<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Podzinger Launches, Moves Podcast Search Forward</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/14/podzinger-launches-moves-podcast-search-forward/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/14/podzinger-launches-moves-podcast-search-forward/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 06:41:42 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Video Ads: Somebody Needs to Solve this Problem</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/14/podzinger-launches-moves-podcast-search-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-1486707</link>
		<dc:creator>Video Ads: Somebody Needs to Solve this Problem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 23:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/14/podzinger-launches-moves-podcast-search-forward/#comment-1486707</guid>
		<description>[...] Podzinger, Everzing searches audio and video. Since they don&#8217;t own the content they can&#8217;t insert [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Podzinger, Everzing searches audio and video. Since they don&#8217;t own the content they can&#8217;t insert [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Search Engine for Spoken Words in YouTube Videos &#124; Think Artificial</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/14/podzinger-launches-moves-podcast-search-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-1398815</link>
		<dc:creator>A Search Engine for Spoken Words in YouTube Videos &#124; Think Artificial</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 16:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/14/podzinger-launches-moves-podcast-search-forward/#comment-1398815</guid>
		<description>[...] words. The engine is powered by 30 year research on speech recognition by BBN Technologies, and allegedly the speech recognition technology is used by the CIA amongst other government agencies. In any case [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] words. The engine is powered by 30 year research on speech recognition by BBN Technologies, and allegedly the speech recognition technology is used by the CIA amongst other government agencies. In any case [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gotuit SceneMaker Lets Users Tag And Cut Online Video</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/14/podzinger-launches-moves-podcast-search-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-681327</link>
		<dc:creator>Gotuit SceneMaker Lets Users Tag And Cut Online Video</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 01:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/14/podzinger-launches-moves-podcast-search-forward/#comment-681327</guid>
		<description>[...] Gotuit gave TechCrunch a demo last Friday and showed how users can take any online video from any source and use their Web application to work with it. There is no application to download. It reminded me a lot of Podzinger, a podcast tagging application, except Podzinger is not human-powered like SceneMaker. SceneMaker tags come from human insight, not speech or video recognition. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Gotuit gave TechCrunch a demo last Friday and showed how users can take any online video from any source and use their Web application to work with it. There is no application to download. It reminded me a lot of Podzinger, a podcast tagging application, except Podzinger is not human-powered like SceneMaker. SceneMaker tags come from human insight, not speech or video recognition. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Start-up.co.nz &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Gotuit SceneMaker Lets Users Tag And Cut Online Video</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/14/podzinger-launches-moves-podcast-search-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-518933</link>
		<dc:creator>Start-up.co.nz &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Gotuit SceneMaker Lets Users Tag And Cut Online Video</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 22:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/14/podzinger-launches-moves-podcast-search-forward/#comment-518933</guid>
		<description>[...] Gotuit gave TechCrunch a demo last Friday and showed how users can take any online video from any source and use their Web application to work with it. There is no application to download. It reminded me a lot of Podzinger, a podcast tagging application, except Podzinger is not human-powered like SceneMaker. SceneMaker tags come from human insight, not speech or video recognition. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Gotuit gave TechCrunch a demo last Friday and showed how users can take any online video from any source and use their Web application to work with it. There is no application to download. It reminded me a lot of Podzinger, a podcast tagging application, except Podzinger is not human-powered like SceneMaker. SceneMaker tags come from human insight, not speech or video recognition. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; Gotuit SceneMakerでオンラインビデオのカットとタグづけ</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/14/podzinger-launches-moves-podcast-search-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-518115</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; Gotuit SceneMakerでオンラインビデオのカットとタグづけ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/14/podzinger-launches-moves-podcast-search-forward/#comment-518115</guid>
		<description>[...] Gotuitは先週の金曜日、TechCrunchにどんなソースのどんなビデオでもSceneMakerのウェブサイト内だけで処理できるところをデモしてみせてくれた。ローカルにアプリケーションをダウンロードする必要はまったくない。これはある意味で「Podzinger」を思い起こさせるものだが、PodzingerはSceneMakerのような人手によるタグづけではない。SceneMakerのタグはあくまで人間の見識によって付けられるもので、音声認識プログラムや画像認識プログラムによるものではない。 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Gotuitは先週の金曜日、TechCrunchにどんなソースのどんなビデオでもSceneMakerのウェブサイト内だけで処理できるところをデモしてみせてくれた。ローカルにアプリケーションをダウンロードする必要はまったくない。これはある意味で「Podzinger」を思い起こさせるものだが、PodzingerはSceneMakerのような人手によるタグづけではない。SceneMakerのタグはあくまで人間の見識によって付けられるもので、音声認識プログラムや画像認識プログラムによるものではない。 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Gotuit SceneMaker Lets Users Tag And Cut Online Video</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/14/podzinger-launches-moves-podcast-search-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-516029</link>
		<dc:creator>Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Gotuit SceneMaker Lets Users Tag And Cut Online Video</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 06:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/14/podzinger-launches-moves-podcast-search-forward/#comment-516029</guid>
		<description>[...] Gotuit gave TechCrunch a demo last Friday and showed how users can take any online video from any source and use their Web application to work with it. There is no application to download. It reminded me a lot of Podzinger, a podcast tagging application, except Podzinger is not human-powered like SceneMaker. SceneMaker tags come from human insight, not speech or video recognition. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Gotuit gave TechCrunch a demo last Friday and showed how users can take any online video from any source and use their Web application to work with it. There is no application to download. It reminded me a lot of Podzinger, a podcast tagging application, except Podzinger is not human-powered like SceneMaker. SceneMaker tags come from human insight, not speech or video recognition. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gotuit SceneMaker Lets Users Tag And Cut Online Video at Swiss Podcast Directory and Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/14/podzinger-launches-moves-podcast-search-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-515914</link>
		<dc:creator>Gotuit SceneMaker Lets Users Tag And Cut Online Video at Swiss Podcast Directory and Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 05:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/14/podzinger-launches-moves-podcast-search-forward/#comment-515914</guid>
		<description>[...] Gotuit gave TechCrunch a demo last Friday and showed how users can take any online video from any source and use their Web application to work with it. There is no application to download. It reminded me a lot of Podzinger, a podcast tagging application, except Podzinger is not human-powered like SceneMaker. SceneMaker tags come from human insight, not speech or video recognition. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Gotuit gave TechCrunch a demo last Friday and showed how users can take any online video from any source and use their Web application to work with it. There is no application to download. It reminded me a lot of Podzinger, a podcast tagging application, except Podzinger is not human-powered like SceneMaker. SceneMaker tags come from human insight, not speech or video recognition. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: All The Cool Kids Are Deep Tagging &#187; JenIT</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/14/podzinger-launches-moves-podcast-search-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-258081</link>
		<dc:creator>All The Cool Kids Are Deep Tagging &#187; JenIT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 15:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/14/podzinger-launches-moves-podcast-search-forward/#comment-258081</guid>
		<description>[...] A few startups are focusing on creating transcriptions of podcasts and video content (see Podzinger, for example), which search engines can then index. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A few startups are focusing on creating transcriptions of podcasts and video content (see Podzinger, for example), which search engines can then index. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: All The Cool Kids Are Deep Tagging &#171; BIG Interactive</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/14/podzinger-launches-moves-podcast-search-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-238167</link>
		<dc:creator>All The Cool Kids Are Deep Tagging &#171; BIG Interactive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 21:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/14/podzinger-launches-moves-podcast-search-forward/#comment-238167</guid>
		<description>[...] A few startups are focusing on creating transcriptions of podcasts and video content (see Pluggd and Podzinger, for example), which search engines can then index. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A few startups are focusing on creating transcriptions of podcasts and video content (see Pluggd and Podzinger, for example), which search engines can then index. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; All The Cool Kids Are Deep Tagging</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/14/podzinger-launches-moves-podcast-search-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-236776</link>
		<dc:creator>Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; All The Cool Kids Are Deep Tagging</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 05:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/14/podzinger-launches-moves-podcast-search-forward/#comment-236776</guid>
		<description>[...] A few startups are focusing on creating transcriptions of podcasts and video content (see Podzinger, for example), which search engines can then index. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A few startups are focusing on creating transcriptions of podcasts and video content (see Podzinger, for example), which search engines can then index. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bad credit history</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/14/podzinger-launches-moves-podcast-search-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-52216</link>
		<dc:creator>bad credit history</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 01:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/14/podzinger-launches-moves-podcast-search-forward/#comment-52216</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;bad credit history...&lt;/strong&gt;

academics complex Chattahoochee:mortification twilights overhangs!credit score http://credit-score.available-credit-report.com/ ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>bad credit history&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>academics complex Chattahoochee:mortification twilights overhangs!credit score <a href="http://credit-score.available-credit-report.com/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://credit-score.available-credit-report.com/'>http://credit-s...dit-report.com/</a> &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cengnlxady</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/14/podzinger-launches-moves-podcast-search-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-49918</link>
		<dc:creator>cengnlxady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 May 2006 17:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/14/podzinger-launches-moves-podcast-search-forward/#comment-49918</guid>
		<description>ellvarapxai uubysqye vizjccydkdi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ellvarapxai uubysqye vizjccydkdi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Somewhat Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/14/podzinger-launches-moves-podcast-search-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-9852</link>
		<dc:creator>Somewhat Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2006 19:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/14/podzinger-launches-moves-podcast-search-forward/#comment-9852</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Podcasts Now Keyword Searchable With Podzinger...&lt;/strong&gt;

The launch of Podzinger last week (January 13, 2006) as a podcast search engine has improved the state of podcast search on the web. The previous norm in podcast search functionality was to allow visitors to search on categories of...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Podcasts Now Keyword Searchable With Podzinger&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The launch of Podzinger last week (January 13, 2006) as a podcast search engine has improved the state of podcast search on the web. The previous norm in podcast search functionality was to allow visitors to search on categories of&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: p</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/14/podzinger-launches-moves-podcast-search-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-9340</link>
		<dc:creator>p</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 00:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/14/podzinger-launches-moves-podcast-search-forward/#comment-9340</guid>
		<description>Just to answer David&#039;s question about the difference between podzinger and podscope technology. I don&#039;t speak for either company but here is my 2c. I&#039;m also going to trivialize the work that goes into building these systems (i.e you&#039;re not going to code either system over a weekend)

podzinger is speech to text i.e transcription. so you take a speech signal and figure out the probability a certain set of sounds matches a known word in your dictionary. after you&#039;ve done the conversion, search is regular old text search (so it&#039;s super fast).

podscope is in speech search which basicaly extracts the phoenemes and creates an index based on this info. whe n you do a search you&#039;re search for a match of sounds. it&#039;s not as fast the podzinger method but is better for stuff like names, places etc which may not exist in text dictionaries.

my ignorant opinion is that you really want a hybrid model where the frontline search uses the podscope method but then trains the podzinger system with new vocabulary. so over time you can get much better transcription.

It&#039;s great to see people jumping into this game. It&#039;ll only improve the pace of speech search research. i expect the big boys to make their first moves around the middle of this year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to answer David&#8217;s question about the difference between podzinger and podscope technology. I don&#8217;t speak for either company but here is my 2c. I&#8217;m also going to trivialize the work that goes into building these systems (i.e you&#8217;re not going to code either system over a weekend)</p>
<p>podzinger is speech to text i.e transcription. so you take a speech signal and figure out the probability a certain set of sounds matches a known word in your dictionary. after you&#8217;ve done the conversion, search is regular old text search (so it&#8217;s super fast).</p>
<p>podscope is in speech search which basicaly extracts the phoenemes and creates an index based on this info. whe n you do a search you&#8217;re search for a match of sounds. it&#8217;s not as fast the podzinger method but is better for stuff like names, places etc which may not exist in text dictionaries.</p>
<p>my ignorant opinion is that you really want a hybrid model where the frontline search uses the podscope method but then trains the podzinger system with new vocabulary. so over time you can get much better transcription.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s great to see people jumping into this game. It&#8217;ll only improve the pace of speech search research. i expect the big boys to make their first moves around the middle of this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: viirya</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/14/podzinger-launches-moves-podcast-search-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-8952</link>
		<dc:creator>viirya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 07:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/14/podzinger-launches-moves-podcast-search-forward/#comment-8952</guid>
		<description>Podzinger&#039;s killer feature - to listen just the snippet that contains terms you search is working and impressively cool. Thanks fo r this introduction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Podzinger&#8217;s killer feature &#8211; to listen just the snippet that contains terms you search is working and impressively cool. Thanks fo r this introduction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/14/podzinger-launches-moves-podcast-search-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-8928</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2006 20:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/14/podzinger-launches-moves-podcast-search-forward/#comment-8928</guid>
		<description>Oops!! I forgot to post the link to Mr. Latt&#039;s bio.

http://www.bbn.com/For_Commercial_Customers/Commercial_Team.html

And a little more here...

http://www.mitforumcambridge.org/archive/r_sep02.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops!! I forgot to post the link to Mr. Latt&#8217;s bio.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bbn.com/For_Commercial_Customers/Commercial_Team.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.bbn.com/For_Commercial_Customers/Commercial_Team.html'>http://www.bbn....rcial_Team.html</a></p>
<p>And a little more here&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mitforumcambridge.org/archive/r_sep02.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.mitforumcambridge.org/archive/r_sep02.html'>http://www.mitf...ve/r_sep02.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/14/podzinger-launches-moves-podcast-search-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-8927</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2006 20:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/14/podzinger-launches-moves-podcast-search-forward/#comment-8927</guid>
		<description>Alex Laats...the leader of the team who developed the specific speech to text technology that powers Podzinger...has a very interesting background. 

He&#039;s quite a different sort when compared to many Web 2.0 entrepreneurs who bootstrap with a mashup, partner with a technology provider based only on the strength of an idea for a &quot;business development opportunity&quot; or cobble together just enough capital to license an existing technology and then hope to get to either cash flow break even or a VC funding / buyout liquidity event before time runs out.

I&#039;m curious...does anyone here have an informed perspective on whose speech to text technology is stronger between Podzinger and Podscope...and why?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex Laats&#8230;the leader of the team who developed the specific speech to text technology that powers Podzinger&#8230;has a very interesting background. </p>
<p>He&#8217;s quite a different sort when compared to many Web 2.0 entrepreneurs who bootstrap with a mashup, partner with a technology provider based only on the strength of an idea for a &#8220;business development opportunity&#8221; or cobble together just enough capital to license an existing technology and then hope to get to either cash flow break even or a VC funding / buyout liquidity event before time runs out.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious&#8230;does anyone here have an informed perspective on whose speech to text technology is stronger between Podzinger and Podscope&#8230;and why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Marks</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/14/podzinger-launches-moves-podcast-search-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-8921</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Marks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2006 18:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/14/podzinger-launches-moves-podcast-search-forward/#comment-8921</guid>
		<description>That response is almost totally false:
&lt;blockquote&gt;Most media players including Quicktime require that the file be downloaded before play begins.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
False - QuickTime has supported &#039;fast start&#039; playback while downloading since the first browser plugin.
&lt;blockquote&gt; You should not experience this delay with RealPlayer, since it supports something called the Range feature of the HTTP1.1 protocol that makes it possible to begin playing almost immediately at any point in an audio file.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
QuickTime supports this too - if you make a reference movie pointing partway into an online file, it starts at that offset.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That response is almost totally false:</p>
<blockquote><p>Most media players including Quicktime require that the file be downloaded before play begins.</p></blockquote>
<p>False &#8211; QuickTime has supported &#8216;fast start&#8217; playback while downloading since the first browser plugin.</p>
<blockquote><p> You should not experience this delay with RealPlayer, since it supports something called the Range feature of the HTTP1.1 protocol that makes it possible to begin playing almost immediately at any point in an audio file.</p></blockquote>
<p>QuickTime supports this too &#8211; if you make a reference movie pointing partway into an online file, it starts at that offset.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/14/podzinger-launches-moves-podcast-search-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-8903</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2006 16:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/14/podzinger-launches-moves-podcast-search-forward/#comment-8903</guid>
		<description>I just don&#039;t see how this would have a big impact, especially in enterprise and the much anticipated Web Office.

Web Office itself is going to have a big climb uphill in terms of adoption. Enterprise culture is slow at adopting new technologies, and they are right to be so, because there are inherent risks in adopting new technologies.

Where they are even slow to adopt Instant Message (although many employees use it, employers don&#039;t see it that useful). 

Don&#039;t forget about the allmighty SOX (Sarbanes-Oxley). Critical office documents created and stored on server based technology, located god knows where under god knows what security standards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just don&#8217;t see how this would have a big impact, especially in enterprise and the much anticipated Web Office.</p>
<p>Web Office itself is going to have a big climb uphill in terms of adoption. Enterprise culture is slow at adopting new technologies, and they are right to be so, because there are inherent risks in adopting new technologies.</p>
<p>Where they are even slow to adopt Instant Message (although many employees use it, employers don&#8217;t see it that useful). </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t forget about the allmighty SOX (Sarbanes-Oxley). Critical office documents created and stored on server based technology, located god knows where under god knows what security standards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod Boothby</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/14/podzinger-launches-moves-podcast-search-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-8848</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod Boothby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2006 05:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/14/podzinger-launches-moves-podcast-search-forward/#comment-8848</guid>
		<description>This is going to have the most amazing impact on enterprise use of Web Office technology.

You can already email your blog.   Now you can leave a voicemail and have it posted on your blog.   Or have the transcript of a conference call posted up.

I am currently building an enterprise blogging system for my firm.   We have 130,000 employees.   Although blogging and Wikis have taken off on the public web, broad adoption within the enterprise is going to be a big challenge.

It is important to find as many ways for people to easily transition from the tools they use today to Web Office tools such as enterprise blogs and enterprise wikis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is going to have the most amazing impact on enterprise use of Web Office technology.</p>
<p>You can already email your blog.   Now you can leave a voicemail and have it posted on your blog.   Or have the transcript of a conference call posted up.</p>
<p>I am currently building an enterprise blogging system for my firm.   We have 130,000 employees.   Although blogging and Wikis have taken off on the public web, broad adoption within the enterprise is going to be a big challenge.</p>
<p>It is important to find as many ways for people to easily transition from the tools they use today to Web Office tools such as enterprise blogs and enterprise wikis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dimitar Vesselinov</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/14/podzinger-launches-moves-podcast-search-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-8847</link>
		<dc:creator>Dimitar Vesselinov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2006 04:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/14/podzinger-launches-moves-podcast-search-forward/#comment-8847</guid>
		<description>G’Day World #68 - Alex Laats, Podzinger
http://gdayworld.thepodcastnetwork.com/2006/01/11/gday-world-68-alex-laats-podzinger/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>G’Day World #68 &#8211; Alex Laats, Podzinger<br />
<a href="http://gdayworld.thepodcastnetwork.com/2006/01/11/gday-world-68-alex-laats-podzinger/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://gdayworld.thepodcastnetwork.com/2006/01/11/gday-world-68-alex-laats-podzinger/'>http://gdayworl...aats-podzinger/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It looks obvious</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/14/podzinger-launches-moves-podcast-search-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-8841</link>
		<dc:creator>It looks obvious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2006 00:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/14/podzinger-launches-moves-podcast-search-forward/#comment-8841</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;PODZINGER...&lt;/strong&gt;

  Techchrunch  reported earlier today about a company specialized in voice search  of podcasting. &#160;This is very cool technology and I have to say that I was very impressed with the results. The ability to recognize voice and search in it in a simi...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>PODZINGER&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>  Techchrunch  reported earlier today about a company specialized in voice search  of podcasting. &nbsp;This is very cool technology and I have to say that I was very impressed with the results. The ability to recognize voice and search in it in a simi&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: swylie &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Podcast Chapter Points</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/14/podzinger-launches-moves-podcast-search-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-8840</link>
		<dc:creator>swylie &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Podcast Chapter Points</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2006 00:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/14/podzinger-launches-moves-podcast-search-forward/#comment-8840</guid>
		<description>[...] Clearly, Apple has thought about Podcasting lots. I recently read a comment by Michael Arrington on TechCrunch talking about Podzinger.  “A perfect new feature would be the ability for publishers and users to tag additional content within the file and allow others to jump right to that.” [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Clearly, Apple has thought about Podcasting lots. I recently read a comment by Michael Arrington on TechCrunch talking about Podzinger.  “A perfect new feature would be the ability for publishers and users to tag additional content within the file and allow others to jump right to that.” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PXLated</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/14/podzinger-launches-moves-podcast-search-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-8839</link>
		<dc:creator>PXLated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2006 00:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/14/podzinger-launches-moves-podcast-search-forward/#comment-8839</guid>
		<description>Speech to full text would be great. I can read/scan far faster than podcasters can talk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speech to full text would be great. I can read/scan far faster than podcasters can talk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rise of the PHX</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/14/podzinger-launches-moves-podcast-search-forward/comment-page-1/#comment-8838</link>
		<dc:creator>Rise of the PHX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2006 23:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/14/podzinger-launches-moves-podcast-search-forward/#comment-8838</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Who Said That?...&lt;/strong&gt;

	If you listen to multiple podcasts on similar topics are trying to track down what show had the word &#8220;Evil Gnome&#8221; look no further than Podzinger.  The site uses voice pattern matching/recognition software to query multiple podcasts.  Throw...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Who Said That?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>	If you listen to multiple podcasts on similar topics are trying to track down what show had the word &#8220;Evil Gnome&#8221; look no further than Podzinger.  The site uses voice pattern matching/recognition software to query multiple podcasts.  Throw&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
