<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TalkCrunch: Podcast with Amazon S3 Grid Storage Team</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/26/talkcrunch-podcast-with-amazon-s3-grid-storage-team/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/26/talkcrunch-podcast-with-amazon-s3-grid-storage-team/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:36:34 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: مركز التحميل</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/26/talkcrunch-podcast-with-amazon-s3-grid-storage-team/comment-page-1/#comment-3029728</link>
		<dc:creator>مركز التحميل</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 12:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/26/talkcrunch-podcast-with-amazon-s3-grid-storage-team/#comment-3029728</guid>
		<description>I suppose it could be used as a small companies’ Akamei — for example a company wants to put out a largish video and doesn’t have the bandwidth to host it themselves. With the ability to make a bittorrent they could lower the costs of distributing it.
I do not feel optimistic to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose it could be used as a small companies’ Akamei — for example a company wants to put out a largish video and doesn’t have the bandwidth to host it themselves. With the ability to make a bittorrent they could lower the costs of distributing it.<br />
I do not feel optimistic to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mortgage refinancing</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/26/talkcrunch-podcast-with-amazon-s3-grid-storage-team/comment-page-1/#comment-1115972</link>
		<dc:creator>mortgage refinancing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 11:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/26/talkcrunch-podcast-with-amazon-s3-grid-storage-team/#comment-1115972</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;mortgage refinancing...&lt;/strong&gt;

ok...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>mortgage refinancing&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>ok&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adultvideo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/26/talkcrunch-podcast-with-amazon-s3-grid-storage-team/comment-page-1/#comment-127339</link>
		<dc:creator>Adultvideo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 06:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/26/talkcrunch-podcast-with-amazon-s3-grid-storage-team/#comment-127339</guid>
		<description>Amazon offers API overhead when all that Omnidrive needs is a raw block device or filesystem.
I suppose it could be used as a small companies’ Akamei — for example a company wants to put out a largish video and doesn’t have the bandwidth to host it themselves. With the ability to make a bittorrent they could lower the costs of distributing it.
I do not feel optimistic to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazon offers API overhead when all that Omnidrive needs is a raw block device or filesystem.<br />
I suppose it could be used as a small companies’ Akamei — for example a company wants to put out a largish video and doesn’t have the bandwidth to host it themselves. With the ability to make a bittorrent they could lower the costs of distributing it.<br />
I do not feel optimistic to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: townx</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/26/talkcrunch-podcast-with-amazon-s3-grid-storage-team/comment-page-1/#comment-24253</link>
		<dc:creator>townx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2006 00:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/26/talkcrunch-podcast-with-amazon-s3-grid-storage-team/#comment-24253</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;S3 + Rails...&lt;/strong&gt;

Well, I spent most of today obsessively coding a simple Rails front-end to S3 called s33r (pronounced &quot;seer&quot;). It&#039;s very incomplete, but mostly intended as a proof of concept. It allows you to perform the following operations:



Create and delete ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>S3 + Rails&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Well, I spent most of today obsessively coding a simple Rails front-end to S3 called s33r (pronounced &#8220;seer&#8221;). It&#8217;s very incomplete, but mostly intended as a proof of concept. It allows you to perform the following operations:</p>
<p>Create and delete &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ontiveros @ Textdriven &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Omnidrive better damn hurry&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/26/talkcrunch-podcast-with-amazon-s3-grid-storage-team/comment-page-1/#comment-23277</link>
		<dc:creator>Ontiveros @ Textdriven &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Omnidrive better damn hurry&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 05:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/26/talkcrunch-podcast-with-amazon-s3-grid-storage-team/#comment-23277</guid>
		<description>[...] Speaking of time, let&#8217;s see how Nik Cubrilovic is spending his: Blogging while buddy Michael was on vacation and podcasting with, you guessed it, Michael at Techcrunch. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Speaking of time, let&#8217;s see how Nik Cubrilovic is spending his: Blogging while buddy Michael was on vacation and podcasting with, you guessed it, Michael at Techcrunch. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/26/talkcrunch-podcast-with-amazon-s3-grid-storage-team/comment-page-1/#comment-23005</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 04:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/26/talkcrunch-podcast-with-amazon-s3-grid-storage-team/#comment-23005</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s too expensive, specially when you have to pay for both upload and downloads!!! Most hosting providers only charge you for downloads. With Amazon, you have to pay both ways. So the effective cost of adding 1TB of data for one month and then retreiving it is $150 + $200 + $200 = $550 which isn&#039;t exactly cheap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s too expensive, specially when you have to pay for both upload and downloads!!! Most hosting providers only charge you for downloads. With Amazon, you have to pay both ways. So the effective cost of adding 1TB of data for one month and then retreiving it is $150 + $200 + $200 = $550 which isn&#8217;t exactly cheap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlogReader</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/26/talkcrunch-podcast-with-amazon-s3-grid-storage-team/comment-page-1/#comment-22984</link>
		<dc:creator>BlogReader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 01:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/26/talkcrunch-podcast-with-amazon-s3-grid-storage-team/#comment-22984</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m still not sure of Amazon&#039;s target market for this.  The pricing is far too high for companies like Omnidrive to make money off of it.

I suppose it could be used as a small companies&#039; Akamei -- for example a company wants to put out a largish video and doesn&#039;t have the bandwidth to host it themselves.  With the ability to make a bittorrent they could lower the costs of distributing it.

Amazon could try and offer a SQL API for the file storage so that a company could have a backup of their data (I say backup as the roundtripping involved would be pretty slow for real time use).

Amazon does have their brand name and ability to execute which allows them to charge more for their service.  I doubt if the Omnidrives of the world can scale like Amazon does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still not sure of Amazon&#8217;s target market for this.  The pricing is far too high for companies like Omnidrive to make money off of it.</p>
<p>I suppose it could be used as a small companies&#8217; Akamei &#8212; for example a company wants to put out a largish video and doesn&#8217;t have the bandwidth to host it themselves.  With the ability to make a bittorrent they could lower the costs of distributing it.</p>
<p>Amazon could try and offer a SQL API for the file storage so that a company could have a backup of their data (I say backup as the roundtripping involved would be pretty slow for real time use).</p>
<p>Amazon does have their brand name and ability to execute which allows them to charge more for their service.  I doubt if the Omnidrives of the world can scale like Amazon does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/26/talkcrunch-podcast-with-amazon-s3-grid-storage-team/comment-page-1/#comment-22972</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 00:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/26/talkcrunch-podcast-with-amazon-s3-grid-storage-team/#comment-22972</guid>
		<description>Initially I was excited about Amazon&#039;s plans, and the price looked fantastic, especially the storage cost. I was even thinking the possibility of offering a 100 GB storage for $19.95/month. 
But looking closer I discovered that the bandwidth cost is really not that great. The price of 20 cents per gig sounds enticing but don&#039;t forget that there are three charges associated with bandwidth:

1/ inbound traffic to my server
2/ outbound traffic from my server
3/ inbound traffic to S3
[this is when traffic is going from customer to S3]

even if all three segments cost $.2/GB, we are looking at a total cost of $.6/GB.  currently most hosting companies charge about $.5/GB for bandwidth.   If someone can figure a way to send traffic directly to S3, then there might be a case.

D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Initially I was excited about Amazon&#8217;s plans, and the price looked fantastic, especially the storage cost. I was even thinking the possibility of offering a 100 GB storage for $19.95/month.<br />
But looking closer I discovered that the bandwidth cost is really not that great. The price of 20 cents per gig sounds enticing but don&#8217;t forget that there are three charges associated with bandwidth:</p>
<p>1/ inbound traffic to my server<br />
2/ outbound traffic from my server<br />
3/ inbound traffic to S3<br />
[this is when traffic is going from customer to S3]</p>
<p>even if all three segments cost $.2/GB, we are looking at a total cost of $.6/GB.  currently most hosting companies charge about $.5/GB for bandwidth.   If someone can figure a way to send traffic directly to S3, then there might be a case.</p>
<p>D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/26/talkcrunch-podcast-with-amazon-s3-grid-storage-team/comment-page-1/#comment-22932</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2006 18:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/26/talkcrunch-podcast-with-amazon-s3-grid-storage-team/#comment-22932</guid>
		<description>I think S3 is a great way for a startup to host media and have reasonable bandwidth costs.  At $.20/GB xfer, that rings in much lower than most dedicated hosts.

It&#039;s a good way to scale up until a company has enough clout to negotiate better bandwidth costs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think S3 is a great way for a startup to host media and have reasonable bandwidth costs.  At $.20/GB xfer, that rings in much lower than most dedicated hosts.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a good way to scale up until a company has enough clout to negotiate better bandwidth costs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Migs</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/26/talkcrunch-podcast-with-amazon-s3-grid-storage-team/comment-page-1/#comment-22855</link>
		<dc:creator>Migs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2006 09:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/26/talkcrunch-podcast-with-amazon-s3-grid-storage-team/#comment-22855</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think you could use S3 for a customer-facing hosted storage.

Costs aside:

1. Any data to/from the customer will make two round trips. Customer to Omnidrive (and its peers), Omnidrive to S3. Perhaps it would work as an archival-type nearline storage, or backup.

2. Amazon offers API overhead when all that Omnidrive needs is a raw block device or filesystem.

(I haven&#039;t listened to the podcast yet, no speakers on this PC I&#039;m borrowing...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think you could use S3 for a customer-facing hosted storage.</p>
<p>Costs aside:</p>
<p>1. Any data to/from the customer will make two round trips. Customer to Omnidrive (and its peers), Omnidrive to S3. Perhaps it would work as an archival-type nearline storage, or backup.</p>
<p>2. Amazon offers API overhead when all that Omnidrive needs is a raw block device or filesystem.</p>
<p>(I haven&#8217;t listened to the podcast yet, no speakers on this PC I&#8217;m borrowing&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
