<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ma.gnolia: More Social Bookmarking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/22/magnolia-more-social-bookmarking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/22/magnolia-more-social-bookmarking/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:05:57 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: §</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/22/magnolia-more-social-bookmarking/comment-page-1/#comment-141876</link>
		<dc:creator>§</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 11:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/22/magnolia-more-social-bookmarking/#comment-141876</guid>
		<description>Domains like this are called &#039;hacked&#039;
names... I think they are good if they
are 2 letters with a 2 letter TLD, as
then they &#039;work&#039; and look like a proper
(well intended) word.

E.g. Recently, I came across www.re.st
this name is ok because it&#039;s easy to
remember, you can probably do cute
things with the dot (to make a great
logo) and it has some merit.

Based on the names alone, i&#039;d have to
pass on Ma.gnolia.com and Del.icio.us!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Domains like this are called &#8216;hacked&#8217;<br />
names&#8230; I think they are good if they<br />
are 2 letters with a 2 letter TLD, as<br />
then they &#8216;work&#8217; and look like a proper<br />
(well intended) word.</p>
<p>E.g. Recently, I came across <a href="http://www.re.st" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.re.st'>http://www.re.st</a><br />
this name is ok because it&#8217;s easy to<br />
remember, you can probably do cute<br />
things with the dot (to make a great<br />
logo) and it has some merit.</p>
<p>Based on the names alone, i&#8217;d have to<br />
pass on Ma.gnolia.com and Del.icio.us!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Sieling</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/22/magnolia-more-social-bookmarking/comment-page-1/#comment-2137</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Sieling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 07:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/22/magnolia-more-social-bookmarking/#comment-2137</guid>
		<description>If the domain name lexical fun is outlawed, I hope we can keep ours under a grandfather clause :)

The name does have a bit of a backstory, but it boiled down to wanting to give a nod to del.icio.us who kicked off social bookmarking and that we really, really wanted the name magnolia. But if you look at magnolia.com you&#039;ll see how we just weren&#039;t going to get it. 

Anyway, we get that the domain name style doesn&#039;t work for everyone. But I am glad to see interest in the features, where we definitely think we can impress, and maybe make the domain name easier to take.

(And thanks for the post, Michael!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the domain name lexical fun is outlawed, I hope we can keep ours under a grandfather clause <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>The name does have a bit of a backstory, but it boiled down to wanting to give a nod to del.icio.us who kicked off social bookmarking and that we really, really wanted the name magnolia. But if you look at magnolia.com you&#8217;ll see how we just weren&#8217;t going to get it. </p>
<p>Anyway, we get that the domain name style doesn&#8217;t work for everyone. But I am glad to see interest in the features, where we definitely think we can impress, and maybe make the domain name easier to take.</p>
<p>(And thanks for the post, Michael!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Cashmore</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/22/magnolia-more-social-bookmarking/comment-page-1/#comment-1917</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Cashmore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2005 18:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/22/magnolia-more-social-bookmarking/#comment-1917</guid>
		<description>Mike,

I agree - these ridiculous domain names should be outlawed.  Hopefully magnolia (where does that darned dot go again?) will make up for it with a killer service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,</p>
<p>I agree &#8211; these ridiculous domain names should be outlawed.  Hopefully magnolia (where does that darned dot go again?) will make up for it with a killer service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: folkmann.ca</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/22/magnolia-more-social-bookmarking/comment-page-1/#comment-1909</link>
		<dc:creator>folkmann.ca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2005 14:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/22/magnolia-more-social-bookmarking/#comment-1909</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Ab.ominations.com&lt;/strong&gt;

Michael Arrington at TechCrunch posts: Iâ€™m skeptical of companies that continue to launch with these domain name abominations (dropping vowels, using random ccTLDs and lots of extra dots), but if the service rocks, I will forgive all. Isn&#039;t the resu...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ab.ominations.com</strong></p>
<p>Michael Arrington at TechCrunch posts: Iâ€™m skeptical of companies that continue to launch with these domain name abominations (dropping vowels, using random ccTLDs and lots of extra dots), but if the service rocks, I will forgive all. Isn&#8217;t the resu&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Arrington</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/22/magnolia-more-social-bookmarking/comment-page-1/#comment-1884</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Arrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2005 19:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/22/magnolia-more-social-bookmarking/#comment-1884</guid>
		<description>The first comment is spam, but in this case I&#039;m not sure I mind. It&#039;s staying up. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first comment is spam, but in this case I&#8217;m not sure I mind. It&#8217;s staying up. <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: atmaspheric &#124; endeavors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ma.gnolia</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/22/magnolia-more-social-bookmarking/comment-page-1/#comment-1874</link>
		<dc:creator>atmaspheric &#124; endeavors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ma.gnolia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2005 13:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/22/magnolia-more-social-bookmarking/#comment-1874</guid>
		<description>[...] TechCrunch Â» Ma.gnolia: More Social Bookmarking [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TechCrunch Â» Ma.gnolia: More Social Bookmarking [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Dunn</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/22/magnolia-more-social-bookmarking/comment-page-1/#comment-1873</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Dunn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2005 13:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/22/magnolia-more-social-bookmarking/#comment-1873</guid>
		<description>Currently, a majority of people social bookmark the same way it&#039;s been done for nearly 10 years - email cc list or email forwarding. The email way I personally like because it allows me to see others on the cc list I can talk to directly.

With that said, social bookmarking has been attempted by companies such as blink.com in the nineties as well as yahoo. I believed they didn&#039;t become popular because they failed to acknowledge social subcultures. 

I&#039;m skeptical of these sites until they understand that people in SOHO think differently than a people in SOMA or people in SOBE, even if the keyword/tag is similiar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Currently, a majority of people social bookmark the same way it&#8217;s been done for nearly 10 years &#8211; email cc list or email forwarding. The email way I personally like because it allows me to see others on the cc list I can talk to directly.</p>
<p>With that said, social bookmarking has been attempted by companies such as blink.com in the nineties as well as yahoo. I believed they didn&#8217;t become popular because they failed to acknowledge social subcultures. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m skeptical of these sites until they understand that people in SOHO think differently than a people in SOMA or people in SOBE, even if the keyword/tag is similiar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Próxima utilidad</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/22/magnolia-more-social-bookmarking/comment-page-1/#comment-1872</link>
		<dc:creator>Próxima utilidad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2005 11:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/22/magnolia-more-social-bookmarking/#comment-1872</guid>
		<description>[...] TechCrunch [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TechCrunch [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
