<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: YackPack Joins the Click, Record Crowd</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/05/yackpack-joins-the-click-record-crowd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/05/yackpack-joins-the-click-record-crowd/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 18:04:41 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: V4S - Голосовая почта для Skype &#124; TechCrunch по-русски</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/05/yackpack-joins-the-click-record-crowd/comment-page-1/#comment-1980189</link>
		<dc:creator>V4S - Голосовая почта для Skype &#124; TechCrunch по-русски</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 00:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=368#comment-1980189</guid>
		<description>[...] похожий) рынок отправки голосовых сообщений через web: YackPack, Odeo Waxmail, vemail, Springdoo и даже скромная [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] похожий) рынок отправки голосовых сообщений через web: YackPack, Odeo Waxmail, vemail, Springdoo и даже скромная [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web 2.0 - Что нового? &#187; Blog Archive &#187; V4S - Голосовая почта для Skype</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/05/yackpack-joins-the-click-record-crowd/comment-page-1/#comment-34659</link>
		<dc:creator>Web 2.0 - Что нового? &#187; Blog Archive &#187; V4S - Голосовая почта для Skype</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 11:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=368#comment-34659</guid>
		<description>[...] V4S присоединяется к целому семейству уже существующих продуктов, которые уже заняли такой же (ну, или очень похожий) рынок отправки голосовых сообщений через web: YackPack, Odeo Waxmail, vemail, Springdoo и даже скромная&#160;slawesome. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] V4S присоединяется к целому семейству уже существующих продуктов, которые уже заняли такой же (ну, или очень похожий) рынок отправки голосовых сообщений через web: YackPack, Odeo Waxmail, vemail, Springdoo и даже скромная&nbsp;slawesome. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch &#187; V4S - Voicemail for Skype</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/05/yackpack-joins-the-click-record-crowd/comment-page-1/#comment-5721</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch &#187; V4S - Voicemail for Skype</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 19:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=368#comment-5721</guid>
		<description>[...] V4S joins a whole bunch of products attacking the same or similar market (sending voicemails over the web): YackPack, Odeo Waxmail, vemail, Springdoo and even the humble slawesome.   Tags: vs4, orb, vmail, voip, skype, techcrunch, web2.0, web+2.0,   Categories: Profiles, VoIP, Software &#124;  Bookmark this post with del.icio.us [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] V4S joins a whole bunch of products attacking the same or similar market (sending voicemails over the web): YackPack, Odeo Waxmail, vemail, Springdoo and even the humble slawesome.   Tags: vs4, orb, vmail, voip, skype, techcrunch, web2.0, web+2.0,   Categories: Profiles, VoIP, Software |  Bookmark this post with del.icio.us [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kris Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/05/yackpack-joins-the-click-record-crowd/comment-page-1/#comment-2880</link>
		<dc:creator>Kris Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2005 01:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=368#comment-2880</guid>
		<description>The name scares me. Really! I have not heard something so terrible long time until now. Yack, Yack. You do understand how it sounds? Yack, like disgusting. Never heard something so stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The name scares me. Really! I have not heard something so terrible long time until now. Yack, Yack. You do understand how it sounds? Yack, like disgusting. Never heard something so stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lonk</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/05/yackpack-joins-the-click-record-crowd/comment-page-1/#comment-2633</link>
		<dc:creator>lonk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2005 14:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=368#comment-2633</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your good wishes. And your comment may well change our musical style!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your good wishes. And your comment may well change our musical style!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BJ Fogg</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/05/yackpack-joins-the-click-record-crowd/comment-page-1/#comment-2600</link>
		<dc:creator>BJ Fogg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2005 03:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=368#comment-2600</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your good wishes. And your comment may well change our musical style!

As for IM and other modes . . . 

In our research we&#039;ve found that many people don&#039;t like the pressure of IM -- too busy, too demanding. I know this is hard for some to believe, but many people want a calm experience, without the pressure of someone waiting for a response. So we&#039;ve designed YackPack to give this convenience and simplicity. 

--BJ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your good wishes. And your comment may well change our musical style!</p>
<p>As for IM and other modes . . . </p>
<p>In our research we&#8217;ve found that many people don&#8217;t like the pressure of IM &#8212; too busy, too demanding. I know this is hard for some to believe, but many people want a calm experience, without the pressure of someone waiting for a response. So we&#8217;ve designed YackPack to give this convenience and simplicity. </p>
<p>&#8211;BJ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guzzard</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/05/yackpack-joins-the-click-record-crowd/comment-page-1/#comment-2516</link>
		<dc:creator>Guzzard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2005 00:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=368#comment-2516</guid>
		<description>You are probably right about the simplicity factor, but most people can use AIM or MSM, and not neccessarily know how to use a browser. With WaxMail I can do the same with my email. http://www.waxmail.biz. Good luck, though the Music is quite bad!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are probably right about the simplicity factor, but most people can use AIM or MSM, and not neccessarily know how to use a browser. With WaxMail I can do the same with my email. <a href="http://www.waxmail.biz" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.waxmail.biz'>http://www.waxmail.biz</a>. Good luck, though the Music is quite bad!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BJ Fogg</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/05/yackpack-joins-the-click-record-crowd/comment-page-1/#comment-2511</link>
		<dc:creator>BJ Fogg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2005 22:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=368#comment-2511</guid>
		<description>YackPack is simpler and more convenient (overall) than the other services you list. 

Simplicity and convenience are big deals for most people out there. But you may be different: As a tech enthusiast, you may find little need for simplicity, so other services may suit you better. But you should give YackPack a try. We find the more people use it, the more they see the value of convenient voice messaging for groups.

I don&#039;t defend our musical choice for the demo video. I think the music is fine, and others like it. Certainly no musical style will appeal to everyone. 

my quick thoughts . . . 

BJ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YackPack is simpler and more convenient (overall) than the other services you list. </p>
<p>Simplicity and convenience are big deals for most people out there. But you may be different: As a tech enthusiast, you may find little need for simplicity, so other services may suit you better. But you should give YackPack a try. We find the more people use it, the more they see the value of convenient voice messaging for groups.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t defend our musical choice for the demo video. I think the music is fine, and others like it. Certainly no musical style will appeal to everyone. </p>
<p>my quick thoughts . . . </p>
<p>BJ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guzzard</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/05/yackpack-joins-the-click-record-crowd/comment-page-1/#comment-2509</link>
		<dc:creator>Guzzard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2005 20:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=368#comment-2509</guid>
		<description>Why would I use YackPack, it seems a little redundant, between, IM, Skype, and Waxmail it seems all so silly. Why not use the phone, cell phone...the list goes on. What was with that corny music...during the demo?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would I use YackPack, it seems a little redundant, between, IM, Skype, and Waxmail it seems all so silly. Why not use the phone, cell phone&#8230;the list goes on. What was with that corny music&#8230;during the demo?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BJ Fogg</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/05/yackpack-joins-the-click-record-crowd/comment-page-1/#comment-2500</link>
		<dc:creator>BJ Fogg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2005 16:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=368#comment-2500</guid>
		<description>This is a good summary. Thanks! As the founder of YackPack, let me share a bit more backgound . . . 

Since we started rolling out the service a week ago, we&#039;ve learned a lot. We&#039;ve added to our long list of improvements needed. That said, our rollout is showing that people are using and liking YackPack as is. 

Personally, I can&#039;t wait to make YackPack better. Our engineering team has been releasing at least one major upgrade each week, so we&#039;re in process. 

You talk about lack of control over the sound files. Yep, you&#039;re right. You can&#039;t edit or download them (yet). We&#039;ll get there . . . . Also, I think the controls for audio playback need to be better. 

As a team we are constantly discussing the tradeoff between simplicity and functionality. For example, in a pilot version we had a &quot;Back 8&quot; button that would let you jump back in the audio 8 seconds. We found that people didn&#039;t use Back 8 much, so we removed it in the name of radical simplicity. Yes, we removed a feature that was already built.

We wanted to launch with the simplest service that still gives value.  

Now we&#039;re in feedback mode. We are listening to users to guide our next steps. In fact, we&#039;re doing more than listening . . . we&#039;ve created a customer advisory board, a YackPack group that works directly with me (new advisors welcome).

So after one week of running the YackPack beta service, we&#039;ve had no big disasters (whew). But it&#039;s getting harder to balance competing priorities. On Monday we&#039;re having a big meeting to focus our work on what matters most.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a good summary. Thanks! As the founder of YackPack, let me share a bit more backgound . . . </p>
<p>Since we started rolling out the service a week ago, we&#8217;ve learned a lot. We&#8217;ve added to our long list of improvements needed. That said, our rollout is showing that people are using and liking YackPack as is. </p>
<p>Personally, I can&#8217;t wait to make YackPack better. Our engineering team has been releasing at least one major upgrade each week, so we&#8217;re in process. </p>
<p>You talk about lack of control over the sound files. Yep, you&#8217;re right. You can&#8217;t edit or download them (yet). We&#8217;ll get there . . . . Also, I think the controls for audio playback need to be better. </p>
<p>As a team we are constantly discussing the tradeoff between simplicity and functionality. For example, in a pilot version we had a &#8220;Back 8&#8243; button that would let you jump back in the audio 8 seconds. We found that people didn&#8217;t use Back 8 much, so we removed it in the name of radical simplicity. Yes, we removed a feature that was already built.</p>
<p>We wanted to launch with the simplest service that still gives value.  </p>
<p>Now we&#8217;re in feedback mode. We are listening to users to guide our next steps. In fact, we&#8217;re doing more than listening . . . we&#8217;ve created a customer advisory board, a YackPack group that works directly with me (new advisors welcome).</p>
<p>So after one week of running the YackPack beta service, we&#8217;ve had no big disasters (whew). But it&#8217;s getting harder to balance competing priorities. On Monday we&#8217;re having a big meeting to focus our work on what matters most.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
