<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ning - R.I.P.?</title>
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/20/ning-rip/</link>
	<description>Startup and Tech News</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 02:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: I Love Ning Infinity + Infinity &#124; WEBDESIGNS Lubin, Legnica, Polkowice, Wrocław.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/20/ning-rip/#comment-2293366</link>
		<dc:creator>I Love Ning Infinity + Infinity &#124; WEBDESIGNS Lubin, Legnica, Polkowice, Wrocław.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 11:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/20/ning-rip/#comment-2293366</guid>
		<description>[...] subject did come up in a marketing meeting the other day and while some of us thought Ning was dead there were others who thought it just might be gearing up to take over as one of the best [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] subject did come up in a marketing meeting the other day and while some of us thought Ning was dead there were others who thought it just might be gearing up to take over as one of the best [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: exposed skin care review</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/20/ning-rip/#comment-1735432</link>
		<dc:creator>exposed skin care review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 10:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/20/ning-rip/#comment-1735432</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;exposed skin care review...&lt;/strong&gt;

The responsible plan of action is to do your studying altogether....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>exposed skin care review&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The responsible plan of action is to do your studying altogether&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Future of Education is Here &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Micro vs Macro</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/20/ning-rip/#comment-1682123</link>
		<dc:creator>The Future of Education is Here &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Micro vs Macro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/20/ning-rip/#comment-1682123</guid>
		<description>[...] an open platform rather than an application; in the micronet category, Ning has addressed many shortcomings and just passed the 100,000 networks mark. In the macro category, Facebook is far ahead in this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] an open platform rather than an application; in the micronet category, Ning has addressed many shortcomings and just passed the 100,000 networks mark. In the macro category, Facebook is far ahead in this [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ning at 100,000 - nature of social networks &#171; Learn-Learn-Learn</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/20/ning-rip/#comment-1643158</link>
		<dc:creator>ning at 100,000 - nature of social networks &#171; Learn-Learn-Learn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 11:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/20/ning-rip/#comment-1643158</guid>
		<description>[...] post about Ning getting to 100,000 networks this weekend.&#160; This is cool, since Ning&#8217;s demise was spoken about back in January 2006 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] post about Ning getting to 100,000 networks this weekend.&nbsp; This is cool, since Ning&#8217;s demise was spoken about back in January 2006 [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ning Milestone: 100k Social Networks</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/20/ning-rip/#comment-1641601</link>
		<dc:creator>Ning Milestone: 100k Social Networks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 13:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/20/ning-rip/#comment-1641601</guid>
		<description>[...] company sure has come a long way since I pronounced them dead in early 2006. Sometimes I like it when I&#8217;m [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] company sure has come a long way since I pronounced them dead in early 2006. Sometimes I like it when I&#8217;m [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ning 2.0</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/20/ning-rip/#comment-1555603</link>
		<dc:creator>techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ning 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 12:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/20/ning-rip/#comment-1555603</guid>
		<description>[...] on Wednesday. I’m looking forward to this, and I’m hoping that they make me eat my critical words on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] on Wednesday. I’m looking forward to this, and I’m hoping that they make me eat my critical words on [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hydrogen peroxide acne</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/20/ning-rip/#comment-1337629</link>
		<dc:creator>hydrogen peroxide acne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 18:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/20/ning-rip/#comment-1337629</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;loreal acne response...&lt;/strong&gt;

acne melasma treatment...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>loreal acne response&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>acne melasma treatment&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch&#8217;s worst post &#171; TechFold</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/20/ning-rip/#comment-1323943</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch&#8217;s worst post &#171; TechFold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 04:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/20/ning-rip/#comment-1323943</guid>
		<description>[...] - hahaha - the post in the search results is the following Febuary - with &#8220;Ning R.I.P.?&#8221; from Michael. Whoops - in retrospect, TC recognized that keyword-ballistic press releases [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] - hahaha - the post in the search results is the following Febuary - with &#8220;Ning R.I.P.?&#8221; from Michael. Whoops - in retrospect, TC recognized that keyword-ballistic press releases [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buy Carisoprodol</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/20/ning-rip/#comment-1280584</link>
		<dc:creator>Buy Carisoprodol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 13:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/20/ning-rip/#comment-1280584</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Buy Carisoprodol...&lt;/strong&gt;

bvnvbnkgf...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Buy Carisoprodol&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>bvnvbnkgf&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ning In Full</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/20/ning-rip/#comment-1066043</link>
		<dc:creator>Ning In Full</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 05:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/20/ning-rip/#comment-1066043</guid>
		<description>[...] months after it initially launched it was so hard to use that basically no one was - I called it a dead application. I&#8217;ve softened on the company since then, giving them their requested time to fully bake the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] months after it initially launched it was so hard to use that basically no one was - I called it a dead application. I&#8217;ve softened on the company since then, giving them their requested time to fully bake the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/20/ning-rip/#comment-945230</link>
		<dc:creator>Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 02:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/20/ning-rip/#comment-945230</guid>
		<description>Your guestbook is example of middle-class guestbooks. Congratulation! Ill show your site and guestbook to my friends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your guestbook is example of middle-class guestbooks. Congratulation! Ill show your site and guestbook to my friends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Gunning &#187; Stealth Mode</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/20/ning-rip/#comment-752600</link>
		<dc:creator>John Gunning &#187; Stealth Mode</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 05:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/20/ning-rip/#comment-752600</guid>
		<description>[...] Stealth mode is when a company operates in secret for some length of time before launching their product or service. Personally I lean towards the transparency side of the fence, with the proviso that you have a somewhat complete idea, product or message to show the world. After all, the execution of an idea is clearly more important than the idea itself. Ning is a great example of a web 2.0 company for whom the stealth mode strategy seemed to backfire. Cases for and against: Paul Kedrosky with the pro-stealth case: But you have to keep the role of stealth in context. It is a rational response to a marketplace with too much risk capital, low barriers to entry, and many entrepreneurial teams looking for ideas. Saying that many people will come to variants of the same idea at the same time is not the same thing as saying you should ring a bell and invite everyone and their favorite VCs to come and feast on your nascent startup. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Stealth mode is when a company operates in secret for some length of time before launching their product or service. Personally I lean towards the transparency side of the fence, with the proviso that you have a somewhat complete idea, product or message to show the world. After all, the execution of an idea is clearly more important than the idea itself. Ning is a great example of a web 2.0 company for whom the stealth mode strategy seemed to backfire. Cases for and against: Paul Kedrosky with the pro-stealth case: But you have to keep the role of stealth in context. It is a rational response to a marketplace with too much risk capital, low barriers to entry, and many entrepreneurial teams looking for ideas. Saying that many people will come to variants of the same idea at the same time is not the same thing as saying you should ring a bell and invite everyone and their favorite VCs to come and feast on your nascent startup. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ning.com Social Application &#171; Hai&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/20/ning-rip/#comment-574013</link>
		<dc:creator>Ning.com Social Application &#171; Hai&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 00:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/20/ning-rip/#comment-574013</guid>
		<description>[...] Review and follow-up from TechCrunch [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Review and follow-up from TechCrunch [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tottigol</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/20/ning-rip/#comment-298264</link>
		<dc:creator>Tottigol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 11:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/20/ning-rip/#comment-298264</guid>
		<description>Don't know, but I'm also interested in ... Greetz, &lt;a href="http://www.thomasschwarzer.de" rel="nofollow"&gt;Tottigol&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t know, but I&#8217;m also interested in &#8230; Greetz, <a href="http://www.thomasschwarzer.de" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/www.thomasschwarzer.de');">Tottigol</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Death of a Web 2.0 poster child? Hope not &#8230; &#171; Great Leaps Forward</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/20/ning-rip/#comment-264703</link>
		<dc:creator>Death of a Web 2.0 poster child? Hope not &#8230; &#171; Great Leaps Forward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2006 13:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/20/ning-rip/#comment-264703</guid>
		<description>[...] Ning may be on the way out &#8230; from TechCrunch: The idea of Ning, which launched in October 2005, is brilliant. Let people easily create social applications tailored with difference web services. Allow others to clone those applications and take the code from them directly into whatever they are building instead of building from scratch. Watch everything evolve as better and better stuff gets built, which in turn is used to build even better stuff. Ning leverages the platform by aggregating the applications and selling advertising and premium tools/features.   &#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Ning may be on the way out &#8230; from TechCrunch: The idea of Ning, which launched in October 2005, is brilliant. Let people easily create social applications tailored with difference web services. Allow others to clone those applications and take the code from them directly into whatever they are building instead of building from scratch. Watch everything evolve as better and better stuff gets built, which in turn is used to build even better stuff. Ning leverages the platform by aggregating the applications and selling advertising and premium tools/features.   &nbsp; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HeavyInfo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/20/ning-rip/#comment-239950</link>
		<dc:creator>HeavyInfo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 21:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/20/ning-rip/#comment-239950</guid>
		<description>Any updates on your thinking about Ning Michael?
It seems like there has been some new development coming out from them lately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any updates on your thinking about Ning Michael?<br />
It seems like there has been some new development coming out from them lately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daso4</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/20/ning-rip/#comment-226842</link>
		<dc:creator>daso4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 19:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/20/ning-rip/#comment-226842</guid>
		<description>Hm... at first the idea sounds interesting to me - but .... 

"...Third, Ning keeps all of the applications under the ning.com roof..."

this kept me out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm&#8230; at first the idea sounds interesting to me - but &#8230;. </p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;Third, Ning keeps all of the applications under the ning.com roof&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>this kept me out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mashup</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/20/ning-rip/#comment-116421</link>
		<dc:creator>mashup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2006 18:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/20/ning-rip/#comment-116421</guid>
		<description>I am sure that uber techfox Amy is working there. Anyway good luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am sure that uber techfox Amy is working there. Anyway good luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tottigol</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/20/ning-rip/#comment-111383</link>
		<dc:creator>Tottigol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 10:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/20/ning-rip/#comment-111383</guid>
		<description>Are there any news? New events scheduled or something like this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are there any news? New events scheduled or something like this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Schwarzenbek</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/20/ning-rip/#comment-106127</link>
		<dc:creator>Schwarzenbek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 17:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/20/ning-rip/#comment-106127</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the great information. Greetings from Schwarzenbek Infos Bilder Postkarten</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the great information. Greetings from Schwarzenbek Infos Bilder Postkarten</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Week in the Valley: Ning</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/20/ning-rip/#comment-100134</link>
		<dc:creator>A Week in the Valley: Ning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 11:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/20/ning-rip/#comment-100134</guid>
		<description>[...] This is partially the reason why they had such mixed PR. Arrington posted &#8217;Ning RIP&#8217; and gave them both barrels as crap. The TechCrunch 53,510 (and me) all looked at Ning when it launched and said &#8216;huh, it&#8217;s PHP with libraries I don&#8217;t own! UGH!&#8217; But users who aren&#8217;t Apache configuring MySQL-worshipping junkies with Rails up both forearms (in other words, normal people) look at it differently. They see something that takes the pain out of building a web site. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] This is partially the reason why they had such mixed PR. Arrington posted &#8217;Ning RIP&#8217; and gave them both barrels as crap. The TechCrunch 53,510 (and me) all looked at Ning when it launched and said &#8216;huh, it&#8217;s PHP with libraries I don&#8217;t own! UGH!&#8217; But users who aren&#8217;t Apache configuring MySQL-worshipping junkies with Rails up both forearms (in other words, normal people) look at it differently. They see something that takes the pain out of building a web site. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MySQL Developer &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Week in the Valley: Ning</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/20/ning-rip/#comment-99886</link>
		<dc:creator>MySQL Developer &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Week in the Valley: Ning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 01:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/20/ning-rip/#comment-99886</guid>
		<description>[...] This is partially the reason why they had such mixed PR. Arrington posted &#8220;Ning RIP&#8221; and gave them both barrels as crap. The TechCrunch 53,510 (and me) all looked at Ning when it launched and said &#8220;huh, it&#8217;s PHP with libraries I don&#8217;t own! UGH!&#8221; But users who aren&#8217;t Apache configuring MySQL-worshipping junkies with Rails up both forearms (in other words, normal people) look at it differently. They see something that takes the pain out of building a web site. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] This is partially the reason why they had such mixed PR. Arrington posted &#8220;Ning RIP&#8221; and gave them both barrels as crap. The TechCrunch 53,510 (and me) all looked at Ning when it launched and said &#8220;huh, it&#8217;s PHP with libraries I don&#8217;t own! UGH!&#8221; But users who aren&#8217;t Apache configuring MySQL-worshipping junkies with Rails up both forearms (in other words, normal people) look at it differently. They see something that takes the pain out of building a web site. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom21</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/20/ning-rip/#comment-63794</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom21</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 11:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/20/ning-rip/#comment-63794</guid>
		<description>When is it going to take place?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When is it going to take place?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Ask and you may receive (a mashup) &#124; Between the Lines &#124; ZDNet.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/20/ning-rip/#comment-38965</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Ask and you may receive (a mashup) &#124; Between the Lines &#124; ZDNet.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 14:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/20/ning-rip/#comment-38965</guid>
		<description>[...] In pointing out certain mashup enablers that are making childs play out of mashup development, I've mentioned Andrew Bidochko's mapbuilder.net.&#160; Says mapbuilder's headline, &#34;MapBuilder lets you tag locations on a map and publish it on your own site. Mapping is now easier than ever. It's free.&#34; Ning is another one of those mashup enablers that's turning mashup development into child's play.&#160; In the case of Zero Bars, Ning's Grahame simply took an existing Ning-based mashup (Review It!), cloned it (using Ning's &#34;Clone this App&#34; feature), made a few changes, and in five minutes (according to Grahame), voila.&#160; Is Ning's process perfect? No. As TechCrunch's Mike Arrington fairly points out, if you're not cloning an existing mashup, building one from scratch on Ning's platform may require skills that most people don't have.&#160; But on the other hand, tools like this have to start somewhere.&#160; Also, be sure to read Ning CEO Gina Bianchini's response to Arrington's criticisms.&#160; In writing: Ning is an online platform for effortlessly creating social web apps for free. Without any coding experience, you can take any of the thousands of active social web applications on Ning today and make them your own in a few easy clicks. You can&#8217;t do this anywhere else on the Internet today&#8230;As a developer who does know how to code, there is no easier place to create and run your own web app, social or otherwise, as there are no downloads required, no databases to manage, and no sysadmin headaches. 95% of what you&#8217;d have to do to build a web app is already done&#8230;.We support external web services from, as Michael mentioned, from Google Maps, Amazon, Yahoo Maps, Flickr, Yahoo Search, and Gmail. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] In pointing out certain mashup enablers that are making childs play out of mashup development, I&#8217;ve mentioned Andrew Bidochko&#8217;s mapbuilder.net.&nbsp; Says mapbuilder&#8217;s headline, &quot;MapBuilder lets you tag locations on a map and publish it on your own site. Mapping is now easier than ever. It&#8217;s free.&quot; Ning is another one of those mashup enablers that&#8217;s turning mashup development into child&#8217;s play.&nbsp; In the case of Zero Bars, Ning&#8217;s Grahame simply took an existing Ning-based mashup (Review It!), cloned it (using Ning&#8217;s &quot;Clone this App&quot; feature), made a few changes, and in five minutes (according to Grahame), voila.&nbsp; Is Ning&#8217;s process perfect? No. As TechCrunch&#8217;s Mike Arrington fairly points out, if you&#8217;re not cloning an existing mashup, building one from scratch on Ning&#8217;s platform may require skills that most people don&#8217;t have.&nbsp; But on the other hand, tools like this have to start somewhere.&nbsp; Also, be sure to read Ning CEO Gina Bianchini&#8217;s response to Arrington&#8217;s criticisms.&nbsp; In writing: Ning is an online platform for effortlessly creating social web apps for free. Without any coding experience, you can take any of the thousands of active social web applications on Ning today and make them your own in a few easy clicks. You can&rsquo;t do this anywhere else on the Internet today&#8230;As a developer who does know how to code, there is no easier place to create and run your own web app, social or otherwise, as there are no downloads required, no databases to manage, and no sysadmin headaches. 95% of what you&rsquo;d have to do to build a web app is already done&#8230;.We support external web services from, as Michael mentioned, from Google Maps, Amazon, Yahoo Maps, Flickr, Yahoo Search, and Gmail. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laender</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/20/ning-rip/#comment-28145</link>
		<dc:creator>Laender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 19:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/20/ning-rip/#comment-28145</guid>
		<description>Are there any other companies like Ning? Companies that let you “Clone” a website?

Thats a interesting question...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are there any other companies like Ning? Companies that let you “Clone” a website?</p>
<p>Thats a interesting question&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.597 seconds -->
