<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox 2.0 Alpha Released</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/19/firefox-20-alpha-released/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/19/firefox-20-alpha-released/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:34:07 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Firefox 2.0 Alpha &#171; LEMP test</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/19/firefox-20-alpha-released/comment-page-2/#comment-2588448</link>
		<dc:creator>Firefox 2.0 Alpha &#171; LEMP test</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 08:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/19/firefox-20-alpha-released/#comment-2588448</guid>
		<description>[...] saw this in Techcrunch&#8217;s post here and this is not even official test version for developer so be ware of starting and stopping all [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] saw this in Techcrunch&#8217;s post here and this is not even official test version for developer so be ware of starting and stopping all [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Video Poker</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/19/firefox-20-alpha-released/comment-page-2/#comment-1115701</link>
		<dc:creator>Video Poker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 11:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/19/firefox-20-alpha-released/#comment-1115701</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Video Poker...&lt;/strong&gt;

great blog! thanks...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Video Poker&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>great blog! thanks&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Citizen Netmom &#187; Firefox 2.0 Alpha</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/19/firefox-20-alpha-released/comment-page-2/#comment-240216</link>
		<dc:creator>Citizen Netmom &#187; Firefox 2.0 Alpha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 00:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/19/firefox-20-alpha-released/#comment-240216</guid>
		<description>[...] Firefox 2.0 Alpha  Not yet ready for primetime, but for the bravest open-source fans, TechCrunch is reporting the availability of FireFox 2.o Alpha. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Firefox 2.0 Alpha  Not yet ready for primetime, but for the bravest open-source fans, TechCrunch is reporting the availability of FireFox 2.o Alpha. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; Firefox 2.0ベータ版－ハイライト</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/19/firefox-20-alpha-released/comment-page-2/#comment-99085</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; Firefox 2.0ベータ版－ハイライト</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 01:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/19/firefox-20-alpha-released/#comment-99085</guid>
		<description>[...] Bon Echoと呼ばれるFirefox 2.0の最初のベータ版が公開された（ダウンロードはここから。Mac用・PC用）。2.0アルファ版は３月から利用可能だった。Firefox 1.0は2004年11月9日にリリースされた。2.0は世界を変えるようなインパクトがあるだろうか？ いくつかナイスな新機能を備えており、もしメモリーと安定性の課題が改善されたら、お祭り騒ぎになるだろう。 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bon Echoと呼ばれるFirefox 2.0の最初のベータ版が公開された（ダウンロードはここから。Mac用・PC用）。2.0アルファ版は３月から利用可能だった。Firefox 1.0は2004年11月9日にリリースされた。2.0は世界を変えるようなインパクトがあるだろうか？ いくつかナイスな新機能を備えており、もしメモリーと安定性の課題が改善されたら、お祭り騒ぎになるだろう。 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Firefox 2.0 beta - the highlights</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/19/firefox-20-alpha-released/comment-page-2/#comment-98852</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Firefox 2.0 beta - the highlights</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 23:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/19/firefox-20-alpha-released/#comment-98852</guid>
		<description>[...] A first Beta version of Firefox 2.0, called Bon Echo, is now available. (Mac:PC) The 2.0 Alpha had been available since March. Firefox 1.0 was released on November 9, 2004. Will 2.0 be a world-changer? There are some nice new features and if the memory and stability issues have been improved then there will be parties in the streets. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A first Beta version of Firefox 2.0, called Bon Echo, is now available. (Mac:PC) The 2.0 Alpha had been available since March. Firefox 1.0 was released on November 9, 2004. Will 2.0 be a world-changer? There are some nice new features and if the memory and stability issues have been improved then there will be parties in the streets. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firefox Boy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/19/firefox-20-alpha-released/comment-page-2/#comment-88401</link>
		<dc:creator>Firefox Boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 12:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/19/firefox-20-alpha-released/#comment-88401</guid>
		<description>When will be ready the final release of Firefox?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When will be ready the final release of Firefox?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/19/firefox-20-alpha-released/comment-page-2/#comment-31574</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 12:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/19/firefox-20-alpha-released/#comment-31574</guid>
		<description>oh and just so u guys know - i dont suggest u use alpha software even if u really wanting FF2.0 better to wait unless you wanna be a tester for fun

my personal experience is like 2 crashes in 6 months with firefox and both were only when i closed the browser so do you think i really cared... no</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh and just so u guys know &#8211; i dont suggest u use alpha software even if u really wanting FF2.0 better to wait unless you wanna be a tester for fun</p>
<p>my personal experience is like 2 crashes in 6 months with firefox and both were only when i closed the browser so do you think i really cared&#8230; no</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/19/firefox-20-alpha-released/comment-page-2/#comment-31572</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 12:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/19/firefox-20-alpha-released/#comment-31572</guid>
		<description>ok reading a few comments on here, if u really think firefox is unstable - jump off a cliff.... 1.5 does crash, just not as often -&gt; try IE 6.0 if u wanna see crashing.... yes individual experiences may differ but what the &quot;heck&quot; are u running it on a 386 16mhz with .5 mb of ram??? dude i seriously suggest u check your system for problems like bad ram - overclocked timings or overclocked processor firefox is one of the most stable browsers ive ever seen, and thats counting every other one thats around.
if u really think its that bad i think the firefox community as a whole should expel u to the world of IE 6.0 where u can get spyware and adware just from using google :S

how can i say this ... hmmm blow a goat</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok reading a few comments on here, if u really think firefox is unstable &#8211; jump off a cliff&#8230;. 1.5 does crash, just not as often -&gt; try IE 6.0 if u wanna see crashing&#8230;. yes individual experiences may differ but what the &#8220;heck&#8221; are u running it on a 386 16mhz with .5 mb of ram??? dude i seriously suggest u check your system for problems like bad ram &#8211; overclocked timings or overclocked processor firefox is one of the most stable browsers ive ever seen, and thats counting every other one thats around.<br />
if u really think its that bad i think the firefox community as a whole should expel u to the world of IE 6.0 where u can get spyware and adware just from using google :S</p>
<p>how can i say this &#8230; hmmm blow a goat</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teoh Han Hui</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/19/firefox-20-alpha-released/comment-page-2/#comment-26270</link>
		<dc:creator>Teoh Han Hui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 16:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/19/firefox-20-alpha-released/#comment-26270</guid>
		<description>Yes! The search box tooltip problem has been  fixed, but there is a new problem arising...

Whenever I use my arrow key to move back in a textbox(for example, this comment box), there will be tracks left over.

Of course this won&#039;t show up in the final release though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes! The search box tooltip problem has been  fixed, but there is a new problem arising&#8230;</p>
<p>Whenever I use my arrow key to move back in a textbox(for example, this comment box), there will be tracks left over.</p>
<p>Of course this won&#8217;t show up in the final release though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gordon mclean. informationally overloaded.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/19/firefox-20-alpha-released/comment-page-2/#comment-23081</link>
		<dc:creator>gordon mclean. informationally overloaded.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 11:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/19/firefox-20-alpha-released/#comment-23081</guid>
		<description>[...] Been a while since I waffled on about Firefox, but with 2.0 in Alpha (no I&#8217;ve not tried it yet, and I&#8217;d suggest you leave it well alone too) I thought it might be a good time to look at the current extensions I&#8217;m using. I&#8217;ve tried many different extensions but have pared things down to what I actually USE, rather than things that might &#8220;just be useful&#8221; now and again. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Been a while since I waffled on about Firefox, but with 2.0 in Alpha (no I&#8217;ve not tried it yet, and I&#8217;d suggest you leave it well alone too) I thought it might be a good time to look at the current extensions I&#8217;m using. I&#8217;ve tried many different extensions but have pared things down to what I actually USE, rather than things that might &#8220;just be useful&#8221; now and again. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Cooper</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/19/firefox-20-alpha-released/comment-page-2/#comment-22801</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Cooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Mar 2006 17:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/19/firefox-20-alpha-released/#comment-22801</guid>
		<description>The whole Firefox 1.5 thing is really weird. It clearly has problems by the numbers of people reporting them, but I&#039;ve not had a single problem on my install (OS X). It&#039;s streets ahead of Safari on the stability and memory front which used to crash at least once a day.

I do, however, make sure to restart Firefox every now and then though, so that may be saving me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The whole Firefox 1.5 thing is really weird. It clearly has problems by the numbers of people reporting them, but I&#8217;ve not had a single problem on my install (OS X). It&#8217;s streets ahead of Safari on the stability and memory front which used to crash at least once a day.</p>
<p>I do, however, make sure to restart Firefox every now and then though, so that may be saving me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodrigo A. Sepúlveda Schulz</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/19/firefox-20-alpha-released/comment-page-2/#comment-22318</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodrigo A. Sepúlveda Schulz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 00:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/19/firefox-20-alpha-released/#comment-22318</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Firefox 2.0 alpha is out...&lt;/strong&gt;

 Did I mention it before ? Nope. Techcrunch has the links and the story. eeeer: the folks in the comments there are warning you that this is a pre-alpha. Use at your own risk....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Firefox 2.0 alpha is out&#8230;</strong></p>
<p> Did I mention it before ? Nope. Techcrunch has the links and the story. eeeer: the folks in the comments there are warning you that this is a pre-alpha. Use at your own risk&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: .newmediarts&#124;:: &#187; Firefox 2.0 Woes</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/19/firefox-20-alpha-released/comment-page-2/#comment-21936</link>
		<dc:creator>.newmediarts&#124;:: &#187; Firefox 2.0 Woes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 17:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/19/firefox-20-alpha-released/#comment-21936</guid>
		<description>[...] After reading a post on TechCrunch about the release of Firefox 2.0 Alpha, I thought I&#8217;d check it out. No harm in testing a developer&#8217;s release, right? Or so I thought. It turned out that it was only compatible with 1 of my 39 extensions (as of 1:00 PM EST today, excluding the DOM Inspector), that being BugMeNot, which is especially unuseful compared to some of my more vital extensions. So I decided that it would be best for me to wait for the final release. I go to uninstall it from the Add/Remove Programs utility, and apparently there&#8217;s some misconfigured registry key or something that&#8217;s preventing me from uninstalling it. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] After reading a post on TechCrunch about the release of Firefox 2.0 Alpha, I thought I&#8217;d check it out. No harm in testing a developer&#8217;s release, right? Or so I thought. It turned out that it was only compatible with 1 of my 39 extensions (as of 1:00 PM EST today, excluding the DOM Inspector), that being BugMeNot, which is especially unuseful compared to some of my more vital extensions. So I decided that it would be best for me to wait for the final release. I go to uninstall it from the Add/Remove Programs utility, and apparently there&#8217;s some misconfigured registry key or something that&#8217;s preventing me from uninstalling it. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Attention Deficit Tech Disorder &#124; TechCrunch » Firefox 2.0 Alpha Released</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/19/firefox-20-alpha-released/comment-page-2/#comment-21896</link>
		<dc:creator>Attention Deficit Tech Disorder &#124; TechCrunch » Firefox 2.0 Alpha Released</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 14:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/19/firefox-20-alpha-released/#comment-21896</guid>
		<description>[...] TechCrunch has a link to a site claiming to have an Alpha version of Firefox 2.0.&#160; I could not find any such alpha verion on the official mozilla site so I wil refrain from downloading this one.&#160; The security of my computer is more important than having the latest and greatest (assuming this is legit). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TechCrunch has a link to a site claiming to have an Alpha version of Firefox 2.0.&nbsp; I could not find any such alpha verion on the official mozilla site so I wil refrain from downloading this one.&nbsp; The security of my computer is more important than having the latest and greatest (assuming this is legit). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/19/firefox-20-alpha-released/comment-page-2/#comment-21881</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 12:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/19/firefox-20-alpha-released/#comment-21881</guid>
		<description>My second question has been answered. The alpha does NOT lock up when netvibes is left up and running. Good enough for me. I&#039;ve made the switch and am sticking with 2.0 in whatever forms come along.

Hoping for full release, sooner the better. Just hope it doesnt get enough market share to become a big fat target.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My second question has been answered. The alpha does NOT lock up when netvibes is left up and running. Good enough for me. I&#8217;ve made the switch and am sticking with 2.0 in whatever forms come along.</p>
<p>Hoping for full release, sooner the better. Just hope it doesnt get enough market share to become a big fat target.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techi</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/19/firefox-20-alpha-released/comment-page-2/#comment-21811</link>
		<dc:creator>Techi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 06:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/19/firefox-20-alpha-released/#comment-21811</guid>
		<description>Nice thing about Opera - if you do close a tab by accident, just hit command-z or choose &#039;undo&#039; from the the edit menu. The page will load right back where you were.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice thing about Opera &#8211; if you do close a tab by accident, just hit command-z or choose &#8216;undo&#8217; from the the edit menu. The page will load right back where you were.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free Hogg. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; This isn&#8217;t the REAL Firefox 2 Alpha.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/19/firefox-20-alpha-released/comment-page-2/#comment-21738</link>
		<dc:creator>Free Hogg. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; This isn&#8217;t the REAL Firefox 2 Alpha.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 20:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/19/firefox-20-alpha-released/#comment-21738</guid>
		<description>[...] There has been a lot of talk about the release of the Firefox 2 Alpha (TechCrunch, Mark Evans, Somewhat Frank, William Computer Blog). Asa, one of the Mozilla people who would actually know, says that this isn&#8217;t the real deal and that we need to hold our horses. When we make a new release, we&#8217;ll say so. Please don&#8217;t report new releases because someone checks in a change to the user agent or similar. If we&#8217;re actaully doing a release, we&#8217;ll announce it. Thanks. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There has been a lot of talk about the release of the Firefox 2 Alpha (TechCrunch, Mark Evans, Somewhat Frank, William Computer Blog). Asa, one of the Mozilla people who would actually know, says that this isn&#8217;t the real deal and that we need to hold our horses. When we make a new release, we&#8217;ll say so. Please don&#8217;t report new releases because someone checks in a change to the user agent or similar. If we&#8217;re actaully doing a release, we&#8217;ll announce it. Thanks. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oBeattie &#187; Firefox 2.0 Alpha Released</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/19/firefox-20-alpha-released/comment-page-2/#comment-21687</link>
		<dc:creator>oBeattie &#187; Firefox 2.0 Alpha Released</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 16:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/19/firefox-20-alpha-released/#comment-21687</guid>
		<description>[...] Source: TechCrunch [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source: TechCrunch [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 200306 &#124; artistik-intelligence-agency.com 1.5</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/19/firefox-20-alpha-released/comment-page-2/#comment-21610</link>
		<dc:creator>200306 &#124; artistik-intelligence-agency.com 1.5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 10:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/19/firefox-20-alpha-released/#comment-21610</guid>
		<description>[...] TechCrunch &#187; Firefox 2.0 firerfox 2.0 alpha Portable Firefox 2.0 Alpha 1 &#8212; Download It Here! XYRON smart cutting machine &#224; decoupe [Spyworld Actu] Collecte, traitement et visualisation de l&#8217;information : Le guide est disponible gratuitement sur le site Internet du Cigref. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TechCrunch &raquo; Firefox 2.0 firerfox 2.0 alpha Portable Firefox 2.0 Alpha 1 &mdash; Download It Here! XYRON smart cutting machine &agrave; decoupe [Spyworld Actu] Collecte, traitement et visualisation de l&rsquo;information : Le guide est disponible gratuitement sur le site Internet du Cigref. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firefox 2.0 Beta at Jason Preston</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/19/firefox-20-alpha-released/comment-page-2/#comment-21582</link>
		<dc:creator>Firefox 2.0 Beta at Jason Preston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 08:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/19/firefox-20-alpha-released/#comment-21582</guid>
		<description>[...] I made the mistake of actually downloading the new Firefox 2.0 alpha. This is not becuase it doesn&#8217;t work - it works great - but rather because I&#8217;ve destroyed the compatibility of all my extensions. (Sigh). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I made the mistake of actually downloading the new Firefox 2.0 alpha. This is not becuase it doesn&#8217;t work &#8211; it works great &#8211; but rather because I&#8217;ve destroyed the compatibility of all my extensions. (Sigh). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greetings from Atlanta. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2006-03-21</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/19/firefox-20-alpha-released/comment-page-2/#comment-21575</link>
		<dc:creator>Greetings from Atlanta. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2006-03-21</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 08:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/19/firefox-20-alpha-released/#comment-21575</guid>
		<description>[...] TechCrunch » Firefox 2.0 Alpha Released An early alpha release of Firefox 2.0 has been quietly released. I don’t care if it is an alpha, it has to be more stable than v.1.5. I’ve downloaded it and its working swimmingly so far on my Mac. In fact I am writing this post with it. The only prob (tags: Firefox Alpha) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TechCrunch » Firefox 2.0 Alpha Released An early alpha release of Firefox 2.0 has been quietly released. I don’t care if it is an alpha, it has to be more stable than v.1.5. I’ve downloaded it and its working swimmingly so far on my Mac. In fact I am writing this post with it. The only prob (tags: Firefox Alpha) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sdsd</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/19/firefox-20-alpha-released/comment-page-2/#comment-21559</link>
		<dc:creator>sdsd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 07:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/19/firefox-20-alpha-released/#comment-21559</guid>
		<description>so.. is it released yet? jump the gun to early but who cares, it&#039;s an early release..i supposed, anyways confusing..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so.. is it released yet? jump the gun to early but who cares, it&#8217;s an early release..i supposed, anyways confusing..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ayuleo Web UI Design &#187; Firefox2.0alpha发布</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/19/firefox-20-alpha-released/comment-page-2/#comment-21557</link>
		<dc:creator>Ayuleo Web UI Design &#187; Firefox2.0alpha发布</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 06:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/19/firefox-20-alpha-released/#comment-21557</guid>
		<description>[...] 由于我的Firefox1.5今天突然死了几次，XP报错了几次，觉得奇怪，于是上网更新，发现Firefox 2.0 Alpha Released, 于是下载下来并在使用当中，据说是更稳定了。另外，部分Extensions失效。继续试用当中…… [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 由于我的Firefox1.5今天突然死了几次，XP报错了几次，觉得奇怪，于是上网更新，发现Firefox 2.0 Alpha Released, 于是下载下来并在使用当中，据说是更稳定了。另外，部分Extensions失效。继续试用当中…… [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ayuleo Web UI Design &#187; Firefox2.0alpha发布</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/19/firefox-20-alpha-released/comment-page-2/#comment-21556</link>
		<dc:creator>Ayuleo Web UI Design &#187; Firefox2.0alpha发布</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 06:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/19/firefox-20-alpha-released/#comment-21556</guid>
		<description>[...] 由于我的Firefox1.5今天突然死了几次，XP报错了几次，觉得奇怪，于是上网更新，发现Firefox 2.0 Alpha Released, 于是下载下来并在使用当中，据说是更稳定了。另外，部分Extensions失效。继续试用当中…… [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 由于我的Firefox1.5今天突然死了几次，XP报错了几次，觉得奇怪，于是上网更新，发现Firefox 2.0 Alpha Released, 于是下载下来并在使用当中，据说是更稳定了。另外，部分Extensions失效。继续试用当中…… [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alin Popescu &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Firefox 2.0 Alpha</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/19/firefox-20-alpha-released/comment-page-2/#comment-21549</link>
		<dc:creator>Alin Popescu &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Firefox 2.0 Alpha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 06:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/19/firefox-20-alpha-released/#comment-21549</guid>
		<description>[...] Ce e ciudat este faptul ca Mozilla nu a decis inca sa faca publica aceasta lansare pe Mozilla.org. Mai multe detalii, aici. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ce e ciudat este faptul ca Mozilla nu a decis inca sa faca publica aceasta lansare pe Mozilla.org. Mai multe detalii, aici. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
