<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ma.gnolia: More Social Bookmarking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/22/magnolia-more-social-bookmarking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/22/magnolia-more-social-bookmarking/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 03:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: §</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/22/magnolia-more-social-bookmarking/#comment-141876</link>
		<dc:creator>§</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 11:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/22/magnolia-more-social-bookmarking/#comment-141876</guid>
		<description>Domains like this are called 'hacked'
names... I think they are good if they
are 2 letters with a 2 letter TLD, as
then they 'work' and look like a proper
(well intended) word.

E.g. Recently, I came across www.re.st
this name is ok because it's easy to
remember, you can probably do cute
things with the dot (to make a great
logo) and it has some merit.

Based on the names alone, i'd have to
pass on Ma.gnolia.com and Del.icio.us!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Domains like this are called &#8216;hacked&#8217;<br />
names&#8230; I think they are good if they<br />
are 2 letters with a 2 letter TLD, as<br />
then they &#8216;work&#8217; and look like a proper<br />
(well intended) word.</p>
<p>E.g. Recently, I came across <a href="http://www.re.st" rel="nofollow">http://www.re.st</a><br />
this name is ok because it&#8217;s easy to<br />
remember, you can probably do cute<br />
things with the dot (to make a great<br />
logo) and it has some merit.</p>
<p>Based on the names alone, i&#8217;d have to<br />
pass on Ma.gnolia.com and Del.icio.us!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Sieling</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/22/magnolia-more-social-bookmarking/#comment-2137</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Sieling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 07:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/22/magnolia-more-social-bookmarking/#comment-2137</guid>
		<description>If the domain name lexical fun is outlawed, I hope we can keep ours under a grandfather clause :)

The name does have a bit of a backstory, but it boiled down to wanting to give a nod to del.icio.us who kicked off social bookmarking and that we really, really wanted the name magnolia. But if you look at magnolia.com you'll see how we just weren't going to get it. 

Anyway, we get that the domain name style doesn't work for everyone. But I am glad to see interest in the features, where we definitely think we can impress, and maybe make the domain name easier to take.

(And thanks for the post, Michael!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the domain name lexical fun is outlawed, I hope we can keep ours under a grandfather clause <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>The name does have a bit of a backstory, but it boiled down to wanting to give a nod to del.icio.us who kicked off social bookmarking and that we really, really wanted the name magnolia. But if you look at magnolia.com you&#8217;ll see how we just weren&#8217;t going to get it. </p>
<p>Anyway, we get that the domain name style doesn&#8217;t work for everyone. But I am glad to see interest in the features, where we definitely think we can impress, and maybe make the domain name easier to take.</p>
<p>(And thanks for the post, Michael!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Cashmore</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/22/magnolia-more-social-bookmarking/#comment-1917</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Cashmore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2005 18:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/22/magnolia-more-social-bookmarking/#comment-1917</guid>
		<description>Mike,

I agree - these ridiculous domain names should be outlawed.  Hopefully magnolia (where does that darned dot go again?) will make up for it with a killer service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,</p>
<p>I agree - these ridiculous domain names should be outlawed.  Hopefully magnolia (where does that darned dot go again?) will make up for it with a killer service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: folkmann.ca</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/22/magnolia-more-social-bookmarking/#comment-1909</link>
		<dc:creator>folkmann.ca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2005 14:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/22/magnolia-more-social-bookmarking/#comment-1909</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Ab.ominations.com&lt;/strong&gt;

Michael Arrington at TechCrunch posts: Iâ€™m skeptical of companies that continue to launch with these domain name abominations (dropping vowels, using random ccTLDs and lots of extra dots), but if the service rocks, I will forgive all. Isn't the resu...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ab.ominations.com</strong></p>
<p>Michael Arrington at TechCrunch posts: Iâ€™m skeptical of companies that continue to launch with these domain name abominations (dropping vowels, using random ccTLDs and lots of extra dots), but if the service rocks, I will forgive all. Isn&#8217;t the resu&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Arrington</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/22/magnolia-more-social-bookmarking/#comment-1884</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Arrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2005 19:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/22/magnolia-more-social-bookmarking/#comment-1884</guid>
		<description>The first comment is spam, but in this case I'm not sure I mind. It's staying up. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first comment is spam, but in this case I&#8217;m not sure I mind. It&#8217;s staying up. <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: atmaspheric &#124; endeavors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ma.gnolia</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/22/magnolia-more-social-bookmarking/#comment-1874</link>
		<dc:creator>atmaspheric &#124; endeavors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ma.gnolia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2005 13:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/22/magnolia-more-social-bookmarking/#comment-1874</guid>
		<description>[...] TechCrunch Â» Ma.gnolia: More Social Bookmarking [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TechCrunch Â» Ma.gnolia: More Social Bookmarking [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Dunn</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/22/magnolia-more-social-bookmarking/#comment-1873</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Dunn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2005 13:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/22/magnolia-more-social-bookmarking/#comment-1873</guid>
		<description>Currently, a majority of people social bookmark the same way it's been done for nearly 10 years - email cc list or email forwarding. The email way I personally like because it allows me to see others on the cc list I can talk to directly.

With that said, social bookmarking has been attempted by companies such as blink.com in the nineties as well as yahoo. I believed they didn't become popular because they failed to acknowledge social subcultures. 

I'm skeptical of these sites until they understand that people in SOHO think differently than a people in SOMA or people in SOBE, even if the keyword/tag is similiar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Currently, a majority of people social bookmark the same way it&#8217;s been done for nearly 10 years - email cc list or email forwarding. The email way I personally like because it allows me to see others on the cc list I can talk to directly.</p>
<p>With that said, social bookmarking has been attempted by companies such as blink.com in the nineties as well as yahoo. I believed they didn&#8217;t become popular because they failed to acknowledge social subcultures. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m skeptical of these sites until they understand that people in SOHO think differently than a people in SOMA or people in SOBE, even if the keyword/tag is similiar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Próxima utilidad</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/22/magnolia-more-social-bookmarking/#comment-1872</link>
		<dc:creator>Próxima utilidad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2005 11:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/22/magnolia-more-social-bookmarking/#comment-1872</guid>
		<description>[...] TechCrunch [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TechCrunch [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.043 seconds -->
