<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deep Web Search - Two Approaches</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/24/deep-web-search-dipsie-glenbrook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/24/deep-web-search-dipsie-glenbrook/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 21:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Job Search Engines</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/24/deep-web-search-dipsie-glenbrook/#comment-156497</link>
		<dc:creator>Job Search Engines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 08:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=412#comment-156497</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Dave...&lt;/strong&gt;

Interesting topic... I'm working in this industry myself and I don't agree about this in 100%, but I added your page to my bookmarks and hope to see more interesting articles in the future...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dave&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Interesting topic&#8230; I&#8217;m working in this industry myself and I don&#8217;t agree about this in 100%, but I added your page to my bookmarks and hope to see more interesting articles in the future&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tvorba web stranok</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/24/deep-web-search-dipsie-glenbrook/#comment-68460</link>
		<dc:creator>tvorba web stranok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2006 09:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=412#comment-68460</guid>
		<description>useful topic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>useful topic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/24/deep-web-search-dipsie-glenbrook/#comment-3857</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2005 19:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=412#comment-3857</guid>
		<description>Looks very interesting. Perhaps with something like this we can actually build web sites the way we want to, without worrying abou how the search engines will or will not index the content.
We are working on several flash designed sites, but always consider not using flash because the engines do not index the content in flash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks very interesting. Perhaps with something like this we can actually build web sites the way we want to, without worrying abou how the search engines will or will not index the content.<br />
We are working on several flash designed sites, but always consider not using flash because the engines do not index the content in flash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How to make your website more indexable by search engines &#171; Tom Raftery&#8217;s I.T. views</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/24/deep-web-search-dipsie-glenbrook/#comment-3852</link>
		<dc:creator>How to make your website more indexable by search engines &#171; Tom Raftery&#8217;s I.T. views</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2005 17:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=412#comment-3852</guid>
		<description>[...] I see Michael Arrington has a post on TechCrunch today about Dipsie dCloak - this is a product which is supposed to help websites make their content more indexable by search engines. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I see Michael Arrington has a post on TechCrunch today about Dipsie dCloak - this is a product which is supposed to help websites make their content more indexable by search engines. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.029 seconds -->
