<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digg 3.0 Launches, First Thoughts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/26/digg-30-launches-first-thoughts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/26/digg-30-launches-first-thoughts/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:23:42 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Digg 3.0 at PubADdict</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/26/digg-30-launches-first-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-1649195</link>
		<dc:creator>Digg 3.0 at PubADdict</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 18:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/26/digg-30-launches-first-thoughts/#comment-1649195</guid>
		<description>[...] lançado ontem a nova versão do Digg. Ainda não experimentei a fundo, mas ficam aqui algumas impressões e 10 formas de tirar partido desta [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] lançado ontem a nova versão do Digg. Ainda não experimentei a fundo, mas ficam aqui algumas impressões e 10 formas de tirar partido desta [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 泛泛其景 &#187; 2.0快报:Digg3.0隆重推出</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/26/digg-30-launches-first-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-101091</link>
		<dc:creator>泛泛其景 &#187; 2.0快报:Digg3.0隆重推出</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 21:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/26/digg-30-launches-first-thoughts/#comment-101091</guid>
		<description>[...] 这几天，Digg的喜事不断。这儿，这儿，当然最大的莫过于今天正式推出的v3版本。 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 这几天，Digg的喜事不断。这儿，这儿，当然最大的莫过于今天正式推出的v3版本。 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; The Bivings Report</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/26/digg-30-launches-first-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-87166</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; The Bivings Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 01:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/26/digg-30-launches-first-thoughts/#comment-87166</guid>
		<description>[...] In the last few weeks, we&#8217;ve seen the news aggregation site Digg expand its&#8217; focus beyond Technology news in an effort to reach more eyeballs. We&#8217;ve also seen Netscape launch a Digg competitor that is also aimed at a wide audience, covering just about every topic you can think of. The macro approach of Digg and Netscape is a pretty clear attempt to compete with large, traditional media websites. Digg is no longer a niche website aimed at a small community of users. It is trying to go big time. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In the last few weeks, we&#8217;ve seen the news aggregation site Digg expand its&#8217; focus beyond Technology news in an effort to reach more eyeballs. We&#8217;ve also seen Netscape launch a Digg competitor that is also aimed at a wide audience, covering just about every topic you can think of. The macro approach of Digg and Netscape is a pretty clear attempt to compete with large, traditional media websites. Digg is no longer a niche website aimed at a small community of users. It is trying to go big time. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quantum Thinking &#187; Digg 3.crap</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/26/digg-30-launches-first-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-86580</link>
		<dc:creator>Quantum Thinking &#187; Digg 3.crap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 13:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/26/digg-30-launches-first-thoughts/#comment-86580</guid>
		<description>[...] Here are some other opinions on Digg v3. It looks like I am not the only one who thinks v3 is a eff up. Also have a look at the latest episode of Diggnation. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Here are some other opinions on Digg v3. It looks like I am not the only one who thinks v3 is a eff up. Also have a look at the latest episode of Diggnation. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 咱就是在网络上胡闹 &#187; links for 2006-06-27</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/26/digg-30-launches-first-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-85942</link>
		<dc:creator>咱就是在网络上胡闹 &#187; links for 2006-06-27</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 00:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/26/digg-30-launches-first-thoughts/#comment-85942</guid>
		<description>[...] TechCrunch » Blog Archive » Digg 3.0 Launches, First Thoughts (tags: digg web2.0) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TechCrunch » Blog Archive » Digg 3.0 Launches, First Thoughts (tags: digg web2.0) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Subir Raha</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/26/digg-30-launches-first-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-85558</link>
		<dc:creator>Subir Raha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 15:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/26/digg-30-launches-first-thoughts/#comment-85558</guid>
		<description>The new features at Digg 3 are pretty interesting and I am sure the Digg community will start developing more &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2005/09/complete-digg-tools-collection/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Digg tools&lt;/a&gt; to further tweak the interface and use the new features.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new features at Digg 3 are pretty interesting and I am sure the Digg community will start developing more <a href="http://www.quickonlinetips.com/archives/2005/09/complete-digg-tools-collection/" rel="nofollow">Digg tools</a> to further tweak the interface and use the new features.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digg V3.0发布，引发口水大战 &#124; BiZwiKi.CN - 喧闹 PK 噪音</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/26/digg-30-launches-first-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-85556</link>
		<dc:creator>Digg V3.0发布，引发口水大战 &#124; BiZwiKi.CN - 喧闹 PK 噪音</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 15:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/26/digg-30-launches-first-thoughts/#comment-85556</guid>
		<description>[...] 正如Nicole 之前的报道，今天是digg V3.0 启动的大喜日子。 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 正如Nicole 之前的报道，今天是digg V3.0 启动的大喜日子。 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/26/digg-30-launches-first-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-85495</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 14:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/26/digg-30-launches-first-thoughts/#comment-85495</guid>
		<description>Although Digg now have more verticals, will they be able to go beyond their primarily tech-savvy user base? my guess is that the stories in other verticals are probably interesting to their tech users but may not necessarily be what other types of users find interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although Digg now have more verticals, will they be able to go beyond their primarily tech-savvy user base? my guess is that the stories in other verticals are probably interesting to their tech users but may not necessarily be what other types of users find interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/26/digg-30-launches-first-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-85464</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 13:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/26/digg-30-launches-first-thoughts/#comment-85464</guid>
		<description>The ui is nice and a little easier to navigate.  As far as ads go, that&#039;s fine too...they&#039;re not too distracting.  My biggest issue is what I was afriad of when I initially heard of the update.  The original user base seems to have dropped off the site.  The comments I see now on the technology container are childish, uninformative and useless.  I use to look forward to the debates and helpful feedback in the comments....now it&#039;s full of inane flamwars and trolling.  I think I might just head to slashdot for now on, it&#039;s really too bad too because I liked digg alot.  I also believe it&#039;s only going to get worse in the coming months as more and more new users begin to &quot;contribute&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ui is nice and a little easier to navigate.  As far as ads go, that&#8217;s fine too&#8230;they&#8217;re not too distracting.  My biggest issue is what I was afriad of when I initially heard of the update.  The original user base seems to have dropped off the site.  The comments I see now on the technology container are childish, uninformative and useless.  I use to look forward to the debates and helpful feedback in the comments&#8230;.now it&#8217;s full of inane flamwars and trolling.  I think I might just head to slashdot for now on, it&#8217;s really too bad too because I liked digg alot.  I also believe it&#8217;s only going to get worse in the coming months as more and more new users begin to &#8220;contribute&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bloggers Buzz</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/26/digg-30-launches-first-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-85308</link>
		<dc:creator>Bloggers Buzz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 08:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/26/digg-30-launches-first-thoughts/#comment-85308</guid>
		<description>[...] TechCrunch has a short post on first thoughts of the new Digg 3.0      &#160; &#160;Posted in In the News &#160; &#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TechCrunch has a short post on first thoughts of the new Digg 3.0      &nbsp; &nbsp;Posted in In the News &nbsp; &nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Motoricerca</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/26/digg-30-launches-first-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-85274</link>
		<dc:creator>Motoricerca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 07:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/26/digg-30-launches-first-thoughts/#comment-85274</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;MotoNews - Google prepara il word processor?...&lt;/strong&gt;

	Pare che nei giorni scorsi ci sia stato un trasferimento di dati da Writely.com, il web word processor acquisito da Google. Il server di destinazione è ignoto, ma qualcuno ha scoperto che il dominio writely.l.google.com è attivo e, per ora, punta al...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>MotoNews &#8211; Google prepara il word processor?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>	Pare che nei giorni scorsi ci sia stato un trasferimento di dati da Writely.com, il web word processor acquisito da Google. Il server di destinazione è ignoto, ma qualcuno ha scoperto che il dominio writely.l.google.com è attivo e, per ora, punta al&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/26/digg-30-launches-first-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-85189</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 05:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/26/digg-30-launches-first-thoughts/#comment-85189</guid>
		<description>The new UI is neat, personally i like it alot. But is it going to entice more non-tech users??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new UI is neat, personally i like it alot. But is it going to entice more non-tech users??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technoogle &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Digg V3 Launches</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/26/digg-30-launches-first-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-85120</link>
		<dc:creator>Technoogle &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Digg V3 Launches</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 03:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/26/digg-30-launches-first-thoughts/#comment-85120</guid>
		<description>[...] More Coverage: Techcrunch, Mashable, TechBlog, PostBubble. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More Coverage: Techcrunch, Mashable, TechBlog, PostBubble. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryce</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/26/digg-30-launches-first-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-85101</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 02:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/26/digg-30-launches-first-thoughts/#comment-85101</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s &lt;b&gt;alright&lt;/b&gt; - but I think it needs to be 100% wide. Move the skyscraper add to the right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s <b>alright</b> &#8211; but I think it needs to be 100% wide. Move the skyscraper add to the right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P2P Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/26/digg-30-launches-first-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-85059</link>
		<dc:creator>P2P Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 00:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/26/digg-30-launches-first-thoughts/#comment-85059</guid>
		<description>I really expected them to add tags to the site, especially since all the new categories make it easier for stuff to get lost. Is there any particular reason why tags might not be a good idea for a site like Digg?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really expected them to add tags to the site, especially since all the new categories make it easier for stuff to get lost. Is there any particular reason why tags might not be a good idea for a site like Digg?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PubADdict &#187; Digg 3.0</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/26/digg-30-launches-first-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-85034</link>
		<dc:creator>PubADdict &#187; Digg 3.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 00:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/26/digg-30-launches-first-thoughts/#comment-85034</guid>
		<description>[...] Foi lançado ontem a nova versão do Digg. Ainda não experimentei a fundo, mas ficam aqui algumas impressões e 10 formas de tirar partido desta ferramenta. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Foi lançado ontem a nova versão do Digg. Ainda não experimentei a fundo, mas ficam aqui algumas impressões e 10 formas de tirar partido desta ferramenta. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/26/digg-30-launches-first-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-84967</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 21:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/26/digg-30-launches-first-thoughts/#comment-84967</guid>
		<description>Digg 3.0 is a big yawner.  They didn&#039;t really add much.  There are glaring holes in their &quot;Digg Topics.&quot;  Reddit is looking better and better everyday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Digg 3.0 is a big yawner.  They didn&#8217;t really add much.  There are glaring holes in their &#8220;Digg Topics.&#8221;  Reddit is looking better and better everyday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: futuria.hr &#187; MSN se hvali i ostale vijesti</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/26/digg-30-launches-first-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-84932</link>
		<dc:creator>futuria.hr &#187; MSN se hvali i ostale vijesti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 20:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/26/digg-30-launches-first-thoughts/#comment-84932</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8230;Digg 3.0 je u pogonu. Više na digg blogu i Techcrunchu. Bilo je nekih tehničkih problemčića zbog povećane navale na servere, ali izgleda da je sada sve OK. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8230;Digg 3.0 je u pogonu. Više na digg blogu i Techcrunchu. Bilo je nekih tehničkih problemčića zbog povećane navale na servere, ali izgleda da je sada sve OK. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan100</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/26/digg-30-launches-first-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-84927</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan100</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 20:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/26/digg-30-launches-first-thoughts/#comment-84927</guid>
		<description>Daniel, thanks for the explanation for moving some content to a seperate tab. However I just couldn&#039;t get on with the new layout, so restored the old one using CSS. Details on my blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel, thanks for the explanation for moving some content to a seperate tab. However I just couldn&#8217;t get on with the new layout, so restored the old one using CSS. Details on my blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TWWS</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/26/digg-30-launches-first-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-84917</link>
		<dc:creator>TWWS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 19:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/26/digg-30-launches-first-thoughts/#comment-84917</guid>
		<description>I liked Digg more yesterday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked Digg more yesterday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/26/digg-30-launches-first-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-84908</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 19:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/26/digg-30-launches-first-thoughts/#comment-84908</guid>
		<description>I wonder if getting stories on the homepage &quot;faster&quot; is really a good thing. Personally, I&#039;d rather see stories on the homepage that are &quot;better&quot;.

Digg is already problematic because it allows users to see the number of Diggs a story has. For true crowd wisdom to kick in, it assumes that every individual is acting independently, with no knowledge of how others are voting. By letting users see the number of Diggs, it encourages a &quot;follow the pack&quot; behavior by which the popular stories get more popular.

It seems like they&#039;re adopting a system where they&#039;re encouraging users to digg stories with a lot of diggs already. Which means that &quot;early momentum&quot; almost becomes a more important factor in getting to the front page than the quality of the story.

Personally I&#039;d rather see them hide the total number of Diggs (or at least bury it somewhere it&#039;s not so visible), and focus on getting quality stories on the front page vs moving stories there quickly.

Aside from that though, I really like what they&#039;re doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if getting stories on the homepage &#8220;faster&#8221; is really a good thing. Personally, I&#8217;d rather see stories on the homepage that are &#8220;better&#8221;.</p>
<p>Digg is already problematic because it allows users to see the number of Diggs a story has. For true crowd wisdom to kick in, it assumes that every individual is acting independently, with no knowledge of how others are voting. By letting users see the number of Diggs, it encourages a &#8220;follow the pack&#8221; behavior by which the popular stories get more popular.</p>
<p>It seems like they&#8217;re adopting a system where they&#8217;re encouraging users to digg stories with a lot of diggs already. Which means that &#8220;early momentum&#8221; almost becomes a more important factor in getting to the front page than the quality of the story.</p>
<p>Personally I&#8217;d rather see them hide the total number of Diggs (or at least bury it somewhere it&#8217;s not so visible), and focus on getting quality stories on the front page vs moving stories there quickly.</p>
<p>Aside from that though, I really like what they&#8217;re doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Living in the Whine Country &#187; OK&#8230; Digg v3 went live, but what are we getting?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/26/digg-30-launches-first-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-84900</link>
		<dc:creator>Living in the Whine Country &#187; OK&#8230; Digg v3 went live, but what are we getting?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 19:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/26/digg-30-launches-first-thoughts/#comment-84900</guid>
		<description>[...] Tech Crunch did a great write-up on the new Digg v3. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tech Crunch did a great write-up on the new Digg v3. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeroen Mulder</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/26/digg-30-launches-first-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-84897</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeroen Mulder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 19:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/26/digg-30-launches-first-thoughts/#comment-84897</guid>
		<description>Daniel: Sounds fair to me. Please hurry. I kid, I kid. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel: Sounds fair to me. Please hurry. I kid, I kid. <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Kellett</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/26/digg-30-launches-first-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-84893</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Kellett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 19:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/26/digg-30-launches-first-thoughts/#comment-84893</guid>
		<description>Correct me if I&#039;m wrong here, but I&#039;m sure the tag cloud has always shown higher dugg stories as bigger in the cloud.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correct me if I&#8217;m wrong here, but I&#8217;m sure the tag cloud has always shown higher dugg stories as bigger in the cloud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Smallman</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/26/digg-30-launches-first-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-84890</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Smallman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 19:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/26/digg-30-launches-first-thoughts/#comment-84890</guid>
		<description>So how come Digg doesn&#039;t work with del.icio.us?

There&#039;s a tie-in with Blogger et al, why not del.icio.us?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So how come Digg doesn&#8217;t work with del.icio.us?</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a tie-in with Blogger et al, why not del.icio.us?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
