<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is the Gawker-Yahoo Deal Important?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/16/is-the-gawker-yahoo-deal-important/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/16/is-the-gawker-yahoo-deal-important/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 01:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gawker запускает новый блог - The Consumerist &#124; TechCrunch по-русски</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/16/is-the-gawker-yahoo-deal-important/#comment-1980765</link>
		<dc:creator>Gawker запускает новый блог - The Consumerist &#124; TechCrunch по-русски</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 12:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=396#comment-1980765</guid>
		<description>[...] этой компании компанией New York Times. В дополнение к их предыдущей сделке с Yahoo по продвижению их контента, сегодня Gawker объявила [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] этой компании компанией New York Times. В дополнение к их предыдущей сделке с Yahoo по продвижению их контента, сегодня Gawker объявила [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 皮膚の病気.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/16/is-the-gawker-yahoo-deal-important/#comment-1381357</link>
		<dc:creator>皮膚の病気.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 15:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=396#comment-1381357</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;加齢臭とは...&lt;/strong&gt;


最近、老人の人特有の体臭を表す言葉として「加齢臭」という言葉がよく使われるようになってきています。


年齢を問わず、多かれ少なかれ人には体臭があります。


体臭の原因...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>加齢臭とは&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>最近、老人の人特有の体臭を表す言葉として「加齢臭」という言葉がよく使われるようになってきています。</p>
<p>年齢を問わず、多かれ少なかれ人には体臭があります。</p>
<p>体臭の原因&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 生命保険見直し相談なら</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/16/is-the-gawker-yahoo-deal-important/#comment-1370493</link>
		<dc:creator>生命保険見直し相談なら</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 02:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=396#comment-1370493</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;生命保険の見直しについて...&lt;/strong&gt;

生命保険の種類はたくさんあります。 自分が現在加入している生命保険の種類を把握していますか。 生命保険には、主に、掛け捨てタ イプの保障型、資金準備の為の貯蓄型とあります。...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>生命保険の見直しについて&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>生命保険の種類はたくさんあります。 自分が現在加入している生命保険の種類を把握していますか。 生命保険には、主に、掛け捨てタ イプの保障型、資金準備の為の貯蓄型とあります。&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seeking Alpha nails Benchmark Funding, Yahoo Deal &#187; JenIT</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/16/is-the-gawker-yahoo-deal-important/#comment-192889</link>
		<dc:creator>Seeking Alpha nails Benchmark Funding, Yahoo Deal &#187; JenIT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 06:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=396#comment-192889</guid>
		<description>[...] The Yahoo deal is very similar to a Yahoo/Gawker deal announced in November 2005, and which was terminated recently. Company-specific content from Seeking Alpha will be included on Yahoo Finance, with links back to Seeking Alpha. No money is changing hands either way. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Yahoo deal is very similar to a Yahoo/Gawker deal announced in November 2005, and which was terminated recently. Company-specific content from Seeking Alpha will be included on Yahoo Finance, with links back to Seeking Alpha. No money is changing hands either way. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seaking Alpha nails Benchmark Funding, Yahoo Deal &#187; JenIT</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/16/is-the-gawker-yahoo-deal-important/#comment-192882</link>
		<dc:creator>Seaking Alpha nails Benchmark Funding, Yahoo Deal &#187; JenIT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 06:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=396#comment-192882</guid>
		<description>[...] The Yahoo deal is very similar to a Yahoo/Gawker deal announced in November 2005, and which was terminated recently. Company-specific content from Seeking Alpha will be included on Yahoo Finance, with links back to Seeking Alpha. No money is changing hands either way. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Yahoo deal is very similar to a Yahoo/Gawker deal announced in November 2005, and which was terminated recently. Company-specific content from Seeking Alpha will be included on Yahoo Finance, with links back to Seeking Alpha. No money is changing hands either way. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: accelzone - techie weblog &#187; Seeking Alpha nails Benchmark Funding, Yahoo Deal</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/16/is-the-gawker-yahoo-deal-important/#comment-186975</link>
		<dc:creator>accelzone - techie weblog &#187; Seeking Alpha nails Benchmark Funding, Yahoo Deal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 07:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=396#comment-186975</guid>
		<description>[...] The Yahoo deal is very similar to a Yahoo/Gawker deal announced in November 2005, and which was terminated recently. Company-specific content from Seeking Alpha will be included on Yahoo Finance, with links back to Seeking Alpha. No money is changing hands either way. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Yahoo deal is very similar to a Yahoo/Gawker deal announced in November 2005, and which was terminated recently. Company-specific content from Seeking Alpha will be included on Yahoo Finance, with links back to Seeking Alpha. No money is changing hands either way. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seeking Real News &#171; Ray-Deo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/16/is-the-gawker-yahoo-deal-important/#comment-186719</link>
		<dc:creator>Seeking Real News &#171; Ray-Deo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 04:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=396#comment-186719</guid>
		<description>[...] The Yahoo deal is very similar to a Yahoo/Gawker deal announced in November 2005, and which was terminated recently. Company-specific content from Seeking Alpha will be included on Yahoo Finance, with links back to Seeking Alpha. No money is changing hands either way. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Yahoo deal is very similar to a Yahoo/Gawker deal announced in November 2005, and which was terminated recently. Company-specific content from Seeking Alpha will be included on Yahoo Finance, with links back to Seeking Alpha. No money is changing hands either way. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; Seaking Alpha、Benchmarkから資金調達、Yahooと提携</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/16/is-the-gawker-yahoo-deal-important/#comment-186620</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; Seaking Alpha、Benchmarkから資金調達、Yahooと提携</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 03:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=396#comment-186620</guid>
		<description>[...] Yahooとの提携は2005年11月に発表されたYahoo/Gawker提携 とほぼ同様だ。この提携は最近終了している。Seaking Alphaの提供する企業ニュースはYahoo Finance内のセクションに元記事へのリンクも含めて表示される。この提携では両者の間に金銭の支払いは生じない。 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Yahooとの提携は2005年11月に発表されたYahoo/Gawker提携 とほぼ同様だ。この提携は最近終了している。Seaking Alphaの提供する企業ニュースはYahoo Finance内のセクションに元記事へのリンクも含めて表示される。この提携では両者の間に金銭の支払いは生じない。 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: accelzone - techie weblog &#187; Seaking Alpha nails Benchmark Funding, Yahoo Deal</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/16/is-the-gawker-yahoo-deal-important/#comment-186492</link>
		<dc:creator>accelzone - techie weblog &#187; Seaking Alpha nails Benchmark Funding, Yahoo Deal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 02:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=396#comment-186492</guid>
		<description>[...] The Yahoo deal is very similar to a Yahoo/Gawker deal announced in November 2005, and which was terminated recently. Company-specific content from Seeking Alpha will be included on Yahoo Finance, with links back to Seeking Alpha. No money is changing hands either way. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Yahoo deal is very similar to a Yahoo/Gawker deal announced in November 2005, and which was terminated recently. Company-specific content from Seeking Alpha will be included on Yahoo Finance, with links back to Seeking Alpha. No money is changing hands either way. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Seaking Alpha nails Benchmark Funding, Yahoo Deal</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/16/is-the-gawker-yahoo-deal-important/#comment-186478</link>
		<dc:creator>Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Seaking Alpha nails Benchmark Funding, Yahoo Deal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 02:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=396#comment-186478</guid>
		<description>[...] The Yahoo deal is very similar to a Yahoo/Gawker deal announced in November 2005, and which was terminated recently. Company-specific content from Seeking Alpha will be included on Yahoo Finance, with links back to Seeking Alpha. No money is changing hands either way. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Yahoo deal is very similar to a Yahoo/Gawker deal announced in November 2005, and which was terminated recently. Company-specific content from Seeking Alpha will be included on Yahoo Finance, with links back to Seeking Alpha. No money is changing hands either way. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; GawkerとYahooの試み結末を迎える</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/16/is-the-gawker-yahoo-deal-important/#comment-104964</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; GawkerとYahooの試み結末を迎える</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 21:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=396#comment-104964</guid>
		<description>[...] GawkerとYahooのコンテンツ・ディストリビューションの契約が終了した。この契約により、YahooはGawkerのコンテンツ掲載の許可を得ていたわけだが･･･。２００５年の１１月に発表された契約時のオリジナルポストはこちら。Gawkerのファウンダー Nick Dentonによる契約解除のポストはこちら。 このパートナーシップはいわば消滅しかかっていたとNickは示唆していた。しかし、彼はこうとも言っている。「Valleywag (ValleywagもGawker Mediaのブログのひとつ) のNick Douglasは、日常茶飯事にLloyd Braun(Yahoo Mediaのトップ）を攻撃しているのだが、これはちっとも今回の事態を助けるものにはならなかった」と。Nickの言っていることは正しいのでは？そう私は思う。 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] GawkerとYahooのコンテンツ・ディストリビューションの契約が終了した。この契約により、YahooはGawkerのコンテンツ掲載の許可を得ていたわけだが･･･。２００５年の１１月に発表された契約時のオリジナルポストはこちら。Gawkerのファウンダー Nick Dentonによる契約解除のポストはこちら。 このパートナーシップはいわば消滅しかかっていたとNickは示唆していた。しかし、彼はこうとも言っている。「Valleywag (ValleywagもGawker Mediaのブログのひとつ) のNick Douglasは、日常茶飯事にLloyd Braun(Yahoo Mediaのトップ）を攻撃しているのだが、これはちっとも今回の事態を助けるものにはならなかった」と。Nickの言っていることは正しいのでは？そう私は思う。 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Gawker-Yahoo Experiment Ends</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/16/is-the-gawker-yahoo-deal-important/#comment-104920</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Gawker-Yahoo Experiment Ends</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 20:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=396#comment-104920</guid>
		<description>[...] GawkerThe Gawker-Yahoo content distribution deal, which allowed Yahoo to post Gawker content on its site, has been terminated. Our original post on the deal, announced in November 2005, is here. Gawker founder Nick Denton&#8217;s post on the termination is here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] GawkerThe Gawker-Yahoo content distribution deal, which allowed Yahoo to post Gawker content on its site, has been terminated. Our original post on the deal, announced in November 2005, is here. Gawker founder Nick Denton&#8217;s post on the termination is here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web 2.0 - Что нового? &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Gawker запускает новый блог - The Consumerist</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/16/is-the-gawker-yahoo-deal-important/#comment-34683</link>
		<dc:creator>Web 2.0 - Что нового? &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Gawker запускает новый блог - The Consumerist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 12:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=396#comment-34683</guid>
		<description>[...] Gawker продолжает&#160;продвигать свой бизнес, несмотря&#160;на молву о&#160;приобретении этой компании компанией&#160;New York Times. В дополнение к их предыдущей сделке с Yahoo по продвижению их контента, сегодня Gawker объявила о запуске своего нового блога - The Consumerist&#160;- блог, юмористически&#160;смотрящий на современный потребительский мир:&#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Gawker продолжает&nbsp;продвигать свой бизнес, несмотря&nbsp;на молву о&nbsp;приобретении этой компании компанией&nbsp;New York Times. В дополнение к их предыдущей сделке с Yahoo по продвижению их контента, сегодня Gawker объявила о запуске своего нового блога - The Consumerist&nbsp;- блог, юмористически&nbsp;смотрящий на современный потребительский мир:&nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch &#187; Gawker Launches New Blog, Consumerist</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/16/is-the-gawker-yahoo-deal-important/#comment-4610</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch &#187; Gawker Launches New Blog, Consumerist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 00:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=396#comment-4610</guid>
		<description>[...] In addition to their recent deal to promote their content within Yahoo, Gawker today announced the launch of its newest blog, The Consumerist, a humorous slant on today&#8217;s consumptive world: We here at Gawker Media love to spend our money, but we hate being treated like cattle while we do it. And so our big happy family is proud to announce the birth of our latest site: Consumerist, our answer to the utter fuckitude of modern capitalism. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In addition to their recent deal to promote their content within Yahoo, Gawker today announced the launch of its newest blog, The Consumerist, a humorous slant on today&#8217;s consumptive world: We here at Gawker Media love to spend our money, but we hate being treated like cattle while we do it. And so our big happy family is proud to announce the birth of our latest site: Consumerist, our answer to the utter fuckitude of modern capitalism. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Kidder</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/16/is-the-gawker-yahoo-deal-important/#comment-3507</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Kidder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2005 17:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=396#comment-3507</guid>
		<description>Actually, using your example link (http://news.yahoo.com/s/lifehacker/20051117/tc_lifehacker/howtomeditate;_ylt=AseqJYzJDq.ln0QXLpCwx6Ks0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTA3cjE0b2MwBHNlYwM3Mzg-), the four stories in the box on the left with the Lifehacker logo go directly to the Gawker property.

thanks
s</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, using your example link (http://news.yahoo.com/s/lifehacker/20051117/tc_lifehacker/howtomeditate;_ylt=AseqJYzJDq.ln0QXLpCwx6Ks0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTA3cjE0b2MwBHNlYwM3Mzg-), the four stories in the box on the left with the Lifehacker logo go directly to the Gawker property.</p>
<p>thanks<br />
s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yopino</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/16/is-the-gawker-yahoo-deal-important/#comment-3399</link>
		<dc:creator>Yopino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 21:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=396#comment-3399</guid>
		<description>I respectuflly disagree with Mr. Rogers'  &lt;a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/16/is-the-gawker-yahoo-deal-important/#comment-3287" rel="nofollow"&gt;comment&lt;/a&gt;, it would be shame if this had been a buy-out of Gawker BUT it is not as the post clearly points out. And THAT &lt;acronym title="In My Humble Opinion"&gt;IMHO&lt;/acronym&gt; is what's news. Kudos to Gawker for this clear sign of growing up and for showing once again that the blogosphere is here to stay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I respectuflly disagree with Mr. Rogers&#8217;  <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/16/is-the-gawker-yahoo-deal-important/#comment-3287" rel="nofollow">comment</a>, it would be shame if this had been a buy-out of Gawker BUT it is not as the post clearly points out. And THAT <acronym title="In My Humble Opinion">IMHO</acronym> is what&#8217;s news. Kudos to Gawker for this clear sign of growing up and for showing once again that the blogosphere is here to stay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: supafuncy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/16/is-the-gawker-yahoo-deal-important/#comment-3393</link>
		<dc:creator>supafuncy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 15:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=396#comment-3393</guid>
		<description>"Jeff Rogers" point (4 or 5 up in these comments) is a rare bit of wisdom indeed, clever thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Jeff Rogers&#8221; point (4 or 5 up in these comments) is a rare bit of wisdom indeed, clever thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Webmarketing</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/16/is-the-gawker-yahoo-deal-important/#comment-3392</link>
		<dc:creator>Webmarketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 14:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=396#comment-3392</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Gawker&lt;/strong&gt;

Gawker, les news Ã  la blogging attitude :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Gawker</strong></p>
<p>Gawker, les news Ã  la blogging attitude <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Coulter</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/16/is-the-gawker-yahoo-deal-important/#comment-3378</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Coulter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 04:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=396#comment-3378</guid>
		<description>My my...blogs all lit up, someone's talking, I think I know who. But I had it well well before even the talker talked, however. Ask Tara, if ye not believe. Not that stupid stuff like this really matters, but just shows how actual reporting and not just a leaker leaking to blogs can win out. ;)

Yeah, it isn't quite apples to apples...but it's a GYM buy-up at least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My my&#8230;blogs all lit up, someone&#8217;s talking, I think I know who. But I had it well well before even the talker talked, however. Ask Tara, if ye not believe. Not that stupid stuff like this really matters, but just shows how actual reporting and not just a leaker leaking to blogs can win out. <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Yeah, it isn&#8217;t quite apples to apples&#8230;but it&#8217;s a GYM buy-up at least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BillSaysThis</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/16/is-the-gawker-yahoo-deal-important/#comment-3348</link>
		<dc:creator>BillSaysThis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 21:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=396#comment-3348</guid>
		<description>Riya isn't really a content play so comparing its potential acquisition to Gawker/Yahoo isn't apples to apples, no more than Microsoft buying Vermeer was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Riya isn&#8217;t really a content play so comparing its potential acquisition to Gawker/Yahoo isn&#8217;t apples to apples, no more than Microsoft buying Vermeer was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Computerworld Blogs</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/16/is-the-gawker-yahoo-deal-important/#comment-3300</link>
		<dc:creator>Computerworld Blogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 15:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=396#comment-3300</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;VPN vulnerability (and a stocking stuffer for nerds).&lt;/strong&gt;

In today's IT Blogwatch, we look at the VPN flaw found by Uni of Oulu in Finland. Not to mention a Christmas present for nerds.&#160; 
IPsec VPN displaying security vulnerabilities so take note if you have a VPN, Cisco or Juniper Networks&#160;or othe...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>VPN vulnerability (and a stocking stuffer for nerds).</strong></p>
<p>In today&#8217;s IT Blogwatch, we look at the VPN flaw found by Uni of Oulu in Finland. Not to mention a Christmas present for nerds.&nbsp;<br />
IPsec VPN displaying security vulnerabilities so take note if you have a VPN, Cisco or Juniper Networks&nbsp;or othe&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Yardley</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/16/is-the-gawker-yahoo-deal-important/#comment-3291</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Yardley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 13:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=396#comment-3291</guid>
		<description>I suspect Gawker's popular &#38; pornographic 'Fleshbot' blog acts like a bit of a poison pill in these situations.  Buy Gawker Media and leave Fleshbot open - bad publicity.  Buy Gawker Media and close Fleshbot - bad publicity.

Wonder how the Weblogs Inc. - AOL deal would've went down if Weblogs had some more 'exciting' properties?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect Gawker&#8217;s popular &amp; pornographic &#8216;Fleshbot&#8217; blog acts like a bit of a poison pill in these situations.  Buy Gawker Media and leave Fleshbot open - bad publicity.  Buy Gawker Media and close Fleshbot - bad publicity.</p>
<p>Wonder how the Weblogs Inc. - AOL deal would&#8217;ve went down if Weblogs had some more &#8216;exciting&#8217; properties?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Rogers</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/16/is-the-gawker-yahoo-deal-important/#comment-3287</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 12:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=396#comment-3287</guid>
		<description>I respectfully disagree. This is the equivilant of Nirvana signing to Geffen...the equivilant of an open source startup selling out to Microsoft, etc...

Big media buying independent web content contributors has been tried in the 90s and rarely worked out.

Let's not forget how great Slate was great before being bought out. Let's remember MP3.com before being bought out. Let's remember all the small Javascript/HTML/#SSI web sites before they were gobbled up by Internet.com. Remember pre-acquired About.com? And let's remember ClickZ before they were bought up and later dumped by the company. 

Meanwhile, Matt Drudge, Fool.com, Jim Cramer Street.com are still going strong and they are is able to syndicate their name out and great success stories. These successful guys are proof that selling out original web content is a dumb idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I respectfully disagree. This is the equivilant of Nirvana signing to Geffen&#8230;the equivilant of an open source startup selling out to Microsoft, etc&#8230;</p>
<p>Big media buying independent web content contributors has been tried in the 90s and rarely worked out.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s not forget how great Slate was great before being bought out. Let&#8217;s remember MP3.com before being bought out. Let&#8217;s remember all the small Javascript/HTML/#SSI web sites before they were gobbled up by Internet.com. Remember pre-acquired About.com? And let&#8217;s remember ClickZ before they were bought up and later dumped by the company. </p>
<p>Meanwhile, Matt Drudge, Fool.com, Jim Cramer Street.com are still going strong and they are is able to syndicate their name out and great success stories. These successful guys are proof that selling out original web content is a dumb idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Montgomery</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/16/is-the-gawker-yahoo-deal-important/#comment-3286</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Montgomery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 10:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=396#comment-3286</guid>
		<description>True. Maybe they'll hire you! :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True. Maybe they&#8217;ll hire you! <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Coulter</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/16/is-the-gawker-yahoo-deal-important/#comment-3285</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Coulter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 10:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=396#comment-3285</guid>
		<description>The GYMs are not yet in content buying moods?

Not quite true. Google snapping up Riya for approx $40 mil. Robbing Google and Yahoo, the only two plausible buyers. MS doesn't buy, and Diller and Murdoch are in the market but for bigger and better properties.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The GYMs are not yet in content buying moods?</p>
<p>Not quite true. Google snapping up Riya for approx $40 mil. Robbing Google and Yahoo, the only two plausible buyers. MS doesn&#8217;t buy, and Diller and Murdoch are in the market but for bigger and better properties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.094 seconds -->
