<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TailRank is Looking Good</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/17/tailrank-is-looking-good/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/17/tailrank-is-looking-good/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:39:24 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tailrank Finally Slides Into The Deadpool, But The Platform Behind It Lives On &#124; TechTwist</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/17/tailrank-is-looking-good/comment-page-1/#comment-2757506</link>
		<dc:creator>Tailrank Finally Slides Into The Deadpool, But The Platform Behind It Lives On &#124; TechTwist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 10:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/17/tailrank-is-looking-good/#comment-2757506</guid>
		<description>[...] launched in late 2005 as an automated news aggregator looking to compete with the likes of Techmeme and a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] launched in late 2005 as an automated news aggregator looking to compete with the likes of Techmeme and a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tailrankがついにデッドプールに落ちたがそれを支えていたプラットホームは生き残る</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/17/tailrank-is-looking-good/comment-page-1/#comment-2757391</link>
		<dc:creator>Tailrankがついにデッドプールに落ちたがそれを支えていたプラットホームは生き残る</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 08:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/17/tailrank-is-looking-good/#comment-2757391</guid>
		<description>[...] Tailrankは2005年の終わりに、ニュースの自動集積サイトとしてロンチし、Techmemeなど既存の類似サービスと競合することになった。2007年の半ばには、このサイトのユーザがほとんどいないことが明らかになり、それから数週間後には同サイトのテクノロジ欄が空白になってしまった（そこで本誌は、このサイトをデッドプール（英語）（日本語記事）に入れるべきかと読者に質問した）。数か月後に行われたアップグレードも効果がなく、今ではこのサイトを訪ねても見えるのはエラーページだけだ。 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tailrankは2005年の終わりに、ニュースの自動集積サイトとしてロンチし、Techmemeなど既存の類似サービスと競合することになった。2007年の半ばには、このサイトのユーザがほとんどいないことが明らかになり、それから数週間後には同サイトのテクノロジ欄が空白になってしまった（そこで本誌は、このサイトをデッドプール（英語）（日本語記事）に入れるべきかと読者に質問した）。数か月後に行われたアップグレードも効果がなく、今ではこのサイトを訪ねても見えるのはエラーページだけだ。 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tailrank Finally Slides Into The Deadpool, But The Platform Behind It Lives On &#124; Marketing Internetowy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/17/tailrank-is-looking-good/comment-page-1/#comment-2757340</link>
		<dc:creator>Tailrank Finally Slides Into The Deadpool, But The Platform Behind It Lives On &#124; Marketing Internetowy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 08:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/17/tailrank-is-looking-good/#comment-2757340</guid>
		<description>[...] launched in late 2005 as an automated news aggregator looking to compete with the likes of Techmeme and a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] launched in late 2005 as an automated news aggregator looking to compete with the likes of Techmeme and a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tailrank Finally Slides Into The Deadpool, But The Platform Behind It Lives On &#124; CHARGED's Digital Lifestyle at Work or Play</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/17/tailrank-is-looking-good/comment-page-1/#comment-2756880</link>
		<dc:creator>Tailrank Finally Slides Into The Deadpool, But The Platform Behind It Lives On &#124; CHARGED's Digital Lifestyle at Work or Play</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 02:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/17/tailrank-is-looking-good/#comment-2756880</guid>
		<description>[...] launched in late 2005 as an automated news aggregator looking to compete with the likes of Techmeme and a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] launched in late 2005 as an automated news aggregator looking to compete with the likes of Techmeme and a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tailrank Finally Slides Into The Deadpool, But The Platform Behind It Lives On &#124; Viningmedia Nieuws</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/17/tailrank-is-looking-good/comment-page-1/#comment-2756848</link>
		<dc:creator>Tailrank Finally Slides Into The Deadpool, But The Platform Behind It Lives On &#124; Viningmedia Nieuws</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 01:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/17/tailrank-is-looking-good/#comment-2756848</guid>
		<description>[...] launched in late 2005 as an automated news aggregator looking to compete with the likes of Techmeme and a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] launched in late 2005 as an automated news aggregator looking to compete with the likes of Techmeme and a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trade Jim News &#187; Tailrank Finally Slides Into The Deadpool, But The Platform Behind It Lives On</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/17/tailrank-is-looking-good/comment-page-1/#comment-2756824</link>
		<dc:creator>Trade Jim News &#187; Tailrank Finally Slides Into The Deadpool, But The Platform Behind It Lives On</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 01:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/17/tailrank-is-looking-good/#comment-2756824</guid>
		<description>[...] launched in late 2005 as an automated news aggregator looking to compete with the likes of Techmeme and a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] launched in late 2005 as an automated news aggregator looking to compete with the likes of Techmeme and a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tailrank Finally Slides Into The Deadpool, But The Platform Behind It Lives On</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/17/tailrank-is-looking-good/comment-page-1/#comment-2756784</link>
		<dc:creator>Tailrank Finally Slides Into The Deadpool, But The Platform Behind It Lives On</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 00:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/17/tailrank-is-looking-good/#comment-2756784</guid>
		<description>[...] launched in late 2005 as an automated news aggregator looking to compete with the likes of Techmeme and a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] launched in late 2005 as an automated news aggregator looking to compete with the likes of Techmeme and a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SM Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/17/tailrank-is-looking-good/comment-page-1/#comment-9573</link>
		<dc:creator>SM Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 21:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/17/tailrank-is-looking-good/#comment-9573</guid>
		<description>Mike &amp; TC readers,

I&#039;ve been searching hard for data in growth of popular subscriber services. Something that had a graph that showed growth in members/subscribers over time for social/community services like Flickr, del.icio.us, memeorandum, etc. Even some general data points like N members over M months would be great. I posted this here because I think lots of folks are hungry for this data like me.

Thanks Mike.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike &amp; TC readers,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been searching hard for data in growth of popular subscriber services. Something that had a graph that showed growth in members/subscribers over time for social/community services like Flickr, del.icio.us, memeorandum, etc. Even some general data points like N members over M months would be great. I posted this here because I think lots of folks are hungry for this data like me.</p>
<p>Thanks Mike.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/17/tailrank-is-looking-good/comment-page-1/#comment-9498</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 10:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/17/tailrank-is-looking-good/#comment-9498</guid>
		<description>Kevin, AFAICT the problem with the TailRank UI is the sidebar. As soon as I enter

.sidebox { display: none; }

everything becomes insanely clear.

Perhaps just a narrower sidebox and more whitespace between the sidebox and the main content would help.

Also, the ads are positioned in such a way that they actually obscure the functionality of the site. I realise that the ads drive your revenue, but what are the most important things you want the user to see?

Also, &quot;Hot tags&quot; - important? Folksonomy heatmaps are the new mullets, right? ;)

&quot;Recently tagged by members&quot; - important?

Just ideas :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin, AFAICT the problem with the TailRank UI is the sidebar. As soon as I enter</p>
<p>.sidebox { display: none; }</p>
<p>everything becomes insanely clear.</p>
<p>Perhaps just a narrower sidebox and more whitespace between the sidebox and the main content would help.</p>
<p>Also, the ads are positioned in such a way that they actually obscure the functionality of the site. I realise that the ads drive your revenue, but what are the most important things you want the user to see?</p>
<p>Also, &#8220;Hot tags&#8221; &#8211; important? Folksonomy heatmaps are the new mullets, right? <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>&#8220;Recently tagged by members&#8221; &#8211; important?</p>
<p>Just ideas <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurence Timms</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/17/tailrank-is-looking-good/comment-page-1/#comment-9491</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurence Timms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 09:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/17/tailrank-is-looking-good/#comment-9491</guid>
		<description>This is a &#039;Hey! Me too! Me too!&#039; comment: why not check out http://chuquet.com - it&#039;s a reverse attention aggregator/metafilter site which presents clusters of articles around a specific link. 

It updates several times a day; again not as often as memeorandum. But then we don&#039;t have a lot of servers. Yet.

It&#039;s based on thousands of feeds rather than tens of thousands, and trashy feeds don&#039;t live for long in the database before being automatically dropped. However, the feed base is gradually increasing as more quality feeds appear.

Users can submit their own feeds to be included in chuquet, but they are also subject to the internal quality processing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a &#8216;Hey! Me too! Me too!&#8217; comment: why not check out <a href="http://chuquet.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://chuquet.com'>http://chuquet.com</a> &#8211; it&#8217;s a reverse attention aggregator/metafilter site which presents clusters of articles around a specific link. </p>
<p>It updates several times a day; again not as often as memeorandum. But then we don&#8217;t have a lot of servers. Yet.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s based on thousands of feeds rather than tens of thousands, and trashy feeds don&#8217;t live for long in the database before being automatically dropped. However, the feed base is gradually increasing as more quality feeds appear.</p>
<p>Users can submit their own feeds to be included in chuquet, but they are also subject to the internal quality processing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marketer&#8217;s Eye &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 5 one-time site promotion tips that pay off big</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/17/tailrank-is-looking-good/comment-page-1/#comment-9407</link>
		<dc:creator>Marketer&#8217;s Eye &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 5 one-time site promotion tips that pay off big</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 15:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/17/tailrank-is-looking-good/#comment-9407</guid>
		<description>[...] TailRank is an interesting site I first learned about on TechCrunch. They attempt to be a &#8220;newspaper of the blogosphere&#8221;, by aggregating hot conversations into groups, and highlighting blogs talking about or initiating hot topics. Most interestingly, they get their blogs to include from members&#8217; subscription lists. You can get yours listed by importing an OPML feed list. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TailRank is an interesting site I first learned about on TechCrunch. They attempt to be a &#8220;newspaper of the blogosphere&#8221;, by aggregating hot conversations into groups, and highlighting blogs talking about or initiating hot topics. Most interestingly, they get their blogs to include from members&#8217; subscription lists. You can get yours listed by importing an OPML feed list. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Arrington</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/17/tailrank-is-looking-good/comment-page-1/#comment-9270</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Arrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 11:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/17/tailrank-is-looking-good/#comment-9270</guid>
		<description>BP - disregard the &quot;specifics&quot; query. Our comments crossed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BP &#8211; disregard the &#8220;specifics&#8221; query. Our comments crossed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigPig</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/17/tailrank-is-looking-good/comment-page-1/#comment-9268</link>
		<dc:creator>BigPig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 11:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/17/tailrank-is-looking-good/#comment-9268</guid>
		<description>&quot;Yeah, I’d like more specifics too&quot;

You mean in addition to what I just wrote?

&quot;Gabe, the founder of meme, is staying at my house right now and I’m partially ripping on it just to gets his anxiety up&quot;

Tell him from me his site is great. I came across it about 2 months ago and I go there at least 3 times a day. I&#039;m curious what he thinks of News Bump actually, as meme and NB are my two main aggregators at the moment although I think the latter is newer.

I should get my company to send him a bill for all the time I spend on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Yeah, I’d like more specifics too&#8221;</p>
<p>You mean in addition to what I just wrote?</p>
<p>&#8220;Gabe, the founder of meme, is staying at my house right now and I’m partially ripping on it just to gets his anxiety up&#8221;</p>
<p>Tell him from me his site is great. I came across it about 2 months ago and I go there at least 3 times a day. I&#8217;m curious what he thinks of News Bump actually, as meme and NB are my two main aggregators at the moment although I think the latter is newer.</p>
<p>I should get my company to send him a bill for all the time I spend on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Arrington</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/17/tailrank-is-looking-good/comment-page-1/#comment-9265</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Arrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 10:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/17/tailrank-is-looking-good/#comment-9265</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I&#039;d like more specifics too.

As for meme, it has certainly grown on me, but I think that is despite its interface, not because of it. I agree, good content wins. I just wonder how many people have visited memeorandum, taken one look at the logo and bolted for good.

Full disclaimer - Gabe, the founder of meme, is staying at my house right now and I&#039;m partially ripping on it just to gets his anxiety up. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I&#8217;d like more specifics too.</p>
<p>As for meme, it has certainly grown on me, but I think that is despite its interface, not because of it. I agree, good content wins. I just wonder how many people have visited memeorandum, taken one look at the logo and bolted for good.</p>
<p>Full disclaimer &#8211; Gabe, the founder of meme, is staying at my house right now and I&#8217;m partially ripping on it just to gets his anxiety up. <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigPig</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/17/tailrank-is-looking-good/comment-page-1/#comment-9264</link>
		<dc:creator>BigPig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 10:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/17/tailrank-is-looking-good/#comment-9264</guid>
		<description>On tail rank I assume. I think there&#039;s just too much &quot;stuff&quot; on one page. Information overload if you like. And it all seems jammed up together.

Sorry to criticise. It&#039;s a very nice site, but I prefer the layout on NewsBump and memorandum. I just tells me what I need to know and there&#039;s nothing else hovering around to distract me.

This is obviously just a personal opinion. Other people may love having a whole bunch of different data thrown at them from every angle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On tail rank I assume. I think there&#8217;s just too much &#8220;stuff&#8221; on one page. Information overload if you like. And it all seems jammed up together.</p>
<p>Sorry to criticise. It&#8217;s a very nice site, but I prefer the layout on NewsBump and memorandum. I just tells me what I need to know and there&#8217;s nothing else hovering around to distract me.</p>
<p>This is obviously just a personal opinion. Other people may love having a whole bunch of different data thrown at them from every angle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Burton</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/17/tailrank-is-looking-good/comment-page-1/#comment-9263</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Burton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 10:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/17/tailrank-is-looking-good/#comment-9263</guid>
		<description>Could you elaborate on &#039;visually confusing&#039; please?

Kevin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could you elaborate on &#8216;visually confusing&#8217; please?</p>
<p>Kevin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigPig</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/17/tailrank-is-looking-good/comment-page-1/#comment-9262</link>
		<dc:creator>BigPig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 10:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/17/tailrank-is-looking-good/#comment-9262</guid>
		<description>That was quick!

I agree it does seem similar to Digg, although more politics than tech. Generally I surf for content rather than gimmicks (such as Digging it) though, so I can forgive it that. I&#039;ve only been going there for about a week, but every day the content is excellent for someone interested in current affairs like me.

If they keep it up (which judging by Digg lately which seems to have been taken over by 12 year olds they may not), I think it&#039;s going to become a very popular site. Web 2.0 is just like Web 1.0 IMHO - it will be driven by quality content.

As for memorandum - I think the interface is the best of all the news aggregators so far (except maybe NewsBump). It&#039;s simple and not too cluttered (although a bit ugly). Tailrank and Gather are too visually confusing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was quick!</p>
<p>I agree it does seem similar to Digg, although more politics than tech. Generally I surf for content rather than gimmicks (such as Digging it) though, so I can forgive it that. I&#8217;ve only been going there for about a week, but every day the content is excellent for someone interested in current affairs like me.</p>
<p>If they keep it up (which judging by Digg lately which seems to have been taken over by 12 year olds they may not), I think it&#8217;s going to become a very popular site. Web 2.0 is just like Web 1.0 IMHO &#8211; it will be driven by quality content.</p>
<p>As for memorandum &#8211; I think the interface is the best of all the news aggregators so far (except maybe NewsBump). It&#8217;s simple and not too cluttered (although a bit ugly). Tailrank and Gather are too visually confusing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Arrington</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/17/tailrank-is-looking-good/comment-page-1/#comment-9261</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Arrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 10:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/17/tailrank-is-looking-good/#comment-9261</guid>
		<description>BigPig - I don&#039;t think I&#039;ve seen NewsBump before now. At first glance (10 seconds on the page) it looks like it has a digg-like interface. Is there any clustering of conversations? What I really like is to see are related discussions across different blogs.

Do you really think Memeorandum has a clean interface? It&#039;s terrible!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BigPig &#8211; I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve seen NewsBump before now. At first glance (10 seconds on the page) it looks like it has a digg-like interface. Is there any clustering of conversations? What I really like is to see are related discussions across different blogs.</p>
<p>Do you really think Memeorandum has a clean interface? It&#8217;s terrible!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigPig</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/17/tailrank-is-looking-good/comment-page-1/#comment-9259</link>
		<dc:creator>BigPig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 10:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/17/tailrank-is-looking-good/#comment-9259</guid>
		<description>I posted on it yesterday too, but I&#039;m surprised you haven&#039;t covered &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newsbump.net&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;News Bump&lt;/a&gt; yet in this space. With the possible exception of memorandum, I think it&#039;s got the cleanest interface and the content so far has been really interesting IMHO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I posted on it yesterday too, but I&#8217;m surprised you haven&#8217;t covered <a href="http://www.newsbump.net" rel="nofollow">News Bump</a> yet in this space. With the possible exception of memorandum, I think it&#8217;s got the cleanest interface and the content so far has been really interesting IMHO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Burton</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/17/tailrank-is-looking-good/comment-page-1/#comment-9252</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Burton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 07:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/17/tailrank-is-looking-good/#comment-9252</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the feedback guys.  If you think the UI is cluttered please let me know how you think it could be simplified.  I&#039;m all ears.  And really quick at incorporating feedback.

WRT time to meme discovery we&#039;re working on a robot update which should hit in another week.  This should allow for deeper breadth and granularity in our recommendations.

Our current goal has been to push for a 1.0 release at the end of January so there should be some killer features landing real soon now :)..

One in particular will blow your doors off (well I think) but I just have to do a little more tuning to get the performance there.  Right now it&#039;s really fast but I want it to scale a little more.

Also take a look at our &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.feedblog.org/2006/01/tailrank_and_ed.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;new editorial control feature&lt;/a&gt;.  I&#039;m hoping to push the code for this tomorrow morning so if any of you guys would like to be an editor just send me an email.

Kevin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the feedback guys.  If you think the UI is cluttered please let me know how you think it could be simplified.  I&#8217;m all ears.  And really quick at incorporating feedback.</p>
<p>WRT time to meme discovery we&#8217;re working on a robot update which should hit in another week.  This should allow for deeper breadth and granularity in our recommendations.</p>
<p>Our current goal has been to push for a 1.0 release at the end of January so there should be some killer features landing real soon now <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> ..</p>
<p>One in particular will blow your doors off (well I think) but I just have to do a little more tuning to get the performance there.  Right now it&#8217;s really fast but I want it to scale a little more.</p>
<p>Also take a look at our <a href="http://www.feedblog.org/2006/01/tailrank_and_ed.html" rel="nofollow">new editorial control feature</a>.  I&#8217;m hoping to push the code for this tomorrow morning so if any of you guys would like to be an editor just send me an email.</p>
<p>Kevin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/17/tailrank-is-looking-good/comment-page-1/#comment-9249</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 07:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/17/tailrank-is-looking-good/#comment-9249</guid>
		<description>Tailrank has improved significantly. A lesson to people in web 2.0: if you have a product, with limited resources, in a crowded space: keep an open and honest blog about your attempts and the industry you&#039;re in. Kevin&#039;s feedblog has kept me interested in a project that normally I would have overlooked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tailrank has improved significantly. A lesson to people in web 2.0: if you have a product, with limited resources, in a crowded space: keep an open and honest blog about your attempts and the industry you&#8217;re in. Kevin&#8217;s feedblog has kept me interested in a project that normally I would have overlooked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike D.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/17/tailrank-is-looking-good/comment-page-1/#comment-9247</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 06:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/17/tailrank-is-looking-good/#comment-9247</guid>
		<description>Yep, agreed.  I really like what Kevin&#039;s done since the first incarnation, and the latest version of Tailrank begins to show what OPML can look and act like outside the sterile confines of a newsreader.

Kevin&#039;s a smart guy and I expect the improvements to only get better as time goes on.  Now you can say &quot;Show me some tail&quot; without feeling dirty about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, agreed.  I really like what Kevin&#8217;s done since the first incarnation, and the latest version of Tailrank begins to show what OPML can look and act like outside the sterile confines of a newsreader.</p>
<p>Kevin&#8217;s a smart guy and I expect the improvements to only get better as time goes on.  Now you can say &#8220;Show me some tail&#8221; without feeling dirty about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jie Kang</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/17/tailrank-is-looking-good/comment-page-1/#comment-9246</link>
		<dc:creator>Jie Kang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 06:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/17/tailrank-is-looking-good/#comment-9246</guid>
		<description>In addition to breaking news, Memeorandum also manages to put more information on its homepage without looking as cluttered as TailRank. Maybe a re-design, or at least a new color scheme, is in order for TailRank.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In addition to breaking news, Memeorandum also manages to put more information on its homepage without looking as cluttered as TailRank. Maybe a re-design, or at least a new color scheme, is in order for TailRank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
