<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Look, Features for Live.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/new-look-features-for-livecom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/new-look-features-for-livecom/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 05:28:58 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: links for&#160;2006-03-09 at //nedward.org</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/new-look-features-for-livecom/comment-page-1/#comment-2050967</link>
		<dc:creator>links for&#160;2006-03-09 at //nedward.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/new-look-features-for-livecom/#comment-2050967</guid>
		<description>[...] Live.com&#8217;s new look &amp; features I can&#8217;t imagine actually ditching Google for a Microsoft search product, but I must say that I am impressed with the Image Search functionality - using AJAX, they mimic the iPhoto/Picasa thumbnail view. (tags: microsoft photos search weblogs) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Live.com&#8217;s new look &amp; features I can&#8217;t imagine actually ditching Google for a Microsoft search product, but I must say that I am impressed with the Image Search functionality &#8211; using AJAX, they mimic the iPhoto/Picasa thumbnail view. (tags: microsoft photos search weblogs) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO IT archive internet marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/new-look-features-for-livecom/comment-page-1/#comment-774028</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO IT archive internet marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 23:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/new-look-features-for-livecom/#comment-774028</guid>
		<description>i don&#039;T really like microsoft. 
they are just too lame. and always have been</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i don&#8217;T really like microsoft.<br />
they are just too lame. and always have been</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Exploring Search Innovations With Microsoft Live Search - Friedbeef&#8217;s Tech - Simple Tech = Fun</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/new-look-features-for-livecom/comment-page-1/#comment-133352</link>
		<dc:creator>Exploring Search Innovations With Microsoft Live Search - Friedbeef&#8217;s Tech - Simple Tech = Fun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Aug 2006 09:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/new-look-features-for-livecom/#comment-133352</guid>
		<description>[...] The &#8220;never ending scrollbar&#8221; attempts to address this by making an extra long first page (which goes into the hundreds or thousands of &#8220;first page results&#8221;). Speed is not really affected, as only a small number of results are displayed at first, and are only incrementally retrieved as you scroll downwards. Although initial reports from Tech Crunch commented about it&#8217;s poor speed, the performance now does seem somewhat seamless if you&#8217;ve got sufficient bandwidth. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The &#8220;never ending scrollbar&#8221; attempts to address this by making an extra long first page (which goes into the hundreds or thousands of &#8220;first page results&#8221;). Speed is not really affected, as only a small number of results are displayed at first, and are only incrementally retrieved as you scroll downwards. Although initial reports from Tech Crunch commented about it&#8217;s poor speed, the performance now does seem somewhat seamless if you&#8217;ve got sufficient bandwidth. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friedbeef.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/new-look-features-for-livecom/comment-page-1/#comment-42850</link>
		<dc:creator>Friedbeef.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2006 19:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/new-look-features-for-livecom/#comment-42850</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Exploring Search Innovations With Microsoft Live Search...&lt;/strong&gt;

&quot;...Let&#039;s face it, while Google may pull up 600 million search items, most of us just want to look at the links on the front page. In fact research has shown that most of us never go past page 3...&quot;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Exploring Search Innovations With Microsoft Live Search&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;Let&#8217;s face it, while Google may pull up 600 million search items, most of us just want to look at the links on the front page. In fact research has shown that most of us never go past page 3&#8230;&#8221;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web 2.0 - Что нового? &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Новый дизайн и новые фичи на Live.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/new-look-features-for-livecom/comment-page-1/#comment-34640</link>
		<dc:creator>Web 2.0 - Что нового? &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Новый дизайн и новые фичи на Live.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 10:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/new-look-features-for-livecom/#comment-34640</guid>
		<description>[...] По материалам: http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/new-look-features-for-livecom/      Posted by newweb Filed in web 2.0, web2.0, live.com, techcrunch [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] По материалам: <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/new-look-features-for-livecom/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/new-look-features-for-livecom/'>http://www.tech...es-for-livecom/</a>      Posted by newweb Filed in web 2.0, web2.0, live.com, techcrunch [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Spider</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/new-look-features-for-livecom/comment-page-1/#comment-23401</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Spider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/new-look-features-for-livecom/#comment-23401</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s hard to compete with GoogIe, but I sure am glad that Goggle is not my only choice for decent results, MSN is my 2nd choice (then &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ask.com/web?q=sirseek&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ASK&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=sirseek&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Yahoo&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://a9.com/sirseek&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;A9&lt;/a&gt;).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s hard to compete with GoogIe, but I sure am glad that Goggle is not my only choice for decent results, MSN is my 2nd choice (then <a href="http://www.ask.com/web?q=sirseek" rel="nofollow">ASK</a>, <a href="http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=sirseek" rel="nofollow">Yahoo</a>, <a href="http://a9.com/sirseek" rel="nofollow">A9</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frickindeal</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/new-look-features-for-livecom/comment-page-1/#comment-23268</link>
		<dc:creator>frickindeal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 04:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/new-look-features-for-livecom/#comment-23268</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know if anyone noticed, but Live.com&#039;s search &quot;infinite scroll bar&quot; doesn&#039;t work the same way in Firefox that it does in IE6.  It breaks the back function insofar as it adds a new entry to the back history for each new &quot;scroll&quot;. This led me to have a list of 20 or so identical &quot;back&quot; entries in FF 1.5.0.1.  It doesn&#039;t do that in IE6; it works correctly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if anyone noticed, but Live.com&#8217;s search &#8220;infinite scroll bar&#8221; doesn&#8217;t work the same way in Firefox that it does in IE6.  It breaks the back function insofar as it adds a new entry to the back history for each new &#8220;scroll&#8221;. This led me to have a list of 20 or so identical &#8220;back&#8221; entries in FF 1.5.0.1.  It doesn&#8217;t do that in IE6; it works correctly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch &#187; Google v. Microsoft: New Search Interfaces</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/new-look-features-for-livecom/comment-page-1/#comment-23056</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch &#187; Google v. Microsoft: New Search Interfaces</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 09:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/new-look-features-for-livecom/#comment-23056</guid>
		<description>[...] Microsoft, through Live.com, is beta testing a new search interface that includes RSS feeds for each search, a much different image search (lots of results thumbnailed) and an &#8220;infinite scroll bar&#8221; that continues to refresh as you scroll down through results. I&#8217;ve written about the new Live.com search here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Microsoft, through Live.com, is beta testing a new search interface that includes RSS feeds for each search, a much different image search (lots of results thumbnailed) and an &#8220;infinite scroll bar&#8221; that continues to refresh as you scroll down through results. I&#8217;ve written about the new Live.com search here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What did Lemminkainen care! &#187; New Image Search on Live.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/new-look-features-for-livecom/comment-page-1/#comment-21488</link>
		<dc:creator>What did Lemminkainen care! &#187; New Image Search on Live.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2006 22:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/new-look-features-for-livecom/#comment-21488</guid>
		<description>[...] Michael Arrignton posted on TechCrunch about the new look and features on Live.com. Among other good things he writes &#8220;Live.com clearly has the best image search on the web now (both results and UI).&#8221; Really? I just read Chris Sherman of SearchEngineWatch.com claim that Ask.com&#8217;s new image search is the best on the market. I&#8217;ll give you the UI, Michael (being able to view dozens of images without clicking a &#8220;next&#8221; link or loading dozens of previews until you need them is cool, though it doesn&#8217;t work as well on regular search), but the results? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michael Arrignton posted on TechCrunch about the new look and features on Live.com. Among other good things he writes &#8220;Live.com clearly has the best image search on the web now (both results and UI).&#8221; Really? I just read Chris Sherman of SearchEngineWatch.com claim that Ask.com&#8217;s new image search is the best on the market. I&#8217;ll give you the UI, Michael (being able to view dozens of images without clicking a &#8220;next&#8221; link or loading dozens of previews until you need them is cool, though it doesn&#8217;t work as well on regular search), but the results? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Wells on TechBiz &#187; Is Google Dropping the Ball?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/new-look-features-for-livecom/comment-page-1/#comment-20765</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Wells on TechBiz &#187; Is Google Dropping the Ball?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 23:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/new-look-features-for-livecom/#comment-20765</guid>
		<description>[...] Mike Arrington has some nice things to say - though I personally didn&#8217;t find the search slow. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mike Arrington has some nice things to say &#8211; though I personally didn&#8217;t find the search slow. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: De Gardener</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/new-look-features-for-livecom/comment-page-1/#comment-18605</link>
		<dc:creator>De Gardener</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 11:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/new-look-features-for-livecom/#comment-18605</guid>
		<description>[...] The point is that each of those posts, in addition to numerous other resources I scan seem to create a huge amount of noise, not in any way proportional to what sound logic would classify as a regular course of business. The CL2 posts got 292 comments on Techcrunch!…it looked like a frenzy of comments and pingbacks (mine included) from all over the world. An amazing number compared to, for instance with 15 comments for the  &#8221; New Look, Features for Live.com&#8221; or roughly 30 comments average a regular post gets. OK – it was a leak which makes it more news worthy and exciting…but the reaction smells more like Googlbation to me, then anything else. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The point is that each of those posts, in addition to numerous other resources I scan seem to create a huge amount of noise, not in any way proportional to what sound logic would classify as a regular course of business. The CL2 posts got 292 comments on Techcrunch!…it looked like a frenzy of comments and pingbacks (mine included) from all over the world. An amazing number compared to, for instance with 15 comments for the  &#8221; New Look, Features for Live.com&#8221; or roughly 30 comments average a regular post gets. OK – it was a leak which makes it more news worthy and exciting…but the reaction smells more like Googlbation to me, then anything else. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sri Red &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Waiting for Live.com Image search</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/new-look-features-for-livecom/comment-page-1/#comment-18572</link>
		<dc:creator>Sri Red &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Waiting for Live.com Image search</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 08:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/new-look-features-for-livecom/#comment-18572</guid>
		<description>[...] When am i going to get the Image search feature in live.com , Its been a few days since it was introduced and evrybody seems to hvae me except me.It always shows that stupid &quot;The site is temporarily unavailable. Please try again later&quot;. It looks so cool and im dying to try it out ,especially after Michael Arrington said that its got to be the best image search he ever used. Even more tempting is this snapshot from Richard&#8217;s post &#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] When am i going to get the Image search feature in live.com , Its been a few days since it was introduced and evrybody seems to hvae me except me.It always shows that stupid &quot;The site is temporarily unavailable. Please try again later&quot;. It looks so cool and im dying to try it out ,especially after Michael Arrington said that its got to be the best image search he ever used. Even more tempting is this snapshot from Richard&#8217;s post &nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Information Narcosis</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/new-look-features-for-livecom/comment-page-1/#comment-18305</link>
		<dc:creator>Information Narcosis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 06:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/new-look-features-for-livecom/#comment-18305</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Windows Live New Look...&lt;/strong&gt;

Widows Live sports a new, more intutive look. Check it out....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Windows Live New Look&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Widows Live sports a new, more intutive look. Check it out&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Arrington</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/new-look-features-for-livecom/comment-page-1/#comment-18206</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Arrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 00:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/new-look-features-for-livecom/#comment-18206</guid>
		<description>Brian - ok, that&#039;s pretty funny. Maybe I should have cut that stuff out. :-)

To MS: I love you, I really do. I just love my Mac more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian &#8211; ok, that&#8217;s pretty funny. Maybe I should have cut that stuff out. <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>To MS: I love you, I really do. I just love my Mac more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian E</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/new-look-features-for-livecom/comment-page-1/#comment-18195</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 23:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/new-look-features-for-livecom/#comment-18195</guid>
		<description>You may stand better chance of being their default tech feed if you didn&#039;t post a screen shot of there site in a FireFox browser on a Mac OS.. LOL.

I have to admit the image and web search is pretty cool. That is if they can get the speed up to or faster than Google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may stand better chance of being their default tech feed if you didn&#8217;t post a screen shot of there site in a FireFox browser on a Mac OS.. LOL.</p>
<p>I have to admit the image and web search is pretty cool. That is if they can get the speed up to or faster than Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tristan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/new-look-features-for-livecom/comment-page-1/#comment-18169</link>
		<dc:creator>Tristan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 22:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/new-look-features-for-livecom/#comment-18169</guid>
		<description>Geee, the UI of Images is sooooooo slow on scrolling that it is quite unusable... A porn thumbnails pages is faster on my Firefox than Windows Live Image Search. (maybe they plan it for Vista machines...)

The scrollbar quite unintuive :( and you got smaller page area for content (web 2.0 version of frames?) You see more results per page on Google than on Live...

The only thing I really like is the font, which is better than google&#039;s. The google font somehow... sucks (and should be smaller).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geee, the UI of Images is sooooooo slow on scrolling that it is quite unusable&#8230; A porn thumbnails pages is faster on my Firefox than Windows Live Image Search. (maybe they plan it for Vista machines&#8230;)</p>
<p>The scrollbar quite unintuive <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />  and you got smaller page area for content (web 2.0 version of frames?) You see more results per page on Google than on Live&#8230;</p>
<p>The only thing I really like is the font, which is better than google&#8217;s. The google font somehow&#8230; sucks (and should be smaller).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Steward</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/new-look-features-for-livecom/comment-page-1/#comment-18028</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Steward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 15:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/new-look-features-for-livecom/#comment-18028</guid>
		<description>Painfully slow but the image searching is very cool.  I&#039;ll consider switching over from Netvibes when they improve the loading times...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Painfully slow but the image searching is very cool.  I&#8217;ll consider switching over from Netvibes when they improve the loading times&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cory Kleinschmidt</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/new-look-features-for-livecom/comment-page-1/#comment-18010</link>
		<dc:creator>Cory Kleinschmidt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 15:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/new-look-features-for-livecom/#comment-18010</guid>
		<description>Microsoft will never add TechCrunch to the Live.com technology feed because you write about too many non-Microsoft startups that threaten Microsoft&#039;s plans for borg-like ubiquity. They don&#039;t like to spread the wealth, you know.

Regarding the new Live.com search, I found it to be intriguing but not very useable. The current method of using search engines is not broken, so why are they trying to fix it?

Oh, wait... it&#039;s Microsoft, that&#039;s why. They have to be different for the sake of being different!

And please, folks. Do yourselves a favor and use Netvibes instead as your Ajax home page. It&#039;s the market leader in this space, IMHO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft will never add TechCrunch to the Live.com technology feed because you write about too many non-Microsoft startups that threaten Microsoft&#8217;s plans for borg-like ubiquity. They don&#8217;t like to spread the wealth, you know.</p>
<p>Regarding the new Live.com search, I found it to be intriguing but not very useable. The current method of using search engines is not broken, so why are they trying to fix it?</p>
<p>Oh, wait&#8230; it&#8217;s Microsoft, that&#8217;s why. They have to be different for the sake of being different!</p>
<p>And please, folks. Do yourselves a favor and use Netvibes instead as your Ajax home page. It&#8217;s the market leader in this space, IMHO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: giive</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/new-look-features-for-livecom/comment-page-1/#comment-17993</link>
		<dc:creator>giive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 14:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/new-look-features-for-livecom/#comment-17993</guid>
		<description>My Safari still cannot work on live.com.
So if anyone want me to use their web site, let my Safari works first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My Safari still cannot work on live.com.<br />
So if anyone want me to use their web site, let my Safari works first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: antigoog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/new-look-features-for-livecom/comment-page-1/#comment-17936</link>
		<dc:creator>antigoog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 10:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/new-look-features-for-livecom/#comment-17936</guid>
		<description>Microsoft is much better than Google! Go MS!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft is much better than Google! Go MS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard MacManus</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/new-look-features-for-livecom/comment-page-1/#comment-17875</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard MacManus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 08:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/new-look-features-for-livecom/#comment-17875</guid>
		<description>I have a Structured Blogging plugin and I&#039;m not afraid to use it... (for reviews, that is) :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a Structured Blogging plugin and I&#8217;m not afraid to use it&#8230; (for reviews, that is) <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Arrington</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/new-look-features-for-livecom/comment-page-1/#comment-17869</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Arrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 08:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/new-look-features-for-livecom/#comment-17869</guid>
		<description>Richard, stay out of this. I &quot;do&quot; companies and products, you&#039;re the smart analysis guy. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard, stay out of this. I &#8220;do&#8221; companies and products, you&#8217;re the smart analysis guy. <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard MacManus</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/new-look-features-for-livecom/comment-page-1/#comment-17867</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard MacManus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 07:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/new-look-features-for-livecom/#comment-17867</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t mind getting on that default Tech group too - it&#039;d double my subscriber numbers overnight!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t mind getting on that default Tech group too &#8211; it&#8217;d double my subscriber numbers overnight!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ebrahim</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/new-look-features-for-livecom/comment-page-1/#comment-17843</link>
		<dc:creator>Ebrahim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 07:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/new-look-features-for-livecom/#comment-17843</guid>
		<description>Very Neat, yes. Been using google too since a month, just changed back to live again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very Neat, yes. Been using google too since a month, just changed back to live again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: techmonster</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/new-look-features-for-livecom/comment-page-1/#comment-17841</link>
		<dc:creator>techmonster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 07:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/new-look-features-for-livecom/#comment-17841</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Windows Live in neuem Look...&lt;/strong&gt;

...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Windows Live in neuem Look&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
