<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: YackPack Joins the Click, Record Crowd</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/05/yackpack-joins-the-click-record-crowd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/05/yackpack-joins-the-click-record-crowd/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 14:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: V4S - Голосовая почта для Skype &#124; TechCrunch по-русски</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/05/yackpack-joins-the-click-record-crowd/#comment-1980189</link>
		<dc:creator>V4S - Голосовая почта для Skype &#124; TechCrunch по-русски</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 00:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=368#comment-1980189</guid>
		<description>[...] похожий) рынок отправки голосовых сообщений через web: YackPack, Odeo Waxmail, vemail, Springdoo и даже скромная [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] похожий) рынок отправки голосовых сообщений через web: YackPack, Odeo Waxmail, vemail, Springdoo и даже скромная [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web 2.0 - Что нового? &#187; Blog Archive &#187; V4S - Голосовая почта для Skype</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/05/yackpack-joins-the-click-record-crowd/#comment-34659</link>
		<dc:creator>Web 2.0 - Что нового? &#187; Blog Archive &#187; V4S - Голосовая почта для Skype</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 11:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=368#comment-34659</guid>
		<description>[...] V4S присоединяется к целому семейству уже существующих продуктов, которые уже заняли такой же (ну, или очень похожий) рынок отправки голосовых сообщений через web: YackPack, Odeo Waxmail, vemail, Springdoo и даже скромная&#160;slawesome. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] V4S присоединяется к целому семейству уже существующих продуктов, которые уже заняли такой же (ну, или очень похожий) рынок отправки голосовых сообщений через web: YackPack, Odeo Waxmail, vemail, Springdoo и даже скромная&nbsp;slawesome. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch &#187; V4S - Voicemail for Skype</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/05/yackpack-joins-the-click-record-crowd/#comment-5721</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch &#187; V4S - Voicemail for Skype</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 19:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=368#comment-5721</guid>
		<description>[...] V4S joins a whole bunch of products attacking the same or similar market (sending voicemails over the web): YackPack, Odeo Waxmail, vemail, Springdoo and even the humble slawesome.   Tags: vs4, orb, vmail, voip, skype, techcrunch, web2.0, web+2.0,   Categories: Profiles, VoIP, Software &#124;  Bookmark this post with del.icio.us [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] V4S joins a whole bunch of products attacking the same or similar market (sending voicemails over the web): YackPack, Odeo Waxmail, vemail, Springdoo and even the humble slawesome.   Tags: vs4, orb, vmail, voip, skype, techcrunch, web2.0, web+2.0,   Categories: Profiles, VoIP, Software |  Bookmark this post with del.icio.us [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kris Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/05/yackpack-joins-the-click-record-crowd/#comment-2880</link>
		<dc:creator>Kris Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2005 01:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=368#comment-2880</guid>
		<description>The name scares me. Really! I have not heard something so terrible long time until now. Yack, Yack. You do understand how it sounds? Yack, like disgusting. Never heard something so stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The name scares me. Really! I have not heard something so terrible long time until now. Yack, Yack. You do understand how it sounds? Yack, like disgusting. Never heard something so stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lonk</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/05/yackpack-joins-the-click-record-crowd/#comment-2633</link>
		<dc:creator>lonk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2005 14:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=368#comment-2633</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your good wishes. And your comment may well change our musical style!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your good wishes. And your comment may well change our musical style!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BJ Fogg</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/05/yackpack-joins-the-click-record-crowd/#comment-2600</link>
		<dc:creator>BJ Fogg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2005 03:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=368#comment-2600</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your good wishes. And your comment may well change our musical style!

As for IM and other modes . . . 

In our research we've found that many people don't like the pressure of IM -- too busy, too demanding. I know this is hard for some to believe, but many people want a calm experience, without the pressure of someone waiting for a response. So we've designed YackPack to give this convenience and simplicity. 

--BJ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your good wishes. And your comment may well change our musical style!</p>
<p>As for IM and other modes . . . </p>
<p>In our research we&#8217;ve found that many people don&#8217;t like the pressure of IM &#8212; too busy, too demanding. I know this is hard for some to believe, but many people want a calm experience, without the pressure of someone waiting for a response. So we&#8217;ve designed YackPack to give this convenience and simplicity. </p>
<p>&#8211;BJ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guzzard</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/05/yackpack-joins-the-click-record-crowd/#comment-2516</link>
		<dc:creator>Guzzard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2005 00:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=368#comment-2516</guid>
		<description>You are probably right about the simplicity factor, but most people can use AIM or MSM, and not neccessarily know how to use a browser. With WaxMail I can do the same with my email. http://www.waxmail.biz. Good luck, though the Music is quite bad!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are probably right about the simplicity factor, but most people can use AIM or MSM, and not neccessarily know how to use a browser. With WaxMail I can do the same with my email. <a href="http://www.waxmail.biz" rel="nofollow">http://www.waxmail.biz</a>. Good luck, though the Music is quite bad!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BJ Fogg</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/05/yackpack-joins-the-click-record-crowd/#comment-2511</link>
		<dc:creator>BJ Fogg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2005 22:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=368#comment-2511</guid>
		<description>YackPack is simpler and more convenient (overall) than the other services you list. 

Simplicity and convenience are big deals for most people out there. But you may be different: As a tech enthusiast, you may find little need for simplicity, so other services may suit you better. But you should give YackPack a try. We find the more people use it, the more they see the value of convenient voice messaging for groups.

I don't defend our musical choice for the demo video. I think the music is fine, and others like it. Certainly no musical style will appeal to everyone. 

my quick thoughts . . . 

BJ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YackPack is simpler and more convenient (overall) than the other services you list. </p>
<p>Simplicity and convenience are big deals for most people out there. But you may be different: As a tech enthusiast, you may find little need for simplicity, so other services may suit you better. But you should give YackPack a try. We find the more people use it, the more they see the value of convenient voice messaging for groups.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t defend our musical choice for the demo video. I think the music is fine, and others like it. Certainly no musical style will appeal to everyone. </p>
<p>my quick thoughts . . . </p>
<p>BJ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guzzard</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/05/yackpack-joins-the-click-record-crowd/#comment-2509</link>
		<dc:creator>Guzzard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2005 20:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=368#comment-2509</guid>
		<description>Why would I use YackPack, it seems a little redundant, between, IM, Skype, and Waxmail it seems all so silly. Why not use the phone, cell phone...the list goes on. What was with that corny music...during the demo?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would I use YackPack, it seems a little redundant, between, IM, Skype, and Waxmail it seems all so silly. Why not use the phone, cell phone&#8230;the list goes on. What was with that corny music&#8230;during the demo?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BJ Fogg</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/11/05/yackpack-joins-the-click-record-crowd/#comment-2500</link>
		<dc:creator>BJ Fogg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2005 16:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=368#comment-2500</guid>
		<description>This is a good summary. Thanks! As the founder of YackPack, let me share a bit more backgound . . . 

Since we started rolling out the service a week ago, we've learned a lot. We've added to our long list of improvements needed. That said, our rollout is showing that people are using and liking YackPack as is. 

Personally, I can't wait to make YackPack better. Our engineering team has been releasing at least one major upgrade each week, so we're in process. 

You talk about lack of control over the sound files. Yep, you're right. You can't edit or download them (yet). We'll get there . . . . Also, I think the controls for audio playback need to be better. 

As a team we are constantly discussing the tradeoff between simplicity and functionality. For example, in a pilot version we had a "Back 8" button that would let you jump back in the audio 8 seconds. We found that people didn't use Back 8 much, so we removed it in the name of radical simplicity. Yes, we removed a feature that was already built.

We wanted to launch with the simplest service that still gives value.  

Now we're in feedback mode. We are listening to users to guide our next steps. In fact, we're doing more than listening . . . we've created a customer advisory board, a YackPack group that works directly with me (new advisors welcome).

So after one week of running the YackPack beta service, we've had no big disasters (whew). But it's getting harder to balance competing priorities. On Monday we're having a big meeting to focus our work on what matters most.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a good summary. Thanks! As the founder of YackPack, let me share a bit more backgound . . . </p>
<p>Since we started rolling out the service a week ago, we&#8217;ve learned a lot. We&#8217;ve added to our long list of improvements needed. That said, our rollout is showing that people are using and liking YackPack as is. </p>
<p>Personally, I can&#8217;t wait to make YackPack better. Our engineering team has been releasing at least one major upgrade each week, so we&#8217;re in process. </p>
<p>You talk about lack of control over the sound files. Yep, you&#8217;re right. You can&#8217;t edit or download them (yet). We&#8217;ll get there . . . . Also, I think the controls for audio playback need to be better. </p>
<p>As a team we are constantly discussing the tradeoff between simplicity and functionality. For example, in a pilot version we had a &#8220;Back 8&#8243; button that would let you jump back in the audio 8 seconds. We found that people didn&#8217;t use Back 8 much, so we removed it in the name of radical simplicity. Yes, we removed a feature that was already built.</p>
<p>We wanted to launch with the simplest service that still gives value.  </p>
<p>Now we&#8217;re in feedback mode. We are listening to users to guide our next steps. In fact, we&#8217;re doing more than listening . . . we&#8217;ve created a customer advisory board, a YackPack group that works directly with me (new advisors welcome).</p>
<p>So after one week of running the YackPack beta service, we&#8217;ve had no big disasters (whew). But it&#8217;s getting harder to balance competing priorities. On Monday we&#8217;re having a big meeting to focus our work on what matters most.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.063 seconds -->
