<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google v. Microsoft: New Search Interfaces</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/28/google-v-microsoft-new-search-interfaces/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/28/google-v-microsoft-new-search-interfaces/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 20:12:21 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: مركز التحميل</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/28/google-v-microsoft-new-search-interfaces/comment-page-2/#comment-3029717</link>
		<dc:creator>مركز التحميل</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 12:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/28/google-v-microsoft-new-search-interfaces/#comment-3029717</guid>
		<description>At this moment whatever Microsoft is doing is not helping there online share. They need to do more and possible buy Yahoo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At this moment whatever Microsoft is doing is not helping there online share. They need to do more and possible buy Yahoo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mayank</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/28/google-v-microsoft-new-search-interfaces/comment-page-2/#comment-2483676</link>
		<dc:creator>Mayank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 10:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/28/google-v-microsoft-new-search-interfaces/#comment-2483676</guid>
		<description>At this moment whatever Microsoft is doing is not helping there online share. They need to do more and possible buy Yahoo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At this moment whatever Microsoft is doing is not helping there online share. They need to do more and possible buy Yahoo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Article Database &#187; Google - In with the new and out with the old</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/28/google-v-microsoft-new-search-interfaces/comment-page-2/#comment-1990296</link>
		<dc:creator>Article Database &#187; Google - In with the new and out with the old</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/28/google-v-microsoft-new-search-interfaces/#comment-1990296</guid>
		<description>[...] some carefully considered changes that have far reaching effects. Lately there has been a ton of buzz about the new Google design and these changes are great examples of what I&#8217;m talking [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] some carefully considered changes that have far reaching effects. Lately there has been a ton of buzz about the new Google design and these changes are great examples of what I&#8217;m talking [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WOW Technology Minute</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/28/google-v-microsoft-new-search-interfaces/comment-page-2/#comment-319728</link>
		<dc:creator>WOW Technology Minute</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 04:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/28/google-v-microsoft-new-search-interfaces/#comment-319728</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;More Live Search and Live Acedemic Makes Beta...&lt;/strong&gt;

I just checked out Microsoft&#8217;s Live Search again. No doubt Microsoft is serious about search. Search.msn.com is pretty hot.
I found the interface to be helpful. I didn&#8217;t do any formal testing, but moving around, searching and figuring out...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>More Live Search and Live Acedemic Makes Beta&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I just checked out Microsoft&#8217;s Live Search again. No doubt Microsoft is serious about search. Search.msn.com is pretty hot.<br />
I found the interface to be helpful. I didn&#8217;t do any formal testing, but moving around, searching and figuring out&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/28/google-v-microsoft-new-search-interfaces/comment-page-2/#comment-319165</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 00:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/28/google-v-microsoft-new-search-interfaces/#comment-319165</guid>
		<description>Anyone interested in rehashing this again?

From a Google user&#039;s perspective, I&#039;d have to say the new improvements at live search and the quality of the results seem to be competitive now. 

Anyone else feeling the same?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone interested in rehashing this again?</p>
<p>From a Google user&#8217;s perspective, I&#8217;d have to say the new improvements at live search and the quality of the results seem to be competitive now. </p>
<p>Anyone else feeling the same?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balaji&#8217;s Blog &#187; links for 2006-03-31</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/28/google-v-microsoft-new-search-interfaces/comment-page-1/#comment-161687</link>
		<dc:creator>Balaji&#8217;s Blog &#187; links for 2006-03-31</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 10:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/28/google-v-microsoft-new-search-interfaces/#comment-161687</guid>
		<description>[...] TechCrunch » Google v. Microsoft: New Search Interfaces See how the upcoming Google and MS Search interfaces stack up (tags: search google microsoft ui beta) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TechCrunch » Google v. Microsoft: New Search Interfaces See how the upcoming Google and MS Search interfaces stack up (tags: search google microsoft ui beta) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BiZwiKi - 喧闹 PK 噪音 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 阿積士WP套装（Ajax WordPress Suite）1.0 发布</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/28/google-v-microsoft-new-search-interfaces/comment-page-1/#comment-30528</link>
		<dc:creator>BiZwiKi - 喧闹 PK 噪音 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 阿積士WP套装（Ajax WordPress Suite）1.0 发布</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 21:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/28/google-v-microsoft-new-search-interfaces/#comment-30528</guid>
		<description>[...] 实在有点迅雷不及掩耳之势！刚刚把包含 Ajax Comments Reply System 的 Theme 发布，几乎在同一天马上把 Live Search 集成进去并作了全面更新。究其原因，主要是 Live Search 的代码实际上早已开发出来并且结合到原来的 Ajax Wordpress Theme 里面。然而一直测试没有成功，因此没有被发布出来。今天，开发小组突然发现 Live Search 失效的原因在于我们后台测试平台使用了 WP-Cache 插件。WP-Cache高性能的缓存技术与实时更新的 Live Search 无奈形成对立！实在有种鱼与熊掌不可兼得的感觉。喧闹 PK 噪音（BuZZ pk Noise）的官方 Weblog 最终决定性能第一，于是你在本站 WebLog 上面或许无法测试 Live Search 的功能。 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 实在有点迅雷不及掩耳之势！刚刚把包含 Ajax Comments Reply System 的 Theme 发布，几乎在同一天马上把 Live Search 集成进去并作了全面更新。究其原因，主要是 Live Search 的代码实际上早已开发出来并且结合到原来的 Ajax Wordpress Theme 里面。然而一直测试没有成功，因此没有被发布出来。今天，开发小组突然发现 Live Search 失效的原因在于我们后台测试平台使用了 WP-Cache 插件。WP-Cache高性能的缓存技术与实时更新的 Live Search 无奈形成对立！实在有种鱼与熊掌不可兼得的感觉。喧闹 PK 噪音（BuZZ pk Noise）的官方 Weblog 最终决定性能第一，于是你在本站 WebLog 上面或许无法测试 Live Search 的功能。 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2006-04-20 at disambiguity</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/28/google-v-microsoft-new-search-interfaces/comment-page-1/#comment-28680</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2006-04-20 at disambiguity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 09:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/28/google-v-microsoft-new-search-interfaces/#comment-28680</guid>
		<description>[...] Google v. Microsoft: New Search Interfaces (Techcrunch) Techcrunch compares the new/upcoming search results interface design from Google and Microsoft (tags: search searchresults) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google v. Microsoft: New Search Interfaces (Techcrunch) Techcrunch compares the new/upcoming search results interface design from Google and Microsoft (tags: search searchresults) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raja</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/28/google-v-microsoft-new-search-interfaces/comment-page-1/#comment-24730</link>
		<dc:creator>Raja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 06:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/28/google-v-microsoft-new-search-interfaces/#comment-24730</guid>
		<description>Alt + Ctr + Del + left click on the page</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alt + Ctr + Del + left click on the page</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wisdom of Crowds at maurorita.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/28/google-v-microsoft-new-search-interfaces/comment-page-1/#comment-23767</link>
		<dc:creator>Wisdom of Crowds at maurorita.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 17:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/28/google-v-microsoft-new-search-interfaces/#comment-23767</guid>
		<description>[...] Na verdade e como o Thomas Hawk diz aqui, em comentário ao que o Michael Arrington diz aqui (dica: estes são dos meus bloggers favoritos e tenciono mostrar-vos a minha &#8220;lista de leitura&#8221; proximamente), o Qooqle (e mais ainda o YouTube, em que o primeiro é baseado) é importante porque a busca é um dos maiores negócios da Internet (aquando do seu IPO (Initial Public Offering) cada acção do Google valia 80 USD, agora vale perto de 400 USD (vejam aqui o valor actual no Yahoo! Finance)). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Na verdade e como o Thomas Hawk diz aqui, em comentário ao que o Michael Arrington diz aqui (dica: estes são dos meus bloggers favoritos e tenciono mostrar-vos a minha &#8220;lista de leitura&#8221; proximamente), o Qooqle (e mais ainda o YouTube, em que o primeiro é baseado) é importante porque a busca é um dos maiores negócios da Internet (aquando do seu IPO (Initial Public Offering) cada acção do Google valia 80 USD, agora vale perto de 400 USD (vejam aqui o valor actual no Yahoo! Finance)). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechPush</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/28/google-v-microsoft-new-search-interfaces/comment-page-1/#comment-23602</link>
		<dc:creator>TechPush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 06:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/28/google-v-microsoft-new-search-interfaces/#comment-23602</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/28/google-v-microsoft-new-search-interfaces/comment-page-1/#comment-23563</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 05:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/28/google-v-microsoft-new-search-interfaces/#comment-23563</guid>
		<description>Sorry, but Live.com doesn&#039;t have ctrl-f as a web developer that site is completly useless to me, I love looking at stats and finding my position, and if i have to manually find it? no thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, but Live.com doesn&#8217;t have ctrl-f as a web developer that site is completly useless to me, I love looking at stats and finding my position, and if i have to manually find it? no thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pacificdave</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/28/google-v-microsoft-new-search-interfaces/comment-page-1/#comment-23431</link>
		<dc:creator>pacificdave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 19:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/28/google-v-microsoft-new-search-interfaces/#comment-23431</guid>
		<description>@jack: i personally think people don&#039;t see through their bloatware.  about half of the people i know have their home page set to msn.com.  some even change their start page to msn.com after i educate them to change to Firefox from IE.  pretty pathetic...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@jack: i personally think people don&#8217;t see through their bloatware.  about half of the people i know have their home page set to msn.com.  some even change their start page to msn.com after i educate them to change to Firefox from IE.  pretty pathetic&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jack</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/28/google-v-microsoft-new-search-interfaces/comment-page-1/#comment-23414</link>
		<dc:creator>jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 18:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/28/google-v-microsoft-new-search-interfaces/#comment-23414</guid>
		<description>Live.com is bloatware like everything Microsoft creates. MS is oblivious to why Google is so successful - simplicity. Simplicity also means faster results. Most people will not want 300 search features. Because MS cannot compete on a search results level, they are traying to compete on a search features level. I find it hilarious that a monopoply on a computer OS has it&#039;s head up it&#039;s ass when it comes to the Internet. Thanks god most monopolies can&#039;t compete outside their core market. Another reason MSN has bombed is that all their fake content presented on the first page is actually just infomercials and corporate sponsorships. People see through this shallow scam. You would think MSN would remove this garbage until it can at least build a decent market share. I think they are trying this with live.com but their implimentation is seriously flawed. Vista was probably delayed because they are finding a way to legally force people to use Live.com through the OS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Live.com is bloatware like everything Microsoft creates. MS is oblivious to why Google is so successful &#8211; simplicity. Simplicity also means faster results. Most people will not want 300 search features. Because MS cannot compete on a search results level, they are traying to compete on a search features level. I find it hilarious that a monopoply on a computer OS has it&#8217;s head up it&#8217;s ass when it comes to the Internet. Thanks god most monopolies can&#8217;t compete outside their core market. Another reason MSN has bombed is that all their fake content presented on the first page is actually just infomercials and corporate sponsorships. People see through this shallow scam. You would think MSN would remove this garbage until it can at least build a decent market share. I think they are trying this with live.com but their implimentation is seriously flawed. Vista was probably delayed because they are finding a way to legally force people to use Live.com through the OS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/28/google-v-microsoft-new-search-interfaces/comment-page-1/#comment-23410</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 18:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/28/google-v-microsoft-new-search-interfaces/#comment-23410</guid>
		<description>Boycott Google!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boycott Google!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DraxAx</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/28/google-v-microsoft-new-search-interfaces/comment-page-1/#comment-23390</link>
		<dc:creator>DraxAx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/28/google-v-microsoft-new-search-interfaces/#comment-23390</guid>
		<description>Live is only IE-Combatible.
Google is any-compatible.

How&#039;s that for a comparison?

What about access for disabled people?
Microsoft is so pathetic...
Their products are only compatible with their products...

I guess that Live search would ocme into my GNU/Linux desktop only if it was compatible....
But still Google is my #1 choice - simpel clean interface with good design and very very fast. No flash and JavaScript when searching. It&#039;s all clutter. Output the results first, and then actually format them. Like using CSS!:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Live is only IE-Combatible.<br />
Google is any-compatible.</p>
<p>How&#8217;s that for a comparison?</p>
<p>What about access for disabled people?<br />
Microsoft is so pathetic&#8230;<br />
Their products are only compatible with their products&#8230;</p>
<p>I guess that Live search would ocme into my GNU/Linux desktop only if it was compatible&#8230;.<br />
But still Google is my #1 choice &#8211; simpel clean interface with good design and very very fast. No flash and JavaScript when searching. It&#8217;s all clutter. Output the results first, and then actually format them. Like using CSS!:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/28/google-v-microsoft-new-search-interfaces/comment-page-1/#comment-23368</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 15:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/28/google-v-microsoft-new-search-interfaces/#comment-23368</guid>
		<description>I dont think Google is testing a new interface, just a new look to the site. Do you really think this is supposed to display some grand and flashy new features? 

Microsoft on the other hand completely redesigned and added features to their old  msn search (now Live).

So how can you compare these two?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont think Google is testing a new interface, just a new look to the site. Do you really think this is supposed to display some grand and flashy new features? </p>
<p>Microsoft on the other hand completely redesigned and added features to their old  msn search (now Live).</p>
<p>So how can you compare these two?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top Click &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google v. Microsoft: New Search Interfaces</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/28/google-v-microsoft-new-search-interfaces/comment-page-1/#comment-23324</link>
		<dc:creator>Top Click &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google v. Microsoft: New Search Interfaces</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 10:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/28/google-v-microsoft-new-search-interfaces/#comment-23324</guid>
		<description>[...] read more&#160;&#124;&#160;digg story [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read more&nbsp;|&nbsp;digg story [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google&#8217;s new interface: Nirlog.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/28/google-v-microsoft-new-search-interfaces/comment-page-1/#comment-23312</link>
		<dc:creator>Google&#8217;s new interface: Nirlog.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 08:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/28/google-v-microsoft-new-search-interfaces/#comment-23312</guid>
		<description>[...] Everyone is talking about the new interface that Google is testing. So, I decided to test and can confirm that it&#8217;s true. If you want to try for yourself follow this blog&#8217;s instruction. This is what I did: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Everyone is talking about the new interface that Google is testing. So, I decided to test and can confirm that it&#8217;s true. If you want to try for yourself follow this blog&#8217;s instruction. This is what I did: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TurkmenPost :: Google v. Microsoft: New Search Interfaces :: March :: 2006</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/28/google-v-microsoft-new-search-interfaces/comment-page-1/#comment-23307</link>
		<dc:creator>TurkmenPost :: Google v. Microsoft: New Search Interfaces :: March :: 2006</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 08:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/28/google-v-microsoft-new-search-interfaces/#comment-23307</guid>
		<description>[...] more at techcrunch. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more at techcrunch. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ky</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/28/google-v-microsoft-new-search-interfaces/comment-page-1/#comment-23305</link>
		<dc:creator>ky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 08:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/28/google-v-microsoft-new-search-interfaces/#comment-23305</guid>
		<description>A fast ajax-based search engine (web, image and video), &lt;a href=&quot;http://askalexia.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://askalexia.com&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A fast ajax-based search engine (web, image and video), <a href="http://askalexia.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://askalexia.com'>http://askalexia.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/28/google-v-microsoft-new-search-interfaces/comment-page-1/#comment-23303</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 07:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/28/google-v-microsoft-new-search-interfaces/#comment-23303</guid>
		<description>um, have microsoft heard of section 508? or the DDA? or even, (gasp) web standards?

havn&#039;t been able to try google, but i&#039;m guessing you at least are able to perform a basic search if .js isn&#039;t available...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>um, have microsoft heard of section 508? or the DDA? or even, (gasp) web standards?</p>
<p>havn&#8217;t been able to try google, but i&#8217;m guessing you at least are able to perform a basic search if .js isn&#8217;t available&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meneame.net</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/28/google-v-microsoft-new-search-interfaces/comment-page-1/#comment-23295</link>
		<dc:creator>meneame.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 06:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/28/google-v-microsoft-new-search-interfaces/#comment-23295</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Comparación de las nuevas interfaces de búsqueda de Google y MSN...&lt;/strong&gt;

Estos dos grandes buscadores andan probando nuevas interfaces de usuario. Por parte de Google solo añade las barritas verdes y solo aparecía aleatoriamente para algunos usuarios (ver http://meneame.net/story.php?id=10260). Por su parte Microsoft permit...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Comparación de las nuevas interfaces de búsqueda de Google y MSN&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Estos dos grandes buscadores andan probando nuevas interfaces de usuario. Por parte de Google solo añade las barritas verdes y solo aparecía aleatoriamente para algunos usuarios (ver <a href="http://meneame.net/story.php?id=10260)" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://meneame.net/story.php?id=10260'>http://meneame....ry.php?id=10260</a>). Por su parte Microsoft permit&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Bokma</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/28/google-v-microsoft-new-search-interfaces/comment-page-1/#comment-23282</link>
		<dc:creator>John Bokma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 05:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/28/google-v-microsoft-new-search-interfaces/#comment-23282</guid>
		<description>@dusoft
&quot;ad Live’s scrollbar... why they have their own grapic javascript scrollbar, when there users are accustomed to the normal one in browser?&quot;

I guess they use AJAX to update. So it&#039;s not a page scroll bar, but a scroll bar that scrolls through the result set.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@dusoft<br />
&#8220;ad Live’s scrollbar&#8230; why they have their own grapic javascript scrollbar, when there users are accustomed to the normal one in browser?&#8221;</p>
<p>I guess they use AJAX to update. So it&#8217;s not a page scroll bar, but a scroll bar that scrolls through the result set.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/28/google-v-microsoft-new-search-interfaces/comment-page-1/#comment-23269</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 04:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/28/google-v-microsoft-new-search-interfaces/#comment-23269</guid>
		<description>Mark Johnson -

What is up with Kosmix email?  I checked our your site when there was all that hype and the news stories a month or two ago (Ican&#039;t remember), and tried to email several times, but they kept getting bounced back saying that the email addresses you guys posted didn&#039;t exist.  IMHO, that&#039;s not projecting a very professional image. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark Johnson -</p>
<p>What is up with Kosmix email?  I checked our your site when there was all that hype and the news stories a month or two ago (Ican&#8217;t remember), and tried to email several times, but they kept getting bounced back saying that the email addresses you guys posted didn&#8217;t exist.  IMHO, that&#8217;s not projecting a very professional image. <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
