<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Find a Deal with Clipfire.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/02/find-a-deal-with-clipfire/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/02/find-a-deal-with-clipfire/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 03:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/02/find-a-deal-with-clipfire/#comment-774900</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 04:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/02/find-a-deal-with-clipfire/#comment-774900</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;SlotsMachines...&lt;/strong&gt;

generally.Parthia!str...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>SlotsMachines&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>generally.Parthia!str&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/02/find-a-deal-with-clipfire/#comment-390516</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 01:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/02/find-a-deal-with-clipfire/#comment-390516</guid>
		<description>Similar site: http://www.boddit.com. No clips but deals comparison engine is better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Similar site: <a href="http://www.boddit.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.boddit.com</a>. No clips but deals comparison engine is better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aggregating RSS feeds at ProBargainHunter.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/02/find-a-deal-with-clipfire/#comment-381779</link>
		<dc:creator>Aggregating RSS feeds at ProBargainHunter.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 07:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/02/find-a-deal-with-clipfire/#comment-381779</guid>
		<description>[...] This site resembles a smart search engine rather than a typical RSS aggregator. Why smart? It allows you to take part in the search process. Here is how it works: You search for a deal, you find one, and you clip it if you like it. Once you clip a deal it will show up at the top of the next search result hence improving the search relevance. The idea sounds great however you really need community to drive it and it is simply not there despite the publicity it received from TechCrunch. I tested it on a few popular keywords and none came back with clipped deals. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This site resembles a smart search engine rather than a typical RSS aggregator. Why smart? It allows you to take part in the search process. Here is how it works: You search for a deal, you find one, and you clip it if you like it. Once you clip a deal it will show up at the top of the next search result hence improving the search relevance. The idea sounds great however you really need community to drive it and it is simply not there despite the publicity it received from TechCrunch. I tested it on a few popular keywords and none came back with clipped deals. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: agreatindian</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/02/find-a-deal-with-clipfire/#comment-261189</link>
		<dc:creator>agreatindian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 22:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/02/find-a-deal-with-clipfire/#comment-261189</guid>
		<description>Looks great. its good feature for clipping the deals</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks great. its good feature for clipping the deals</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yan Bezugliy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/02/find-a-deal-with-clipfire/#comment-212650</link>
		<dc:creator>Yan Bezugliy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 23:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/02/find-a-deal-with-clipfire/#comment-212650</guid>
		<description>That is right. The user base just isn't there. I have tried a few popular keywords and none came clipped.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is right. The user base just isn&#8217;t there. I have tried a few popular keywords and none came clipped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Felton</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/02/find-a-deal-with-clipfire/#comment-103717</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Felton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 18:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/02/find-a-deal-with-clipfire/#comment-103717</guid>
		<description>I have been keeping an eye on Clipfire; however, it just hasn't taken off yet.  It seems like a really great idea.  A search engine for deals sounds great!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been keeping an eye on Clipfire; however, it just hasn&#8217;t taken off yet.  It seems like a really great idea.  A search engine for deals sounds great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daddy-O</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/02/find-a-deal-with-clipfire/#comment-97720</link>
		<dc:creator>Daddy-O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 17:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/02/find-a-deal-with-clipfire/#comment-97720</guid>
		<description>As a startup Deals &#38; Coupon site trying to gain more traffic, I like the idea of Clipfire.  It allows us to get more exposure to our site. 

We try and post only our best deals there, because it all comes down to credibility.  

"Daddyo" Dan
http://www.daddyodeals.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a startup Deals &amp; Coupon site trying to gain more traffic, I like the idea of Clipfire.  It allows us to get more exposure to our site. </p>
<p>We try and post only our best deals there, because it all comes down to credibility.  </p>
<p>&#8220;Daddyo&#8221; Dan<br />
<a href="http://www.daddyodeals.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.daddyodeals.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Next Generation Shopping &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ClipFire - Deal Aggregator, Social Commerce</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/02/find-a-deal-with-clipfire/#comment-26265</link>
		<dc:creator>Next Generation Shopping &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ClipFire - Deal Aggregator, Social Commerce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 15:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/02/find-a-deal-with-clipfire/#comment-26265</guid>
		<description>[...] Kevin Carey is the creator of this ClipFire service, but some are curious of how he can swing a profit from it. On a TechCrunch post from earlier this year Michael Arrington reviewed the service, and several readers posted some interesting comments regarding the issue of the site generating revenues. One that caught my attention was an idea to manipulate the RSS changing the affiliate IDs 50% of the time. Aside from being an issue of morals, and the pains involved in doing that, it that basically throws the whole point of the community site out the window. Pete Cashmore, of the Mashable.com blog, believes a better approach would have been to split revenue with users and let them post the deals. His review of the ClipFire service, which calls it Digg for Deals, is a skeptical one. Pete I agree with you on the point of perhaps filling up with spam in the future, but only if the site becomes very popular! And what isn&#8217;t filling with spam these days? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Kevin Carey is the creator of this ClipFire service, but some are curious of how he can swing a profit from it. On a TechCrunch post from earlier this year Michael Arrington reviewed the service, and several readers posted some interesting comments regarding the issue of the site generating revenues. One that caught my attention was an idea to manipulate the RSS changing the affiliate IDs 50% of the time. Aside from being an issue of morals, and the pains involved in doing that, it that basically throws the whole point of the community site out the window. Pete Cashmore, of the Mashable.com blog, believes a better approach would have been to split revenue with users and let them post the deals. His review of the ClipFire service, which calls it Digg for Deals, is a skeptical one. Pete I agree with you on the point of perhaps filling up with spam in the future, but only if the site becomes very popular! And what isn&#8217;t filling with spam these days? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Carey</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/02/find-a-deal-with-clipfire/#comment-8193</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Carey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 05:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/02/find-a-deal-with-clipfire/#comment-8193</guid>
		<description>Marc, you are right on target. The users provided the content, they deserve the credit.

Clipfire should earn its revenue from the service (aggregation, searching, etc.). The Google association is fits perfectly.

Kevin Carey
http://www.clipfire.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marc, you are right on target. The users provided the content, they deserve the credit.</p>
<p>Clipfire should earn its revenue from the service (aggregation, searching, etc.). The Google association is fits perfectly.</p>
<p>Kevin Carey<br />
<a href="http://www.clipfire.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.clipfire.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Mezzacca</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/02/find-a-deal-with-clipfire/#comment-7949</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Mezzacca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2006 10:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/02/find-a-deal-with-clipfire/#comment-7949</guid>
		<description>I don't think the point is to try to parse affiliate URLs... That would make no sense.  Look it how Google started.  If ClipFire can get a good userbase then they can worry about revenue later... I'm sure they have thought of how, I can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think the point is to try to parse affiliate URLs&#8230; That would make no sense.  Look it how Google started.  If ClipFire can get a good userbase then they can worry about revenue later&#8230; I&#8217;m sure they have thought of how, I can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dealsinus</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/02/find-a-deal-with-clipfire/#comment-7906</link>
		<dc:creator>Dealsinus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2006 19:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/02/find-a-deal-with-clipfire/#comment-7906</guid>
		<description>Clipfire is really doing great job allowing users to post links. They must be having idea to implement their own affliate links in future.

Also see another deal site. http://www.dealsinus.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clipfire is really doing great job allowing users to post links. They must be having idea to implement their own affliate links in future.</p>
<p>Also see another deal site. <a href="http://www.dealsinus.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.dealsinus.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Montgomery</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/02/find-a-deal-with-clipfire/#comment-7675</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Montgomery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2006 08:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/02/find-a-deal-with-clipfire/#comment-7675</guid>
		<description>Revenue sharing is a fine idea, but revenue gifting is a waste. Surely the Clipfire peep/s could parse the URLs and insert their affiliate IDs 50% of the time to make it sharing instead of gifting?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Revenue sharing is a fine idea, but revenue gifting is a waste. Surely the Clipfire peep/s could parse the URLs and insert their affiliate IDs 50% of the time to make it sharing instead of gifting?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Cashmore</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/02/find-a-deal-with-clipfire/#comment-7594</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Cashmore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2006 23:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/02/find-a-deal-with-clipfire/#comment-7594</guid>
		<description>I agree with James J - this model makes no business sense.  If you're going to create a spammer's haven, you might as well earn some cash for your trouble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with James J - this model makes no business sense.  If you&#8217;re going to create a spammer&#8217;s haven, you might as well earn some cash for your trouble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rubin</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/02/find-a-deal-with-clipfire/#comment-7003</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rubin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 23:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/02/find-a-deal-with-clipfire/#comment-7003</guid>
		<description>Interesting, I built http://www.discountwatcher.com/ a couple of years ago. It is a services that scours the Internet for the latest discounted items and then organizes it's finds by category, brand and store. All RSS enabled of course. I've been working on a 2.0 version of the service, in some ways it looks like I've been scooped by Clipfire :-(.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, I built <a href="http://www.discountwatcher.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.discountwatcher.com/</a> a couple of years ago. It is a services that scours the Internet for the latest discounted items and then organizes it&#8217;s finds by category, brand and store. All RSS enabled of course. I&#8217;ve been working on a 2.0 version of the service, in some ways it looks like I&#8217;ve been scooped by Clipfire :-(.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/02/find-a-deal-with-clipfire/#comment-6955</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 20:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/02/find-a-deal-with-clipfire/#comment-6955</guid>
		<description>Doesn't encouraging people to include referals end up encouraging people to submit lots of spammy free i-pod deals and stuff that arn't actually 'deals'?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t encouraging people to include referals end up encouraging people to submit lots of spammy free i-pod deals and stuff that arn&#8217;t actually &#8216;deals&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fortino</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/02/find-a-deal-with-clipfire/#comment-6933</link>
		<dc:creator>Fortino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 18:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/02/find-a-deal-with-clipfire/#comment-6933</guid>
		<description>Seeing that you mentioned to "Think Digg" I felt you should know that Digg has had this feature for months.

Check it out...

http://digg.com/deals

Fortino - Out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seeing that you mentioned to &#8220;Think Digg&#8221; I felt you should know that Digg has had this feature for months.</p>
<p>Check it out&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://digg.com/deals" rel="nofollow">http://digg.com/deals</a></p>
<p>Fortino - Out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mitch</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/02/find-a-deal-with-clipfire/#comment-6921</link>
		<dc:creator>mitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 14:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/02/find-a-deal-with-clipfire/#comment-6921</guid>
		<description>Check out slick deals (slickdeals.net). It's not really web 2.o-ish, but has great deals from a larger user base.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out slick deals (slickdeals.net). It&#8217;s not really web 2.o-ish, but has great deals from a larger user base.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Freitag</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/02/find-a-deal-with-clipfire/#comment-6918</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Freitag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 13:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/02/find-a-deal-with-clipfire/#comment-6918</guid>
		<description>Hey Mike have you seen Dealazon.com? It uses Amazon's web services to find the best deals on amazon, and then lets you search and sort through them on the site or via RSS. 

Disclosure - I built it -
http://www.dealazon.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Mike have you seen Dealazon.com? It uses Amazon&#8217;s web services to find the best deals on amazon, and then lets you search and sort through them on the site or via RSS. </p>
<p>Disclosure - I built it -<br />
<a href="http://www.dealazon.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.dealazon.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Yeh</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/02/find-a-deal-with-clipfire/#comment-6908</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Yeh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 08:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/02/find-a-deal-with-clipfire/#comment-6908</guid>
		<description>I disagree James.  The goal here is to drive usage of the service.  Power posters are essential to building up a critical mass of deals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree James.  The goal here is to drive usage of the service.  Power posters are essential to building up a critical mass of deals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James J.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/02/find-a-deal-with-clipfire/#comment-6901</link>
		<dc:creator>James J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 06:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/01/02/find-a-deal-with-clipfire/#comment-6901</guid>
		<description>A nice idea, but they missed an opportunity to make money now. Allowing users to include their affiliate codes in the links they post does give them an incentive to post new deals, but Clipfire doesn't make anything from it. They should have implemented a system like Fatwallet's Cash Back program where they would use their own affiliate codes but split revenues with posters. This way there would still be an incentive for users to post new deals and Clipfire would actually make some money too. Clipfire could still implement such a system, but it's something they would need to do before they have a lot of users because such a change at that point would likely upset some of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A nice idea, but they missed an opportunity to make money now. Allowing users to include their affiliate codes in the links they post does give them an incentive to post new deals, but Clipfire doesn&#8217;t make anything from it. They should have implemented a system like Fatwallet&#8217;s Cash Back program where they would use their own affiliate codes but split revenues with posters. This way there would still be an incentive for users to post new deals and Clipfire would actually make some money too. Clipfire could still implement such a system, but it&#8217;s something they would need to do before they have a lot of users because such a change at that point would likely upset some of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.074 seconds -->
