<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Something I Don&#8217;t Get About Swaptree</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/02/i-like-swaptree-but/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/02/i-like-swaptree-but/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 14:02:54 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tjbuck</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/02/i-like-swaptree-but/comment-page-1/#comment-2754097</link>
		<dc:creator>tjbuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 19:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/02/i-like-swaptree-but/#comment-2754097</guid>
		<description>The only bad thing as a new member to Swaptree that I see and thats so far is that you can only do so many trades until they confirm you have shipped your item...this is obviously to keep you searching for ahwile after and waiting for others to comment before you are allowed to make more trades...also it made sense to me that if I put a higher quality item on there, perhaps a brand new book which I ordered two of at one time without knowing, then I thought it would up the value of the item I would receive in trade...obviously WRONG as someone offered me something of way less value and I declined with a warning to let me know that I shouldn&#039;t do this as it would restrict future trades...of course you must always try inm order to learn and I learned that you don&#039;t put items of value to you on there.  Things you are ready to throw away is much better...more fair...oh well we live and learn..otherwise its nice to trade a few things and get a new book but I also think ebay is better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only bad thing as a new member to Swaptree that I see and thats so far is that you can only do so many trades until they confirm you have shipped your item&#8230;this is obviously to keep you searching for ahwile after and waiting for others to comment before you are allowed to make more trades&#8230;also it made sense to me that if I put a higher quality item on there, perhaps a brand new book which I ordered two of at one time without knowing, then I thought it would up the value of the item I would receive in trade&#8230;obviously WRONG as someone offered me something of way less value and I declined with a warning to let me know that I shouldn&#8217;t do this as it would restrict future trades&#8230;of course you must always try inm order to learn and I learned that you don&#8217;t put items of value to you on there.  Things you are ready to throw away is much better&#8230;more fair&#8230;oh well we live and learn..otherwise its nice to trade a few things and get a new book but I also think ebay is better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Forget eBay. Use Swaptree.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/02/i-like-swaptree-but/comment-page-1/#comment-2477158</link>
		<dc:creator>Forget eBay. Use Swaptree.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 09:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/02/i-like-swaptree-but/#comment-2477158</guid>
		<description>[...] been covering Boston-based Swaptree since mid 2006. The company is creating a network of users who swap books, CDs, DVDs and video games. The company [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] been covering Boston-based Swaptree since mid 2006. The company is creating a network of users who swap books, CDs, DVDs and video games. The company [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ajax Girl &#187; Blog Archive &#187; SwapTree, Back From The Dead - In Private Beta</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/02/i-like-swaptree-but/comment-page-1/#comment-1470428</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajax Girl &#187; Blog Archive &#187; SwapTree, Back From The Dead - In Private Beta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 12:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/02/i-like-swaptree-but/#comment-1470428</guid>
		<description>[...] was sure trading site Swaptree had been abaondoned. After a flurry of press about them over a year ago, they went very quiet. Potential investors told me they&#8217;d [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was sure trading site Swaptree had been abaondoned. After a flurry of press about them over a year ago, they went very quiet. Potential investors told me they&#8217;d [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SwapTree, Back From The Dead - In Private Beta</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/02/i-like-swaptree-but/comment-page-1/#comment-1470353</link>
		<dc:creator>SwapTree, Back From The Dead - In Private Beta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 11:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/02/i-like-swaptree-but/#comment-1470353</guid>
		<description>[...] was sure trading site Swaptree had been abaondoned. After a flurry of press about them over a year ago, they went very quiet. Potential investors told me they&#8217;d [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was sure trading site Swaptree had been abaondoned. After a flurry of press about them over a year ago, they went very quiet. Potential investors told me they&#8217;d [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/02/i-like-swaptree-but/comment-page-1/#comment-98239</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 05:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/02/i-like-swaptree-but/#comment-98239</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;[bartering vs. using currency is] more than anything it’s a question of perceived value.&lt;/i&gt;

i don&#039;t know what &#039;perceived value&#039; is, but i&#039;ve tried dumping/trading used books i&#039;ve read for several years now, and have rarely been successful. i once used that service where you put some sticker on the book and then leave it someplace pseudo-public, like a coffeeshop or something, but that kinda sucked for several reason.

i tried to start, via craigs, a bartering book ring - where all us pseudo-liberal types would each by the latest hate-Bush book and then all swap in a couple of weeks. to me, it was about saving money, but is was at least as much about building community - real community, with a political backdrop. the book ring never worked. 

maybe swaptree will eventually go live.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>[bartering vs. using currency is] more than anything it’s a question of perceived value.</i></p>
<p>i don&#8217;t know what &#8216;perceived value&#8217; is, but i&#8217;ve tried dumping/trading used books i&#8217;ve read for several years now, and have rarely been successful. i once used that service where you put some sticker on the book and then leave it someplace pseudo-public, like a coffeeshop or something, but that kinda sucked for several reason.</p>
<p>i tried to start, via craigs, a bartering book ring &#8211; where all us pseudo-liberal types would each by the latest hate-Bush book and then all swap in a couple of weeks. to me, it was about saving money, but is was at least as much about building community &#8211; real community, with a political backdrop. the book ring never worked. </p>
<p>maybe swaptree will eventually go live.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/02/i-like-swaptree-but/comment-page-1/#comment-96083</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 04:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/02/i-like-swaptree-but/#comment-96083</guid>
		<description>There are many great questions concerning this post.  I&#039;m a cofounder of a similar site www.lendmonkey.com and I&#039;d like to share some of our answers.  

Pete/James - This model failed by a number of dotcom companies we believe because it was prior to peer to peer trading.  Most people had a &#039;quality over quantity&#039; point of view due to the high cost of media.  Post peer to peer, people expect to have access to a much greater supply of media for a low cost.  We&#039;re putting these people in touch with each other so they can save time downloading and organizing files, but still have the benefits of peer to peer.

Phil - We are community based and allow people to make friends with other people who like the same type of media - not &#039;useless stuff.&#039;  Several of the new trading sites are System-based which is easy for people to put &#039;useless stuff&#039; up for trade.  

Seth - Why barter?  Bartering cuts the middle man as much as possible for commodity type products like media.  A movies value is determined by having a person that wants the film.  Any movie has the chance to have the same value as any other movie when niche markets are served.  Think of eBay: purchasing a film on eBay has a small dollar price, plus a fairly large shipping price (Up to $8 when we started lendmonkey!) for a single dvd.  We provide mailers to send the dvd case at wholesale and do not upcharge on shipping costs, so typical shipping is $1.80 for a dvd.

Dave - If you&#039;re interested in local swaps, then you&#039;ll like lendmonkey Places. 

SlashClick - SconicSwap wasn&#039;t the first.  An early dotcom swap site that used a point system for bartering that failed was called MrSwap.

We believe in a community rather than an algorithm, and we believe after trials that a small charge per trade will save our members time and result in a better trading community than an ad supported site.  We would rather have a small, reliable community of traders; than a huge community of people with no committment to each other.  We allow swapping of books, music, movies and games and we’re open to a global marketplace (though our pages are not localized yet). If you’re interested in a trading site which is similar to Swaptree but allows you to trade with your neighbors, coworkers, and friends rather than having to mail everything; then please check us out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are many great questions concerning this post.  I&#8217;m a cofounder of a similar site <a href="http://www.lendmonkey.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.lendmonkey.com'>http://www.lendmonkey.com</a> and I&#8217;d like to share some of our answers.  </p>
<p>Pete/James &#8211; This model failed by a number of dotcom companies we believe because it was prior to peer to peer trading.  Most people had a &#8216;quality over quantity&#8217; point of view due to the high cost of media.  Post peer to peer, people expect to have access to a much greater supply of media for a low cost.  We&#8217;re putting these people in touch with each other so they can save time downloading and organizing files, but still have the benefits of peer to peer.</p>
<p>Phil &#8211; We are community based and allow people to make friends with other people who like the same type of media &#8211; not &#8216;useless stuff.&#8217;  Several of the new trading sites are System-based which is easy for people to put &#8216;useless stuff&#8217; up for trade.  </p>
<p>Seth &#8211; Why barter?  Bartering cuts the middle man as much as possible for commodity type products like media.  A movies value is determined by having a person that wants the film.  Any movie has the chance to have the same value as any other movie when niche markets are served.  Think of eBay: purchasing a film on eBay has a small dollar price, plus a fairly large shipping price (Up to $8 when we started lendmonkey!) for a single dvd.  We provide mailers to send the dvd case at wholesale and do not upcharge on shipping costs, so typical shipping is $1.80 for a dvd.</p>
<p>Dave &#8211; If you&#8217;re interested in local swaps, then you&#8217;ll like lendmonkey Places. </p>
<p>SlashClick &#8211; SconicSwap wasn&#8217;t the first.  An early dotcom swap site that used a point system for bartering that failed was called MrSwap.</p>
<p>We believe in a community rather than an algorithm, and we believe after trials that a small charge per trade will save our members time and result in a better trading community than an ad supported site.  We would rather have a small, reliable community of traders; than a huge community of people with no committment to each other.  We allow swapping of books, music, movies and games and we’re open to a global marketplace (though our pages are not localized yet). If you’re interested in a trading site which is similar to Swaptree but allows you to trade with your neighbors, coworkers, and friends rather than having to mail everything; then please check us out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch en français &#187; Du nouveau chez Swaptree (captures d&#8217;écran)</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/02/i-like-swaptree-but/comment-page-1/#comment-80861</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch en français &#187; Du nouveau chez Swaptree (captures d&#8217;écran)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 20:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/02/i-like-swaptree-but/#comment-80861</guid>
		<description>[...] Il y a quelques semaines, nous avons posté un article quelque peu négatif sur une start-up en cours de développement basée à Boston, Swaptree. Par ailleurs, Ouriel avait rédigé un article comparatif dans lequel Swaptree faisait pâle figure face au service français, SplitGames. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Il y a quelques semaines, nous avons posté un article quelque peu négatif sur une start-up en cours de développement basée à Boston, Swaptree. Par ailleurs, Ouriel avait rédigé un article comparatif dans lequel Swaptree faisait pâle figure face au service français, SplitGames. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OceanCreep &#187; Swaptree, a new swapping service</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/02/i-like-swaptree-but/comment-page-1/#comment-80288</link>
		<dc:creator>OceanCreep &#187; Swaptree, a new swapping service</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 08:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/02/i-like-swaptree-but/#comment-80288</guid>
		<description>[...] Other reviews: techcrunch.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Other reviews: techcrunch.com [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; Swaptree アップデート、初のスクリーンショット</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/02/i-like-swaptree-but/comment-page-1/#comment-80177</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; Swaptree アップデート、初のスクリーンショット</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 05:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/02/i-like-swaptree-but/#comment-80177</guid>
		<description>[...] ２、３週間前、私は「Swaptree」というボストンにある未公開のスタートアップに関し、いくぶんネガティブな記事を書いた。その後、Ourielが フォローアップ記事で、フランスのサービスSplit Games社と比らべ、Swaptree社が（劣るものとして）比較する記事を書いた。 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ２、３週間前、私は「Swaptree」というボストンにある未公開のスタートアップに関し、いくぶんネガティブな記事を書いた。その後、Ourielが フォローアップ記事で、フランスのサービスSplit Games社と比らべ、Swaptree社が（劣るものとして）比較する記事を書いた。 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: All About Web Technologies &#187; Web 2.0 Test</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/02/i-like-swaptree-but/comment-page-1/#comment-79544</link>
		<dc:creator>All About Web Technologies &#187; Web 2.0 Test</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 16:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/02/i-like-swaptree-but/#comment-79544</guid>
		<description>[...] Web 2.0 Test Posted in Web 2.0 by maxwell on the June 20th, 2006   A couple of weeks ago I wrote a somewhat negative post about an unlaunched startup in Boston called Swaptree. Ouriel wrote a follow up post comparing Swaptree (unfavorably) to a French service called SplitGames. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Web 2.0 Test Posted in Web 2.0 by maxwell on the June 20th, 2006   A couple of weeks ago I wrote a somewhat negative post about an unlaunched startup in Boston called Swaptree. Ouriel wrote a follow up post comparing Swaptree (unfavorably) to a French service called SplitGames. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Swaptree Update, First Screen Shots</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/02/i-like-swaptree-but/comment-page-1/#comment-79095</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Swaptree Update, First Screen Shots</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 07:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/02/i-like-swaptree-but/#comment-79095</guid>
		<description>[...] A couple of weeks ago I wrote a somewhat negative post about an unlaunched startup in Boston called Swaptree. Ouriel wrote a follow up post comparing Swaptree (unfavorably) to a French service called SplitGames. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A couple of weeks ago I wrote a somewhat negative post about an unlaunched startup in Boston called Swaptree. Ouriel wrote a follow up post comparing Swaptree (unfavorably) to a French service called SplitGames. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheIndex.Agregador &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Swaptree, intercambio de objetos entre usuarios</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/02/i-like-swaptree-but/comment-page-1/#comment-68100</link>
		<dc:creator>TheIndex.Agregador &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Swaptree, intercambio de objetos entre usuarios</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 23:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/02/i-like-swaptree-but/#comment-68100</guid>
		<description>[...] Vía &#124; TechCrunch Enlace &#124; Swaptree [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Vía | TechCrunch Enlace | Swaptree [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shannon</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/02/i-like-swaptree-but/comment-page-1/#comment-66859</link>
		<dc:creator>shannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 12:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/02/i-like-swaptree-but/#comment-66859</guid>
		<description>&gt;Why are we reverting to bartering? I though eBay reaffirmed currency as the best way to trade online. 

more than anything it&#039;s a question of perceived value.  

Why do people sell their items on ebay instead of just taking into the local Half Priced Books (or equivalent)... well the obvious answer is that you&#039;re going to get less than what the item is worth by going to a Brick and Morter.   People still take their items to the local Half Priced Books/Gamestop/Movie Trading Company but only if they&#039;re too impatient to sell their items on ebay. 

this website is going one step further in increasing the resale value - now instead of getting 10% return at half priced books or 50% using ebay I can get 90% value by trading the item with someone directly.  I&#039;ve not lost anything in the transaction (minus the small fee associated with the website)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;Why are we reverting to bartering? I though eBay reaffirmed currency as the best way to trade online. </p>
<p>more than anything it&#8217;s a question of perceived value.  </p>
<p>Why do people sell their items on ebay instead of just taking into the local Half Priced Books (or equivalent)&#8230; well the obvious answer is that you&#8217;re going to get less than what the item is worth by going to a Brick and Morter.   People still take their items to the local Half Priced Books/Gamestop/Movie Trading Company but only if they&#8217;re too impatient to sell their items on ebay. </p>
<p>this website is going one step further in increasing the resale value &#8211; now instead of getting 10% return at half priced books or 50% using ebay I can get 90% value by trading the item with someone directly.  I&#8217;ve not lost anything in the transaction (minus the small fee associated with the website)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: samfind</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/02/i-like-swaptree-but/comment-page-1/#comment-66506</link>
		<dc:creator>samfind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 01:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/02/i-like-swaptree-but/#comment-66506</guid>
		<description>I do not understand this.  There used to be bartering ...oh... about 3000 years ago and it was replaced with some sort of currency because it was easier to trade currency for an item or service than it was to trade another item or service.  Why are we reverting to bartering?  I though eBay reaffirmed currency as the best way to trade online.  

hmph.

samfind
http://samfind.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not understand this.  There used to be bartering &#8230;oh&#8230; about 3000 years ago and it was replaced with some sort of currency because it was easier to trade currency for an item or service than it was to trade another item or service.  Why are we reverting to bartering?  I though eBay reaffirmed currency as the best way to trade online.  </p>
<p>hmph.</p>
<p>samfind<br />
<a href="http://samfind.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://samfind.com'>http://samfind.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meredith</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/02/i-like-swaptree-but/comment-page-1/#comment-65197</link>
		<dc:creator>Meredith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 19:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/02/i-like-swaptree-but/#comment-65197</guid>
		<description>I was an avid user of &lt;strong&gt;Switchouse&lt;/strong&gt; back in &lt;a href=&quot;http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.switchouse.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;its heyday&lt;/a&gt;.  I traded books, CDs, and DVDs - it was a really wonderful service.  And it was &lt;em&gt;successful&lt;/em&gt;, for a while.  Unfortunately, it was bought by Amazon.com, which proceeded to &lt;a href=&quot;http://web.archive.org/web/20020601081000/www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/subst/misc/switchouse.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;discontinue the service&lt;/a&gt; in 2002.  I don&#039;t think its Half.com-like offering (&lt;em&gt;selling&lt;/em&gt; your used stuff) was ever particularly successful, but it was great for &lt;em&gt;trading&lt;/em&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was an avid user of <strong>Switchouse</strong> back in <a href="http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.switchouse.com/" rel="nofollow">its heyday</a>.  I traded books, CDs, and DVDs &#8211; it was a really wonderful service.  And it was <em>successful</em>, for a while.  Unfortunately, it was bought by Amazon.com, which proceeded to <a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20020601081000/www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/subst/misc/switchouse.html" rel="nofollow">discontinue the service</a> in 2002.  I don&#8217;t think its Half.com-like offering (<em>selling</em> your used stuff) was ever particularly successful, but it was great for <em>trading</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: logix</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/02/i-like-swaptree-but/comment-page-1/#comment-64977</link>
		<dc:creator>logix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 15:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/02/i-like-swaptree-but/#comment-64977</guid>
		<description>Dave (#7), 

Try this for me: go to ebay and enter &quot;Spiderman 2 dvd&quot; in the search field.  Hmm, hundreds of hits with people trying to sell their dvd for a few bucks.  Now enter &quot;stephen king paperback&quot;.  Wow, look at that!  Dozens and dozens of paperback books that people are trying to sell for cheap.  Some are in perfect condition, some are worn but people are buying and selling them all the same.

Sure there will always be people who just buy new stuff from Amazon, etc. but there is a huge contingent out there that are interested in getting a second life out of disposable media.  Having a site like Swaptree show you what books, games or DVDs you can get for that old copy of Christine you have sitting on the shelf seems pretty appealing to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave (#7), </p>
<p>Try this for me: go to ebay and enter &#8220;Spiderman 2 dvd&#8221; in the search field.  Hmm, hundreds of hits with people trying to sell their dvd for a few bucks.  Now enter &#8220;stephen king paperback&#8221;.  Wow, look at that!  Dozens and dozens of paperback books that people are trying to sell for cheap.  Some are in perfect condition, some are worn but people are buying and selling them all the same.</p>
<p>Sure there will always be people who just buy new stuff from Amazon, etc. but there is a huge contingent out there that are interested in getting a second life out of disposable media.  Having a site like Swaptree show you what books, games or DVDs you can get for that old copy of Christine you have sitting on the shelf seems pretty appealing to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TecnoUnion :: Swaptree, intercambio de objetos entre usuarios :: June :: 2006</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/02/i-like-swaptree-but/comment-page-1/#comment-64973</link>
		<dc:creator>TecnoUnion :: Swaptree, intercambio de objetos entre usuarios :: June :: 2006</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 15:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/02/i-like-swaptree-but/#comment-64973</guid>
		<description>[...] Fuente: TechCrunch   Archivado en: SoftWare [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fuente: TechCrunch   Archivado en: SoftWare [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniele Levy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/02/i-like-swaptree-but/comment-page-1/#comment-64200</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniele Levy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 21:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/02/i-like-swaptree-but/#comment-64200</guid>
		<description>Tyler - yes, as you can see in the url and email on all my posts here, I am with Peerflix...I thought that was obvious. What is your association with swaptree?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tyler &#8211; yes, as you can see in the url and email on all my posts here, I am with Peerflix&#8230;I thought that was obvious. What is your association with swaptree?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler Ready</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/02/i-like-swaptree-but/comment-page-1/#comment-64147</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler Ready</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 20:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/02/i-like-swaptree-but/#comment-64147</guid>
		<description>Daniele - Shocking you like peerflix&#039;s model better, since your are their Vice President of Marketing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniele &#8211; Shocking you like peerflix&#8217;s model better, since your are their Vice President of Marketing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peerflix_NoThanks</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/02/i-like-swaptree-but/comment-page-1/#comment-64059</link>
		<dc:creator>Peerflix_NoThanks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 18:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/02/i-like-swaptree-but/#comment-64059</guid>
		<description>I just recently stopped using peerflix due to their terrible business practices.  They only want members to ship the dvd disc and worst of all they want you to ship it wrapped in a piece of paper.  There&#039;s no way you can convince me that shipping a disc through the USPS is safe in just a piece of paper.  I have the broken and damaged dvds to prove it thanks to peerflix.  I&#039;m not the only one jumping ship...just take a look at their new forum and the discussions going on there or the old &quot;unofficial&quot; forum at DVDTradeTalk.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just recently stopped using peerflix due to their terrible business practices.  They only want members to ship the dvd disc and worst of all they want you to ship it wrapped in a piece of paper.  There&#8217;s no way you can convince me that shipping a disc through the USPS is safe in just a piece of paper.  I have the broken and damaged dvds to prove it thanks to peerflix.  I&#8217;m not the only one jumping ship&#8230;just take a look at their new forum and the discussions going on there or the old &#8220;unofficial&#8221; forum at DVDTradeTalk.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; SplitGames vs Swaptree</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/02/i-like-swaptree-but/comment-page-1/#comment-64043</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; SplitGames vs Swaptree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 18:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/02/i-like-swaptree-but/#comment-64043</guid>
		<description>[...] Following Mike’s analysis on Swaptree I have compared it with SplitGames , a French company that is also playing in the courtyard of product trading community but that is playing by different rules. In my view, more relevant. Let’s look closer (the website is in French only for now). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Following Mike’s analysis on Swaptree I have compared it with SplitGames , a French company that is also playing in the courtyard of product trading community but that is playing by different rules. In my view, more relevant. Let’s look closer (the website is in French only for now). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniele Levy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/02/i-like-swaptree-but/comment-page-1/#comment-63997</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniele Levy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 17:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/02/i-like-swaptree-but/#comment-63997</guid>
		<description>A couple of thoughts to add here:

* &#039;What is different from these services vs. web 1.0 swap sites?&#039; - Well, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.peerflix.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Peerflix &lt;/a&gt;and Lala for example offer a distributed peer-to-peer trading model. At Peerflix, you simply list DVDs you have and the system will find someone who wants your merchandise. You list the DVDs you want and the system will find someone else who has the merchadise you want. It does not pair people in one-to-one or even one-to-many swaps, thereby dramatically increasing the number of matches across the network. Swaptree and other smaller sites are all trying to resurect the one-to-one (or one-to-four?) approach where you need to find a trading partner(s) right there and then to complete your transation. In my opinion, the infinite number of connections offered by a decentralized, fluid peer to peer trade is superior - and where the innovation is.

* &#039;Why not use cash?&#039; - By all means, if the merchandise you want to trade is worth your time and effort to convert it to cash (and maybe convert it back into another piece of property later), do it. The barter system works well when the stuff you want to get rid of, or the stuff you want to get, is not worth that much, so that if you don&#039;t get the maximum monetary value for your stuff, that&#039;s OK. With DVDs, it&#039;s all about watching a movie. There is no rocket science: you are done with a movie, you send it to someone else, you get a new-to-you movie in return. For $0.99. That&#039;s simple, that&#039;s cheap, and that&#039;s why it works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of thoughts to add here:</p>
<p>* &#8216;What is different from these services vs. web 1.0 swap sites?&#8217; &#8211; Well, <a href="http://www.peerflix.com" rel="nofollow">Peerflix </a>and Lala for example offer a distributed peer-to-peer trading model. At Peerflix, you simply list DVDs you have and the system will find someone who wants your merchandise. You list the DVDs you want and the system will find someone else who has the merchadise you want. It does not pair people in one-to-one or even one-to-many swaps, thereby dramatically increasing the number of matches across the network. Swaptree and other smaller sites are all trying to resurect the one-to-one (or one-to-four?) approach where you need to find a trading partner(s) right there and then to complete your transation. In my opinion, the infinite number of connections offered by a decentralized, fluid peer to peer trade is superior &#8211; and where the innovation is.</p>
<p>* &#8216;Why not use cash?&#8217; &#8211; By all means, if the merchandise you want to trade is worth your time and effort to convert it to cash (and maybe convert it back into another piece of property later), do it. The barter system works well when the stuff you want to get rid of, or the stuff you want to get, is not worth that much, so that if you don&#8217;t get the maximum monetary value for your stuff, that&#8217;s OK. With DVDs, it&#8217;s all about watching a movie. There is no rocket science: you are done with a movie, you send it to someone else, you get a new-to-you movie in return. For $0.99. That&#8217;s simple, that&#8217;s cheap, and that&#8217;s why it works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/02/i-like-swaptree-but/comment-page-1/#comment-63615</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 06:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/02/i-like-swaptree-but/#comment-63615</guid>
		<description>I think &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.switchdiscs.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;SwitchDiscs.com&lt;/a&gt; should be mentioned here.  They have been doing this same thing for a couple months now.  I&#039;ve been using it for the past month and have started to really like it.  I&#039;ve traded away some old dvds, cds and games and received some great titles in return...some of which were brand new still with original packaging (I guess some members are switching bad gifts or discs they already had).  Anyways, I submitted this to TechCrunch and have yet to see them do a review but yet they review a similar site that hasn&#039;t even launched.  If you haven&#039;t already I suggest you check out SwitchDiscs.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think <a href="http://www.switchdiscs.com" rel="nofollow">SwitchDiscs.com</a> should be mentioned here.  They have been doing this same thing for a couple months now.  I&#8217;ve been using it for the past month and have started to really like it.  I&#8217;ve traded away some old dvds, cds and games and received some great titles in return&#8230;some of which were brand new still with original packaging (I guess some members are switching bad gifts or discs they already had).  Anyways, I submitted this to TechCrunch and have yet to see them do a review but yet they review a similar site that hasn&#8217;t even launched.  If you haven&#8217;t already I suggest you check out SwitchDiscs.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blast From the Past</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/02/i-like-swaptree-but/comment-page-1/#comment-62930</link>
		<dc:creator>Blast From the Past</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jun 2006 09:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/02/i-like-swaptree-but/#comment-62930</guid>
		<description>Only 7 years gone by... ;-0
http://www.internetnews.com/bus-news/article.php/266331</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only 7 years gone by&#8230; ;-0<br />
<a href="http://www.internetnews.com/bus-news/article.php/266331" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.internetnews.com/bus-news/article.php/266331'>http://www.inte...icle.php/266331</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webvapors &#187; Swapping 2.0</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/02/i-like-swaptree-but/comment-page-1/#comment-62723</link>
		<dc:creator>webvapors &#187; Swapping 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jun 2006 03:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/02/i-like-swaptree-but/#comment-62723</guid>
		<description>[...] I came across an interesting thread on SwapTree earlier today on TechCrunch, and it looks like Mike had really nailed the key points. While I am not a complete non-believer in the model, I think the main thing some of the online swapping and barter sites are missing is the fact that marketplaces work best when there is real currency involved. People want to make money and this has been demonstrated very well by ebay as well as all the poker sites. Did we hear much about any fantasy gaming sites for too long? No, because the currency is not real and they fade like a fad with time. Some of the recent activity in MMOGs like SecondLife is another example - a lot of momentum is being built around them with a number of users playing as a full time job because they are able to convert their earnings in WoW and SecondLife and others into real world currency - which drive sustainable growth. I think this may be the main missing piece in the online swapping puzzle.  These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I came across an interesting thread on SwapTree earlier today on TechCrunch, and it looks like Mike had really nailed the key points. While I am not a complete non-believer in the model, I think the main thing some of the online swapping and barter sites are missing is the fact that marketplaces work best when there is real currency involved. People want to make money and this has been demonstrated very well by ebay as well as all the poker sites. Did we hear much about any fantasy gaming sites for too long? No, because the currency is not real and they fade like a fad with time. Some of the recent activity in MMOGs like SecondLife is another example &#8211; a lot of momentum is being built around them with a number of users playing as a full time job because they are able to convert their earnings in WoW and SecondLife and others into real world currency &#8211; which drive sustainable growth. I think this may be the main missing piece in the online swapping puzzle.  These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
