<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sharpcast takes $13.5 million in Funding</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/975/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/975/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 03:21:40 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sharpcast Expands Sync Platform With Photos v1.0</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/975/comment-page-1/#comment-1271972</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharpcast Expands Sync Platform With Photos v1.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 02:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/975/#comment-1271972</guid>
		<description>[...] took $13.5 million in financing last March, which means they&#8217;ll need a home run to make a decent 3 to 7x return for their investors. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] took $13.5 million in financing last March, which means they&#8217;ll need a home run to make a decent 3 to 7x return for their investors. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phanfare Says Rich Internet Applications Are Best &#187; JenIT</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/975/comment-page-1/#comment-299047</link>
		<dc:creator>Phanfare Says Rich Internet Applications Are Best &#187; JenIT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 16:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/975/#comment-299047</guid>
		<description>[...] Phanfare offers unlimited storage of both archival and web quality photos and videos up to 10 minutes long (and an impressive 1.5 GB in size) in monthly, yearly and lifetime plans costing $7, $55 and $300 respectively. CEO Andrew Erlichson&#8217;s last company, Flashbase, was acquired by DoubleClick in 2000. They face competition from a number of other companies, including the well funded Sharpcast and Fabrik, a company with a Maxtor/Seagate hardware partnership. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Phanfare offers unlimited storage of both archival and web quality photos and videos up to 10 minutes long (and an impressive 1.5 GB in size) in monthly, yearly and lifetime plans costing $7, $55 and $300 respectively. CEO Andrew Erlichson&#8217;s last company, Flashbase, was acquired by DoubleClick in 2000. They face competition from a number of other companies, including the well funded Sharpcast and Fabrik, a company with a Maxtor/Seagate hardware partnership. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Phanfare Says Rich Internet Applications Are Best</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/975/comment-page-1/#comment-270367</link>
		<dc:creator>Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Phanfare Says Rich Internet Applications Are Best</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 00:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/975/#comment-270367</guid>
		<description>[...] Phanfare offers unlimited storage of both archival and web quality photos and 100 MB or smaller videos in monthly, yearly and lifetime plans at $7, $55 and $300 respectively. CEO Andrew Erlichson&#8217;s last company, Flashbase, was acquired by DoubleClick in 2000. They face competition from a number of other companies, including the well funded Sharpcast and Fabrik, a company with a Maxtor/Seagate hardware partnership. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Phanfare offers unlimited storage of both archival and web quality photos and 100 MB or smaller videos in monthly, yearly and lifetime plans at $7, $55 and $300 respectively. CEO Andrew Erlichson&#8217;s last company, Flashbase, was acquired by DoubleClick in 2000. They face competition from a number of other companies, including the well funded Sharpcast and Fabrik, a company with a Maxtor/Seagate hardware partnership. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrewterry.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; EmperorsClothes 2.0</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/975/comment-page-1/#comment-164773</link>
		<dc:creator>andrewterry.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; EmperorsClothes 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 10:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/975/#comment-164773</guid>
		<description>[...] Just read Techcrunch for week and see how many new, VC-backed start-ups are doing what so many other VC-backed start-ups are doing: social-networking, Flash video-sharing, IM, or blogging; throw in a pastel colour pallete, rounded corners and AJAX and make sure your new firm ends with the letter &#8220;r&#8221; (or should that be &#8220;lettr&#8221;?), and, Boom!, you have the now stereotypical Web 2.0 start-up. And, its failrly likely you will get cash thrown at you. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Just read Techcrunch for week and see how many new, VC-backed start-ups are doing what so many other VC-backed start-ups are doing: social-networking, Flash video-sharing, IM, or blogging; throw in a pastel colour pallete, rounded corners and AJAX and make sure your new firm ends with the letter &#8220;r&#8221; (or should that be &#8220;lettr&#8221;?), and, Boom!, you have the now stereotypical Web 2.0 start-up. And, its failrly likely you will get cash thrown at you. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MobileCrunch &#187; Sharpcast is Synchronization 2.0</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/975/comment-page-1/#comment-137375</link>
		<dc:creator>MobileCrunch &#187; Sharpcast is Synchronization 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 22:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/975/#comment-137375</guid>
		<description>[...] Author&#8217;s Note: Sharpcast has also been the recipient of frequent coverage over at TechCrunch, the Web 2.0 Uberblog. For more information check out: Sharpcast Takes in $13.5 in Funding The Supernova 12 Sharpcast Opens to the Public   Tags: mobile-data-synch, synchronization, intellisync, data-replication, backup-software, data-migration, mobile-data, oliverstarr, mobilecrunch  Categories: Mobile Applications, Analysis &#124;  Bookmark this post with del.icio.us [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Author&#8217;s Note: Sharpcast has also been the recipient of frequent coverage over at TechCrunch, the Web 2.0 Uberblog. For more information check out: Sharpcast Takes in $13.5 in Funding The Supernova 12 Sharpcast Opens to the Public   Tags: mobile-data-synch, synchronization, intellisync, data-replication, backup-software, data-migration, mobile-data, oliverstarr, mobilecrunch  Categories: Mobile Applications, Analysis |  Bookmark this post with del.icio.us [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; Sharpcastが一般公開</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/975/comment-page-1/#comment-70950</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; Sharpcastが一般公開</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 03:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/975/#comment-70950</guid>
		<description>[...] ３月頭に１３．５万ドルの資金ラウンドを終了した（２ラウンドあわせて合計１６．５万ドル）シリコンバレーの Sharpcast が今一般公開された。正式な発表は明日水曜日。しかし、サイトはすでに新規登録者のために公開されている。 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ３月頭に１３．５万ドルの資金ラウンドを終了した（２ラウンドあわせて合計１６．５万ドル）シリコンバレーの Sharpcast が今一般公開された。正式な発表は明日水曜日。しかし、サイトはすでに新規登録者のために公開されている。 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web 2.0 - Что нового? Новости интернет проектов &#187; Sharpcast открылся для публики</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/975/comment-page-1/#comment-60843</link>
		<dc:creator>Web 2.0 - Что нового? Новости интернет проектов &#187; Sharpcast открылся для публики</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 03:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/975/#comment-60843</guid>
		<description>[...] Базирующийся в Силиконовой Долине, проект Sharpcast, который в начале марта получил финансирование в $13.5M (и в итоге &quot;поднявший&quot; $16.5М), теперь открыт для всех. Официальное заявление будет завтра - в среду - но сайт уже открыт для новых регистраций. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Базирующийся в Силиконовой Долине, проект Sharpcast, который в начале марта получил финансирование в $13.5M (и в итоге &quot;поднявший&quot; $16.5М), теперь открыт для всех. Официальное заявление будет завтра &#8211; в среду &#8211; но сайт уже открыт для новых регистраций. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Sharpcast Opens to the Public</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/975/comment-page-1/#comment-58348</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Sharpcast Opens to the Public</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 04:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/975/#comment-58348</guid>
		<description>[...] Silicon Valley based Sharpcast, which closed a $13.5 million round of financing in early March (and $16.5 million total over two rounds), is open to the public. The official announcement is tomorrow - Wednesday - but the site is open now for new registrations. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Silicon Valley based Sharpcast, which closed a $13.5 million round of financing in early March (and $16.5 million total over two rounds), is open to the public. The official announcement is tomorrow &#8211; Wednesday &#8211; but the site is open now for new registrations. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/975/comment-page-1/#comment-26315</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 22:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/975/#comment-26315</guid>
		<description>Robert - thanks for this link - just love pixsense. I have had a camera phone for 3 years and I can finally use it!!!! Perfect usability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert &#8211; thanks for this link &#8211; just love pixsense. I have had a camera phone for 3 years and I can finally use it!!!! Perfect usability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Nichels</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/975/comment-page-1/#comment-21993</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Nichels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 22:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/975/#comment-21993</guid>
		<description>I dont know if anyone has looked at www.pixsense.com.  I was introduced to a person who works there.  I have played with Shozu client, Vizrea client and others.  PixSense has the best client.  It does stuff like auto tags and auto categorization in its gallery.  It doesnt sync yet from server to phone but I understand its coming.  Whats more important, I was told they havent taken in a dime of investment money unlike the other companies and their beta was launched in February.  Im not sure if they are looking for funding but it seems they could do allot w/ what the other companies have been funded at.  They have an impressive team also.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont know if anyone has looked at <a href="http://www.pixsense.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.pixsense.com'>http://www.pixsense.com</a>.  I was introduced to a person who works there.  I have played with Shozu client, Vizrea client and others.  PixSense has the best client.  It does stuff like auto tags and auto categorization in its gallery.  It doesnt sync yet from server to phone but I understand its coming.  Whats more important, I was told they havent taken in a dime of investment money unlike the other companies and their beta was launched in February.  Im not sure if they are looking for funding but it seems they could do allot w/ what the other companies have been funded at.  They have an impressive team also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rodney munch</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/975/comment-page-1/#comment-21739</link>
		<dc:creator>rodney munch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 21:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/975/#comment-21739</guid>
		<description>fotki.com offers direct email/MMS upload to online albums although they don&#039;t advertise it to much (i think they should). it&#039;s so damn cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fotki.com offers direct email/MMS upload to online albums although they don&#8217;t advertise it to much (i think they should). it&#8217;s so damn cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bart Claeys</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/975/comment-page-1/#comment-17963</link>
		<dc:creator>Bart Claeys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 12:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/975/#comment-17963</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m always amazed by the amounts of funding companies in the States get. Where does all this money go to? Is it transferred in their bankaccount as a whole? Do they really need that much money? At first sight the technology seems fairly simple and with a small team of 20 developers you can realise it easily. Or is there something I don&#039;t get?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m always amazed by the amounts of funding companies in the States get. Where does all this money go to? Is it transferred in their bankaccount as a whole? Do they really need that much money? At first sight the technology seems fairly simple and with a small team of 20 developers you can realise it easily. Or is there something I don&#8217;t get?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arjun</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/975/comment-page-1/#comment-17831</link>
		<dc:creator>Arjun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 06:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/975/#comment-17831</guid>
		<description>I just discovered ShoZu.com a few days ago...it doesn&#039;t do the bi-directional sync like Sharpcast, but for what it does (auto-publishing picture phone pics to Flickr/shutterfly/etc), it does it flawlessly.  As soon as you take a photo, you have the option of sending the picture to flickr.com - one button click, and you&#039;re done.  Doesn&#039;t get much easier than that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just discovered ShoZu.com a few days ago&#8230;it doesn&#8217;t do the bi-directional sync like Sharpcast, but for what it does (auto-publishing picture phone pics to Flickr/shutterfly/etc), it does it flawlessly.  As soon as you take a photo, you have the option of sending the picture to flickr.com &#8211; one button click, and you&#8217;re done.  Doesn&#8217;t get much easier than that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mick Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/975/comment-page-1/#comment-17760</link>
		<dc:creator>Mick Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 02:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/975/#comment-17760</guid>
		<description>Vizrea.com already has the same exact thing today, plus a lot more! Most photo sharing sites are a mere step away from adding an auto sync option.

One thing these guys miss is that they assume your computer is always going to be your master vault of all your photos or content! This is not always the case, I have lots of photos that I may upload to Flickr that I then delete from my own computer, because I either don&#039;t want them or need them or don&#039;t want to waste space. With sharpcast, they are mere offering a sync between your computer and the web, sort of what www.foldershare.com does right now for free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vizrea.com already has the same exact thing today, plus a lot more! Most photo sharing sites are a mere step away from adding an auto sync option.</p>
<p>One thing these guys miss is that they assume your computer is always going to be your master vault of all your photos or content! This is not always the case, I have lots of photos that I may upload to Flickr that I then delete from my own computer, because I either don&#8217;t want them or need them or don&#8217;t want to waste space. With sharpcast, they are mere offering a sync between your computer and the web, sort of what <a href="http://www.foldershare.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.foldershare.com'>http://www.foldershare.com</a> does right now for free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/975/comment-page-1/#comment-17757</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 02:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/975/#comment-17757</guid>
		<description>Sharpcast is the real deal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sharpcast is the real deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mick Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/975/comment-page-1/#comment-17756</link>
		<dc:creator>Mick Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 02:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/975/#comment-17756</guid>
		<description>What technology! It&#039;s nothing more than a file sync program with a little interface on top of it. www.vizrea.com already has this product and its not waiting to be release this spring! It&#039;s ready and available now, and lots of other companies (phanfare.com for example) already offer a more advanced product (minus the treo interface which not too many people are going to care much about).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What technology! It&#8217;s nothing more than a file sync program with a little interface on top of it. <a href="http://www.vizrea.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.vizrea.com'>http://www.vizrea.com</a> already has this product and its not waiting to be release this spring! It&#8217;s ready and available now, and lots of other companies (phanfare.com for example) already offer a more advanced product (minus the treo interface which not too many people are going to care much about).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HotJiminy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/975/comment-page-1/#comment-17748</link>
		<dc:creator>HotJiminy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 02:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/975/#comment-17748</guid>
		<description>Wow, I can get photos from my phone to my PC now - its called email.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I can get photos from my phone to my PC now &#8211; its called email.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Arrington</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/975/comment-page-1/#comment-17735</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Arrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 01:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/975/#comment-17735</guid>
		<description>David, generally speaking I agree with you, although Sharpcast has some pretty advanced technology. It has a chance to go big time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, generally speaking I agree with you, although Sharpcast has some pretty advanced technology. It has a chance to go big time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/975/comment-page-1/#comment-17733</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 01:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/08/975/#comment-17733</guid>
		<description>This is why traditional VC is totally screwed for small companies.  These aren&#039;t the next Intel/Microsoft/Qualcomm/etc...

The odd part is that not all entrepreneurs realize it yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is why traditional VC is totally screwed for small companies.  These aren&#8217;t the next Intel/Microsoft/Qualcomm/etc&#8230;</p>
<p>The odd part is that not all entrepreneurs realize it yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
