<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inform.com Re-Launches with Major Feature Changes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/12/05/informcom-re-launches-with-major-feature-changes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/12/05/informcom-re-launches-with-major-feature-changes/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:38:02 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: UK hosting web services</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/12/05/informcom-re-launches-with-major-feature-changes/comment-page-1/#comment-2535431</link>
		<dc:creator>UK hosting web services</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 19:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/12/05/informcom-re-launches-with-major-feature-changes/#comment-2535431</guid>
		<description>Seems interesting, but are they making any money?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems interesting, but are they making any money?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dailywireless.org &#187; DayLife</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/12/05/informcom-re-launches-with-major-feature-changes/comment-page-1/#comment-661432</link>
		<dc:creator>dailywireless.org &#187; DayLife</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 05:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/12/05/informcom-re-launches-with-major-feature-changes/#comment-661432</guid>
		<description>[...] Michael Arrington of TechCrunch, an investor in Daylife, pans it in a review on his site.  Daylife enters the market about a year after a slew of other competitors came out with their products. Gather.com, Inform.com, NewsVine and Topix all have competing products. Google News reigns over all of them. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michael Arrington of TechCrunch, an investor in Daylife, pans it in a review on his site.  Daylife enters the market about a year after a slew of other competitors came out with their products. Gather.com, Inform.com, NewsVine and Topix all have competing products. Google News reigns over all of them. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Daylife Launches, Starts Very Long Uphill Climb</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/12/05/informcom-re-launches-with-major-feature-changes/comment-page-1/#comment-659874</link>
		<dc:creator>Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Daylife Launches, Starts Very Long Uphill Climb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 19:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/12/05/informcom-re-launches-with-major-feature-changes/#comment-659874</guid>
		<description>[...] But Daylife enters the market about a year after a slew of other competitors came out with their products. Gather.com, Inform.com, NewsVine and Topix all have competing products. Google News reigns over all of them. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But Daylife enters the market about a year after a slew of other competitors came out with their products. Gather.com, Inform.com, NewsVine and Topix all have competing products. Google News reigns over all of them. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bureau credit report</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/12/05/informcom-re-launches-with-major-feature-changes/comment-page-1/#comment-52167</link>
		<dc:creator>bureau credit report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 01:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/12/05/informcom-re-launches-with-major-feature-changes/#comment-52167</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;bureau credit report...&lt;/strong&gt;

Perseid centralize!potentials lofts hollowness region?free credit report http://free-credit-report.secured-credit-report.com/ ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>bureau credit report&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Perseid centralize!potentials lofts hollowness region?free credit report <a href="http://free-credit-report.secured-credit-report.com/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://free-credit-report.secured-credit-report.com/'>http://free-cre...dit-report.com/</a> &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jbyers - blog &#187; Tale of the Tape: Inform</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/12/05/informcom-re-launches-with-major-feature-changes/comment-page-1/#comment-20881</link>
		<dc:creator>jbyers - blog &#187; Tale of the Tape: Inform</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2006 09:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/12/05/informcom-re-launches-with-major-feature-changes/#comment-20881</guid>
		<description>[...] In case you looked at Squidoo&#8217;s graph and weren&#8217;t impressed, here&#8217;s a sobering comparison. I went poking around for sites that were TechCrunched around the same time Squidoo was in beta to see how other big-buzz launches stacked up. Inform.com caught my eye because of their launch double-whammy: a New York Times feature followed shortly by a TechCrunch evisceration. Five months later - with a more favorable second look by TechCrunch in December, the picture is not good. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In case you looked at Squidoo&#8217;s graph and weren&#8217;t impressed, here&#8217;s a sobering comparison. I went poking around for sites that were TechCrunched around the same time Squidoo was in beta to see how other big-buzz launches stacked up. Inform.com caught my eye because of their launch double-whammy: a New York Times feature followed shortly by a TechCrunch evisceration. Five months later &#8211; with a more favorable second look by TechCrunch in December, the picture is not good. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch &#187; The Gather.com Issue</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/12/05/informcom-re-launches-with-major-feature-changes/comment-page-1/#comment-9019</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch &#187; The Gather.com Issue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 17:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/12/05/informcom-re-launches-with-major-feature-changes/#comment-9019</guid>
		<description>[...] Bloggers are generally giving Gather a big thumbs down. Mathew Ingram does a particularly good job in talking about all the competitors. He left out the massively funded Inform.com though, another service that has struggled with product direction but that is clearly taking criticisms constructively.   Tags: gather, inform, techcrunch, news, web2.0, web 2.0  Categories: Company &amp; Product Profiles &#124;  Bookmark this post with del.icio.us [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bloggers are generally giving Gather a big thumbs down. Mathew Ingram does a particularly good job in talking about all the competitors. He left out the massively funded Inform.com though, another service that has struggled with product direction but that is clearly taking criticisms constructively.   Tags: gather, inform, techcrunch, news, web2.0, web 2.0  Categories: Company &#38; Product Profiles |  Bookmark this post with del.icio.us [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/12/05/informcom-re-launches-with-major-feature-changes/comment-page-1/#comment-4462</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2005 16:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/12/05/informcom-re-launches-with-major-feature-changes/#comment-4462</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, clicking on any story crashes Safari outright. Interesting that they don&#039;t even use HTML links but opted for (apparently non-functional) javascript instead.  After the popup fiasco and now this, I wonder if anyone technical is leading the charge over there.

It just seems like someone had a decent idea for a web site but couldn&#039;t find anyone competent to build it. I know this is still a beta but these sorts of things are not &quot;kinks&quot; really... they are poor decisions made at the architecture level. Almost unthinkable ones really, in this day and age.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, clicking on any story crashes Safari outright. Interesting that they don&#8217;t even use HTML links but opted for (apparently non-functional) javascript instead.  After the popup fiasco and now this, I wonder if anyone technical is leading the charge over there.</p>
<p>It just seems like someone had a decent idea for a web site but couldn&#8217;t find anyone competent to build it. I know this is still a beta but these sorts of things are not &#8220;kinks&#8221; really&#8230; they are poor decisions made at the architecture level. Almost unthinkable ones really, in this day and age.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarat Pediredla</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/12/05/informcom-re-launches-with-major-feature-changes/comment-page-1/#comment-4460</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarat Pediredla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2005 15:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/12/05/informcom-re-launches-with-major-feature-changes/#comment-4460</guid>
		<description>Thats it! If I see one more Smiley graphic ad on a &quot;Web 2.0&quot; site, I will flip. 

RSS aggregators are abundant and yet I still like the look of Inform. So, here I am looking at the slick interface and clicking around when I notice the dreaded graphic smiley ad.

Alas, we cannot do away with advertising but that specific ad ONLY reminds me of spam sites and cheap tricks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats it! If I see one more Smiley graphic ad on a &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243; site, I will flip. </p>
<p>RSS aggregators are abundant and yet I still like the look of Inform. So, here I am looking at the slick interface and clicking around when I notice the dreaded graphic smiley ad.</p>
<p>Alas, we cannot do away with advertising but that specific ad ONLY reminds me of spam sites and cheap tricks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Dunn</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/12/05/informcom-re-launches-with-major-feature-changes/comment-page-1/#comment-4457</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Dunn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2005 14:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/12/05/informcom-re-launches-with-major-feature-changes/#comment-4457</guid>
		<description>My belief is once you launch a business and you didn&#039;t win over the critics, focus on developing strategies that will build your business looking foward.

I&#039;m going to assume Inform.com PR went out the way to communicate their new &quot;technical&quot; features to the blogosphere. I do not understand this approach. Initial launch, they went out and got MSM publicity, bloggers wrote about them very critically and the past is the past. I say get over the past - get to business!

Inform.com is in a hostile competitive market - headlines aggegration. Mainstream media is fighting mad for survival, Search engines and portals are competiting hard and Inform.com need get in the fight instead of trying to win over bloggers for nice reviews.

In other words, mentioning these new features have little value when Inform.com haven&#039;t answer the question why should anyone use Inform.com and how do their service differentiate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My belief is once you launch a business and you didn&#8217;t win over the critics, focus on developing strategies that will build your business looking foward.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to assume Inform.com PR went out the way to communicate their new &#8220;technical&#8221; features to the blogosphere. I do not understand this approach. Initial launch, they went out and got MSM publicity, bloggers wrote about them very critically and the past is the past. I say get over the past &#8211; get to business!</p>
<p>Inform.com is in a hostile competitive market &#8211; headlines aggegration. Mainstream media is fighting mad for survival, Search engines and portals are competiting hard and Inform.com need get in the fight instead of trying to win over bloggers for nice reviews.</p>
<p>In other words, mentioning these new features have little value when Inform.com haven&#8217;t answer the question why should anyone use Inform.com and how do their service differentiate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gtox</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/12/05/informcom-re-launches-with-major-feature-changes/comment-page-1/#comment-4455</link>
		<dc:creator>Gtox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2005 13:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/12/05/informcom-re-launches-with-major-feature-changes/#comment-4455</guid>
		<description>looks ok, although i hate it when i can&#039;t middle-click the links/stories in firefox</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>looks ok, although i hate it when i can&#8217;t middle-click the links/stories in firefox</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
