<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gravee Takes a New Approach to Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/12/21/gravee-takes-a-new-approach-to-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/12/21/gravee-takes-a-new-approach-to-search/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 01:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Praized Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Five Social Search Sites: Yoono, Gravee, Jookster, StumbleUpon, Otavo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/12/21/gravee-takes-a-new-approach-to-search/#comment-567654</link>
		<dc:creator>The Praized Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Five Social Search Sites: Yoono, Gravee, Jookster, StumbleUpon, Otavo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 19:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=490#comment-567654</guid>
		<description>[...] 2) Gravee &#8220;is a social search application that differs from others in that it is trying to change the economics of search by sharing advertising revenue with content owners, with a rev-share business model. The site shares up to 70% of all ad revenues with the natural listings that appear on the same page when an ad occurs, as well as with the referring Web site.&#8221; here is TechCrunch&#8217;s take  on it. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2) Gravee &#8220;is a social search application that differs from others in that it is trying to change the economics of search by sharing advertising revenue with content owners, with a rev-share business model. The site shares up to 70% of all ad revenues with the natural listings that appear on the same page when an ad occurs, as well as with the referring Web site.&#8221; here is TechCrunch&#8217;s take  on it. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/12/21/gravee-takes-a-new-approach-to-search/#comment-6589</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 00:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=490#comment-6589</guid>
		<description>Jeff,

not true, users dont go past page 2 of any search result, so if a website not relevant(not surfaced in the first 2 pages), it'll never get clicked. . . thus make no money 

again, I think these guys are going have problem getting "searchers" in the first place . .  its a catch 22 without a solution. . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff,</p>
<p>not true, users dont go past page 2 of any search result, so if a website not relevant(not surfaced in the first 2 pages), it&#8217;ll never get clicked. . . thus make no money </p>
<p>again, I think these guys are going have problem getting &#8220;searchers&#8221; in the first place . .  its a catch 22 without a solution. . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Dalton</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/12/21/gravee-takes-a-new-approach-to-search/#comment-6355</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Dalton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2005 04:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=490#comment-6355</guid>
		<description>So, let me see, my site doesn't actually have to be relevant at all, not even clicked on to get paid! Sweet.  

I should've asked Santa for some splog software for Christmas instead of video games!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, let me see, my site doesn&#8217;t actually have to be relevant at all, not even clicked on to get paid! Sweet.  </p>
<p>I should&#8217;ve asked Santa for some splog software for Christmas instead of video games!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Arrington</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/12/21/gravee-takes-a-new-approach-to-search/#comment-5892</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Arrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2005 01:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=490#comment-5892</guid>
		<description>Jeremy - Ok, good point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremy - Ok, good point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shane</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/12/21/gravee-takes-a-new-approach-to-search/#comment-5876</link>
		<dc:creator>shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 22:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=490#comment-5876</guid>
		<description>#6

Ditto.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#6</p>
<p>Ditto.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Razvan Antonescu &#187; This quite sucks</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/12/21/gravee-takes-a-new-approach-to-search/#comment-5869</link>
		<dc:creator>Razvan Antonescu &#187; This quite sucks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 21:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=490#comment-5869</guid>
		<description>[...] On a post from Techcrunch regarding some meta search engine Jeremy Zawodny says the following: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] On a post from Techcrunch regarding some meta search engine Jeremy Zawodny says the following: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mario</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/12/21/gravee-takes-a-new-approach-to-search/#comment-5868</link>
		<dc:creator>Mario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 21:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=490#comment-5868</guid>
		<description>Doesn't make a lot of sense.

How can this mechanism produce any improvement at the user level or any particular advantage for the engine?

Also, a brand-new/zero-traffic/zero-revenue  project which is willing to share its advertising revenues with me and other 100 millions of people, doesn't make me feel rich.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t make a lot of sense.</p>
<p>How can this mechanism produce any improvement at the user level or any particular advantage for the engine?</p>
<p>Also, a brand-new/zero-traffic/zero-revenue  project which is willing to share its advertising revenues with me and other 100 millions of people, doesn&#8217;t make me feel rich.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a beezy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/12/21/gravee-takes-a-new-approach-to-search/#comment-5864</link>
		<dc:creator>a beezy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 20:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=490#comment-5864</guid>
		<description>this may be an interesting business model, but i sure don't see how it helps the user at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this may be an interesting business model, but i sure don&#8217;t see how it helps the user at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Zawodny</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/12/21/gravee-takes-a-new-approach-to-search/#comment-5856</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Zawodny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 19:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=490#comment-5856</guid>
		<description>So now a spammer (err, I mean "SEO") can get money from a search engine by being in the top 10 even if they're never clicked on.

I'm in the wrong end of this business!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So now a spammer (err, I mean &#8220;SEO&#8221;) can get money from a search engine by being in the top 10 even if they&#8217;re never clicked on.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m in the wrong end of this business!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Rogers</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/12/21/gravee-takes-a-new-approach-to-search/#comment-5852</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 19:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=490#comment-5852</guid>
		<description>#10 - I couldn't say it better myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#10 - I couldn&#8217;t say it better myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Arrington</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/12/21/gravee-takes-a-new-approach-to-search/#comment-5847</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Arrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 18:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=490#comment-5847</guid>
		<description>#4 - the Claim procedures of technorati that involve giving them your password - xmlrpc - wouldn't work for non blogs. Otherwise, perfect (and I believe should be added for blogs).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#4 - the Claim procedures of technorati that involve giving them your password - xmlrpc - wouldn&#8217;t work for non blogs. Otherwise, perfect (and I believe should be added for blogs).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mimoun</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/12/21/gravee-takes-a-new-approach-to-search/#comment-5844</link>
		<dc:creator>Mimoun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 17:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=490#comment-5844</guid>
		<description>This is just stupid what's the benefit of using their search engine for users?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just stupid what&#8217;s the benefit of using their search engine for users?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/12/21/gravee-takes-a-new-approach-to-search/#comment-5842</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 17:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=490#comment-5842</guid>
		<description>Wow, they share up to 105% of their revenue (70% + 35%). It sounds to me like the key words in that sentence are "up to". Maybe an average revenue share would be more helpful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, they share up to 105% of their revenue (70% + 35%). It sounds to me like the key words in that sentence are &#8220;up to&#8221;. Maybe an average revenue share would be more helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gopi</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/12/21/gravee-takes-a-new-approach-to-search/#comment-5840</link>
		<dc:creator>Gopi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 16:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=490#comment-5840</guid>
		<description>This is the worst idea i've seen...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the worst idea i&#8217;ve seen&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scotty</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/12/21/gravee-takes-a-new-approach-to-search/#comment-5836</link>
		<dc:creator>Scotty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 16:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=490#comment-5836</guid>
		<description>This seems like a potential big win for site owners, but I have a hard time seeing what the big value add for users is.  Why would I want to use this over google?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seems like a potential big win for site owners, but I have a hard time seeing what the big value add for users is.  Why would I want to use this over google?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mashable* - Pete Cashmore on Web2.0 &#187; Gravee - Search Engine (Shares Revenue with Content Creators!)</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/12/21/gravee-takes-a-new-approach-to-search/#comment-5833</link>
		<dc:creator>Mashable* - Pete Cashmore on Web2.0 &#187; Gravee - Search Engine (Shares Revenue with Content Creators!)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 15:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=490#comment-5833</guid>
		<description>[...] Mike Arrington adds more: Gravee also shares up to 35% of revenue with publisers that join their affiliate program and place their search box on their site. This will be an interesting way of driving traffic to their site. Site claiming is done via whois information - meaning you must be in control of your domain name to claim the blog. Another way for them to accomplish this would be to ask the site owner to put a piece of code on her/his site, which I imagine they will add at some point. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mike Arrington adds more: Gravee also shares up to 35% of revenue with publisers that join their affiliate program and place their search box on their site. This will be an interesting way of driving traffic to their site. Site claiming is done via whois information - meaning you must be in control of your domain name to claim the blog. Another way for them to accomplish this would be to ask the site owner to put a piece of code on her/his site, which I imagine they will add at some point. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mashable*</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/12/21/gravee-takes-a-new-approach-to-search/#comment-5832</link>
		<dc:creator>Mashable*</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 15:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=490#comment-5832</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Gravee - Search Engine (Shares Revenue with Content Creators!)&lt;/strong&gt;

	
	This is something I&#8217;ve been thinking about a lot recently - how could search engine revenue be divided more fairly?  Bill Gates suggested that the ad revenue should be shared with users, but now a startup called Gravee is trying something just...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Gravee - Search Engine (Shares Revenue with Content Creators!)</strong></p>
<p>	This is something I&#8217;ve been thinking about a lot recently - how could search engine revenue be divided more fairly?  Bill Gates suggested that the ad revenue should be shared with users, but now a startup called Gravee is trying something just&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek van Vliet</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/12/21/gravee-takes-a-new-approach-to-search/#comment-5829</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek van Vliet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 15:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=490#comment-5829</guid>
		<description>I tried to claim my site and the verification email they sent waas just a bunch of jiberish characters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried to claim my site and the verification email they sent waas just a bunch of jiberish characters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yakov</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/12/21/gravee-takes-a-new-approach-to-search/#comment-5813</link>
		<dc:creator>Yakov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 13:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=490#comment-5813</guid>
		<description>I've asked them what really new is offered by their search engine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve asked them what really new is offered by their search engine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Migs</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/12/21/gravee-takes-a-new-approach-to-search/#comment-5809</link>
		<dc:creator>Migs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 11:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=490#comment-5809</guid>
		<description>"Claim" - Technorati!

The signup button has a typo. The are .php - I don't think PHP search engines can scale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Claim&#8221; - Technorati!</p>
<p>The signup button has a typo. The are .php - I don&#8217;t think PHP search engines can scale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Basic Thinking Blog &#187; Suchmaschine Gravee.com mit neuem Werbeansatz</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/12/21/gravee-takes-a-new-approach-to-search/#comment-5804</link>
		<dc:creator>Basic Thinking Blog &#187; Suchmaschine Gravee.com mit neuem Werbeansatz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 11:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=490#comment-5804</guid>
		<description>[...] via Techcrunch  weitere Artikel zu: affiliates, gravee, suchmaschinen   &#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] via Techcrunch  weitere Artikel zu: affiliates, gravee, suchmaschinen   &nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Razvan Antonescu</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/12/21/gravee-takes-a-new-approach-to-search/#comment-5795</link>
		<dc:creator>Razvan Antonescu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 09:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=490#comment-5795</guid>
		<description>Ah....and those thin lines below the logo make the GUI quite horrible</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah&#8230;.and those thin lines below the logo make the GUI quite horrible</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Razvan Antonescu</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/12/21/gravee-takes-a-new-approach-to-search/#comment-5794</link>
		<dc:creator>Razvan Antonescu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 09:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=490#comment-5794</guid>
		<description>Hmmmm pretty interesting. If only they'll find out that the world expands beyond US borders...(registration form is only for US residents)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmmm pretty interesting. If only they&#8217;ll find out that the world expands beyond US borders&#8230;(registration form is only for US residents)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.077 seconds -->
