Comments on: Web 2.0 DNA

By: rado rohal

rado rohal — Sat, 10 Jun 2006 09:42:40 +0000

its joke, very humorous

By: DiTTES.iNFO BLOG

DiTTES.iNFO BLOG — Sat, 27 May 2006 21:54:07 +0000

Crucial DNA of Web 2.0…

Brandon Schauer hat eine Web 2.0 DNA erstellt, die auf einer Zeitleiste schön die einzelnen Meilensteine des Web zum Web 2.0 darstellt. DOWNLOAD PDF.

The industry has spent a lot of time defining Web 2.0 and mapping its DNA. But as we attempt to emu…

By: DiTTES.iNFO TESTBLOG

DiTTES.iNFO TESTBLOG — Mon, 15 May 2006 18:20:15 +0000

Crucial DNA of Web 2.0…

Brandon Schauer hat eine Web 2.0 DNA erstellt, die auf einer Zeitleiste schön die einzelnen Meilensteine des Web zum Web 2.0 darstellt. DOWNLOAD PDF.

The industry has spent a lot of time defining Web 2.0 and mapping its DNA. But as we attempt to emu…

By: Big Dog

Big Dog — Fri, 24 Feb 2006 19:28:24 +0000

I think this was very informative despite the fact that it “misses the point” which I tend to agree with. Anyway, the debate on what IS web 2.0 is kind of getting old now.

By: Stonehead

Stonehead — Wed, 07 Dec 2005 11:06:02 +0000

I’m a non-believer.

Just like Web 2.0 is a stupid label for a collection of buzzwords, this PDF entirely misses the point. It’s all about companies. If you’re going to observe the real evolution that’s going on anyway, it should be about the things that make websites applications.

I guess I should be happy that there’s no podcasting company to mention in this PDF.

Yet.

By: Bob Aman

Bob Aman — Mon, 05 Dec 2005 15:07:38 +0000

I contest the definition of “snark” as “bitchy.”

See UD.

By: Somewhat Frank

Somewhat Frank — Sat, 03 Dec 2005 04:15:27 +0000

Plotting Web 2.0’s Adaptive Path

Adaptive Path’s Brandon Schauer came out with a new report today that investigates Web 2.0 and tries to explain why many of the killer Web 2.0 applications were not created until recently, as the sum of many parts, while the

By: Enric

Enric — Sat, 03 Dec 2005 00:54:48 +0000

I just thought the article was humorous. A value judgement wasn’t intended. But I can understand that this may not be the venue to interject humor.

By: Bits and Buzz

Bits and Buzz — Sat, 03 Dec 2005 00:43:48 +0000

Web 0.x to Web 2.0 Simplified

…while this “new wave” brings tremendous user and social values, it still does not seem to address some of the critical Internet roadblocks to pervasive Internet collaboration…To better understand these limitations, we need to …

By: Michael Arrington

Michael Arrington — Fri, 02 Dec 2005 22:43:50 +0000

Wow. Blogospere is a bit pissy today. I think its an incredible document, thoughtfully distilled.

Adaptive Path has been involved with some amazing products, and their internal Measure Map is the best blog analytics tool out there. They have real world experience and build great stuff.

I’ll ask the question that others ask me all the time: did you take the time to read the document carefully before you slammed it?

By: Mark

Mark — Fri, 02 Dec 2005 22:01:29 +0000

That’s the most blowhard piece of writing I have ever read. I didn’t realize it only took massive use of buzzwords to become a “senior practitioner.”

By: Dan

Dan — Fri, 02 Dec 2005 21:57:06 +0000

I think you misunderstand ’snark’ (snarkish doesn’t appear to be a word). Snark means ‘to be bitchy’. I’m assuming you meant something similar.

37signals wasn’t exactly being bitchy. Their point was that Adaptive Path was incoherent and filled with marketing speak. If anything, 37signals was pointing out the ‘Dilbertesque irony’ of Adaptive Path’s article.

By: Enric

Enric — Fri, 02 Dec 2005 20:01:48 +0000

Have you seen 37Signals snarkish take, “Heckling Adaptive Path“?

By: Nathan

Nathan — Fri, 02 Dec 2005 19:46:58 +0000

I was gonna do something similar as part of my dissertation, I guess I’ll have to build on that one now! Very good approach and clearly helps you understand the current transition we’re witnessing. Maybe some hints as to where we’re heading as well…