<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New: Blog Ad Exchange at Rojo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/02/16/new-blog-ad-exchange-at-rojo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/02/16/new-blog-ad-exchange-at-rojo/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 09:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: buy overnight propecia</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/02/16/new-blog-ad-exchange-at-rojo/#comment-1802255</link>
		<dc:creator>buy overnight propecia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 22:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/02/16/new-blog-ad-exchange-at-rojo/#comment-1802255</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;propecia uk...&lt;/strong&gt;

ought artfulness...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>propecia uk&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>ought artfulness&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nano Read</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/02/16/new-blog-ad-exchange-at-rojo/#comment-327597</link>
		<dc:creator>Nano Read</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 06:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/02/16/new-blog-ad-exchange-at-rojo/#comment-327597</guid>
		<description>Couple of sites does this already. One good one is Adleaf www.adleaf.com that I use. Non-intrusive and drive some free traffic to my blog site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couple of sites does this already. One good one is Adleaf <a href="http://www.adleaf.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.adleaf.com</a> that I use. Non-intrusive and drive some free traffic to my blog site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicola Mattina</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/02/16/new-blog-ad-exchange-at-rojo/#comment-205807</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicola Mattina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 13:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/02/16/new-blog-ad-exchange-at-rojo/#comment-205807</guid>
		<description>It is very dangerous to use Rojo. They have switched to a new interface that doen not work at all. All my feeds disappeared and it is not possibile to exporto opml. They are not giving any information about this incredible demonstration of incompetence!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is very dangerous to use Rojo. They have switched to a new interface that doen not work at all. All my feeds disappeared and it is not possibile to exporto opml. They are not giving any information about this incredible demonstration of incompetence!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bassett</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/02/16/new-blog-ad-exchange-at-rojo/#comment-114796</link>
		<dc:creator>bassett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 08:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/02/16/new-blog-ad-exchange-at-rojo/#comment-114796</guid>
		<description>Cool site. Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool site. Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fdme cytprk</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/02/16/new-blog-ad-exchange-at-rojo/#comment-94933</link>
		<dc:creator>fdme cytprk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jul 2006 13:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/02/16/new-blog-ad-exchange-at-rojo/#comment-94933</guid>
		<description>mkcwub fbmik npxlocsz mxitacjun puerig xsgncqvd jbymzufl</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mkcwub fbmik npxlocsz mxitacjun puerig xsgncqvd jbymzufl</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Library clips :: Rojo Feedshare: reciprocal promote :: February :: 2006</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/02/16/new-blog-ad-exchange-at-rojo/#comment-14598</link>
		<dc:creator>Library clips :: Rojo Feedshare: reciprocal promote :: February :: 2006</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 06:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/02/16/new-blog-ad-exchange-at-rojo/#comment-14598</guid>
		<description>[...] - del.icio.us - Furl BOOKMARK THIS POST: del.icio.us - Furl - Simpy - Watchlist RELATED: Furl - Waypath      &#171;&#171; Previous: DIYmemetracker [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] - del.icio.us - Furl BOOKMARK THIS POST: del.icio.us - Furl - Simpy - Watchlist RELATED: Furl - Waypath      &laquo;&laquo; Previous: DIYmemetracker [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Boag</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/02/16/new-blog-ad-exchange-at-rojo/#comment-14362</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Boag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 12:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/02/16/new-blog-ad-exchange-at-rojo/#comment-14362</guid>
		<description>Is there anybody out there doing this properly. e.g. without pushing you through to a third party (in this case Rojo) instead of directly to the feed. Also it would be nice to find a system that worked on click throughs rather than impressions. If I was running this I would just wrap a DIV around the javascript and set the style to visibility:none. That way it still loads and I get the impression but I wouldnt have to display those pesky ads on my site ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there anybody out there doing this properly. e.g. without pushing you through to a third party (in this case Rojo) instead of directly to the feed. Also it would be nice to find a system that worked on click throughs rather than impressions. If I was running this I would just wrap a DIV around the javascript and set the style to visibility:none. That way it still loads and I get the impression but I wouldnt have to display those pesky ads on my site <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/02/16/new-blog-ad-exchange-at-rojo/#comment-14263</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 23:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/02/16/new-blog-ad-exchange-at-rojo/#comment-14263</guid>
		<description>Freitas you've got the point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Freitas you&#8217;ve got the point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M Freitas</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/02/16/new-blog-ad-exchange-at-rojo/#comment-13913</link>
		<dc:creator>M Freitas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 22:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/02/16/new-blog-ad-exchange-at-rojo/#comment-13913</guid>
		<description>"Let the users decide if they want to link to their sites or their feeds. Make the link customizable."

Actually a captive RSS audience is perhaps more interesting than a one off visit to a page. What if on that day the visitor doesn't see anything interesting on the landing page?

At least, with the RSS subscription it will take a few days for him to evaluate, and start visiting the site if the content seems good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Let the users decide if they want to link to their sites or their feeds. Make the link customizable.&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually a captive RSS audience is perhaps more interesting than a one off visit to a page. What if on that day the visitor doesn&#8217;t see anything interesting on the landing page?</p>
<p>At least, with the RSS subscription it will take a few days for him to evaluate, and start visiting the site if the content seems good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damien Mulley &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Boost a blogger</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/02/16/new-blog-ad-exchange-at-rojo/#comment-13828</link>
		<dc:creator>Damien Mulley &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Boost a blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 09:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/02/16/new-blog-ad-exchange-at-rojo/#comment-13828</guid>
		<description>[...] TechCrunch talks about the new Rojo idea known as Feedshare. Basically you stick some code on your page and it advertises a blog and an ad. In turn your blog will be advertised on someoneelse&#8217;s blog. So for every block of ads you show (2 in a block) your ad will be displayed on another website. Rojo makes money from the second ad. I like the fact that the ad also has a direct link to your feed so you can subscribe to it. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TechCrunch talks about the new Rojo idea known as Feedshare. Basically you stick some code on your page and it advertises a blog and an ad. In turn your blog will be advertised on someoneelse&#8217;s blog. So for every block of ads you show (2 in a block) your ad will be displayed on another website. Rojo makes money from the second ad. I like the fact that the ad also has a direct link to your feed so you can subscribe to it. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jie Kang</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/02/16/new-blog-ad-exchange-at-rojo/#comment-13762</link>
		<dc:creator>Jie Kang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 01:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/02/16/new-blog-ad-exchange-at-rojo/#comment-13762</guid>
		<description>Let the users decide if they want to link to their sites or their feeds. Make the link customizable. BTW, the ad units are well-designed, looks cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let the users decide if they want to link to their sites or their feeds. Make the link customizable. BTW, the ad units are well-designed, looks cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Devlin</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/02/16/new-blog-ad-exchange-at-rojo/#comment-13760</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Devlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 01:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/02/16/new-blog-ad-exchange-at-rojo/#comment-13760</guid>
		<description>Isn't &lt;a href="http://www.blogexplosion.com/blogtextlinks/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Blog Explosion&lt;/a&gt; already doing something like this with their BlogTextlinks program? BE already have thousands of blogs in their network so I imagine they have a better chance of making it work than Rojo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t <a href="http://www.blogexplosion.com/blogtextlinks/" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/www.blogexplosion.com');">Blog Explosion</a> already doing something like this with their BlogTextlinks program? BE already have thousands of blogs in their network so I imagine they have a better chance of making it work than Rojo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/02/16/new-blog-ad-exchange-at-rojo/#comment-13758</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 00:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/02/16/new-blog-ad-exchange-at-rojo/#comment-13758</guid>
		<description>Ted, et. al. this is helpful. We'll come up with some concepts on how to get people right to the content but still make it easy to subscribe for future releases. Appreciate the input.

Wil - will work on some concepts for this too. If you have a specific request, hit me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ted, et. al. this is helpful. We&#8217;ll come up with some concepts on how to get people right to the content but still make it easy to subscribe for future releases. Appreciate the input.</p>
<p>Wil - will work on some concepts for this too. If you have a specific request, hit me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wil</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/02/16/new-blog-ad-exchange-at-rojo/#comment-13742</link>
		<dc:creator>Wil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 00:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/02/16/new-blog-ad-exchange-at-rojo/#comment-13742</guid>
		<description>I like the idea, and I understand the thinking behind encouraging feed subscriptions rather than just click-throughs. 

One feature I'd like to see is more control over which feeds will (and will not) be shown in my shared space.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the idea, and I understand the thinking behind encouraging feed subscriptions rather than just click-throughs. </p>
<p>One feature I&#8217;d like to see is more control over which feeds will (and will not) be shown in my shared space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/02/16/new-blog-ad-exchange-at-rojo/#comment-13740</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 00:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/02/16/new-blog-ad-exchange-at-rojo/#comment-13740</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;would you rather have one clickthrough to your site or one subscriber to your feed?&lt;/i&gt;

Can't I still subscribe to the feed once I've read the content and gotten a feel for the site? 

Perhaps I am abnormal, but I read a lot of sites every day, and only a few per week or even per month get added to my reader. 

I think this is a really cool idea, because there is too much content and too many sites to manage, and this has a great contextual way of introducing relevant stuff. However the intermediate step makes it harder to enjoy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>would you rather have one clickthrough to your site or one subscriber to your feed?</i></p>
<p>Can&#8217;t I still subscribe to the feed once I&#8217;ve read the content and gotten a feel for the site? </p>
<p>Perhaps I am abnormal, but I read a lot of sites every day, and only a few per week or even per month get added to my reader. </p>
<p>I think this is a really cool idea, because there is too much content and too many sites to manage, and this has a great contextual way of introducing relevant stuff. However the intermediate step makes it harder to enjoy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Burton</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/02/16/new-blog-ad-exchange-at-rojo/#comment-13733</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Burton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 00:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/02/16/new-blog-ad-exchange-at-rojo/#comment-13733</guid>
		<description>Oh.. you could also do both btw.   Have the link be the HTML version but also have an 'add to rojo' link at the bottom.

See you on Friday.

Kevin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh.. you could also do both btw.   Have the link be the HTML version but also have an &#8216;add to rojo&#8217; link at the bottom.</p>
<p>See you on Friday.</p>
<p>Kevin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Burton</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/02/16/new-blog-ad-exchange-at-rojo/#comment-13725</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Burton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 23:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/02/16/new-blog-ad-exchange-at-rojo/#comment-13725</guid>
		<description>"here’s an honest question: would you rather have one clickthrough to your site or one subscriber to your feed? It’s our view that in general a feed subscription will generate more readership for a blog than a one time link. It’s the gift that keeps on giving."

Chris... leave it up to the user.

Allow them to have the target link be the blog and not Rojo's RSS feed.

Most users still haven't (and won't) move to feeds (and the numbers seem to back this up).

In certain communities the HTML version of the blog will always win.

Kevin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;here’s an honest question: would you rather have one clickthrough to your site or one subscriber to your feed? It’s our view that in general a feed subscription will generate more readership for a blog than a one time link. It’s the gift that keeps on giving.&#8221;</p>
<p>Chris&#8230; leave it up to the user.</p>
<p>Allow them to have the target link be the blog and not Rojo&#8217;s RSS feed.</p>
<p>Most users still haven&#8217;t (and won&#8217;t) move to feeds (and the numbers seem to back this up).</p>
<p>In certain communities the HTML version of the blog will always win.</p>
<p>Kevin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tecnorantes &#187; Rojo lanza Feedshare : el intercambio de enlaces mas publicidad de toda la vida, pero para blogs</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/02/16/new-blog-ad-exchange-at-rojo/#comment-13718</link>
		<dc:creator>Tecnorantes &#187; Rojo lanza Feedshare : el intercambio de enlaces mas publicidad de toda la vida, pero para blogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 23:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/02/16/new-blog-ad-exchange-at-rojo/#comment-13718</guid>
		<description>[...] El 2º enlace por lo visto va a ser para poner publicidad, en principio basado en CPM. En un futuro, según dicen en Techcrunch, pretenden también pasar a campañas por click y por suscepción. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] El 2º enlace por lo visto va a ser para poner publicidad, en principio basado en CPM. En un futuro, según dicen en Techcrunch, pretenden también pasar a campañas por click y por suscepción. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tecnorantes &#187; Rojo lanza Feedshare : el intercambio de enlaces mas publicidad de toda la vida, pero para blogs</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/02/16/new-blog-ad-exchange-at-rojo/#comment-13719</link>
		<dc:creator>Tecnorantes &#187; Rojo lanza Feedshare : el intercambio de enlaces mas publicidad de toda la vida, pero para blogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 23:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/02/16/new-blog-ad-exchange-at-rojo/#comment-13719</guid>
		<description>[...] El 2º enlace por lo visto va a ser para poner publicidad, en principio basado en CPM. En un futuro, según dicen en Techcrunch, pretenden también pasar a campañas por click y por suscepción. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] El 2º enlace por lo visto va a ser para poner publicidad, en principio basado en CPM. En un futuro, según dicen en Techcrunch, pretenden también pasar a campañas por click y por suscepción. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/02/16/new-blog-ad-exchange-at-rojo/#comment-13717</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 23:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/02/16/new-blog-ad-exchange-at-rojo/#comment-13717</guid>
		<description>Yes -- we'll be at the party tomorrow and would love to answer questions and take suggestions.

To the point that the Feed Listings point back to Rojo.com rather than the feed lister, here's an honest question: would you rather have one clickthrough to your site or one subscriber to your feed? It's our view that in general a feed subscription will generate more readership for a blog than a one time link. It's the gift that keeps on giving. Yes, that means we need to direct people to a page that we host to help users subscribe to that feed in their choice of feed readers. But many bloggers might find this to be a good trade off. What do you think: rather have one click or one subscription?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes &#8212; we&#8217;ll be at the party tomorrow and would love to answer questions and take suggestions.</p>
<p>To the point that the Feed Listings point back to Rojo.com rather than the feed lister, here&#8217;s an honest question: would you rather have one clickthrough to your site or one subscriber to your feed? It&#8217;s our view that in general a feed subscription will generate more readership for a blog than a one time link. It&#8217;s the gift that keeps on giving. Yes, that means we need to direct people to a page that we host to help users subscribe to that feed in their choice of feed readers. But many bloggers might find this to be a good trade off. What do you think: rather have one click or one subscription?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sid Steward</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/02/16/new-blog-ad-exchange-at-rojo/#comment-13715</link>
		<dc:creator>Sid Steward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 23:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/02/16/new-blog-ad-exchange-at-rojo/#comment-13715</guid>
		<description>"Oh and to Sid … Do you ever sleep man?"

:-)

I've been having a lot of fun -- maybe too much fun ('must ... make ... deadline!').

LinkLike is my latest.  It is a true child of the web 2.0 renaissance: social-powered, tag-enbaled, blog-oriented, and a bad logo to boot ... a work of love.  I hope you find it useful.

I have another web app coming along, but I vowed to finish some paying work, first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Oh and to Sid … Do you ever sleep man?&#8221;</p>
<p> <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been having a lot of fun &#8212; maybe too much fun (&#8217;must &#8230; make &#8230; deadline!&#8217;).</p>
<p>LinkLike is my latest.  It is a true child of the web 2.0 renaissance: social-powered, tag-enbaled, blog-oriented, and a bad logo to boot &#8230; a work of love.  I hope you find it useful.</p>
<p>I have another web app coming along, but I vowed to finish some paying work, first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niall Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/02/16/new-blog-ad-exchange-at-rojo/#comment-13713</link>
		<dc:creator>Niall Kennedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/02/16/new-blog-ad-exchange-at-rojo/#comment-13713</guid>
		<description>It's good marketing for the Rojo team to release this new feature alongside their sponsorship of tomorrow's TechCrunch party. I'm sure they'll have more to say at their booth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s good marketing for the Rojo team to release this new feature alongside their sponsorship of tomorrow&#8217;s TechCrunch party. I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;ll have more to say at their booth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Benson</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/02/16/new-blog-ad-exchange-at-rojo/#comment-13712</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Benson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/02/16/new-blog-ad-exchange-at-rojo/#comment-13712</guid>
		<description>Oh and to Sid ... Do you ever sleep man?  I swear every day I find some new Sidgizmo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh and to Sid &#8230; Do you ever sleep man?  I swear every day I find some new Sidgizmo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Benson</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/02/16/new-blog-ad-exchange-at-rojo/#comment-13711</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Benson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/02/16/new-blog-ad-exchange-at-rojo/#comment-13711</guid>
		<description>Michael Randall beat me to it.  I was thinking "This sure seems like I saw this about a decade ago..."  But link exchange didn't aim you at linkexchange.com.  

Again, inconvenience destroys utility.  The only reason I have to go through rojo's intermediary screen is to provide them with ad revenue.  That makes me feel used.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Randall beat me to it.  I was thinking &#8220;This sure seems like I saw this about a decade ago&#8230;&#8221;  But link exchange didn&#8217;t aim you at linkexchange.com.  </p>
<p>Again, inconvenience destroys utility.  The only reason I have to go through rojo&#8217;s intermediary screen is to provide them with ad revenue.  That makes me feel used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sid Steward</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/02/16/new-blog-ad-exchange-at-rojo/#comment-13707</link>
		<dc:creator>Sid Steward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 20:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/02/16/new-blog-ad-exchange-at-rojo/#comment-13707</guid>
		<description>I created something like this called LinkLike:

http://linklike.com/

It uses graphic ads instead of text.  From the site:

"LinkLike is a social networking web site for folks who run web sites. Its metered ad exchange service lets you trade eyeballs with your partners, boosting unique visitors.

&lt;i&gt;Metered&lt;/i&gt; means that for every user you send to their site, they must send a user to your site. (If your partner falls behind, then our ad server simply stops showing his ad on your site until he catches up.)"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I created something like this called LinkLike:</p>
<p><a href="http://linklike.com/" rel="nofollow">http://linklike.com/</a></p>
<p>It uses graphic ads instead of text.  From the site:</p>
<p>&#8220;LinkLike is a social networking web site for folks who run web sites. Its metered ad exchange service lets you trade eyeballs with your partners, boosting unique visitors.</p>
<p><i>Metered</i> means that for every user you send to their site, they must send a user to your site. (If your partner falls behind, then our ad server simply stops showing his ad on your site until he catches up.)&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.094 seconds -->
