<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Musings On Share Your OPML</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/05/27/musings-on-share-your-opml/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/05/27/musings-on-share-your-opml/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 03:20:39 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: مركز لتحميل</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/05/27/musings-on-share-your-opml/comment-page-2/#comment-3029837</link>
		<dc:creator>مركز لتحميل</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 13:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/05/27/musings-on-share-your-opml/#comment-3029837</guid>
		<description>Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Fedora, Xen, Qemu, UML, Python, Ruby, Tomcat, Java, Mono, Glassfish, JOnAS, or OORexx.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Fedora, Xen, Qemu, UML, Python, Ruby, Tomcat, Java, Mono, Glassfish, JOnAS, or OORexx.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dicontas - Centralised Services for Email Monitoring</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/05/27/musings-on-share-your-opml/comment-page-1/#comment-1610238</link>
		<dc:creator>Dicontas - Centralised Services for Email Monitoring</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 09:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/05/27/musings-on-share-your-opml/#comment-1610238</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Dicontas - Centralised Services for Email Monitoring...&lt;/strong&gt;

The average person would be under the impression that taking the time to get intellect on this affair is a waste of time....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dicontas &#8211; Centralised Services for Email Monitoring&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The average person would be under the impression that taking the time to get intellect on this affair is a waste of time&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chrono Tron &#62;&#62; World Wide Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/05/27/musings-on-share-your-opml/comment-page-1/#comment-129226</link>
		<dc:creator>Chrono Tron &#62;&#62; World Wide Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 10:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/05/27/musings-on-share-your-opml/#comment-129226</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Time out &amp; Lots of link love!...&lt;/strong&gt;

After the extreme disappointment yesterday morning, I took some time off from the world of glitz, glamour and happy faces. I needed some time to be with myself, sometime to see the truth and sometime to realize things. I thought a lot, a damn lot and d...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Time out &amp; Lots of link love!&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>After the extreme disappointment yesterday morning, I took some time off from the world of glitz, glamour and happy faces. I needed some time to be with myself, sometime to see the truth and sometime to realize things. I thought a lot, a damn lot and d&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martinfernandez.com &#8212; Rankings de blogs y marketing OPML</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/05/27/musings-on-share-your-opml/comment-page-1/#comment-68658</link>
		<dc:creator>martinfernandez.com &#8212; Rankings de blogs y marketing OPML</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2006 16:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/05/27/musings-on-share-your-opml/#comment-68658</guid>
		<description>[...] Soy consciente de las limitaciones que presentan los rankings de blogs. Con todo, me ha parecido interesante el planteamiento de Michael Arrington en TechCrunch a propósito del último proyecto de Dave Winer: Share Your OPML. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Soy consciente de las limitaciones que presentan los rankings de blogs. Con todo, me ha parecido interesante el planteamiento de Michael Arrington en TechCrunch a propósito del último proyecto de Dave Winer: Share Your OPML. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thejo/Blog &#187; Share your OPML spammed?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/05/27/musings-on-share-your-opml/comment-page-1/#comment-60223</link>
		<dc:creator>Thejo/Blog &#187; Share your OPML spammed?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 13:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/05/27/musings-on-share-your-opml/#comment-60223</guid>
		<description>[...] Share your OPML a fairly new project founded by Dave Winer is a nice aggregator of reading lists in the form of OPML files. Mike Arrington has some ideas on how this could be really useful. I dropped by today and unforunately caught it a bad time&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Share your OPML a fairly new project founded by Dave Winer is a nice aggregator of reading lists in the form of OPML files. Mike Arrington has some ideas on how this could be really useful. I dropped by today and unforunately caught it a bad time&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W^L+</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/05/27/musings-on-share-your-opml/comment-page-1/#comment-58448</link>
		<dc:creator>W^L+</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 06:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/05/27/musings-on-share-your-opml/#comment-58448</guid>
		<description>One problem.  I have about 5 blogs that I read almost daily, and another 5 to 10 that I read at least twice each month.  But I don&#039;t use feeds OR bookmarks.  The ones that I pay attention to have enough influence for me to memorize their URLs and manually type them.  I&#039;ll bet there are many people like me who will never show up in the popularity rankings.  We will never be counted in deciding what blogs would be interesting for someone who reads what we read.  And that limits the usefulness of the information generated.

How do I find a blog I might want to read?  Easy.  It will usually be mentioned by Mark Pilgrim, Anil Dash, Sam Ruby, Dean Edwards, MiniMSFT, Groklaw, or Slashdot.  Or it may mention Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Fedora, Xen, Qemu, UML, Python, Ruby, Tomcat, Java, Mono, Glassfish, JOnAS, or OORexx.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One problem.  I have about 5 blogs that I read almost daily, and another 5 to 10 that I read at least twice each month.  But I don&#8217;t use feeds OR bookmarks.  The ones that I pay attention to have enough influence for me to memorize their URLs and manually type them.  I&#8217;ll bet there are many people like me who will never show up in the popularity rankings.  We will never be counted in deciding what blogs would be interesting for someone who reads what we read.  And that limits the usefulness of the information generated.</p>
<p>How do I find a blog I might want to read?  Easy.  It will usually be mentioned by Mark Pilgrim, Anil Dash, Sam Ruby, Dean Edwards, MiniMSFT, Groklaw, or Slashdot.  Or it may mention Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Fedora, Xen, Qemu, UML, Python, Ruby, Tomcat, Java, Mono, Glassfish, JOnAS, or OORexx.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#60;CONTENT /&#62; v.4 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2006-05-31</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/05/27/musings-on-share-your-opml/comment-page-1/#comment-58285</link>
		<dc:creator>&#60;CONTENT /&#62; v.4 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2006-05-31</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 02:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/05/27/musings-on-share-your-opml/#comment-58285</guid>
		<description>[...] TechCrunch » Blog Archive » Musings On Share Your OPML (tags: rss techcrunch opml syo) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TechCrunch » Blog Archive » Musings On Share Your OPML (tags: rss techcrunch opml syo) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Like Your Work &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2006-05-31</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/05/27/musings-on-share-your-opml/comment-page-1/#comment-58212</link>
		<dc:creator>Like Your Work &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2006-05-31</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 00:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/05/27/musings-on-share-your-opml/#comment-58212</guid>
		<description>[...] TechCrunch » Blog Archive » Musings On Share Your OPML (tags: delicious) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TechCrunch » Blog Archive » Musings On Share Your OPML (tags: delicious) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Posner</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/05/27/musings-on-share-your-opml/comment-page-1/#comment-58070</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Posner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 19:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/05/27/musings-on-share-your-opml/#comment-58070</guid>
		<description>I think that there is a great amount of useful, actionable information in the comment stream on blogs. When is someone going to make it easy to search the comment streams for topical information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that there is a great amount of useful, actionable information in the comment stream on blogs. When is someone going to make it easy to search the comment streams for topical information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hans Gerwitz</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/05/27/musings-on-share-your-opml/comment-page-1/#comment-57885</link>
		<dc:creator>Hans Gerwitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 15:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/05/27/musings-on-share-your-opml/#comment-57885</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m inclined to agree with the 56K population objection.  Michael cannot be serious about &quot;people may not even know they are using SYO to store their feed information.&quot;

However, the &quot;share my blogroll&quot; meme has proven its fitness, and the affinity recommendations will be compelling to a number of users.  Perhaps if SYO or a lookalike provided mass-market appeal through blogroll widgets, etc.  Or at the very least republished as OPML so we could micropublish using Grazr or Optimal.

In short, SYO&#039;s aggregate data is exciting to researchers and marketers, but they&#039;ll need to provide more selfish benefit to grow the participant pool (and motivate even the 56K to keep up-to-date).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m inclined to agree with the 56K population objection.  Michael cannot be serious about &#8220;people may not even know they are using SYO to store their feed information.&#8221;</p>
<p>However, the &#8220;share my blogroll&#8221; meme has proven its fitness, and the affinity recommendations will be compelling to a number of users.  Perhaps if SYO or a lookalike provided mass-market appeal through blogroll widgets, etc.  Or at the very least republished as OPML so we could micropublish using Grazr or Optimal.</p>
<p>In short, SYO&#8217;s aggregate data is exciting to researchers and marketers, but they&#8217;ll need to provide more selfish benefit to grow the participant pool (and motivate even the 56K to keep up-to-date).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Hollows</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/05/27/musings-on-share-your-opml/comment-page-1/#comment-57818</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Hollows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 13:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/05/27/musings-on-share-your-opml/#comment-57818</guid>
		<description>Although it is &quot;Walled&quot; in that it only works on FeedBlitz&#039;s subscriber base, FeedAdvisor.com dowes make subscriber-based metrics and suggestions for new content based on user subscriptions, not what someone has uploaded.  I think that&#039;s a core issue with SYO - you need to want to share your OPML and keep it updated.  Sites like FeedAdvisor automate that.  Nop upload necessary, and it&#039;s updated in real-time as subscribers come and go - FeedAdvisor dos monitor and report aggregate (not individual) reading habits.  Steve Rubel at micropersuasion talked briefly about it at http://www.micropersuasion.com/2006/05/find_feeds_with.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although it is &#8220;Walled&#8221; in that it only works on FeedBlitz&#8217;s subscriber base, FeedAdvisor.com dowes make subscriber-based metrics and suggestions for new content based on user subscriptions, not what someone has uploaded.  I think that&#8217;s a core issue with SYO &#8211; you need to want to share your OPML and keep it updated.  Sites like FeedAdvisor automate that.  Nop upload necessary, and it&#8217;s updated in real-time as subscribers come and go &#8211; FeedAdvisor dos monitor and report aggregate (not individual) reading habits.  Steve Rubel at micropersuasion talked briefly about it at <a href="http://www.micropersuasion.com/2006/05/find_feeds_with.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.micropersuasion.com/2006/05/find_feeds_with.html'>http://www.micr...feeds_with.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Share Your OPML &#171; marksdigital</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/05/27/musings-on-share-your-opml/comment-page-1/#comment-57789</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Share Your OPML &#171; marksdigital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 12:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/05/27/musings-on-share-your-opml/#comment-57789</guid>
		<description>[...] Michael Arrington explains why &#8220;Share Your OPML&#8221; is more than just another A-List blog ranking system. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michael Arrington explains why &#8220;Share Your OPML&#8221; is more than just another A-List blog ranking system. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Micro Persuasion</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/05/27/musings-on-share-your-opml/comment-page-1/#comment-57728</link>
		<dc:creator>Micro Persuasion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 10:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/05/27/musings-on-share-your-opml/#comment-57728</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;On OPML and Marketing...&lt;/strong&gt;

PR Week writes what I believe is the first look at the impact of OPML on marketing. OPML is a great technology that is just getting going. It will be a few years before it starts to impact our world...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>On OPML and Marketing&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>PR Week writes what I believe is the first look at the impact of OPML on marketing. OPML is a great technology that is just getting going. It will be a few years before it starts to impact our world&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scripting News Annex &#187; Scripting News for 5/29/2006</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/05/27/musings-on-share-your-opml/comment-page-1/#comment-57252</link>
		<dc:creator>Scripting News Annex &#187; Scripting News for 5/29/2006</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 20:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/05/27/musings-on-share-your-opml/#comment-57252</guid>
		<description>[...] TechCrunch: &#8220;Share Your OPML is already a good blog ranking system, and over time it has the chance to become the definitive ranking and recommendation system for blogs. And when I saw that, I&#8217;m thinking the very long tail of blogs, not just the top 100 or even 1,000.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TechCrunch: &#8220;Share Your OPML is already a good blog ranking system, and over time it has the chance to become the definitive ranking and recommendation system for blogs. And when I saw that, I&#8217;m thinking the very long tail of blogs, not just the top 100 or even 1,000.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shakermaker</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/05/27/musings-on-share-your-opml/comment-page-1/#comment-57240</link>
		<dc:creator>shakermaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 20:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/05/27/musings-on-share-your-opml/#comment-57240</guid>
		<description>One problem I think there is in bigging up SYO as being a worthy long tail list of blogs is, simply how many of those sites on a reading list are actually read often? I can imagine, say a user of FeedDemon, upping an OPML list with a bunch of pre-defined, pre-installed feeds, adding a few more, and then never coming back to them ever again. Yet the data would remain on SYO as as important as someone who avidly reads the same feed. Which is more worthy for a rank? It&#039;s also a service ripe for spamming and influencing.

The problem is, without accurately monitoring each users reading habits, there can never be a true top list of any feeds. And by accurately monitoring each users habits, you&#039;re invading privacy and are no better than Spyware...and &quot;attention&quot; malarky won&#039;t solve that :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One problem I think there is in bigging up SYO as being a worthy long tail list of blogs is, simply how many of those sites on a reading list are actually read often? I can imagine, say a user of FeedDemon, upping an OPML list with a bunch of pre-defined, pre-installed feeds, adding a few more, and then never coming back to them ever again. Yet the data would remain on SYO as as important as someone who avidly reads the same feed. Which is more worthy for a rank? It&#8217;s also a service ripe for spamming and influencing.</p>
<p>The problem is, without accurately monitoring each users reading habits, there can never be a true top list of any feeds. And by accurately monitoring each users habits, you&#8217;re invading privacy and are no better than Spyware&#8230;and &#8220;attention&#8221; malarky won&#8217;t solve that <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Rafer</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/05/27/musings-on-share-your-opml/comment-page-1/#comment-57043</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Rafer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 16:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/05/27/musings-on-share-your-opml/#comment-57043</guid>
		<description>Arrington said, &quot;We don’t need to open up to the masses and become interested in what they read. We need to keep banging away on new stuff and see what sticks…. We aren’t in an echo chamber… as a leader in this space you need to keep the religion.&quot;

Mike, 

If I am a leader here, as you kindly suggest, then it is incumbent upon to me to state that we _are_ in an Echo Chamber. It’s an incredibly pleasant place to be, but it’s an inhibitor to getting significant businesses built and broad societal progress made. Contrary to your point, my only “religion” is advancing the power and desires of my users -- and as many of them as humanly possible. Innovation is a means to an end, not the point of the exercise.

I don&#039;t know how much of the last Bust you were here for, but your statement above will contribute to the stress and anguish of many more people than you realize. Many first-time entrepreneurs now look to Techcrunch for Web2-industry context. I&#039;m of the opinion that a measure of responsibility is coupled with that authority. 

Taken literally, and that&#039;s how I think you mean it, your quote says that people should build whatever applications they think of in the hope that enough people care. That will cause a far higher rate of startup failure than is necessary -- just like the last time. The more pointless applications that are built now, the more layoffs there will be later. Market research and product marketing aren&#039;t things that come naturally to many smart technical folks, but they are the best way to lower the risk of failure. With the success of Techcrunch, if you encourage better business practices, a reasonable number of people will listen to you.

Specifically, the problem is that many startups are building applications that ONLY innovators will ever love. It&#039;s fine for startups to use our ivory-tower world as an early adopter segment if they have an idea of how to break out of it into a market large enough to matter economically (e.g. Flickr, LinkedIn, etc.). However, there are any number of startup people who think that getting traction with the valley insiders equals success. That’s a fine first step if you want to build a small profitable business, but under few other circumstances.

Neither Dogster nor SYO fall into the pattern that I&#039;m worried about above. A very small percent of Dogster&#039;s 200k+ users are valley insiders, and they have a defined market of millions to address. I sit in the Dogster office every day, and innovation for it&#039;s own sake is completely absent. Everything they do is product marketing and customer-driven. SYO is also exempt because Dave Winer clearly tells anyone who listens that he’s _only_ interested in serving the innovators and not in building businesses. He won’t raise errant venture capital, hire a bunch of people, and then need to turn them out when the money’s gone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arrington said, &#8220;We don’t need to open up to the masses and become interested in what they read. We need to keep banging away on new stuff and see what sticks…. We aren’t in an echo chamber… as a leader in this space you need to keep the religion.&#8221;</p>
<p>Mike, </p>
<p>If I am a leader here, as you kindly suggest, then it is incumbent upon to me to state that we _are_ in an Echo Chamber. It’s an incredibly pleasant place to be, but it’s an inhibitor to getting significant businesses built and broad societal progress made. Contrary to your point, my only “religion” is advancing the power and desires of my users &#8212; and as many of them as humanly possible. Innovation is a means to an end, not the point of the exercise.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know how much of the last Bust you were here for, but your statement above will contribute to the stress and anguish of many more people than you realize. Many first-time entrepreneurs now look to Techcrunch for Web2-industry context. I&#8217;m of the opinion that a measure of responsibility is coupled with that authority. </p>
<p>Taken literally, and that&#8217;s how I think you mean it, your quote says that people should build whatever applications they think of in the hope that enough people care. That will cause a far higher rate of startup failure than is necessary &#8212; just like the last time. The more pointless applications that are built now, the more layoffs there will be later. Market research and product marketing aren&#8217;t things that come naturally to many smart technical folks, but they are the best way to lower the risk of failure. With the success of Techcrunch, if you encourage better business practices, a reasonable number of people will listen to you.</p>
<p>Specifically, the problem is that many startups are building applications that ONLY innovators will ever love. It&#8217;s fine for startups to use our ivory-tower world as an early adopter segment if they have an idea of how to break out of it into a market large enough to matter economically (e.g. Flickr, LinkedIn, etc.). However, there are any number of startup people who think that getting traction with the valley insiders equals success. That’s a fine first step if you want to build a small profitable business, but under few other circumstances.</p>
<p>Neither Dogster nor SYO fall into the pattern that I&#8217;m worried about above. A very small percent of Dogster&#8217;s 200k+ users are valley insiders, and they have a defined market of millions to address. I sit in the Dogster office every day, and innovation for it&#8217;s own sake is completely absent. Everything they do is product marketing and customer-driven. SYO is also exempt because Dave Winer clearly tells anyone who listens that he’s _only_ interested in serving the innovators and not in building businesses. He won’t raise errant venture capital, hire a bunch of people, and then need to turn them out when the money’s gone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bizwiki</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/05/27/musings-on-share-your-opml/comment-page-1/#comment-56698</link>
		<dc:creator>bizwiki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 09:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/05/27/musings-on-share-your-opml/#comment-56698</guid>
		<description>Noted it, not such a creative idea (technorati favarite), yet SYO is just a nice way for more peoples to share more. You can just grabe all what others are reading, not only just a piece of webpage (del.icio.us&#039;s way). Summaring the feeds according to the catelogies come in the way, for people find out where they should go to, not just a bulket of OPMLs. But I think it hard for SYO making this happens, any idea for this ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noted it, not such a creative idea (technorati favarite), yet SYO is just a nice way for more peoples to share more. You can just grabe all what others are reading, not only just a piece of webpage (del.icio.us&#8217;s way). Summaring the feeds according to the catelogies come in the way, for people find out where they should go to, not just a bulket of OPMLs. But I think it hard for SYO making this happens, any idea for this ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ouriel Ohayon</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/05/27/musings-on-share-your-opml/comment-page-1/#comment-56692</link>
		<dc:creator>Ouriel Ohayon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 09:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/05/27/musings-on-share-your-opml/#comment-56692</guid>
		<description>Mike i totally share your analysis (to be honest i planned to launch surch a service a year ago). However something is missing. We all know a big  part of a blog audience is bookmark generated. I think the ideal standard would be a combination of feed-centric stats like SYO and bookmark-stats (although i have no idea how exactly this could be measured, adding a bookmark would not be enough unless the URL bookmarked could be tracked by a regular stat engine).

That would reflect the true audience of a blog and would report an honest ranking i believe

Of couse with the time more people will use RSS and less Bookmarks but i believe a significant share will remain on bookmarks specially new internet users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike i totally share your analysis (to be honest i planned to launch surch a service a year ago). However something is missing. We all know a big  part of a blog audience is bookmark generated. I think the ideal standard would be a combination of feed-centric stats like SYO and bookmark-stats (although i have no idea how exactly this could be measured, adding a bookmark would not be enough unless the URL bookmarked could be tracked by a regular stat engine).</p>
<p>That would reflect the true audience of a blog and would report an honest ranking i believe</p>
<p>Of couse with the time more people will use RSS and less Bookmarks but i believe a significant share will remain on bookmarks specially new internet users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nitin Nanivadekar</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/05/27/musings-on-share-your-opml/comment-page-1/#comment-56613</link>
		<dc:creator>Nitin Nanivadekar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 08:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/05/27/musings-on-share-your-opml/#comment-56613</guid>
		<description>Michael has a good point here. To present the feeds the reader based on his intensions. Digging the &#039;Database of Intensions&#039;; a term coined by a famous book &quot;Search&quot;.

I am glad to know that Michael wants some sort of Search tool that can come out of RSS feeds.

I think the upcoming flickrss. com will try to build a Social Network over RSS which will come closer to Michael&#039;s grand vision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael has a good point here. To present the feeds the reader based on his intensions. Digging the &#8216;Database of Intensions&#8217;; a term coined by a famous book &#8220;Search&#8221;.</p>
<p>I am glad to know that Michael wants some sort of Search tool that can come out of RSS feeds.</p>
<p>I think the upcoming flickrss. com will try to build a Social Network over RSS which will come closer to Michael&#8217;s grand vision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nitin Nanivadekar</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/05/27/musings-on-share-your-opml/comment-page-1/#comment-56612</link>
		<dc:creator>Nitin Nanivadekar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 08:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/05/27/musings-on-share-your-opml/#comment-56612</guid>
		<description>Michael has a good point here. To present the feeds the reader based on his intensions. Digging the &#039;Database of Intensions&#039;; a term coined by a famous book &quot;Search&quot;.

I am glad to know that Michael wants some sort of Search tool that can come out of RSS feeds.

I think the upcoming flickrss.com will try to build a Social Network over RSS which will come closer to Michael&#039;s grand vision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael has a good point here. To present the feeds the reader based on his intensions. Digging the &#8216;Database of Intensions&#8217;; a term coined by a famous book &#8220;Search&#8221;.</p>
<p>I am glad to know that Michael wants some sort of Search tool that can come out of RSS feeds.</p>
<p>I think the upcoming flickrss.com will try to build a Social Network over RSS which will come closer to Michael&#8217;s grand vision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aaron wall</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/05/27/musings-on-share-your-opml/comment-page-1/#comment-56510</link>
		<dc:creator>aaron wall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 06:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/05/27/musings-on-share-your-opml/#comment-56510</guid>
		<description>&gt; I’m thinking the very long tail of blogs
&gt;The best approach to feed introduction/search is reading lists.

I completely disagree. It might work decent until it gets spammed. But it will. Just like general search, blog search, forums, comments, trackbacks, tags, pings, cross site scripting errors, etc etc etc.

I bet it is exceptionally easy to put legit looking co-citation into an OMPL list and randomize it to work spam blogs up toward the top. So little effort. So little relevancy. It can&#039;t be widely adopted without becoming a spam den.

Plus I find more interesting stuff by reading in content citations from channels I already read than from looking at some of the blogs they say they read. If they read something influential and useful often then most likely that will show up in the content area of their blog, no?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; I’m thinking the very long tail of blogs<br />
&gt;The best approach to feed introduction/search is reading lists.</p>
<p>I completely disagree. It might work decent until it gets spammed. But it will. Just like general search, blog search, forums, comments, trackbacks, tags, pings, cross site scripting errors, etc etc etc.</p>
<p>I bet it is exceptionally easy to put legit looking co-citation into an OMPL list and randomize it to work spam blogs up toward the top. So little effort. So little relevancy. It can&#8217;t be widely adopted without becoming a spam den.</p>
<p>Plus I find more interesting stuff by reading in content citations from channels I already read than from looking at some of the blogs they say they read. If they read something influential and useful often then most likely that will show up in the content area of their blog, no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Satish</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/05/27/musings-on-share-your-opml/comment-page-1/#comment-56434</link>
		<dc:creator>Satish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 04:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/05/27/musings-on-share-your-opml/#comment-56434</guid>
		<description>@16 - Ken Rossi :

The problem with commenting from your feed reader relates to the inherent holes in the major blogging APIs.  There is no standard way of programmatically accessing comments for a given platform.  

The CommentAPI makes an attempt at doing such, but it&#039;s far from being widely adopted.  RSS Bandit supports the CommentAPI for blogs that also make use of it by the way.  So you can comment from that feed reader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@16 &#8211; Ken Rossi :</p>
<p>The problem with commenting from your feed reader relates to the inherent holes in the major blogging APIs.  There is no standard way of programmatically accessing comments for a given platform.  </p>
<p>The CommentAPI makes an attempt at doing such, but it&#8217;s far from being widely adopted.  RSS Bandit supports the CommentAPI for blogs that also make use of it by the way.  So you can comment from that feed reader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BiZwiKi.CN - 喧闹 PK 噪音 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2006-05-29</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/05/27/musings-on-share-your-opml/comment-page-1/#comment-56203</link>
		<dc:creator>BiZwiKi.CN - 喧闹 PK 噪音 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2006-05-29</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 00:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/05/27/musings-on-share-your-opml/#comment-56203</guid>
		<description>[...] TechCrunch » Blog Archive » Musings On Share Your OPML 相对与Technorati单纯的链接计算而言；这似乎是一个更能体验Weblog价值的评级系统 (tags: Web2.0 weblog review opml) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TechCrunch » Blog Archive » Musings On Share Your OPML 相对与Technorati单纯的链接计算而言；这似乎是一个更能体验Weblog价值的评级系统 (tags: Web2.0 weblog review opml) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ron</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/05/27/musings-on-share-your-opml/comment-page-1/#comment-56137</link>
		<dc:creator>ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 May 2006 23:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/05/27/musings-on-share-your-opml/#comment-56137</guid>
		<description>&quot;completely objective&quot;...funny;)  pro only! next.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;completely objective&#8221;&#8230;funny;)  pro only! next.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Scroggins</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/05/27/musings-on-share-your-opml/comment-page-1/#comment-56074</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Scroggins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 May 2006 22:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/05/27/musings-on-share-your-opml/#comment-56074</guid>
		<description>As a rabid Atom/RSS user, I just have to say that SYO is too removed from any services I actually need to be worth my time. If this was coming from Google Reader or NewsGator and was linked into syncing services or the implementation of the Attention XML spec, I would be more excited, but as a standalone vanity listing,  it is worthless. I have plenty of sites in my OPML that I rarely read. In order for SYO to be accurate or useful, it need to reflect actual attention metrics like viewing and clickthrough.

Personally, I read Signal vs. Noise 7:1 over TechCrunch (which I also enjoy), but SYO would just reinforce the #1 position of Techcrunch if I added my OPML. This is not giving an accurate account of position in my mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a rabid Atom/RSS user, I just have to say that SYO is too removed from any services I actually need to be worth my time. If this was coming from Google Reader or NewsGator and was linked into syncing services or the implementation of the Attention XML spec, I would be more excited, but as a standalone vanity listing,  it is worthless. I have plenty of sites in my OPML that I rarely read. In order for SYO to be accurate or useful, it need to reflect actual attention metrics like viewing and clickthrough.</p>
<p>Personally, I read Signal vs. Noise 7:1 over TechCrunch (which I also enjoy), but SYO would just reinforce the #1 position of Techcrunch if I added my OPML. This is not giving an accurate account of position in my mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
