<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Base Launched. Yuck.</title>
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/15/google-base-launched-yuck/</link>
	<description>Startup and Tech News</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 08:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: cae11b1b0653</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/15/google-base-launched-yuck/#comment-2290228</link>
		<dc:creator>cae11b1b0653</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 02:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/15/google-base-launched-yuck/#comment-2290228</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;cae11b1b0653...&lt;/strong&gt;

cae11b1b065335070a81...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>cae11b1b0653&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>cae11b1b065335070a81&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cingular media mall ringtones</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/15/google-base-launched-yuck/#comment-2020763</link>
		<dc:creator>cingular media mall ringtones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 17:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/15/google-base-launched-yuck/#comment-2020763</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;best payday loan best payday loan site...&lt;/strong&gt;

Do free maker ringtones software no faxing instant payday loan...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>best payday loan best payday loan site&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Do free maker ringtones software no faxing instant payday loan&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: info polyphonic remember ringtones siemens info polyphonic remember ringtones sagem info polyphonic remember ringtones</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/15/google-base-launched-yuck/#comment-1887185</link>
		<dc:creator>info polyphonic remember ringtones siemens info polyphonic remember ringtones sagem info polyphonic remember ringtones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 09:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/15/google-base-launched-yuck/#comment-1887185</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;info polyphonic remember ringtones sagem info polyphonic remember ringtones siemens...&lt;/strong&gt;

Let''s start with make your own mp3 ringtones box music ringtones sony...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>info polyphonic remember ringtones sagem info polyphonic remember ringtones siemens&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Let&#8217;&#8217;s start with make your own mp3 ringtones box music ringtones sony&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adult internet station tv</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/15/google-base-launched-yuck/#comment-1597164</link>
		<dc:creator>adult internet station tv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 03:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/15/google-base-launched-yuck/#comment-1597164</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;adult internet station tv...&lt;/strong&gt;

Techcrunch » Blog Archive » Google Base Launched. Yuck....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>adult internet station tv&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Techcrunch » Blog Archive » Google Base Launched. Yuck&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FreebasePortal &#187; Blog Archive &#187; This is cool, unless it achieves consciousness and kills us all</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/15/google-base-launched-yuck/#comment-1293107</link>
		<dc:creator>FreebasePortal &#187; Blog Archive &#187; This is cool, unless it achieves consciousness and kills us all</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 19:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/15/google-base-launched-yuck/#comment-1293107</guid>
		<description>[...] looks to be what Google Base is not: open and useful. I imagine there will be more than one forehead self-smacked at Google HQ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] looks to be what Google Base is not: open and useful. I imagine there will be more than one forehead self-smacked at Google HQ [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Horn</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/15/google-base-launched-yuck/#comment-1095608</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Horn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 23:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/15/google-base-launched-yuck/#comment-1095608</guid>
		<description>Hey, you don't have to worry about the new Expiration Date requirement if you set up an account over at SingleFeed -- we fully support the expiration date and make sure that it is always present, always valid (30 days from today), and make sure your product feed and any updates are submitted EVERY DAY -- with an accurate and always live (30 days from upload) expiration date.

Please, come try us out for Google Base, and you can also, using the same feed, set up for product submission to many of the other popular shopping engines (shopping.com, shopzilla, nextag, etc.)

Jeremy Horn
SingleFeed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, you don&#8217;t have to worry about the new Expiration Date requirement if you set up an account over at SingleFeed &#8212; we fully support the expiration date and make sure that it is always present, always valid (30 days from today), and make sure your product feed and any updates are submitted EVERY DAY &#8212; with an accurate and always live (30 days from upload) expiration date.</p>
<p>Please, come try us out for Google Base, and you can also, using the same feed, set up for product submission to many of the other popular shopping engines (shopping.com, shopzilla, nextag, etc.)</p>
<p>Jeremy Horn<br />
SingleFeed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Possible Snag in Google/Fox Renegotiations</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/15/google-base-launched-yuck/#comment-894413</link>
		<dc:creator>Possible Snag in Google/Fox Renegotiations</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 07:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/15/google-base-launched-yuck/#comment-894413</guid>
		<description>[...] I wouldn&#8217;t quite say that Google Base is a competitor to eBay, but certainly Google Checkout is driving hard at PayPal. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I wouldn&#8217;t quite say that Google Base is a competitor to eBay, but certainly Google Checkout is driving hard at PayPal. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: apply for credit</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/15/google-base-launched-yuck/#comment-772315</link>
		<dc:creator>apply for credit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 15:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/15/google-base-launched-yuck/#comment-772315</guid>
		<description>Don't like some latest google 'improvements' too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t like some latest google &#8216;improvements&#8217; too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Online Dating 2.0: Thirteen Sites To Find Love - • XXX Master •</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/15/google-base-launched-yuck/#comment-240829</link>
		<dc:creator>Online Dating 2.0: Thirteen Sites To Find Love - • XXX Master •</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 11:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/15/google-base-launched-yuck/#comment-240829</guid>
		<description>[...] An entire batch of next generation dating sites have emerged that are starting to nip at the established players. One, PlentyofFish, launched in 2003 and has over half a million monthly U.S. visitors. Recently, even Google has entered the space through their Google Base product. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] An entire batch of next generation dating sites have emerged that are starting to nip at the established players. One, PlentyofFish, launched in 2003 and has over half a million monthly U.S. visitors. Recently, even Google has entered the space through their Google Base product. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; オンラインデート 2.0: 「出会い」のための13のサイト</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/15/google-base-launched-yuck/#comment-109519</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; オンラインデート 2.0: 「出会い」のための13のサイト</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2006 21:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/15/google-base-launched-yuck/#comment-109519</guid>
		<description>[...] まったく新手の次世代ともいうべきデートサイトが現れて既存のサイトを少しずつ追い上げている。ひとつはPlentyofFishで2003年にスタートしたが、米国で毎月50万以上の訪問者を得ている。最近GoogleでさえGoogle Baseサービスを通じてこの分野に参入を試みている。 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] まったく新手の次世代ともいうべきデートサイトが現れて既存のサイトを少しずつ追い上げている。ひとつはPlentyofFishで2003年にスタートしたが、米国で毎月50万以上の訪問者を得ている。最近GoogleでさえGoogle Baseサービスを通じてこの分野に参入を試みている。 [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: e-Fuze Mobile &#187; Google Base and the Dating Website Space</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/15/google-base-launched-yuck/#comment-109488</link>
		<dc:creator>e-Fuze Mobile &#187; Google Base and the Dating Website Space</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2006 20:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/15/google-base-launched-yuck/#comment-109488</guid>
		<description>[...] The Online Dating market is a flourishing one that can also be very lucrative. There are various dating community websites, some more established than others, Yahoo! Personals and Match.com being the most established with a combined user base of 9.3 million unique users per month. The websites are mostly free, though some charge a premium to communicate with members. Yahoo! for example charges $25 USD per month (Match.com offers a basic plan at $30 USD per month). Now, these websites mostly rely on revenue from advertising, and with page views generating in the billions every month, a lot of money is at stake. Advertising guru Google has also noticed these trends and has jumped on the bandwagon by introducing Google Base which is free and better since it is easier to match yourself with persons who share the same interest as you do. You can learn more about Google Base here. Learn more about the dating website space and other companies competing for market share  here.  Google , Google Base , Match.com , social , Web 2.0 , Yahoo! Personals ShareThese icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The Online Dating market is a flourishing one that can also be very lucrative. There are various dating community websites, some more established than others, Yahoo! Personals and Match.com being the most established with a combined user base of 9.3 million unique users per month. The websites are mostly free, though some charge a premium to communicate with members. Yahoo! for example charges $25 USD per month (Match.com offers a basic plan at $30 USD per month). Now, these websites mostly rely on revenue from advertising, and with page views generating in the billions every month, a lot of money is at stake. Advertising guru Google has also noticed these trends and has jumped on the bandwagon by introducing Google Base which is free and better since it is easier to match yourself with persons who share the same interest as you do. You can learn more about Google Base here. Learn more about the dating website space and other companies competing for market share  here.  Google , Google Base , Match.com , social , Web 2.0 , Yahoo! Personals ShareThese icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Online Dating 2.0: Thirteen Sites To Find Love</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/15/google-base-launched-yuck/#comment-109178</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Online Dating 2.0: Thirteen Sites To Find Love</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2006 09:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/15/google-base-launched-yuck/#comment-109178</guid>
		<description>[...] An entire batch of next generation dating sites have emerged that are starting to nip at the established players. One, PlentyofFish, launched in 2003 and has over half a million monthly U.S. visitors. Recently, even Google has entered the space through their Google Base product. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] An entire batch of next generation dating sites have emerged that are starting to nip at the established players. One, PlentyofFish, launched in 2003 and has over half a million monthly U.S. visitors. Recently, even Google has entered the space through their Google Base product. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fatality9nvj</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/15/google-base-launched-yuck/#comment-107008</link>
		<dc:creator>fatality9nvj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 08:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/15/google-base-launched-yuck/#comment-107008</guid>
		<description>Ein Schloss, Ein &lt;a href="http://niemachujanamariolke.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;poker&lt;/a&gt; Wurst, Ein Kopf !nvj</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ein Schloss, Ein <a href="http://niemachujanamariolke.com/" rel="nofollow">poker</a> Wurst, Ein Kopf !nvj</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ticketwood</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/15/google-base-launched-yuck/#comment-93858</link>
		<dc:creator>ticketwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 11:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/15/google-base-launched-yuck/#comment-93858</guid>
		<description>I personally believe (actually I know- Google don’t have a choice) in 2006, Google will dump or minimize web crawling/search all together and build on this ‘base’ model. Google has to obsolete the over-celebrated concept of ’search’ if they want to stay on cutting edge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally believe (actually I know- Google don’t have a choice) in 2006, Google will dump or minimize web crawling/search all together and build on this ‘base’ model. Google has to obsolete the over-celebrated concept of ’search’ if they want to stay on cutting edge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Google Base no category killer &#124; Digital Micro-Markets &#124; ZDNet.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/15/google-base-launched-yuck/#comment-48566</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Google Base no category killer &#124; Digital Micro-Markets &#124; ZDNet.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 May 2006 17:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/15/google-base-launched-yuck/#comment-48566</guid>
		<description>[...] Or, to quote Michael Arrington, &#34;Google Base Launched. Yuck.&#34; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Or, to quote Michael Arrington, &quot;Google Base Launched. Yuck.&quot; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steffen&#8217;s Blog &#187; edgeio, TechCrunch, Archimedes Ventures</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/15/google-base-launched-yuck/#comment-4186</link>
		<dc:creator>Steffen&#8217;s Blog &#187; edgeio, TechCrunch, Archimedes Ventures</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 19:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/15/google-base-launched-yuck/#comment-4186</guid>
		<description>[...] SomewhatFrank.com has some more info about edgeio. They seem to use Structured Blogging to do classifieds from within blogs and hence trying to attack craigslist or Google Base, etc.. Ok, this is what everybody expects. Much more interesting is Frank&#8217;s source of the information. It&#8217;s coming from a Archimedes Ventures, a venture company. And the blog of this company is: TechCrunch! You know what they said about Google Base? Yuck!. Since TechCrunch kind of invested in edgeio, I guess their review will look a little different  . [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] SomewhatFrank.com has some more info about edgeio. They seem to use Structured Blogging to do classifieds from within blogs and hence trying to attack craigslist or Google Base, etc.. Ok, this is what everybody expects. Much more interesting is Frank&#8217;s source of the information. It&#8217;s coming from a Archimedes Ventures, a venture company. And the blog of this company is: TechCrunch! You know what they said about Google Base? Yuck!. Since TechCrunch kind of invested in edgeio, I guess their review will look a little different  . [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CrunchNotes &#187; Total Nonsense</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/15/google-base-launched-yuck/#comment-3686</link>
		<dc:creator>CrunchNotes &#187; Total Nonsense</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 12:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/15/google-base-launched-yuck/#comment-3686</guid>
		<description>[...] My God, John, have you even looked at Google Base? Is this what you have to do to get on Google&#8217;s short list of publications they ping before launch? Write whatever they tell you to? Do you have any evidence to support these statements? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] My God, John, have you even looked at Google Base? Is this what you have to do to get on Google&#8217;s short list of publications they ping before launch? Write whatever they tell you to? Do you have any evidence to support these statements? [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Read/Write Web</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/15/google-base-launched-yuck/#comment-3594</link>
		<dc:creator>Read/Write Web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 09:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/15/google-base-launched-yuck/#comment-3594</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Web 2.0 Weekly Wrap-up, 14-20 Nov 2005&lt;/strong&gt;

This week: Explaining Web 2.0 to normal people, Google Base, Yahoo Shoposhere,
Amazon tags, Hypertext and the next 15 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Web 2.0 Weekly Wrap-up, 14-20 Nov 2005</strong></p>
<p>This week: Explaining Web 2.0 to normal people, Google Base, Yahoo Shoposhere,<br />
Amazon tags, Hypertext and the next 15 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CrunchNotes &#187; Open APIs, Microformats, Centralized Data</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/15/google-base-launched-yuck/#comment-3545</link>
		<dc:creator>CrunchNotes &#187; Open APIs, Microformats, Centralized Data</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2005 10:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/15/google-base-launched-yuck/#comment-3545</guid>
		<description>[...] Google Base has a lot of problems. The big one for me is that is another centralized content play, when all of the really interesting content is created at the edge. Jeff points out some other issues with Base, including the fact that the data is not only centralized but there is no API for non-Google search engines to access the data. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Google Base has a lot of problems. The big one for me is that is another centralized content play, when all of the really interesting content is created at the edge. Jeff points out some other issues with Base, including the fact that the data is not only centralized but there is no API for non-Google search engines to access the data. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Huere Lisi&#8217;s &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Base basicly a basic DBASE</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/15/google-base-launched-yuck/#comment-3371</link>
		<dc:creator>Huere Lisi&#8217;s &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Base basicly a basic DBASE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 00:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/15/google-base-launched-yuck/#comment-3371</guid>
		<description>[...] TechCrunch Â» Google Base Launched. Yuck. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] TechCrunch Â» Google Base Launched. Yuck. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Naveed Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/15/google-base-launched-yuck/#comment-3317</link>
		<dc:creator>Naveed Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 17:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/15/google-base-launched-yuck/#comment-3317</guid>
		<description>Its more than ugly. Information sharing wont work that way.   I think Google Base is going to be one of Google's flop projects or atleast close to flop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its more than ugly. Information sharing wont work that way.   I think Google Base is going to be one of Google&#8217;s flop projects or atleast close to flop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bronte Media &#187; Open Letter To Google Base Product Manager</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/15/google-base-launched-yuck/#comment-3294</link>
		<dc:creator>Bronte Media &#187; Open Letter To Google Base Product Manager</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 14:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/15/google-base-launched-yuck/#comment-3294</guid>
		<description>[...] But the reason I am writing today is that I thought you could have done a lot better job with the launch of Google Base. A lot better. As it stands, Google Base looks, to quote a profilific blogger who quoted another blogger, &#8220;like a 1985 dBASE file with less functionality. Itâ€™s ugly.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] But the reason I am writing today is that I thought you could have done a lot better job with the launch of Google Base. A lot better. As it stands, Google Base looks, to quote a profilific blogger who quoted another blogger, &#8220;like a 1985 dBASE file with less functionality. Itâ€™s ugly.&#8221; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. LeRoy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/15/google-base-launched-yuck/#comment-3277</link>
		<dc:creator>J. LeRoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 05:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/15/google-base-launched-yuck/#comment-3277</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;All Your Data Are Belong to Us&lt;/strong&gt;

Googlebase has launched. Everyone is wondering what to do with it. Some people fear it will be a spam haven and horribly abused. Some people think it is like dBase and dull dull dull. I think that Googlebase is amazing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>All Your Data Are Belong to Us</strong></p>
<p>Googlebase has launched. Everyone is wondering what to do with it. Some people fear it will be a spam haven and horribly abused. Some people think it is like dBase and dull dull dull. I think that Googlebase is amazing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/15/google-base-launched-yuck/#comment-3273</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 02:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/15/google-base-launched-yuck/#comment-3273</guid>
		<description>Am I the only one who get's a little sick seeing everyone bow down to Google?  I'm glad at least Mike gave it a fair review - "meh" is the best way to describe it.  Yay, it's structured, but who cares?  It adds little value to anything...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I the only one who get&#8217;s a little sick seeing everyone bow down to Google?  I&#8217;m glad at least Mike gave it a fair review - &#8220;meh&#8221; is the best way to describe it.  Yay, it&#8217;s structured, but who cares?  It adds little value to anything&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/15/google-base-launched-yuck/#comment-3270</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 01:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/15/google-base-launched-yuck/#comment-3270</guid>
		<description>How does Google intend to deal with the signal to noise problems endemic to any normalized data submission engine? Is there a reputation system?

I love the idea of truely normalized data on a massive basis, but without some bidirectional feedback, it is nearly useless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does Google intend to deal with the signal to noise problems endemic to any normalized data submission engine? Is there a reputation system?</p>
<p>I love the idea of truely normalized data on a massive basis, but without some bidirectional feedback, it is nearly useless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.444 seconds -->
