<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Del.icio.us Competitors Try Paying Users</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/28/delicious-competitors-paying-users/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/28/delicious-competitors-paying-users/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 14:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Notes on Paying Users &#171; timtowle</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/28/delicious-competitors-paying-users/#comment-385196</link>
		<dc:creator>Notes on Paying Users &#171; timtowle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 23:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/28/delicious-competitors-paying-users/#comment-385196</guid>
		<description>[...] Lots of start-ups within the social bookmarking space are paying users and here in Spain Digg clones Meneame and Fresqui have both announced within a day or so of each other that they’ll pay users via the AdSense route. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Lots of start-ups within the social bookmarking space are paying users and here in Spain Digg clones Meneame and Fresqui have both announced within a day or so of each other that they’ll pay users via the AdSense route. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sugar We're Going Down</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/28/delicious-competitors-paying-users/#comment-192725</link>
		<dc:creator>Sugar We're Going Down</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 04:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/28/delicious-competitors-paying-users/#comment-192725</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Dave...&lt;/strong&gt;

Interesting topic... I'm working in this industry myself and I don't agree about this in 100%, but I added your page to my bookmarks and hope to see more interesting articles in the future...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dave&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Interesting topic&#8230; I&#8217;m working in this industry myself and I don&#8217;t agree about this in 100%, but I added your page to my bookmarks and hope to see more interesting articles in the future&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mashable* &#187; Social Search Heats Up: Microsoft and Eurekster in Talks</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/28/delicious-competitors-paying-users/#comment-27427</link>
		<dc:creator>Mashable* &#187; Social Search Heats Up: Microsoft and Eurekster in Talks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2006 21:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/28/delicious-competitors-paying-users/#comment-27427</guid>
		<description>[...] But it&#8217;s not just social search: there are hints that Microsoft may cotton on to revenue sharing, too. The article revisits MSN Search and Win - in many ways, this is actually a paid-to-search model. Unfortunately, this isn&#8217;t quite the right approach - it makes more sense to pay users to improve your search results (see also my thoughts on paying del.icio.us users, then connect the dots). It&#8217;ll be interesting to see what happens to the other social search startups - Wink, Jookster, Prefound, Filangy et al - now that the big guns are moving in. And of course community is Google&#8217;s biggest weakness: will they ever make a social search play? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But it&#8217;s not just social search: there are hints that Microsoft may cotton on to revenue sharing, too. The article revisits MSN Search and Win - in many ways, this is actually a paid-to-search model. Unfortunately, this isn&#8217;t quite the right approach - it makes more sense to pay users to improve your search results (see also my thoughts on paying del.icio.us users, then connect the dots). It&#8217;ll be interesting to see what happens to the other social search startups - Wink, Jookster, Prefound, Filangy et al - now that the big guns are moving in. And of course community is Google&#8217;s biggest weakness: will they ever make a social search play? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mashable*</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/28/delicious-competitors-paying-users/#comment-21776</link>
		<dc:creator>Mashable*</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 01:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/28/delicious-competitors-paying-users/#comment-21776</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;PreFound - Social Search + Revenue Sharing...&lt;/strong&gt;

	
	I&#8217;ve been a big proponent of revenue sharing and social search, so it&#8217;s interesting to see these two themes come together in the form of Prefound.  From the site:
	PreFound.com allows human users to (a) see what other humans have gathere...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>PreFound - Social Search + Revenue Sharing&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>	I&#8217;ve been a big proponent of revenue sharing and social search, so it&#8217;s interesting to see these two themes come together in the form of Prefound.  From the site:<br />
	PreFound.com allows human users to (a) see what other humans have gathere&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mashable* &#187; PreFound - Social Search + Revenue Sharing</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/28/delicious-competitors-paying-users/#comment-21774</link>
		<dc:creator>Mashable* &#187; PreFound - Social Search + Revenue Sharing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 01:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/28/delicious-competitors-paying-users/#comment-21774</guid>
		<description>[...] So what are the long term prospects for Prefound? Not brilliant, but not terrible either. My feeling is that Yahoo will be aggressive in the social search space and their acquisition of del.icio.us provides the perfect mechanism for that to happen. What&#8217;s more, del.icio.us takes advantage of the work users are already doing for selfish reasons (to store interesting links) - this means the motivation to bookmark pages is much clearer. And if del.icio.us lets you add your Yahoo Publisher Network ID to your pages, the motivation will be stronger still. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So what are the long term prospects for Prefound? Not brilliant, but not terrible either. My feeling is that Yahoo will be aggressive in the social search space and their acquisition of del.icio.us provides the perfect mechanism for that to happen. What&#8217;s more, del.icio.us takes advantage of the work users are already doing for selfish reasons (to store interesting links) - this means the motivation to bookmark pages is much clearer. And if del.icio.us lets you add your Yahoo Publisher Network ID to your pages, the motivation will be stronger still. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hi. I&#8217;m Black! &#187; links for 2006-01-29</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/28/delicious-competitors-paying-users/#comment-12167</link>
		<dc:creator>Hi. I&#8217;m Black! &#187; links for 2006-01-29</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 04:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/28/delicious-competitors-paying-users/#comment-12167</guid>
		<description>[...] Del.icio.us Competitors Paying Users Get paid to send traffic to del.icio.us competitors? Eh, maybe&#8230; (tags: delious news)   Technorati Tags: delicious software      Tags [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Del.icio.us Competitors Paying Users Get paid to send traffic to del.icio.us competitors? Eh, maybe&#8230; (tags: delious news)   Technorati Tags: delicious software      Tags [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DoBump</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/28/delicious-competitors-paying-users/#comment-11858</link>
		<dc:creator>DoBump</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2006 17:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/28/delicious-competitors-paying-users/#comment-11858</guid>
		<description>If you do not have the first mover advantage then you got to pony up the money to attract attention. Sad, but a fact of life.

Of course, I am just a tiny bit biased, since I am in a similar "industry" myself, since DoBump offers paid forum posters for new or struggling forums.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you do not have the first mover advantage then you got to pony up the money to attract attention. Sad, but a fact of life.</p>
<p>Of course, I am just a tiny bit biased, since I am in a similar &#8220;industry&#8221; myself, since DoBump offers paid forum posters for new or struggling forums.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GetSpot Now &#187; Can $ Buy Social ?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/28/delicious-competitors-paying-users/#comment-11632</link>
		<dc:creator>GetSpot Now &#187; Can $ Buy Social ?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2006 13:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/28/delicious-competitors-paying-users/#comment-11632</guid>
		<description>[...] Understand from TechCrunch that Del.icio.us Competitors Try Paying Users , Simpy did it by allow user to put google ads on their user page , Rawsugar is paying directly to user base on popularity  , its seem like the fight between social bookmarking been pushing to another new level. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Understand from TechCrunch that Del.icio.us Competitors Try Paying Users , Simpy did it by allow user to put google ads on their user page , Rawsugar is paying directly to user base on popularity  , its seem like the fight between social bookmarking been pushing to another new level. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucrative tips &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Share bookmarks for money !</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/28/delicious-competitors-paying-users/#comment-10918</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucrative tips &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Share bookmarks for money !</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 19:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/28/delicious-competitors-paying-users/#comment-10918</guid>
		<description>[...] found on Techcrunch [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] found on Techcrunch [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch » Del.icio.us Competitors Try Paying Users &#187; Web 2.0 Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/28/delicious-competitors-paying-users/#comment-10848</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch » Del.icio.us Competitors Try Paying Users &#187; Web 2.0 Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 12:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/28/delicious-competitors-paying-users/#comment-10848</guid>
		<description>[...] If you&#8217;re a big user of tagging sites like Blinklist or del.icio.us then take a look at this post from Michael Arrington on TechCrunch. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If you&#8217;re a big user of tagging sites like Blinklist or del.icio.us then take a look at this post from Michael Arrington on TechCrunch. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SA Blog :: Adsense Revenue Sharing :: January :: 2006</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/28/delicious-competitors-paying-users/#comment-10824</link>
		<dc:creator>SA Blog :: Adsense Revenue Sharing :: January :: 2006</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 10:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/28/delicious-competitors-paying-users/#comment-10824</guid>
		<description>[...] According to Techcrunch.com, Simpy is paying 100% of the proceeds from Google to the user for any ads on the page and Rawsugar are paying the top twenty “directories” (user bookmark pages) between $25 and $500 per month. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] According to Techcrunch.com, Simpy is paying 100% of the proceeds from Google to the user for any ads on the page and Rawsugar are paying the top twenty “directories” (user bookmark pages) between $25 and $500 per month. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blackrimglasses.com &#187; TechCrunch » Del.icio.us Competitors Try Paying Users</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/28/delicious-competitors-paying-users/#comment-10793</link>
		<dc:creator>blackrimglasses.com &#187; TechCrunch » Del.icio.us Competitors Try Paying Users</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2006 21:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/28/delicious-competitors-paying-users/#comment-10793</guid>
		<description>[...] TechCrunch » Del.icio.us Competitors Try Paying Users let us try to monetize   by Black Rim Glasses &#124; posted in running Trackback URL &#124; Comment RSS Feed Tag at del.icio.us &#124; Incoming links [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TechCrunch » Del.icio.us Competitors Try Paying Users let us try to monetize   by Black Rim Glasses | posted in running Trackback URL | Comment RSS Feed Tag at del.icio.us | Incoming links [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eszter</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/28/delicious-competitors-paying-users/#comment-10790</link>
		<dc:creator>eszter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2006 21:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/28/delicious-competitors-paying-users/#comment-10790</guid>
		<description>Re the comment highlighting, I think it's a nice touch, but I think it would help if you had a note right after "X Comments" in the beginning of the comments section explaining what a highlighted comment stands for. This will help those who are new to the site and don't know who its author is understand why some comments are highlighted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re the comment highlighting, I think it&#8217;s a nice touch, but I think it would help if you had a note right after &#8220;X Comments&#8221; in the beginning of the comments section explaining what a highlighted comment stands for. This will help those who are new to the site and don&#8217;t know who its author is understand why some comments are highlighted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Lazar</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/28/delicious-competitors-paying-users/#comment-10777</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Lazar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2006 18:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/28/delicious-competitors-paying-users/#comment-10777</guid>
		<description>A couple of clarifications:

First, the RawSugar Rewards program is, as I mentioned on Pete's post, a way to share with our members before we introduce advertising later this year.

Second, while we're certainly bigger than Otis's one man side project we're hardly a big company at leass than a dozen nor are we searching for a business model. For more details on the latter watch for news from Demo in a week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of clarifications:</p>
<p>First, the RawSugar Rewards program is, as I mentioned on Pete&#8217;s post, a way to share with our members before we introduce advertising later this year.</p>
<p>Second, while we&#8217;re certainly bigger than Otis&#8217;s one man side project we&#8217;re hardly a big company at leass than a dozen nor are we searching for a business model. For more details on the latter watch for news from Demo in a week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Otis</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/28/delicious-competitors-paying-users/#comment-10772</link>
		<dc:creator>Otis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2006 17:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/28/delicious-competitors-paying-users/#comment-10772</guid>
		<description>Kevin: it's not all about money.  That is why I pointed out that Simpy == 1 person's side project.  For me, this is more about experimenting and learning about human behaviour than making money.  In the long run, I think that's more valuable in life.  I already learned that people freak out and become super-suspicious when money enters the picture. :)

Michael: that is partly it.  I prefer it this way - I don't need to do any work, I don't pay anything to anyone, people earn whatever they earn, and I don't even need to know how much they earn.

I think the important thing to see here, at least in Simpy's case, is that Simpy is not paying anyone!  RawSugar is.  Simpy is not - Google is.  I simply make it possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin: it&#8217;s not all about money.  That is why I pointed out that Simpy == 1 person&#8217;s side project.  For me, this is more about experimenting and learning about human behaviour than making money.  In the long run, I think that&#8217;s more valuable in life.  I already learned that people freak out and become super-suspicious when money enters the picture. <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Michael: that is partly it.  I prefer it this way - I don&#8217;t need to do any work, I don&#8217;t pay anything to anyone, people earn whatever they earn, and I don&#8217;t even need to know how much they earn.</p>
<p>I think the important thing to see here, at least in Simpy&#8217;s case, is that Simpy is not paying anyone!  RawSugar is.  Simpy is not - Google is.  I simply make it possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Yeh</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/28/delicious-competitors-paying-users/#comment-10736</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Yeh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2006 07:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/28/delicious-competitors-paying-users/#comment-10736</guid>
		<description>To paraphrase Isaac Asimov, "Paying users is the last refuge of the incompetent."  Simply tacking on paying users strikes me as a painful reminder of the excesses of the tail end of the last boom.

If a user experience isn't compelling without the cash, the small amounts a typical consumer service can afford to pay simply aren't that effective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To paraphrase Isaac Asimov, &#8220;Paying users is the last refuge of the incompetent.&#8221;  Simply tacking on paying users strikes me as a painful reminder of the excesses of the tail end of the last boom.</p>
<p>If a user experience isn&#8217;t compelling without the cash, the small amounts a typical consumer service can afford to pay simply aren&#8217;t that effective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Arrington</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/28/delicious-competitors-paying-users/#comment-10730</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Arrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2006 06:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/28/delicious-competitors-paying-users/#comment-10730</guid>
		<description>Kevin - #25 - Since you are inserting your own adsense code, Simpy actually never even touches the money. I suspect this is more a response to the work that would be required in tracking and paying out users "share" if they were to try to take a percentage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin - #25 - Since you are inserting your own adsense code, Simpy actually never even touches the money. I suspect this is more a response to the work that would be required in tracking and paying out users &#8220;share&#8221; if they were to try to take a percentage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Burton</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/28/delicious-competitors-paying-users/#comment-10726</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Burton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2006 05:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/28/delicious-competitors-paying-users/#comment-10726</guid>
		<description>The thing I find shocking is that Simpy decided to give 100% to their user base.

This just doesn't make a lot of sense it's a reasonable expectation for Simpy to at least take a cut to cover hosting costs.

Kevin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing I find shocking is that Simpy decided to give 100% to their user base.</p>
<p>This just doesn&#8217;t make a lot of sense it&#8217;s a reasonable expectation for Simpy to at least take a cut to cover hosting costs.</p>
<p>Kevin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ookles Blog &#187; &#8220;robust, socially accurate, and cheap&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/28/delicious-competitors-paying-users/#comment-10723</link>
		<dc:creator>Ookles Blog &#187; &#8220;robust, socially accurate, and cheap&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2006 03:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/28/delicious-competitors-paying-users/#comment-10723</guid>
		<description>[...] Bonus link, Michael Arrington today highlights two del.icio.us competitors who want to pay taggers in return for the value they create&#8211;23 comments so far reflect lots of interest elsewhere. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bonus link, Michael Arrington today highlights two del.icio.us competitors who want to pay taggers in return for the value they create&#8211;23 comments so far reflect lots of interest elsewhere. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Arrington</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/28/delicious-competitors-paying-users/#comment-10703</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Arrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2006 01:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/28/delicious-competitors-paying-users/#comment-10703</guid>
		<description>Ok, cool. I'll stick with the highlights for now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, cool. I&#8217;ll stick with the highlights for now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Topix.net Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/28/delicious-competitors-paying-users/#comment-10695</link>
		<dc:creator>Topix.net Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2006 00:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/28/delicious-competitors-paying-users/#comment-10695</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Is it a value chain or an attempt to buy community?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Mike Arrington asks "Is [paying users for contributed content] a gimick to generate attention or is it a viable long term strategy to generate user adoption?" Sometimes when a web model takes off the economics flip 180 degrees. Instead of......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Is it a value chain or an attempt to buy community?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Mike Arrington asks &#8220;Is [paying users for contributed content] a gimick to generate attention or is it a viable long term strategy to generate user adoption?&#8221; Sometimes when a web model takes off the economics flip 180 degrees. Instead of&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mat</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/28/delicious-competitors-paying-users/#comment-10693</link>
		<dc:creator>Mat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2006 00:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/28/delicious-competitors-paying-users/#comment-10693</guid>
		<description>highlights = good</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>highlights = good</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/28/delicious-competitors-paying-users/#comment-10687</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2006 21:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/28/delicious-competitors-paying-users/#comment-10687</guid>
		<description>Michael &#124; I really do like the highlighting of your comments

Pete &#124; While I do agree that there are network effects in the social bookmarking world, I would say that they are 1) not as strong as in some other segments like online auctions for example and 2) the switching costs are also quite low given that users can simply export and import bookmarks.  

Lastly, in a network effects driven business it all does not matter until one has reached the tipping point.  I don't think del.icio.us is there yet.  They have a great chance of getting there first, but we at www.blinklist.com are quite confident that it is still very early before anyone is close to hitting the tipping point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael | I really do like the highlighting of your comments</p>
<p>Pete | While I do agree that there are network effects in the social bookmarking world, I would say that they are 1) not as strong as in some other segments like online auctions for example and 2) the switching costs are also quite low given that users can simply export and import bookmarks.  </p>
<p>Lastly, in a network effects driven business it all does not matter until one has reached the tipping point.  I don&#8217;t think del.icio.us is there yet.  They have a great chance of getting there first, but we at <a href="http://www.blinklist.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.blinklist.com</a> are quite confident that it is still very early before anyone is close to hitting the tipping point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Barnett</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/28/delicious-competitors-paying-users/#comment-10685</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Barnett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2006 21:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/28/delicious-competitors-paying-users/#comment-10685</guid>
		<description>imho, your highlighted comments is a good idea...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>imho, your highlighted comments is a good idea&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steffen Rusitschka&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; del.icio.us alternatives pay users</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/28/delicious-competitors-paying-users/#comment-10684</link>
		<dc:creator>Steffen Rusitschka&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; del.icio.us alternatives pay users</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2006 21:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/28/delicious-competitors-paying-users/#comment-10684</guid>
		<description>[...] Also check out the TechCrunch posting on that issue. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Also check out the TechCrunch posting on that issue. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.109 seconds -->
