peopleaggregator/comment-page-2/#comment-2962565</link>
		<dc:creator>vashok@in.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 14:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/27/a-look-inside-peopleaggregator/#comment-2962565</guid>
		<description>I need to contact the peoplwaggregator&#039;s support tem .Can anyone provide me the url or email of the team.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I need to contact the peoplwaggregator&#8217;s support tem .Can anyone provide me the url or email of the team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rakesh</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/27/a-look-inside-peopleaggregator/comment-page-2/#comment-2940617</link>
		<dc:creator>Rakesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 08:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/27/a-look-inside-peopleaggregator/#comment-2940617</guid>
		<description>That’s one UGLY website</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That’s one UGLY website</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Social Networks, Open Source and Risk Assessment &#171; UK Web Focus</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/27/a-look-inside-peopleaggregator/comment-page-2/#comment-2921152</link>
		<dc:creator>Social Networks, Open Source and Risk Assessment &#171; UK Web Focus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 07:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/27/a-look-inside-peopleaggregator/#comment-2921152</guid>
		<description>[...] Who remembers &#8220;Marc Canter’s much anticipated PeopleAggregator&#8220;, which provided, as described in TechCrunch in 2006, &#8220;free downloads of the software for organizations who prefer to host it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Who remembers &#8220;Marc Canter’s much anticipated PeopleAggregator&#8220;, which provided, as described in TechCrunch in 2006, &#8220;free downloads of the software for organizations who prefer to host it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doing the right thing vs. doing the things that matter to users &#171; Ungeek DaPo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/27/a-look-inside-peopleaggregator/comment-page-2/#comment-2199137</link>
		<dc:creator>Doing the right thing vs. doing the things that matter to users &#171; Ungeek DaPo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 17:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/27/a-look-inside-peopleaggregator/#comment-2199137</guid>
		<description>[...] Aggregator. You can get an overview of People Aggregator from a Techcrunch post almost 2 years old A look inside PeopleAggregator. Quoting from the post,   Here’s how it works. PeopleAggregator.net will be a fully functioning [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Aggregator. You can get an overview of People Aggregator from a Techcrunch post almost 2 years old A look inside PeopleAggregator. Quoting from the post,   Here’s how it works. PeopleAggregator.net will be a fully functioning [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Remember PeopleAggregator? &#171; UK Web Focus</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/27/a-look-inside-peopleaggregator/comment-page-2/#comment-1837105</link>
		<dc:creator>Remember PeopleAggregator? &#171; UK Web Focus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 06:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/27/a-look-inside-peopleaggregator/#comment-1837105</guid>
		<description>[...] today for the role he played in locking users into Macromedia Flash&#8220;. As described in a TechCrunch article &#8220;PeopleAggregator is all about using open standards to prevent lock-in in one of the most [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] today for the role he played in locking users into Macromedia Flash&#8220;. As described in a TechCrunch article &#8220;PeopleAggregator is all about using open standards to prevent lock-in in one of the most [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/27/a-look-inside-peopleaggregator/comment-page-2/#comment-1785185</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 23:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/27/a-look-inside-peopleaggregator/#comment-1785185</guid>
		<description>M4AYbL 3v3445vtt075nvn0g8d0nb</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>M4AYbL 3v3445vtt075nvn0g8d0nb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: information on buspar</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/27/a-look-inside-peopleaggregator/comment-page-2/#comment-1201601</link>
		<dc:creator>information on buspar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/27/a-look-inside-peopleaggregator/#comment-1201601</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;abusing fioricet...&lt;/strong&gt;

effexor xr contraindications...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>abusing fioricet&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>effexor xr contraindications&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc&#8217;s Voice &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Best Hits of Last Year - &#8220;Our product, services and Ideas&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/27/a-look-inside-peopleaggregator/comment-page-2/#comment-842360</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc&#8217;s Voice &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Best Hits of Last Year - &#8220;Our product, services and Ideas&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 11:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/27/a-look-inside-peopleaggregator/#comment-842360</guid>
		<description>[...] We ship PeopleAggregator 1.0 - Dan Farber, Richard MacManus, TechCrunch, Raju Bitter [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We ship PeopleAggregator 1.0 &#8211; Dan Farber, Richard MacManus, TechCrunch, Raju Bitter [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Venture Beat &#187; Blog Archive &#187; GoingOn v. PeopleAggregator: May the best man win!</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/27/a-look-inside-peopleaggregator/comment-page-2/#comment-163104</link>
		<dc:creator>Venture Beat &#187; Blog Archive &#187; GoingOn v. PeopleAggregator: May the best man win!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 07:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/27/a-look-inside-peopleaggregator/#comment-163104</guid>
		<description>[...] There is also a healthy debate going on about whether there is a business model behind the effort, or not. Some love the vision, some dismiss it. We shall see. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There is also a healthy debate going on about whether there is a business model behind the effort, or not. Some love the vision, some dismiss it. We shall see. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sickofmusic.com &#187; 5 ways to laugh about your startup</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/27/a-look-inside-peopleaggregator/comment-page-1/#comment-97289</link>
		<dc:creator>sickofmusic.com &#187; 5 ways to laugh about your startup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 09:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/27/a-look-inside-peopleaggregator/#comment-97289</guid>
		<description>[...] 2. Have no shame in pitching your company. I propose a new drinking game: every time you see somebody slide a sidearmed company pitch into a Techcrunch comment, you must take a shot. It usually sounds like, &#8220;Wow that&#8217;s a great idea, in fact, we&#8217;ve been working on LINK HERE for a few months and it incorporates that functionality, and more!&#8221; Just today I&#8217;ve seen some examples, but I won&#8217;t link to you because they&#8217;re too blatant. Okay, I lied. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2. Have no shame in pitching your company. I propose a new drinking game: every time you see somebody slide a sidearmed company pitch into a Techcrunch comment, you must take a shot. It usually sounds like, &#8220;Wow that&#8217;s a great idea, in fact, we&#8217;ve been working on LINK HERE for a few months and it incorporates that functionality, and more!&#8221; Just today I&#8217;ve seen some examples, but I won&#8217;t link to you because they&#8217;re too blatant. Okay, I lied. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vfgrsdtvsrdtv</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/27/a-look-inside-peopleaggregator/comment-page-1/#comment-95179</link>
		<dc:creator>vfgrsdtvsrdtv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jul 2006 20:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/27/a-look-inside-peopleaggregator/#comment-95179</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;fgdrstgvd...&lt;/strong&gt;

ceasrsv vtrtv werce v weqrqwer rwreqrwr...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>fgdrstgvd&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>ceasrsv vtrtv werce v weqrqwer rwreqrwr&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unitstep.net</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/27/a-look-inside-peopleaggregator/comment-page-1/#comment-90876</link>
		<dc:creator>unitstep.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 16:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/27/a-look-inside-peopleaggregator/#comment-90876</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Open data standards and microformats across networks...&lt;/strong&gt;

There&#8217;s been a lot of ......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Open data standards and microformats across networks&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>There&#8217;s been a lot of &#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 5 Ways To Make Me Laugh At Your Web 2.0 Company &#187; Project Syndicate</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/27/a-look-inside-peopleaggregator/comment-page-1/#comment-89882</link>
		<dc:creator>5 Ways To Make Me Laugh At Your Web 2.0 Company &#187; Project Syndicate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jul 2006 05:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/27/a-look-inside-peopleaggregator/#comment-89882</guid>
		<description>[...] 2. Have no shame in pitching your company.I propose a new drinking game: every time you see somebody slide a sidearmed company pitch into a Techcrunch comment, you must take a shot. It usually sounds like, &#8220;Wow that&#8217;s a great idea, in fact, we&#8217;ve been working on LINK HERE for a few months and it incorporates that functionality, and more!&#8221; Just today I&#8217;ve seen some examples, but I won&#8217;t link to you because they&#8217;re too blatant. Okay, I lied. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2. Have no shame in pitching your company.I propose a new drinking game: every time you see somebody slide a sidearmed company pitch into a Techcrunch comment, you must take a shot. It usually sounds like, &#8220;Wow that&#8217;s a great idea, in fact, we&#8217;ve been working on LINK HERE for a few months and it incorporates that functionality, and more!&#8221; Just today I&#8217;ve seen some examples, but I won&#8217;t link to you because they&#8217;re too blatant. Okay, I lied. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gnomedexer</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/27/a-look-inside-peopleaggregator/comment-page-1/#comment-88995</link>
		<dc:creator>gnomedexer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2006 00:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/27/a-look-inside-peopleaggregator/#comment-88995</guid>
		<description>http://digg.com/tech_news/Canter_Admits_to_being_3rd_generation_red_diaper_baby</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://digg.com/tech_news/Canter_Admits_to_being_3rd_generation_red_diaper_baby" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://digg.com/tech_news/Canter_Admits_to_being_3rd_generation_red_diaper_baby'>http://digg.com...red_diaper_baby</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JamesM</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/27/a-look-inside-peopleaggregator/comment-page-1/#comment-88099</link>
		<dc:creator>JamesM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 03:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/27/a-look-inside-peopleaggregator/#comment-88099</guid>
		<description>Yuck.. That&#039;s one UGLY website.. SO bussyyyy. They need better designers. Given how many people worked on it. I expected MORE. They got aleast a dozen indians developers working on it.  I guess you get what you paid for.. GO figures...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yuck.. That&#8217;s one UGLY website.. SO bussyyyy. They need better designers. Given how many people worked on it. I expected MORE. They got aleast a dozen indians developers working on it.  I guess you get what you paid for.. GO figures&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rakesh Agrawal&#8217;s Blog &#187; More about PeopleAggregator</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/27/a-look-inside-peopleaggregator/comment-page-1/#comment-87977</link>
		<dc:creator>Rakesh Agrawal&#8217;s Blog &#187; More about PeopleAggregator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 23:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/27/a-look-inside-peopleaggregator/#comment-87977</guid>
		<description>[...] Mike over at TechCrunch has a much better look at TechCrunch than my brief first glance.  Mike concludes with, IMO, the most significant thing about PA &#8212; they support open identity standards (among other open standards) so they win loyal users through trust instead of &#8220;lock-in&#8221;.  I remember hearing Marc pitch the value of data portability at Gnomedex last year so I know shipping PA is is a big milestone for him and his team. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mike over at TechCrunch has a much better look at TechCrunch than my brief first glance.  Mike concludes with, IMO, the most significant thing about PA &#8212; they support open identity standards (among other open standards) so they win loyal users through trust instead of &#8220;lock-in&#8221;.  I remember hearing Marc pitch the value of data portability at Gnomedex last year so I know shipping PA is is a big milestone for him and his team. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dreamcore</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/27/a-look-inside-peopleaggregator/comment-page-1/#comment-86838</link>
		<dc:creator>Dreamcore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 19:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/27/a-look-inside-peopleaggregator/#comment-86838</guid>
		<description>&quot;...password protection is scheduled to be removed Wednesday around noon Pacific time.&quot;

I wonder if &quot;around noon&quot; means &quot;hours around noon&quot;, &quot;days around noon&quot;, or maybe it&#039;s a geological allegory?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;password protection is scheduled to be removed Wednesday around noon Pacific time.&#8221;</p>
<p>I wonder if &#8220;around noon&#8221; means &#8220;hours around noon&#8221;, &#8220;days around noon&#8221;, or maybe it&#8217;s a geological allegory?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sull</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/27/a-look-inside-peopleaggregator/comment-page-1/#comment-86823</link>
		<dc:creator>sull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 18:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/27/a-look-inside-peopleaggregator/#comment-86823</guid>
		<description>i wont waste space speculating on the peepagg target market(s) and biz plan.

my first impression of the actual UI was &quot;It&#039;s like web 2.0 happened in the 90&#039;s&quot;

my opinion of the concept is mixed.  if done correctly, it could be a useful tool for organizations and interest groups... emphasis being on the &quot;create a network&quot; feature and the open source self-hosting option.  
its definately a good exercise for a first (second?) incarnation.  

bugs and poor UI aside, i think PA will have some moderate success (of course dependent on how quickly they can provide a stable product) but the from a broader perspective i would ask everyone to refresh and define what online social networking trully is.  then, look at the plethora of tools and services that can provide you with what you NEED.  

the web itself.... the blogosphere itself.... is a social network.   
Google is too.... been to gmail lately?  member of a google group? 

if PA is truly for geek-minded people.... then why wouldnt these people just install a blog and use social networking plugins for a loose version of what apparently PA offers.  

my typical experience with SN often result in &#039;people spam&#039;.  my successes are with interest groups/mailing lists.  

a friend (mmeiser.com) summed up my PA criticisms yesterday by simply saying &quot;

&quot;Networking for networking&#039;s sake is simply pointless.&quot;

But PA DOES allow you to make a network for your specific purposes.  
But how unique is that, really?  Is it enough to make this project succeed?
Why not install Drupal, Wordpress, Joomla etc instead of PeepAgg? 
Where is the blatant benefit here?  I&#039;m willing to get taught, but.....

sull</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i wont waste space speculating on the peepagg target market(s) and biz plan.</p>
<p>my first impression of the actual UI was &#8220;It&#8217;s like web 2.0 happened in the 90&#8217;s&#8221;</p>
<p>my opinion of the concept is mixed.  if done correctly, it could be a useful tool for organizations and interest groups&#8230; emphasis being on the &#8220;create a network&#8221; feature and the open source self-hosting option.<br />
its definately a good exercise for a first (second?) incarnation.  </p>
<p>bugs and poor UI aside, i think PA will have some moderate success (of course dependent on how quickly they can provide a stable product) but the from a broader perspective i would ask everyone to refresh and define what online social networking trully is.  then, look at the plethora of tools and services that can provide you with what you NEED.  </p>
<p>the web itself&#8230;. the blogosphere itself&#8230;. is a social network.<br />
Google is too&#8230;. been to gmail lately?  member of a google group? </p>
<p>if PA is truly for geek-minded people&#8230;. then why wouldnt these people just install a blog and use social networking plugins for a loose version of what apparently PA offers.  </p>
<p>my typical experience with SN often result in &#8216;people spam&#8217;.  my successes are with interest groups/mailing lists.  </p>
<p>a friend (mmeiser.com) summed up my PA criticisms yesterday by simply saying &#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Networking for networking&#8217;s sake is simply pointless.&#8221;</p>
<p>But PA DOES allow you to make a network for your specific purposes.<br />
But how unique is that, really?  Is it enough to make this project succeed?<br />
Why not install Drupal, Wordpress, Joomla etc instead of PeepAgg?<br />
Where is the blatant benefit here?  I&#8217;m willing to get taught, but&#8230;..</p>
<p>sull</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/27/a-look-inside-peopleaggregator/comment-page-1/#comment-86721</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 16:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/27/a-look-inside-peopleaggregator/#comment-86721</guid>
		<description>I think the idea of a single web identity that can be shared through an open standard is one whose time has come. I would like to see this effort combined with that from Identity 2.0. It would be the concept of having a single .net login / identity, but it would actually have some meaning since it also would be tied up with the social networking activity that is definitely gaining traction these days. 

For all of those comments above that complain that people don&#039;t care about open standards, you&#039;re missing the point. It doesn&#039;t matter if people care about the WORDS &#039;open standards&#039;, but more if people are going to care if their social network connections belong to themselves or to some company like LinkedIn or MySpace. AND... with the fickle nature of trends (which something like MySpace could arguably be), I think the appeal of being able to uproot when you&#039;ve outgrown this social hub &#039;neighborhood&#039; could be quite appealing to anyone as long as it was marketed properly. Time will tell...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the idea of a single web identity that can be shared through an open standard is one whose time has come. I would like to see this effort combined with that from Identity 2.0. It would be the concept of having a single .net login / identity, but it would actually have some meaning since it also would be tied up with the social networking activity that is definitely gaining traction these days. </p>
<p>For all of those comments above that complain that people don&#8217;t care about open standards, you&#8217;re missing the point. It doesn&#8217;t matter if people care about the WORDS &#8216;open standards&#8217;, but more if people are going to care if their social network connections belong to themselves or to some company like LinkedIn or MySpace. AND&#8230; with the fickle nature of trends (which something like MySpace could arguably be), I think the appeal of being able to uproot when you&#8217;ve outgrown this social hub &#8216;neighborhood&#8217; could be quite appealing to anyone as long as it was marketed properly. Time will tell&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: usmediaweb&#187; Blog Archive &#187; It’s All About Identity</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/27/a-look-inside-peopleaggregator/comment-page-1/#comment-86675</link>
		<dc:creator>usmediaweb&#187; Blog Archive &#187; It’s All About Identity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/27/a-look-inside-peopleaggregator/#comment-86675</guid>
		<description>[...] That&#8217;s the tree that Marc Canter is barking up, with his latest project, PeopleAggregator.  PeopleAggregator is a social networking platform, built on open standards, and capable of aggregating all of your identities into one place, and transporting them wherevere you want. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] That&#8217;s the tree that Marc Canter is barking up, with his latest project, PeopleAggregator.  PeopleAggregator is a social networking platform, built on open standards, and capable of aggregating all of your identities into one place, and transporting them wherevere you want. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JasonKolb.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/27/a-look-inside-peopleaggregator/comment-page-1/#comment-86662</link>
		<dc:creator>JasonKolb.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/27/a-look-inside-peopleaggregator/#comment-86662</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;PeopleAggregator:  The MySpace Killer?...&lt;/strong&gt;

I just found out about a site called PeopleAggregator (Via TechCrunch) which aggregates your online identity from various social networking sites into one place. Not only is it a social network itself (that part I&#039;m not all that excited about...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>PeopleAggregator:  The MySpace Killer?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I just found out about a site called PeopleAggregator (Via TechCrunch) which aggregates your online identity from various social networking sites into one place. Not only is it a social network itself (that part I&#8217;m not all that excited about&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It&#8217;s All About Identity -- Alec Saunders .LOG</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/27/a-look-inside-peopleaggregator/comment-page-1/#comment-86633</link>
		<dc:creator>It&#8217;s All About Identity -- Alec Saunders .LOG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 14:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/27/a-look-inside-peopleaggregator/#comment-86633</guid>
		<description>[...] That&#8217;s the tree that Marc Canter is barking up, with his latest project, PeopleAggregator.  PeopleAggregator is a social networking platform, built on open standards, and capable of aggregating all of your identities into one place, and transporting them wherevere you want. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] That&#8217;s the tree that Marc Canter is barking up, with his latest project, PeopleAggregator.  PeopleAggregator is a social networking platform, built on open standards, and capable of aggregating all of your identities into one place, and transporting them wherevere you want. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dee&#8217;s-Planet! &#187; A look inside PeopleAggregator</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/27/a-look-inside-peopleaggregator/comment-page-1/#comment-86605</link>
		<dc:creator>Dee&#8217;s-Planet! &#187; A look inside PeopleAggregator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 14:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/27/a-look-inside-peopleaggregator/#comment-86605</guid>
		<description>[...] Marc Canter&#8217;s much anticipated PeopleAggregator is starting to roll out, PeopleAggregator.net will be a fully functioning online social network in and of itself, but it will share information with other services through common identity standards for our profiles and through APIs (application programming interfaces) for our writing, multimedia and contacts. Continue reading full article&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Marc Canter&rsquo;s much anticipated PeopleAggregator is starting to roll out, PeopleAggregator.net will be a fully functioning online social network in and of itself, but it will share information with other services through common identity standards for our profiles and through APIs (application programming interfaces) for our writing, multimedia and contacts. Continue reading full article&hellip; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Dewey</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/27/a-look-inside-peopleaggregator/comment-page-1/#comment-86578</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Dewey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 13:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/27/a-look-inside-peopleaggregator/#comment-86578</guid>
		<description>We&#039;re working on something similar, although not as complicated. It revolves more around communication and data sharing, which will hopefully lead to tons of new applications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re working on something similar, although not as complicated. It revolves more around communication and data sharing, which will hopefully lead to tons of new applications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wil</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/27/a-look-inside-peopleaggregator/comment-page-1/#comment-86540</link>
		<dc:creator>Wil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 13:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/27/a-look-inside-peopleaggregator/#comment-86540</guid>
		<description>These myspace or facebook and others will not open up until users demand the plasticity in porting and transfering their data/id over to other site.  Just like credit card co. do now.

It will happen but not that soon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These myspace or facebook and others will not open up until users demand the plasticity in porting and transfering their data/id over to other site.  Just like credit card co. do now.</p>
<p>It will happen but not that soon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
