<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More on Songbird</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/29/more-on-songbird/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/29/more-on-songbird/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 18:06:59 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dizi</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/29/more-on-songbird/comment-page-1/#comment-2783738</link>
		<dc:creator>dizi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 22:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/29/more-on-songbird/#comment-2783738</guid>
		<description>Songbird looks very beautiful but really need equalizer.. 
&lt;a href=&quot;www.gencdizi.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;dizi indir&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Songbird looks very beautiful but really need equalizer..<br />
<a href="www.gencdizi.com" rel="nofollow">dizi indir</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: worldkontor</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/29/more-on-songbird/comment-page-1/#comment-2730228</link>
		<dc:creator>worldkontor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 19:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/29/more-on-songbird/#comment-2730228</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.worldkontor.net&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;par&#231;a kont&#246;r&lt;/a&gt;
Nice very accurate</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.worldkontor.net" rel="nofollow">par&ccedil;a kont&ouml;r</a><br />
Nice very accurate</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: get propecia</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/29/more-on-songbird/comment-page-1/#comment-1802275</link>
		<dc:creator>get propecia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 22:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/29/more-on-songbird/#comment-1802275</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;propecia...&lt;/strong&gt;

justifiably confrontation...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>propecia&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>justifiably confrontation&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: diazepam prescription</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/29/more-on-songbird/comment-page-1/#comment-1729620</link>
		<dc:creator>diazepam prescription</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 21:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/29/more-on-songbird/#comment-1729620</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;diazepam...&lt;/strong&gt;

devitalise isobar...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>diazepam&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>devitalise isobar&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: celebrex</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/29/more-on-songbird/comment-page-1/#comment-1507038</link>
		<dc:creator>celebrex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 16:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/29/more-on-songbird/#comment-1507038</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;celebrex...&lt;/strong&gt;

uajt oveiq...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>celebrex&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>uajt oveiq&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Salin</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/29/more-on-songbird/comment-page-1/#comment-240527</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Salin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 05:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/29/more-on-songbird/#comment-240527</guid>
		<description>Yeah, Songbird looks very beautiful.
But without the EQUALIZER, it just sucks!
Just try your favorite song with Songbird and the same song with an equalized iTunes... See?
No comparison.
Not to say that I like iTunes though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, Songbird looks very beautiful.<br />
But without the EQUALIZER, it just sucks!<br />
Just try your favorite song with Songbird and the same song with an equalized iTunes&#8230; See?<br />
No comparison.<br />
Not to say that I like iTunes though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Robin</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/29/more-on-songbird/comment-page-1/#comment-229089</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/29/more-on-songbird/#comment-229089</guid>
		<description>Songbird looks very promising indeed.
But, come on, without a graphical equalizer it is certainly not going to steal iTunes market share.
I&#039;m sure people will miss it sooner or later.
I missed it after 5 seconds already during my first try.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Songbird looks very promising indeed.<br />
But, come on, without a graphical equalizer it is certainly not going to steal iTunes market share.<br />
I&#8217;m sure people will miss it sooner or later.<br />
I missed it after 5 seconds already during my first try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eConectados &#187; Archivo del blog &#187; Songbird desafía a iTunes</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/29/more-on-songbird/comment-page-1/#comment-142551</link>
		<dc:creator>eConectados &#187; Archivo del blog &#187; Songbird desafía a iTunes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 19:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/29/more-on-songbird/#comment-142551</guid>
		<description>[...] Ya había leído acerca de él, pero a través de Techcrunch veo más imágenes sobre el programa. Como podéis ver tiene una interfaz muy muy cuidada. Algunos dicen que es igual que la de iTunes. Y es cierto, excepto en algunos detalles que la mejoran, pero ¿quién ha dicho que lo bueno no puede reusarse? ¿Un lema de los informáticos no es &#8220;Si algo ya está hecho, cópialo&#8221; ? Siempre que te dejen las leyes del copyright claro. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ya había leído acerca de él, pero a través de Techcrunch veo más imágenes sobre el programa. Como podéis ver tiene una interfaz muy muy cuidada. Algunos dicen que es igual que la de iTunes. Y es cierto, excepto en algunos detalles que la mejoran, pero ¿quién ha dicho que lo bueno no puede reusarse? ¿Un lema de los informáticos no es &#8220;Si algo ya está hecho, cópialo&#8221; ? Siempre que te dejen las leyes del copyright claro. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nerdflood &#187; So, Songbird is actually just singing a different tune</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/29/more-on-songbird/comment-page-1/#comment-73844</link>
		<dc:creator>nerdflood &#187; So, Songbird is actually just singing a different tune</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 13:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/29/more-on-songbird/#comment-73844</guid>
		<description>[...] The fact that that concept never occurred to me upsets me to no end. I&#8217;d like to blame it on their misrepresentation of the product, but it&#8217;s far more likely that I&#8217;m simply dense. In investigating the Songbird build, I really should have discovered this commentary from Mike Arrington: One thing to clear up is that Songbird is not an online application - it is (among other things) a next generation media player. And it is absolutely turning my head around in the way I think about certain things. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The fact that that concept never occurred to me upsets me to no end. I&#8217;d like to blame it on their misrepresentation of the product, but it&#8217;s far more likely that I&#8217;m simply dense. In investigating the Songbird build, I really should have discovered this commentary from Mike Arrington: One thing to clear up is that Songbird is not an online application &#8211; it is (among other things) a next generation media player. And it is absolutely turning my head around in the way I think about certain things. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Group / Apart &#187; To Download A Songbird</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/29/more-on-songbird/comment-page-1/#comment-59407</link>
		<dc:creator>A Group / Apart &#187; To Download A Songbird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 21:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/29/more-on-songbird/#comment-59407</guid>
		<description>[...] This is probably one of the coolest little applications I&#8217;ve seen in a long time. Songbird is an open source music player built on the Firefox platform. It&#8217;s pretty advanced for such a young concept (version 0.1 as I write this) and has a lot of people very impressed. It&#8217;s kinda like iTunes, but open to the whole web. Ooooh, the possibilities&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This is probably one of the coolest little applications I&#8217;ve seen in a long time. Songbird is an open source music player built on the Firefox platform. It&#8217;s pretty advanced for such a young concept (version 0.1 as I write this) and has a lot of people very impressed. It&#8217;s kinda like iTunes, but open to the whole web. Ooooh, the possibilities&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Songbird 0.1 Proof-of-Concept at JaypeeOnline</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/29/more-on-songbird/comment-page-1/#comment-13564</link>
		<dc:creator>Songbird 0.1 Proof-of-Concept at JaypeeOnline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/29/more-on-songbird/#comment-13564</guid>
		<description>[...] What others have to say about Songbird: &#8220;At first it only looked like a black iTunes&#8230;it is XUL based and more open than iTunes, expect a large number of plug-ins and extensions to really do some wild new things in the frustratingly stagnant world of media players.&#8221; -Studio Moustache &#8220;Screw Web 2.0, XUL moves us straight into the Web 3.0 that technologists like you and I that “get it” are really looking forward to &#8221; -Mike Rundle on TechCrunch Vote for JaypeeOnline [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What others have to say about Songbird: &#8220;At first it only looked like a black iTunes&#8230;it is XUL based and more open than iTunes, expect a large number of plug-ins and extensions to really do some wild new things in the frustratingly stagnant world of media players.&#8221; -Studio Moustache &#8220;Screw Web 2.0, XUL moves us straight into the Web 3.0 that technologists like you and I that “get it” are really looking forward to &#8221; -Mike Rundle on TechCrunch Vote for JaypeeOnline [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slapjack</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/29/more-on-songbird/comment-page-1/#comment-12445</link>
		<dc:creator>slapjack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 14:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/29/more-on-songbird/#comment-12445</guid>
		<description>[...] Songbird is the open-source alternative to iTunes and other media players that people have been writing about a for a month or two now. It bears more than a passing resemblance to Apple&#8217;s player too. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Songbird is the open-source alternative to iTunes and other media players that people have been writing about a for a month or two now. It bears more than a passing resemblance to Apple&#8217;s player too. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch &#187; Songbird to Launch Tonight</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/29/more-on-songbird/comment-page-1/#comment-12370</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch &#187; Songbird to Launch Tonight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 07:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/29/more-on-songbird/#comment-12370</guid>
		<description>[...] Songbird, the eagerly anticipated new media browser and web player built on the Mozilla (Firefox) engine, will launch (for Windows) later tonight or this morning (unless it doesn&#8217;t, CEO Rob Lord tells me  ). Mac and linux will come later. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Songbird, the eagerly anticipated new media browser and web player built on the Mozilla (Firefox) engine, will launch (for Windows) later tonight or this morning (unless it doesn&#8217;t, CEO Rob Lord tells me  ). Mac and linux will come later. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mashable* - Pete Cashmore on Web2.0 &#187; Mercora - Music Discovery Service (with P2P and Support for Google Talk)</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/29/more-on-songbird/comment-page-1/#comment-7022</link>
		<dc:creator>Mashable* - Pete Cashmore on Web2.0 &#187; Mercora - Music Discovery Service (with P2P and Support for Google Talk)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2006 00:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/29/more-on-songbird/#comment-7022</guid>
		<description>[...] PS. On the subject of digital music players, I&#8217;m keeping an eye on SongBird. Mike Arrington is following it too. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PS. On the subject of digital music players, I&#8217;m keeping an eye on SongBird. Mike Arrington is following it too. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Songbird</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/29/more-on-songbird/comment-page-1/#comment-4588</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Songbird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 20:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/29/more-on-songbird/#comment-4588</guid>
		<description>[...] Songbird is a desktop media player from the same guys that developed Winamp and Yahoo! music engine. Songbird is built atop the Mozilla platform forÂ cross-platform extensibility. The interface looks similar to Itunes, but it surely seems to boastÂ many things that Itunes and other media players doesnt have. The songbird team gavea good explanation here on some of the factsAlthough I haven&#8217;t had a chance to test it, Michael at TechCrunch reviews it further&#8230;Its time we have a new media player&#8230;watch out Apple! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Songbird is a desktop media player from the same guys that developed Winamp and Yahoo! music engine. Songbird is built atop the Mozilla platform forÂ cross-platform extensibility. The interface looks similar to Itunes, but it surely seems to boastÂ many things that Itunes and other media players doesnt have. The songbird team gavea good explanation here on some of the factsAlthough I haven&#8217;t had a chance to test it, Michael at TechCrunch reviews it further&#8230;Its time we have a new media player&#8230;watch out Apple! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Arrington</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/29/more-on-songbird/comment-page-1/#comment-4136</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Arrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 10:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/29/more-on-songbird/#comment-4136</guid>
		<description>I agree, XUL is an extremely interesting angle to discuss. I will be writing more as things progress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, XUL is an extremely interesting angle to discuss. I will be writing more as things progress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Songbirdnest.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/29/more-on-songbird/comment-page-1/#comment-4106</link>
		<dc:creator>Songbirdnest.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 22:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/29/more-on-songbird/#comment-4106</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Props to the It-Getters&lt;/strong&gt;

Thanks to Asa Dosler and Michael Arrington for noticing Songbird. 
I particularly appreciate the comment from Mike Rundle on TechCrunch:

Screw Web 2.0, XUL moves us straight into the Web 3.0 that technologists like you and I that â€œget itâ€ are really </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Props to the It-Getters</strong></p>
<p>Thanks to Asa Dosler and Michael Arrington for noticing Songbird.<br />
I particularly appreciate the comment from Mike Rundle on TechCrunch:</p>
<p>Screw Web 2.0, XUL moves us straight into the Web 3.0 that technologists like you and I that â€œget itâ€ are really</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Breslin</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/29/more-on-songbird/comment-page-1/#comment-4091</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Breslin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 18:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/29/more-on-songbird/#comment-4091</guid>
		<description>Ok so now I get XUL after reading Songbird&#039;s explanation. The only downside i see with it is that it still focuses on the desktop based application. Many many more projects are sprouting up to avoid the reliance on desktop apps so they can be more &quot;portable.&quot;  Now having a desktop companion or something that backs everything up to the web and thus becomes a desktop/web hybrid app is what really intrigues me about this XUL. Seeing as people still have to deal with their net connections going out, the XUL desktop app paired with the web based version would make sense.

sorry to go off in another direction unrelated to songbird.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok so now I get XUL after reading Songbird&#8217;s explanation. The only downside i see with it is that it still focuses on the desktop based application. Many many more projects are sprouting up to avoid the reliance on desktop apps so they can be more &#8220;portable.&#8221;  Now having a desktop companion or something that backs everything up to the web and thus becomes a desktop/web hybrid app is what really intrigues me about this XUL. Seeing as people still have to deal with their net connections going out, the XUL desktop app paired with the web based version would make sense.</p>
<p>sorry to go off in another direction unrelated to songbird.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moustache &#187; Apps I am looking forward to: Songbird</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/29/more-on-songbird/comment-page-1/#comment-4084</link>
		<dc:creator>Moustache &#187; Apps I am looking forward to: Songbird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 17:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/29/more-on-songbird/#comment-4084</guid>
		<description>[...] At first it only looked like a black iTunes, but Songbird is really looking interesting. All I have to go on are the screenshots and this post at TechCrunch, but I am eagerly awaiting the December public beta to see what&#8217;s under the hood. Since it is XUL based and more open than iTunes, expect a large number of plug-ins and extensions to really do some wild new things in the frustratingly stagnant world of media players. Seriously, I&#8217;ve been trying to get rid of Winamp and iTunes for years, but nothing has even mildly impressed me (foobar was close, but I don&#8217;t have weeks to spend fiddling with software to make it work like I want it to). At this point, Songbird has a very low bar to clear to become the best of breed media player.  Technorati Tags: music mp3 software media+player itunes winamp songbird  Posted Tuesday, November 29, 2005 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] At first it only looked like a black iTunes, but Songbird is really looking interesting. All I have to go on are the screenshots and this post at TechCrunch, but I am eagerly awaiting the December public beta to see what&#8217;s under the hood. Since it is XUL based and more open than iTunes, expect a large number of plug-ins and extensions to really do some wild new things in the frustratingly stagnant world of media players. Seriously, I&#8217;ve been trying to get rid of Winamp and iTunes for years, but nothing has even mildly impressed me (foobar was close, but I don&#8217;t have weeks to spend fiddling with software to make it work like I want it to). At this point, Songbird has a very low bar to clear to become the best of breed media player.  Technorati Tags: music mp3 software media+player itunes winamp songbird  Posted Tuesday, November 29, 2005 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Rundle</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/29/more-on-songbird/comment-page-1/#comment-4081</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Rundle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 16:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/29/more-on-songbird/#comment-4081</guid>
		<description>Exactly Tracey, I&#039;m a bit confused as to why Michael didn&#039;t explore the XUL interfacing angle a bit more since it&#039;s so very important and forward-thinking.  

Screw Web 2.0, XUL moves us straight into the Web 3.0 that technologists like you and I that &quot;get it&quot; are really looking forward to :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly Tracey, I&#8217;m a bit confused as to why Michael didn&#8217;t explore the XUL interfacing angle a bit more since it&#8217;s so very important and forward-thinking.  </p>
<p>Screw Web 2.0, XUL moves us straight into the Web 3.0 that technologists like you and I that &#8220;get it&#8221; are really looking forward to <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tracey</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/29/more-on-songbird/comment-page-1/#comment-4074</link>
		<dc:creator>tracey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 13:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/29/more-on-songbird/#comment-4074</guid>
		<description>I anticipate the release of this application.  Why?  Because it&#039;s built with XUL, includes plugins and is cross-platform.  This opens many possibilties for further customization.

I currently use a not so well known application called Quod Libet http://www.sacredchao.net/quodlibet/wiki along with Streamtuner http://www.nongnu.org/streamtuner/.  

I hate having the multiple applications open to listen to these streams.  I would prefer them in one nice interface.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I anticipate the release of this application.  Why?  Because it&#8217;s built with XUL, includes plugins and is cross-platform.  This opens many possibilties for further customization.</p>
<p>I currently use a not so well known application called Quod Libet <a href="http://www.sacredchao.net/quodlibet/wiki" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.sacredchao.net/quodlibet/wiki'>http://www.sacr.../quodlibet/wiki</a> along with Streamtuner <a href="http://www.nongnu.org/streamtuner/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.nongnu.org/streamtuner/'>http://www.nong...rg/streamtuner/</a>.  </p>
<p>I hate having the multiple applications open to listen to these streams.  I would prefer them in one nice interface.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Something about a Songbird. at AberrantAbsurdity</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/29/more-on-songbird/comment-page-1/#comment-4067</link>
		<dc:creator>Something about a Songbird. at AberrantAbsurdity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 09:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/29/more-on-songbird/#comment-4067</guid>
		<description>[...] Finally, what looks like a media player/jukebox worth downloading. I was reading through my daily list of blogs and came across an entry on one of my favorite blogs, Techcrunch. It was a post about something called Songbird. Well Mike at Techcrunch is in the alpha for it, but he has been asked not to say hardly anything about it. So of course I had to follow the link to the Songbird website to learn more about it. Basically it seems like it is just another media player that looks eerily similar to iTunes, only black. I can live with that though, as it stands I think the look of Songbird is really nice, at least from the screenshots I have seen. It seems though they are adding a twist to the normal media player setup though. They want it to integrate with &#8220;digital media network services&#8221; such as Odeo and Last.fm. It should be interesting to see how it all turns out. I hope to get in on the preview as soon as it&#8217;s available to give it a test drive.  Technorati Tags: audio jukebox media music player       // Used for showing and hiding user information in the comment form function ShowUtils() { document.getElementById(&quot;authorinfo&quot;).style.display = &quot;&quot;; document.getElementById(&quot;showinfo&quot;).style.display = &quot;none&quot;; document.getElementById(&quot;hideinfo&quot;).style.display = &quot;&quot;; } function HideUtils() { document.getElementById(&quot;authorinfo&quot;).style.display = &quot;none&quot;; document.getElementById(&quot;showinfo&quot;).style.display = &quot;&quot;; document.getElementById(&quot;hideinfo&quot;).style.display = &quot;none&quot;; } [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Finally, what looks like a media player/jukebox worth downloading. I was reading through my daily list of blogs and came across an entry on one of my favorite blogs, Techcrunch. It was a post about something called Songbird. Well Mike at Techcrunch is in the alpha for it, but he has been asked not to say hardly anything about it. So of course I had to follow the link to the Songbird website to learn more about it. Basically it seems like it is just another media player that looks eerily similar to iTunes, only black. I can live with that though, as it stands I think the look of Songbird is really nice, at least from the screenshots I have seen. It seems though they are adding a twist to the normal media player setup though. They want it to integrate with &#8220;digital media network services&#8221; such as Odeo and Last.fm. It should be interesting to see how it all turns out. I hope to get in on the preview as soon as it&#8217;s available to give it a test drive.  Technorati Tags: audio jukebox media music player       // Used for showing and hiding user information in the comment form function ShowUtils() { document.getElementById(&#8221;authorinfo&#8221;).style.display = &#8220;&#8221;; document.getElementById(&#8221;showinfo&#8221;).style.display = &#8220;none&#8221;; document.getElementById(&#8221;hideinfo&#8221;).style.display = &#8220;&#8221;; } function HideUtils() { document.getElementById(&#8221;authorinfo&#8221;).style.display = &#8220;none&#8221;; document.getElementById(&#8221;showinfo&#8221;).style.display = &#8220;&#8221;; document.getElementById(&#8221;hideinfo&#8221;).style.display = &#8220;none&#8221;; } [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Blandford</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/29/more-on-songbird/comment-page-1/#comment-4066</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Blandford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 09:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/29/more-on-songbird/#comment-4066</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t that iTunes... ? In black. On a different platform.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t that iTunes&#8230; ? In black. On a different platform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
