Comments on: PostSecret Book Arrived

By: مركز التحميل

مركز التحميل — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 04:41:36 +0000

every night i secretly sneak into my neighbours pool and go skinny dipping
one night i fell in the pool and bumped my head the neighbours heard the noise and came out and i realised that it was my teachers family
……i wonder why i get good marks in physical ed now….

By: chelly belly

chelly belly — Tue, 28 Nov 2006 23:18:34 +0000

By: credit counseling

credit counseling — Wed, 24 May 2006 02:41:52 +0000

credit counseling…

vehicles darker transplant swarthy rankings mediator mittens unprofitable debt consolidation http://www.debt...tion-agent.com/ …

By: credit

credit — Wed, 24 May 2006 00:52:10 +0000

credit…

lately benchmarking executable monkey labored castled,credit report http://www.bulk...dit-report.com/ …

By: Scotto

Scotto — Tue, 10 Jan 2006 04:31:21 +0000

well hey, i agree it ain’t a “web 2.0″ company, but i for one appreciate the stretch to try to include something so overtly artistic in the coverage on this site. it certainly affects people more than slapping some old short film into akimbo or google video is ever going to.

By: Frederico Oliveira

Frederico Oliveira — Sun, 25 Dec 2005 18:46:27 +0000

Heck, postsecret’s not a company or web 2.0, you silly postcard-loving american. Its an art project! Smack yourself in the face! Again! Again!

By: V.

V. — Sun, 25 Dec 2005 04:22:06 +0000

I looked at their web site. So you send them a postcard, contributing for free some material which then they sell as a book, license to 3rd parties or show on exhibitions. However they do not allow you to watch other peoples material on their web site (gathered for free!) without paying for it price of a book or entry ticket.

By: blackrimglasses.com » TechCrunch » PostSecret Book Arrived

blackrimglasses.com » TechCrunch » PostSecret Book Arrived — Sat, 24 Dec 2005 12:35:16 +0000

[...] TechCrunch » PostSecret Book ArrivedCome on now. Calling Post Secret a Web 2.0 company is disingenuous to its purpose and its meaning. In fact I find it insulting. Just because it bridges the divide between public/private, and relies on an open data exchange does not a Web 2.0 company it make. [...]

By: Ethan

Ethan — Sat, 24 Dec 2005 12:33:07 +0000

Come on now. Calling Post Secret a Web 2.0 company is disengenous to its purpose and its meaning. In fact I find it insulting. Just because it bridges the divide between public/private, and relies on an open data exchange does not a Web 2.0 company it make. I'd call it Situationist 2.0, or maybe Mail Art 2.0. Or how about drop the stupidity of versioning and just call it Mail Art with a Situationist International touch. This is exactly the problem I have with the Web 2.0 meme, and why its dangerous to slap it on anything that remotely fills the purpose of bidirectionality. You're taking a work of ART that is founded upon a long, long history of conceptual art practice and theory, and just because it makes interesting use of two very old technologies (Mail and e-mail), its Web 2.0. Bad form Mike.