<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New York Times Redesign</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/03/new-york-times-redesign/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/03/new-york-times-redesign/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 06:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: vumupajecn</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/03/new-york-times-redesign/#comment-1523853</link>
		<dc:creator>vumupajecn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 11:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/03/new-york-times-redesign/#comment-1523853</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;vumupajecn...&lt;/strong&gt;

nice post...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>vumupajecn&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>nice post&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cnn.Com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/03/new-york-times-redesign/#comment-327892</link>
		<dc:creator>Cnn.Com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 08:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/03/new-york-times-redesign/#comment-327892</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Dave...&lt;/strong&gt;

Interesting topic... I'm working in this industry myself and I don't agree about this in 100%, but I added your page to my bookmarks and hope to see more interesting articles in the future...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dave&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Interesting topic&#8230; I&#8217;m working in this industry myself and I don&#8217;t agree about this in 100%, but I added your page to my bookmarks and hope to see more interesting articles in the future&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agile Ajax</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/03/new-york-times-redesign/#comment-37836</link>
		<dc:creator>Agile Ajax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 14:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/03/new-york-times-redesign/#comment-37836</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;10 Business Reasons to Use AJAX...&lt;/strong&gt;

I'm not sure where on the hype curve we are with AJAX, but one of the open question for businesses is: why and where should you consider using AJAX? I give ten places, in declining order of urgency, where the...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>10 Business Reasons to Use AJAX&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure where on the hype curve we are with AJAX, but one of the open question for businesses is: why and where should you consider using AJAX? I give ten places, in declining order of urgency, where the&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SemJanelas.net &#187; Mentiras Sinceras</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/03/new-york-times-redesign/#comment-26529</link>
		<dc:creator>SemJanelas.net &#187; Mentiras Sinceras</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 19:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/03/new-york-times-redesign/#comment-26529</guid>
		<description>[...] O New York Times já reformulou seu site, e outros vão veicular conteúdo de blogs. Quando a mídia nacional vai parar de esconder essa verdade? Journalists no longer anticipate or create buzz &#8212; rather, they react to it: “Everyone is buzzing about FaceBook. There must be something to this, so I had better write a story about it.” This role reversal has fried people&#8217;s minds. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] O New York Times já reformulou seu site, e outros vão veicular conteúdo de blogs. Quando a mídia nacional vai parar de esconder essa verdade? Journalists no longer anticipate or create buzz &#8212; rather, they react to it: “Everyone is buzzing about FaceBook. There must be something to this, so I had better write a story about it.” This role reversal has fried people&#8217;s minds. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Круглый стол Web 2.0 &#187; Редизайн &#8220;Нью-Йорк Таймс&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/03/new-york-times-redesign/#comment-26113</link>
		<dc:creator>Круглый стол Web 2.0 &#187; Редизайн &#8220;Нью-Йорк Таймс&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Apr 2006 21:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/03/new-york-times-redesign/#comment-26113</guid>
		<description>[...] По материалам Techcrunch [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] По материалам Techcrunch [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Круглый стол Web 2.0 &#187; Редизайн &#8220;Нью-Йорк Таймс&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/03/new-york-times-redesign/#comment-26114</link>
		<dc:creator>Круглый стол Web 2.0 &#187; Редизайн &#8220;Нью-Йорк Таймс&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Apr 2006 21:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/03/new-york-times-redesign/#comment-26114</guid>
		<description>[...] По материалам Techcrunch [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] По материалам Techcrunch [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Search Engines Web</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/03/new-york-times-redesign/#comment-25977</link>
		<dc:creator>Search Engines Web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Apr 2006 23:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/03/new-york-times-redesign/#comment-25977</guid>
		<description>The Video is a great and long overdue asset...

But the homepage layout seems to have no logic to it; category-postions appear almost random.

Perhaps putting so many topics and links and the homepage was to save bandwidth by having users scroll down instead of click on new directories.

Interestingly, it still has that "traditional" look - so as to maintain the Image of a Newspaper</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Video is a great and long overdue asset&#8230;</p>
<p>But the homepage layout seems to have no logic to it; category-postions appear almost random.</p>
<p>Perhaps putting so many topics and links and the homepage was to save bandwidth by having users scroll down instead of click on new directories.</p>
<p>Interestingly, it still has that &#8220;traditional&#8221; look - so as to maintain the Image of a Newspaper</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/03/new-york-times-redesign/#comment-25104</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 18:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/03/new-york-times-redesign/#comment-25104</guid>
		<description>I agree with Geof. We need more space to see what's on the page. It's too much information for a single screen. They could be more sellective on this information architecture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Geof. We need more space to see what&#8217;s on the page. It&#8217;s too much information for a single screen. They could be more sellective on this information architecture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: o [cc] do [caiocesar] na [www] &#187; New York Times Redesign</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/03/new-york-times-redesign/#comment-25027</link>
		<dc:creator>o [cc] do [caiocesar] na [www] &#187; New York Times Redesign</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 10:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/03/new-york-times-redesign/#comment-25027</guid>
		<description>[...] techcrunch apontou ontem: they now have a dedicated area of the site to show video clips.    4.4.2006 s 07:39&#124; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] techcrunch apontou ontem: they now have a dedicated area of the site to show video clips.    4.4.2006 s 07:39| [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kingsley 2.0</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/03/new-york-times-redesign/#comment-24972</link>
		<dc:creator>Kingsley 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 04:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/03/new-york-times-redesign/#comment-24972</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;NYT redesigns; blogosphere wets pants....&lt;/strong&gt;

I agree with Dave that the NYT redesign sucks. The collective wetting of the blogosphere&#8217;s pants, however is just plain embarassing.
There is absolutely no flow, even less scannability and no cognition of the fact that the screen is still a much ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>NYT redesigns; blogosphere wets pants&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>I agree with Dave that the NYT redesign sucks. The collective wetting of the blogosphere&#8217;s pants, however is just plain embarassing.<br />
There is absolutely no flow, even less scannability and no cognition of the fact that the screen is still a much &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cem Basman</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/03/new-york-times-redesign/#comment-24897</link>
		<dc:creator>Cem Basman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 21:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/03/new-york-times-redesign/#comment-24897</guid>
		<description>Another subtle web redesign: http://www.cnn.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another subtle web redesign: <a href="http://www.cnn.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.cnn.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Serge Lescouarnec</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/03/new-york-times-redesign/#comment-24871</link>
		<dc:creator>Serge Lescouarnec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 17:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/03/new-york-times-redesign/#comment-24871</guid>
		<description>Actually the redesigned NY Times website shares some of the changes that I noticed on the International Herald Tribune (www.iht.com) site in the past 2 weeks.

Serge

Biz:
http://www.njconcierges.com
Blog:
http://sergetheconcierge.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually the redesigned NY Times website shares some of the changes that I noticed on the International Herald Tribune (www.iht.com) site in the past 2 weeks.</p>
<p>Serge</p>
<p>Biz:<br />
<a href="http://www.njconcierges.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.njconcierges.com</a><br />
Blog:<br />
<a href="http://sergetheconcierge.com" rel="nofollow">http://sergetheconcierge.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Pollock</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/03/new-york-times-redesign/#comment-24855</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Pollock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 16:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/03/new-york-times-redesign/#comment-24855</guid>
		<description>The similarities between www.nytimes.com and www.jot.com are startling.

Nice work, Mr. Wain!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The similarities between <a href="http://www.nytimes.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com</a> and <a href="http://www.jot.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.jot.com</a> are startling.</p>
<p>Nice work, Mr. Wain!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rushi&#8217;s Ramblings &#187; Blog Archive &#187; NY Times, MS Office and New Services</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/03/new-york-times-redesign/#comment-24840</link>
		<dc:creator>Rushi&#8217;s Ramblings &#187; Blog Archive &#187; NY Times, MS Office and New Services</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 15:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/03/new-york-times-redesign/#comment-24840</guid>
		<description>[...] The New York Times website has undergone a make over. What a big change it is from its previous version. They are moving closer towards Web 2.0. The site looks really good. Anil Dash reviews the Redesign and take a look at the editor&#39;s note on the redesign. (Techcrunch does one too) Also reading Anil Dash&#39;s blog I see a really nice write up on April Fool&#39;s Day.Although its interesting that it was posted on March 31st. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The New York Times website has undergone a make over. What a big change it is from its previous version. They are moving closer towards Web 2.0. The site looks really good. Anil Dash reviews the Redesign and take a look at the editor&#39;s note on the redesign. (Techcrunch does one too) Also reading Anil Dash&#39;s blog I see a really nice write up on April Fool&#39;s Day.Although its interesting that it was posted on March 31st. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl Prigge</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/03/new-york-times-redesign/#comment-24829</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl Prigge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 14:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/03/new-york-times-redesign/#comment-24829</guid>
		<description>Gah, they've done it!  They've created &lt;a href="http://reddit.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;reddit&lt;/a&gt; -- without all the user-generated content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gah, they&#8217;ve done it!  They&#8217;ve created <a href="http://reddit.com" rel="nofollow">reddit</a> &#8212; without all the user-generated content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saul Weiner</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/03/new-york-times-redesign/#comment-24819</link>
		<dc:creator>Saul Weiner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 13:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/03/new-york-times-redesign/#comment-24819</guid>
		<description>I love the most blogged stories list. Great idea to see wht content is genrating buzz.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the most blogged stories list. Great idea to see wht content is genrating buzz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; NY Times to begin linking blogs? The Blog Herald: more blog news more often</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/03/new-york-times-redesign/#comment-24814</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; NY Times to begin linking blogs? The Blog Herald: more blog news more often</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 13:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/03/new-york-times-redesign/#comment-24814</guid>
		<description>[...] You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your ownsite. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your ownsite. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geof Harries</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/03/new-york-times-redesign/#comment-24812</link>
		<dc:creator>Geof Harries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 13:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/03/new-york-times-redesign/#comment-24812</guid>
		<description>Like the recent cnn.com redesign, it creates a wider web page! I now have to stretch my browser more and more to see everything. Are these sites going to require full screen browers soon

No, just a monitor with support for 1024 x 768 px screen resolution. Do you really browse with a 640 px window? Bigger monitors, at least 17", are pretty darned cheap these days.

I was thinking it looked kinda like theonion.com, only, uh, less green.

&lt;a href="http://www.subtraction.com/archives/2006/0403_the_awesome_.php" rel="nofollow"&gt;Khoi Vinh&lt;/a&gt;, designer behind the re-launched Onion, was part of the implementation team, not the design team. Any direct similarities are likely not intended.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like the recent cnn.com redesign, it creates a wider web page! I now have to stretch my browser more and more to see everything. Are these sites going to require full screen browers soon</p>
<p>No, just a monitor with support for 1024 x 768 px screen resolution. Do you really browse with a 640 px window? Bigger monitors, at least 17&#8243;, are pretty darned cheap these days.</p>
<p>I was thinking it looked kinda like theonion.com, only, uh, less green.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.subtraction.com/archives/2006/0403_the_awesome_.php" rel="nofollow">Khoi Vinh</a>, designer behind the re-launched Onion, was part of the implementation team, not the design team. Any direct similarities are likely not intended.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Bryant</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/03/new-york-times-redesign/#comment-24810</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Bryant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 12:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/03/new-york-times-redesign/#comment-24810</guid>
		<description>I was thinking it looked kinda like theonion.com, only, uh, less green.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was thinking it looked kinda like theonion.com, only, uh, less green.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/03/new-york-times-redesign/#comment-24809</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 12:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/03/new-york-times-redesign/#comment-24809</guid>
		<description>Like the recent cnn.com redesign,
it creates a wider web page! I now have
to stretch my browser more and more
to see everything. Are these sites going 
to require full screen browers soon?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like the recent cnn.com redesign,<br />
it creates a wider web page! I now have<br />
to stretch my browser more and more<br />
to see everything. Are these sites going<br />
to require full screen browers soon?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jared l.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/03/new-york-times-redesign/#comment-24776</link>
		<dc:creator>jared l.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 09:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/03/new-york-times-redesign/#comment-24776</guid>
		<description>Their redesign has some similarity with NYMag. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their redesign has some similarity with NYMag. <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard MacManus</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/03/new-york-times-redesign/#comment-24773</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard MacManus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 09:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/03/new-york-times-redesign/#comment-24773</guid>
		<description>NY Times owns a company called Blogrunner, which created 'The Annotated NY Times'. So my bet is they're using that technology.

But the Blogrunner page *still* doesn't acknowledge &lt;a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ny_times_owns_b.php" rel="nofollow"&gt;the NY Times owns it&lt;/a&gt;! What's up with that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NY Times owns a company called Blogrunner, which created &#8216;The Annotated NY Times&#8217;. So my bet is they&#8217;re using that technology.</p>
<p>But the Blogrunner page *still* doesn&#8217;t acknowledge <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ny_times_owns_b.php" rel="nofollow">the NY Times owns it</a>! What&#8217;s up with that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Googlist</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/03/new-york-times-redesign/#comment-24770</link>
		<dc:creator>Googlist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 09:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/04/03/new-york-times-redesign/#comment-24770</guid>
		<description>I'm definitely hoping NYT jumps on the Blogburst trend.  Either that service or its own "contextual bloglinks" would be a huge step forward in validating the relevancy of small publishers' opinions in current events conversation.  Nice to see the NYT might be slowly moving this way as its articles are some of the most blogged on the net.  The pay for play NYT archives, however, will continue to plague bloggers (who prefer not to hack their own archive links)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m definitely hoping NYT jumps on the Blogburst trend.  Either that service or its own &#8220;contextual bloglinks&#8221; would be a huge step forward in validating the relevancy of small publishers&#8217; opinions in current events conversation.  Nice to see the NYT might be slowly moving this way as its articles are some of the most blogged on the net.  The pay for play NYT archives, however, will continue to plague bloggers (who prefer not to hack their own archive links)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.128 seconds -->
