<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stylehive is Looking Good</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/20/stylehive-is-looking-good/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/20/stylehive-is-looking-good/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:03:46 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Emily Chang - Designer &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Style Meets the Social Web with the Stylehive</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/20/stylehive-is-looking-good/comment-page-1/#comment-2788807</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily Chang - Designer &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Style Meets the Social Web with the Stylehive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 01:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/20/stylehive-is-looking-good/#comment-2788807</guid>
		<description>[...] Stylehive is Looking Good by Mike Arrington at Techcrunch [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Stylehive is Looking Good by Mike Arrington at Techcrunch [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/20/stylehive-is-looking-good/comment-page-1/#comment-2761338</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 15:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/20/stylehive-is-looking-good/#comment-2761338</guid>
		<description>Stylehive is good, but you&#039;ve got to check out www.ShoeHunting.com, as well!  It&#039;s a social shopping network devoted to shoe lovers.  Members can save shoes from anywhere on the internet, and find the best prices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stylehive is good, but you&#8217;ve got to check out <a href="http://www.ShoeHunting.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.ShoeHunting.com'>http://www.ShoeHunting.com</a>, as well!  It&#8217;s a social shopping network devoted to shoe lovers.  Members can save shoes from anywhere on the internet, and find the best prices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Social Shopping &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Wishpot: Social Shopping Goes Mobile</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/20/stylehive-is-looking-good/comment-page-1/#comment-1542846</link>
		<dc:creator>Social Shopping &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Wishpot: Social Shopping Goes Mobile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 00:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/20/stylehive-is-looking-good/#comment-1542846</guid>
		<description>[...] friends would fill that social void in a local mall.Wishpot competes in the same space as Kaboodle, Stylehive, Yahoo Shoposphere, Zlio and MyPickList.If you’re a shopaholic who loves a good brand and telling [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] friends would fill that social void in a local mall.Wishpot competes in the same space as Kaboodle, Stylehive, Yahoo Shoposphere, Zlio and MyPickList.If you’re a shopaholic who loves a good brand and telling [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch en français &#187; Wishpot: le shopping social arrive sur votre mobile</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/20/stylehive-is-looking-good/comment-page-1/#comment-1485446</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch en français &#187; Wishpot: le shopping social arrive sur votre mobile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 05:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/20/stylehive-is-looking-good/#comment-1485446</guid>
		<description>[...] concurrence le même terrain que Kaboodle, Stylehive, Yahoo Shoposhere, Zlio et [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] concurrence le même terrain que Kaboodle, Stylehive, Yahoo Shoposhere, Zlio et [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boliver</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/20/stylehive-is-looking-good/comment-page-1/#comment-1170440</link>
		<dc:creator>Boliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 06:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/20/stylehive-is-looking-good/#comment-1170440</guid>
		<description>ERR s</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ERR s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: provig</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/20/stylehive-is-looking-good/comment-page-1/#comment-930205</link>
		<dc:creator>provig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 13:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/20/stylehive-is-looking-good/#comment-930205</guid>
		<description>Unlike other prescription drugs, the only other effective method of treatment for ED, ProVIGRAX has absolutely no side-effects, is safe for use by everyone and has no short term or long-term disadvantages from continual usage. &lt;a href=&quot;http://tiny.pl/chzc&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;sudden erectile dysfunction&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unlike other prescription drugs, the only other effective method of treatment for ED, ProVIGRAX has absolutely no side-effects, is safe for use by everyone and has no short term or long-term disadvantages from continual usage. <a href="http://tiny.pl/chzc" rel="nofollow">sudden erectile dysfunction</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Kerssemakers</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/20/stylehive-is-looking-good/comment-page-1/#comment-614576</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Kerssemakers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 21:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/20/stylehive-is-looking-good/#comment-614576</guid>
		<description>Stylehive is slow, thats for sure, but its the beste social shopping website fo now</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stylehive is slow, thats for sure, but its the beste social shopping website fo now</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 小小研究員的學習之路 &#187; Stylehive &#38; 神奇小蓋蓋&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/20/stylehive-is-looking-good/comment-page-1/#comment-360902</link>
		<dc:creator>小小研究員的學習之路 &#187; Stylehive &#38; 神奇小蓋蓋&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 14:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/20/stylehive-is-looking-good/#comment-360902</guid>
		<description>[...] TechCrunch在Stylehive is Looking Good這篇文章中提到有80%在網路商店上「逛街」的人其實都只是先「做功課」而已，只有20%的人會在當下直接線上下單。因此Stylehive聰明地抓住這80%的需求，提供了協助使用者蒐集與整理商品資訊的服務。 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TechCrunch在Stylehive is Looking Good這篇文章中提到有80%在網路商店上「逛街」的人其實都只是先「做功課」而已，只有20%的人會在當下直接線上下單。因此Stylehive聰明地抓住這80%的需求，提供了協助使用者蒐集與整理商品資訊的服務。 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heather</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/20/stylehive-is-looking-good/comment-page-1/#comment-352651</link>
		<dc:creator>heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 22:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/20/stylehive-is-looking-good/#comment-352651</guid>
		<description>i am probably one of the only women posting my comment here, so given I am the target audience, i just want to say that this is the best shopping website ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i am probably one of the only women posting my comment here, so given I am the target audience, i just want to say that this is the best shopping website ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markus</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/20/stylehive-is-looking-good/comment-page-1/#comment-262524</link>
		<dc:creator>Markus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 14:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/20/stylehive-is-looking-good/#comment-262524</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;shopping...&lt;/strong&gt;

...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>shopping&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch reports: Ramblings on ThisNext &#171; TechAddress</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/20/stylehive-is-looking-good/comment-page-1/#comment-185654</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch reports: Ramblings on ThisNext &#171; TechAddress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 18:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/20/stylehive-is-looking-good/#comment-185654</guid>
		<description>[...] Other services have launched in this space as well, generally focusing on wish lists, recommendation lists or both, and often giving users tools to put widgets with recommended or desired products up on their blogs or websites. See our posts on Kaboodle, Stylehive, Yahoo Shoposphere and MyPickList. Wists is another site in this category, although we have not written about it yet. These sites expand well beyond technology in their product reviews. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Other services have launched in this space as well, generally focusing on wish lists, recommendation lists or both, and often giving users tools to put widgets with recommended or desired products up on their blogs or websites. See our posts on Kaboodle, Stylehive, Yahoo Shoposphere and MyPickList. Wists is another site in this category, although we have not written about it yet. These sites expand well beyond technology in their product reviews. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ramblings on ThisNext</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/20/stylehive-is-looking-good/comment-page-1/#comment-184967</link>
		<dc:creator>Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ramblings on ThisNext</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 10:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/20/stylehive-is-looking-good/#comment-184967</guid>
		<description>[...] Other services have launched in this space as well, generally focusing on wish lists, recommendation lists or both, and often giving users tools to put widgets with recommended or desired products up on their blogs or websites. See our posts on Kaboodle, Stylehive, Yahoo Shoposphere and MyPickList. Wists is another site in this category, although we have not written about it yet. These sites expand well beyond technology in their product reviews. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Other services have launched in this space as well, generally focusing on wish lists, recommendation lists or both, and often giving users tools to put widgets with recommended or desired products up on their blogs or websites. See our posts on Kaboodle, Stylehive, Yahoo Shoposphere and MyPickList. Wists is another site in this category, although we have not written about it yet. These sites expand well beyond technology in their product reviews. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Social Intelligence - Social Networking Market Research and Analysis &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Stylehive - Digg for fashion</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/20/stylehive-is-looking-good/comment-page-1/#comment-100485</link>
		<dc:creator>Social Intelligence - Social Networking Market Research and Analysis &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Stylehive - Digg for fashion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 21:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/20/stylehive-is-looking-good/#comment-100485</guid>
		<description>[...] (via Mashable, TechCrunch)     Posted by justin.smith Filed in elite, bookmarking [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (via Mashable, TechCrunch)     Posted by justin.smith Filed in elite, bookmarking [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mamamia</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/20/stylehive-is-looking-good/comment-page-1/#comment-49210</link>
		<dc:creator>mamamia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 May 2006 07:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/20/stylehive-is-looking-good/#comment-49210</guid>
		<description>the problem w/ stylehive, cheapr, wists, and all these &quot;community shopping&quot; sites is that they get spammed by bastards w/ affiliate accounts. There&#039;s nothing interesting on the stylehive site...just a punch of crappy looking furniture and clothes that some bastard spammer added.

if myspace is the cesspool of online community then stylehive is the cesspool of shopping.

ouch!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the problem w/ stylehive, cheapr, wists, and all these &#8220;community shopping&#8221; sites is that they get spammed by bastards w/ affiliate accounts. There&#8217;s nothing interesting on the stylehive site&#8230;just a punch of crappy looking furniture and clothes that some bastard spammer added.</p>
<p>if myspace is the cesspool of online community then stylehive is the cesspool of shopping.</p>
<p>ouch!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/20/stylehive-is-looking-good/comment-page-1/#comment-31069</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 11:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/20/stylehive-is-looking-good/#comment-31069</guid>
		<description>visually stunning? i guess that&#039;s one way to put it. kinda like our POTUS is quite stunning, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>visually stunning? i guess that&#8217;s one way to put it. kinda like our POTUS is quite stunning, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trackers United</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/20/stylehive-is-looking-good/comment-page-1/#comment-30069</link>
		<dc:creator>Trackers United</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 15:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/20/stylehive-is-looking-good/#comment-30069</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Mostly Research...&lt;/strong&gt;

In a recent post, Michael Arrington (TechCrunch) said that &quot;80% of online shopping is research and only 20% is actually buying&quot;, when covering the launch of shopping bookmark tool Styehive. Given that the industry standard conversion rates are in the...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Mostly Research&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>In a recent post, Michael Arrington (TechCrunch) said that &#8220;80% of online shopping is research and only 20% is actually buying&#8221;, when covering the launch of shopping bookmark tool Styehive. Given that the industry standard conversion rates are in the&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/20/stylehive-is-looking-good/comment-page-1/#comment-29549</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 22:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/20/stylehive-is-looking-good/#comment-29549</guid>
		<description>Too true Mike. Stick a fork in both this post and stylehive, they both reek.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too true Mike. Stick a fork in both this post and stylehive, they both reek.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fsckr</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/20/stylehive-is-looking-good/comment-page-1/#comment-29490</link>
		<dc:creator>fsckr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 18:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/20/stylehive-is-looking-good/#comment-29490</guid>
		<description>The idea is pretty interesting. Fads are fickle, styles change and the websites that cater to it have to work hard to keep up. Getting community input is a great way to do this.

Like some of the previous posters I feel like the layout detracts from the overall idea (too many pics, too little associated content,unnecessary duplicates take up way too much space etc)

BTW thanks for the cheapr.com linkage Carlos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The idea is pretty interesting. Fads are fickle, styles change and the websites that cater to it have to work hard to keep up. Getting community input is a great way to do this.</p>
<p>Like some of the previous posters I feel like the layout detracts from the overall idea (too many pics, too little associated content,unnecessary duplicates take up way too much space etc)</p>
<p>BTW thanks for the cheapr.com linkage Carlos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/20/stylehive-is-looking-good/comment-page-1/#comment-29463</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 16:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/20/stylehive-is-looking-good/#comment-29463</guid>
		<description>I am going to assume that Arrington is saying the site is good because he is most likely friends with Michael Carrier or Emily Chang, and not because the site is visually appealing because it&#039;s not.  This weblog subject has the foul stench of nepotism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am going to assume that Arrington is saying the site is good because he is most likely friends with Michael Carrier or Emily Chang, and not because the site is visually appealing because it&#8217;s not.  This weblog subject has the foul stench of nepotism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global Advanced Media WeBlog &#187;</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/20/stylehive-is-looking-good/comment-page-1/#comment-29294</link>
		<dc:creator>Global Advanced Media WeBlog &#187;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 04:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/20/stylehive-is-looking-good/#comment-29294</guid>
		<description>[...] Read the whole post and comments about stylehive at TechCrunch. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read the whole post and comments about stylehive at TechCrunch. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Sanders</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/20/stylehive-is-looking-good/comment-page-1/#comment-29293</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Sanders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 04:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/20/stylehive-is-looking-good/#comment-29293</guid>
		<description>this site looks like crap.  sorry, emily chang whoever the heck you are, but you need to learn to not design like you&#039;re making a fisher price instruction booklet.

shut the site and move on.  it sucks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this site looks like crap.  sorry, emily chang whoever the heck you are, but you need to learn to not design like you&#8217;re making a fisher price instruction booklet.</p>
<p>shut the site and move on.  it sucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/20/stylehive-is-looking-good/comment-page-1/#comment-29136</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 18:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/20/stylehive-is-looking-good/#comment-29136</guid>
		<description>StyleHive is exactly what it purports to be. It is about fashion, fads and the latest in &quot;trendiness&quot;.  I like that anyone can post their products and I like that look and feel of the screens.  I like the &quot;hive&quot; concept as well. What I don&#039;t like about it, is the difficulty in adding your ideas. I have to go through too many screens.  Also, I am getting no sense of price or what is the the best price for given items.  I am a beta tester for cheapr.com and what I like about that site is that it emphasises users entering products, dialog among users (social) and getting the best deal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>StyleHive is exactly what it purports to be. It is about fashion, fads and the latest in &#8220;trendiness&#8221;.  I like that anyone can post their products and I like that look and feel of the screens.  I like the &#8220;hive&#8221; concept as well. What I don&#8217;t like about it, is the difficulty in adding your ideas. I have to go through too many screens.  Also, I am getting no sense of price or what is the the best price for given items.  I am a beta tester for cheapr.com and what I like about that site is that it emphasises users entering products, dialog among users (social) and getting the best deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William G</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/20/stylehive-is-looking-good/comment-page-1/#comment-29121</link>
		<dc:creator>William G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 17:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/20/stylehive-is-looking-good/#comment-29121</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t wait till the site actually gets some usage.  Having 1 or 2 people save bookmarks and the same 9 people contributing shows the site doesn&#039;t have much to offer.  Me thinks that StyleHive has no stickiness and can&#039;t retain anyone except for the people that are working on the site and their friends.  BTW, you really ought to offer some innovation rather than the &quot;me-too&quot; typical web 2.0 features such as tag clouds and social bookmarking, fonts to help the blind and the like.  Web 2.0 sites should not just be about imitating the status quo, but should also have some innovation somewhere in the site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t wait till the site actually gets some usage.  Having 1 or 2 people save bookmarks and the same 9 people contributing shows the site doesn&#8217;t have much to offer.  Me thinks that StyleHive has no stickiness and can&#8217;t retain anyone except for the people that are working on the site and their friends.  BTW, you really ought to offer some innovation rather than the &#8220;me-too&#8221; typical web 2.0 features such as tag clouds and social bookmarking, fonts to help the blind and the like.  Web 2.0 sites should not just be about imitating the status quo, but should also have some innovation somewhere in the site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blaze</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/20/stylehive-is-looking-good/comment-page-1/#comment-29085</link>
		<dc:creator>Blaze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 14:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/20/stylehive-is-looking-good/#comment-29085</guid>
		<description>Yeah not visually stunning at all. I mean its your blog and you can say what you want and all... but it aint visually stunning!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah not visually stunning at all. I mean its your blog and you can say what you want and all&#8230; but it aint visually stunning!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Beadle</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/20/stylehive-is-looking-good/comment-page-1/#comment-28990</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Beadle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 09:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/20/stylehive-is-looking-good/#comment-28990</guid>
		<description>I know it&#039;s in alpha (the new beta?), but shouldn&#039;t they at least have alt attributes on their images and generally write valid HTML?

The trouble with too many 2.0 startups is, in the rush to market, the collective wisdom of standards and accessibility has been thrown aside.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know it&#8217;s in alpha (the new beta?), but shouldn&#8217;t they at least have alt attributes on their images and generally write valid HTML?</p>
<p>The trouble with too many 2.0 startups is, in the rush to market, the collective wisdom of standards and accessibility has been thrown aside.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
