<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inform.com Doesn&#8217;t</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/16/informcom-doesnt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/16/informcom-doesnt/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 22:58:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Inform.com - Still Failing</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/16/informcom-doesnt/comment-page-1/#comment-2607716</link>
		<dc:creator>Inform.com - Still Failing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/16/informcom-doesnt/#comment-2607716</guid>
		<description>[...] accompanied by a hype-laden NY Times article and the revelation that it employs 55 people (!). Mike called it like he saw it, then followed up with some damage control - frankly, he was right the first time. Today I dropped [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] accompanied by a hype-laden NY Times article and the revelation that it employs 55 people (!). Mike called it like he saw it, then followed up with some damage control &#8211; frankly, he was right the first time. Today I dropped [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web App Roundup Numero 2!</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/16/informcom-doesnt/comment-page-1/#comment-2605799</link>
		<dc:creator>Web App Roundup Numero 2!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 03:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/16/informcom-doesnt/#comment-2605799</guid>
		<description>[...] they haven&#8217;t been launched to the public yet! I&#8217;ve also left off Inform, because most people agree that it&#8217;s a true beta and not yet ready for the big time.   SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: &quot;Web App Roundup Numero 2!&quot;, url: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] they haven&#8217;t been launched to the public yet! I&#8217;ve also left off Inform, because most people agree that it&#8217;s a true beta and not yet ready for the big time.   SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: &#8220;Web App Roundup Numero 2!&#8221;, url: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; Inform.comの最新サービス</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/16/informcom-doesnt/comment-page-1/#comment-118325</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; Inform.comの最新サービス</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 17:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/16/informcom-doesnt/#comment-118325</guid>
		<description>[...] 私は過去にInform.com に関してはあれや、これや記事を書いてきた。 (それからこの記事も)。 この会社はニューヨークに本拠を置くスタートアップで、巨額の資金を調達しているが、昨年末スタートしたニュースサービスは質が高いとはいえなかった。以来改善に向けて真剣な努力が続けられてきた。最新のInform Publisher Servicesはメジャーなウェブサイト制作者向けのサービスで、ユーザーの記事にアーカイブ中の（望むらくは）関係ある情報へのリンクを付加することでユーザーサイトのページビューの増加を図ろうという試み。この新サービスはウェブサイトに掲載されている記事に自動的にリンクを作成する。リンクはその記事内容に関連あるサイト内のページと Inform.comのアーカイブページに張られる。これにはブログの投稿や音声、動画も含まれる。このサービスは現在オクラホマの新聞社のサイトNewsOK.comに提供されている。具体例を見るにはこのページに行って、記事中のリンクのどれかをクリックしてみるとよい。2番目の段落中の“State Department”（国務省）をクリックしてみたところこのページに飛んだ。 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 私は過去にInform.com に関してはあれや、これや記事を書いてきた。 (それからこの記事も)。 この会社はニューヨークに本拠を置くスタートアップで、巨額の資金を調達しているが、昨年末スタートしたニュースサービスは質が高いとはいえなかった。以来改善に向けて真剣な努力が続けられてきた。最新のInform Publisher Servicesはメジャーなウェブサイト制作者向けのサービスで、ユーザーの記事にアーカイブ中の（望むらくは）関係ある情報へのリンクを付加することでユーザーサイトのページビューの増加を図ろうという試み。この新サービスはウェブサイトに掲載されている記事に自動的にリンクを作成する。リンクはその記事内容に関連あるサイト内のページと Inform.comのアーカイブページに張られる。これにはブログの投稿や音声、動画も含まれる。このサービスは現在オクラホマの新聞社のサイトNewsOK.comに提供されている。具体例を見るにはこのページに行って、記事中のリンクのどれかをクリックしてみるとよい。2番目の段落中の“State Department”（国務省）をクリックしてみたところこのページに飛んだ。 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SilverFusion.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Inform.com’s Latest Offering</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/16/informcom-doesnt/comment-page-1/#comment-118246</link>
		<dc:creator>SilverFusion.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Inform.com’s Latest Offering</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 15:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/16/informcom-doesnt/#comment-118246</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;ve gone back and forth on Inform.com in the past (we also covered them here). They are a massively funded New York startup that launched an inferior news product late last year. Since then, they&#8217;ve made real efforts to shake things up. Their newest product, Inform Publisher Services, is aimed at big web publishers, and is designed to help them increase page views by adding relevant links to other, hopefully related, content in their archives. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;ve gone back and forth on Inform.com in the past (we also covered them here). They are a massively funded New York startup that launched an inferior news product late last year. Since then, they&#8217;ve made real efforts to shake things up. Their newest product, Inform Publisher Services, is aimed at big web publishers, and is designed to help them increase page views by adding relevant links to other, hopefully related, content in their archives. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Inform.com&#8217;s Latest Offering</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/16/informcom-doesnt/comment-page-1/#comment-117922</link>
		<dc:creator>Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Inform.com&#8217;s Latest Offering</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 07:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/16/informcom-doesnt/#comment-117922</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;ve gone back and forth on Inform.com in the past (we also covered them here). They are a massively funded New York startup that launched an inferior news product late last year. Since then, they&#8217;ve made real efforts to shake things up. Their newest product, Inform Publisher Services, is aimed at big web publishers, and is designed to help them increase page views by adding relevant links to other, hopefully related, content in their archives. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;ve gone back and forth on Inform.com in the past (we also covered them here). They are a massively funded New York startup that launched an inferior news product late last year. Since then, they&#8217;ve made real efforts to shake things up. Their newest product, Inform Publisher Services, is aimed at big web publishers, and is designed to help them increase page views by adding relevant links to other, hopefully related, content in their archives. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jbyers - blog &#187; Tale of the Tape: Inform</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/16/informcom-doesnt/comment-page-1/#comment-20878</link>
		<dc:creator>jbyers - blog &#187; Tale of the Tape: Inform</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2006 08:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/16/informcom-doesnt/#comment-20878</guid>
		<description>[...] In case you looked at Squidoo&#8217;s graph and weren&#8217;t impressed, here&#8217;s a sobering comparison. I went poking around for sites that were TechCrunched around the same time Squidoo was in beta to see how other big-buzz launches stacked up. Inform.com caught my eye because of their launch double-whammy: a New York Times feature followed shortly by a TechCrunch evisceration. Five months later - with a more favorable second look by TechCrunch in December, the picture is not good. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In case you looked at Squidoo&#8217;s graph and weren&#8217;t impressed, here&#8217;s a sobering comparison. I went poking around for sites that were TechCrunched around the same time Squidoo was in beta to see how other big-buzz launches stacked up. Inform.com caught my eye because of their launch double-whammy: a New York Times feature followed shortly by a TechCrunch evisceration. Five months later &#8211; with a more favorable second look by TechCrunch in December, the picture is not good. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch &#187; Inform.com Re-Launches with Major Feature Changes</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/16/informcom-doesnt/comment-page-1/#comment-4445</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch &#187; Inform.com Re-Launches with Major Feature Changes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2005 08:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/16/informcom-doesnt/#comment-4445</guid>
		<description>[...] My previous profiles of Inform are here and here.   Tags: inform.com, inform, news, rss, techcrunch, web2.0, web+2.0  Categories: Profiles, Search &#124;  Bookmark this post with del.icio.us [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] My previous profiles of Inform are here and here.   Tags: inform.com, inform, news, rss, techcrunch, web2.0, web+2.0  Categories: Profiles, Search |  Bookmark this post with del.icio.us [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TECHNOSIGHT &#187; An Open Letter to TechCrunch&#8217;s Michael Arrington</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/16/informcom-doesnt/comment-page-1/#comment-2126</link>
		<dc:creator>TECHNOSIGHT &#187; An Open Letter to TechCrunch&#8217;s Michael Arrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 02:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/16/informcom-doesnt/#comment-2126</guid>
		<description>[...] As I commented on your blog some time back, I value it most as an objective resource, a fact based encyclopedia for Web 2.0 products and services. I understand that occasionally there will be some editorializing (as in the case of Inform.com) but I hope to see that reserved for your new companion blog going forward - and I plan on reading that one as often as TechCrunch. If you truly believe in letting the web decide, then I think TechCrunch can serve us best as an unbiased source for tracking Web 2.0. I know that&#8217;s a tough challenge but you seem more than capable for being up to the the task. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As I commented on your blog some time back, I value it most as an objective resource, a fact based encyclopedia for Web 2.0 products and services. I understand that occasionally there will be some editorializing (as in the case of Inform.com) but I hope to see that reserved for your new companion blog going forward &#8211; and I plan on reading that one as often as TechCrunch. If you truly believe in letting the web decide, then I think TechCrunch can serve us best as an unbiased source for tracking Web 2.0. I know that&#8217;s a tough challenge but you seem more than capable for being up to the the task. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch &#187; A Second Look at Inform.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/16/informcom-doesnt/comment-page-1/#comment-1919</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch &#187; A Second Look at Inform.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2005 19:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/16/informcom-doesnt/#comment-1919</guid>
		<description>[...] We hammered on Inform.com last week following their launch and a fluffy article in the New York Times. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We hammered on Inform.com last week following their launch and a fluffy article in the New York Times. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Look Beyond</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/16/informcom-doesnt/comment-page-1/#comment-1707</link>
		<dc:creator>Look Beyond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2005 15:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/16/informcom-doesnt/#comment-1707</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Well Informed?&lt;/strong&gt;

 Neal Goldman, founder and former CEO of CapitalIQ (acquired by Standard Poors last year for circa $225 million), this week launched his latest venture, Inform Technologies. Inform, currently in beta, is a news service designed to enable users to</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Well Informed?</strong></p>
<p> Neal Goldman, founder and former CEO of CapitalIQ (acquired by Standard Poors last year for circa $225 million), this week launched his latest venture, Inform Technologies. Inform, currently in beta, is a news service designed to enable users to</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tijs</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/16/informcom-doesnt/comment-page-1/#comment-1664</link>
		<dc:creator>Tijs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2005 08:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/16/informcom-doesnt/#comment-1664</guid>
		<description>What bothers me is not so much that the product sucks but more the fact that it took 55 people and millions of wasted dollars to come up with this crappy product. Small teams are better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What bothers me is not so much that the product sucks but more the fact that it took 55 people and millions of wasted dollars to come up with this crappy product. Small teams are better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/16/informcom-doesnt/comment-page-1/#comment-1642</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 23:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/16/informcom-doesnt/#comment-1642</guid>
		<description>They write this on their FAQ.  The virus doesn&#039;t seem to be harmful.  

Inform employs the very latest coding techniques to build its feature-rich and data-intensive news reading application for the web. Some antivirus programs have a trigger that shows a warning for JS.Wonka if they detect any complex Javascript code being downloaded by your browser. Unfortunately, this trigger can occasionally be activated by the code we use to deliver our web site to you, even though it is perfectly safe and clean from any viruses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They write this on their FAQ.  The virus doesn&#8217;t seem to be harmful.  </p>
<p>Inform employs the very latest coding techniques to build its feature-rich and data-intensive news reading application for the web. Some antivirus programs have a trigger that shows a warning for JS.Wonka if they detect any complex Javascript code being downloaded by your browser. Unfortunately, this trigger can occasionally be activated by the code we use to deliver our web site to you, even though it is perfectly safe and clean from any viruses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wonka</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/16/informcom-doesnt/comment-page-1/#comment-1620</link>
		<dc:creator>Wonka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 19:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/16/informcom-doesnt/#comment-1620</guid>
		<description>When I click the link on the inform.com to open the news site, my antirirus program spotted a virus called JS.Wonka. Any one has idea about that? Maybe there is a wrong javascript there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I click the link on the inform.com to open the news site, my antirirus program spotted a virus called JS.Wonka. Any one has idea about that? Maybe there is a wrong javascript there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Arrington</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/16/informcom-doesnt/comment-page-1/#comment-1616</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Arrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 17:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/16/informcom-doesnt/#comment-1616</guid>
		<description>#4 - typo fixed. thanks Mario

#5 - I think it was the combination of the Times fluff piece, the fact that it didn&#039;t support Firefox and that it presented itself as a google/yahoo killer. Also, this site has pop ups. POP UPs. Just incredibly stupid in my opinion. Also, I would have done a review and at least tried to point positive things out but the sofware was unusable to me. So I gave up and started firing missles.

I&#039;d love an email from the company or a dedicated user telling me what I&#039;ve missed. I&#039;ll happily do a follow up if I&#039;m incorrect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#4 &#8211; typo fixed. thanks Mario</p>
<p>#5 &#8211; I think it was the combination of the Times fluff piece, the fact that it didn&#8217;t support Firefox and that it presented itself as a google/yahoo killer. Also, this site has pop ups. POP UPs. Just incredibly stupid in my opinion. Also, I would have done a review and at least tried to point positive things out but the sofware was unusable to me. So I gave up and started firing missles.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d love an email from the company or a dedicated user telling me what I&#8217;ve missed. I&#8217;ll happily do a follow up if I&#8217;m incorrect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Make You Go Hmm: &#187; Being an Inform-ant sucks</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/16/informcom-doesnt/comment-page-1/#comment-1610</link>
		<dc:creator>Make You Go Hmm: &#187; Being an Inform-ant sucks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 17:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/16/informcom-doesnt/#comment-1610</guid>
		<description>[...] Naturally, inform.com has a few bloggers talking about them &#8212; and I&#8217;ll be one more &#8212; but probably not in the way they had hoped our readers would be informed, including Techcrunch&#8217;s descriptive and honest title: Inform.com Doesn&#8217;t: I honestly canâ€™t figure out what it is, even after reading the Times fluff piece. They say its an RSS Reader but adding feeds is anything but easy. Newbies need simplicity. Oldbies want something that handles a ton of feeds efficiently. This does neither. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Naturally, inform.com has a few bloggers talking about them &#8212; and I&#8217;ll be one more &#8212; but probably not in the way they had hoped our readers would be informed, including Techcrunch&#8217;s descriptive and honest title: Inform.com Doesn&#8217;t: I honestly canâ€™t figure out what it is, even after reading the Times fluff piece. They say its an RSS Reader but adding feeds is anything but easy. Newbies need simplicity. Oldbies want something that handles a ton of feeds efficiently. This does neither. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technoogle &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Inform, another RSS Reader, any different?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/16/informcom-doesnt/comment-page-1/#comment-1609</link>
		<dc:creator>Technoogle &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Inform, another RSS Reader, any different?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 16:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/16/informcom-doesnt/#comment-1609</guid>
		<description>[...] Here are Mikeâ€™s words about it, and here are Steveâ€™s and Rafatâ€™s, so you get the point that itâ€™s nothing impressive or different. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Here are Mikeâ€™s words about it, and here are Steveâ€™s and Rafatâ€™s, so you get the point that itâ€™s nothing impressive or different. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Things That ... Make You Go Hmm</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/16/informcom-doesnt/comment-page-1/#comment-1608</link>
		<dc:creator>Things That ... Make You Go Hmm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 16:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/16/informcom-doesnt/#comment-1608</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Being an Inform-ant sucks&lt;/strong&gt;

	An aggressive start-up from New York called inform.com is making some pretty large claims, throwing down the gaunlet that it can do things that Yahoo news and Google News cannot.
	
	
But Inform goes further, scanning every news article from hundreds o...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Being an Inform-ant sucks</strong></p>
<p>	An aggressive start-up from New York called inform.com is making some pretty large claims, throwing down the gaunlet that it can do things that Yahoo news and Google News cannot.</p>
<p>But Inform goes further, scanning every news article from hundreds o&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/16/informcom-doesnt/comment-page-1/#comment-1605</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 13:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/16/informcom-doesnt/#comment-1605</guid>
		<description>And the links bar is gone, so no bookmarklets which means no social bookmarking. That alone is a deal breaker for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the links bar is gone, so no bookmarklets which means no social bookmarking. That alone is a deal breaker for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/16/informcom-doesnt/comment-page-1/#comment-1596</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 10:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/16/informcom-doesnt/#comment-1596</guid>
		<description>It mentions on the 1st page that it works best with IE (although I prefer FF.  So I used IE.

My thoughts:
It&#039;s a bit quirky and not at all &quot;elegant&quot; in design, and it&#039;s &quot;discovery area&quot; takes some getting used to.  But, once you have selected an article, the Top Stories and My Sources newsreader interface is quite nice.

Split into 3 sections:
1. Top left it is easy to switch between sections (world news, sports, etc)

2.  The bottom left gives an easy to read blurb on each aricls.

3.  THe Right pane shows the whole article in html without having to open a new page or leave the reader (this alone - just IMHO - makes it much better than Readers like Bloglines, newsgator).


Separately:
1. The Flag article (for later viewing) feature is easy to use and handy.

2.  I did find thh My Channles section tough to set up in a may that attracted meaningful results.  A few common key words sometimes even attracted no results.  Disappointing. 

3.  There is no way yet (they say it is coming) to add RSS feeds, let alone import an OPML so serious RSS feeders that target specific sites not included in their sources will find Inform useless. 

4.  The Hot Channels section is OK for people just looking to Discover news for fun but not very helpful for targeted searching.

The interface in general is easy enough to pick up in a few minutes.  Again not elegant but definitely not awful?

NET I don&#039;t understand your disdainful review.  To me it is un unfinished product that may be useful to casual newsreaders or readers of the major news services.  It needs some feature upgrades to be any use to power users (RSS and OPML import).  Its Reader specific layout - once you have settled on a source is fine in fact quite good.

It&#039;s a work in progress that shows some potential in my opinion.  But by  the sound of your comments it is clearly not useable with Firefox. 


I mainly posted this because you seem so positive about nearly every product - many which seem pretty minor in use to me - so I was curious to check this site out after you lambasted it.

Regards,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It mentions on the 1st page that it works best with IE (although I prefer FF.  So I used IE.</p>
<p>My thoughts:<br />
It&#8217;s a bit quirky and not at all &#8220;elegant&#8221; in design, and it&#8217;s &#8220;discovery area&#8221; takes some getting used to.  But, once you have selected an article, the Top Stories and My Sources newsreader interface is quite nice.</p>
<p>Split into 3 sections:<br />
1. Top left it is easy to switch between sections (world news, sports, etc)</p>
<p>2.  The bottom left gives an easy to read blurb on each aricls.</p>
<p>3.  THe Right pane shows the whole article in html without having to open a new page or leave the reader (this alone &#8211; just IMHO &#8211; makes it much better than Readers like Bloglines, newsgator).</p>
<p>Separately:<br />
1. The Flag article (for later viewing) feature is easy to use and handy.</p>
<p>2.  I did find thh My Channles section tough to set up in a may that attracted meaningful results.  A few common key words sometimes even attracted no results.  Disappointing. </p>
<p>3.  There is no way yet (they say it is coming) to add RSS feeds, let alone import an OPML so serious RSS feeders that target specific sites not included in their sources will find Inform useless. </p>
<p>4.  The Hot Channels section is OK for people just looking to Discover news for fun but not very helpful for targeted searching.</p>
<p>The interface in general is easy enough to pick up in a few minutes.  Again not elegant but definitely not awful?</p>
<p>NET I don&#8217;t understand your disdainful review.  To me it is un unfinished product that may be useful to casual newsreaders or readers of the major news services.  It needs some feature upgrades to be any use to power users (RSS and OPML import).  Its Reader specific layout &#8211; once you have settled on a source is fine in fact quite good.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a work in progress that shows some potential in my opinion.  But by  the sound of your comments it is clearly not useable with Firefox. </p>
<p>I mainly posted this because you seem so positive about nearly every product &#8211; many which seem pretty minor in use to me &#8211; so I was curious to check this site out after you lambasted it.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mario</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/16/informcom-doesnt/comment-page-1/#comment-1595</link>
		<dc:creator>Mario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 09:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/16/informcom-doesnt/#comment-1595</guid>
		<description>You must really really dislike it - you even made the link point to zopa.com instead of inform.com :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You must really really dislike it &#8211; you even made the link point to zopa.com instead of inform.com <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Purcell</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/16/informcom-doesnt/comment-page-1/#comment-1581</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Purcell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 06:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/16/informcom-doesnt/#comment-1581</guid>
		<description>Seems like they went out of their way to break almost every usability rule there is. I think the &quot;Take a Quick Tutorial&quot; link is the best. I shouldn&#039;t need a quick tutorial, I should just &quot;get it&quot; from the beginning. I actually think I will use this site in my usability lecture this week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like they went out of their way to break almost every usability rule there is. I think the &#8220;Take a Quick Tutorial&#8221; link is the best. I shouldn&#8217;t need a quick tutorial, I should just &#8220;get it&#8221; from the beginning. I actually think I will use this site in my usability lecture this week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frederico Oliveira</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/16/informcom-doesnt/comment-page-1/#comment-1577</link>
		<dc:creator>Frederico Oliveira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 05:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/16/informcom-doesnt/#comment-1577</guid>
		<description>Ditto.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ditto.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian K</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/16/informcom-doesnt/comment-page-1/#comment-1576</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 05:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/16/informcom-doesnt/#comment-1576</guid>
		<description>No, you aren&#039;t missing anything. it&#039;s horrible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, you aren&#8217;t missing anything. it&#8217;s horrible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
