<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Office &#8211; WTF?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/04/279/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/04/279/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:43:35 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Doris W</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/04/279/comment-page-1/#comment-2560106</link>
		<dc:creator>Doris W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 09:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/04/279/#comment-2560106</guid>
		<description>Hello , I am Doris Wang on the ning .com .My space address is : http://lifestar558.ning.com welcome to visite it ,thanks in advance !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello , I am Doris Wang on the ning .com .My space address is : <a href="http://lifestar558.ning.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://lifestar558.ning.com'>http://lifestar558.ning.com</a> welcome to visite it ,thanks in advance !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/04/279/comment-page-1/#comment-373071</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 15:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/04/279/#comment-373071</guid>
		<description>Cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goo(gle)sphere &#124; .:&#124;randgaenge&#124;:.&#124;.:ISSN 1680-4961:.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/04/279/comment-page-1/#comment-220099</link>
		<dc:creator>Goo(gle)sphere &#124; .:&#124;randgaenge&#124;:.&#124;.:ISSN 1680-4961:.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 08:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/04/279/#comment-220099</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;m not entirely convinced if that&#8217;s really fun for us. Although def. a relevant move form the desktop pc to the web as platform.I anticipate lots of competitors on a less diffused customer base but only one click away.Made def. sense for Google (t d f) to invest in storage to give away and data-mining to harness the fruits.[Update:] I think we&#8217;ll see java-enabled OpenOffice (t d f) via the browser (or/and the Google Toolbar) pretty soon. Update again: we are getting closer. As widely anticipated , Google and&#8230;: &#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;m not entirely convinced if that&#8217;s really fun for us. Although def. a relevant move form the desktop pc to the web as platform.I anticipate lots of competitors on a less diffused customer base but only one click away.Made def. sense for Google (t d f) to invest in storage to give away and data-mining to harness the fruits.[Update:] I think we&#8217;ll see java-enabled OpenOffice (t d f) via the browser (or/and the Google Toolbar) pretty soon. Update again: we are getting closer. As widely anticipated , Google and&#8230;: &#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kivi Eija</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/04/279/comment-page-1/#comment-2690</link>
		<dc:creator>Kivi Eija</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 12:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/04/279/#comment-2690</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;TechCrunch &#187; Google Office - WTF?&lt;/strong&gt;

TechCrunch &#187; Goo...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>TechCrunch &raquo; Google Office &#8211; WTF?<br />
</strong></p>
<p>TechCrunch &raquo; Goo&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/04/279/comment-page-1/#comment-1262</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2005 22:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/04/279/#comment-1262</guid>
		<description>Wait a minute, maybe they&#039;re not publicly announcing everything yet.  Just because they didn&#039;t announce it doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s not in the works...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait a minute, maybe they&#8217;re not publicly announcing everything yet.  Just because they didn&#8217;t announce it doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s not in the works&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ah Knight&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Hu-ha about the Google Office</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/04/279/comment-page-1/#comment-1230</link>
		<dc:creator>Ah Knight&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Hu-ha about the Google Office</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2005 00:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/04/279/#comment-1230</guid>
		<description>[...] Just saw a post that mention about the partnership btw &lt;Google and Sun Microsystems , a lot of hu-ha when the user find out that the partnership is not aiming for &quot;Google Office&quot; - an idea using all the office suite on web. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Just saw a post that mention about the partnership btw &lt;Google and Sun Microsystems , a lot of hu-ha when the user find out that the partnership is not aiming for &quot;Google Office&quot; &#8211; an idea using all the office suite on web. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/04/279/comment-page-1/#comment-1213</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2005 17:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/04/279/#comment-1213</guid>
		<description>They&#039;ve come to the point.. just like Microsoft... that we expect too much out of them and very little will wow us now. It was inevitable, but I didn&#039;t expect it to happen so quickly. That&#039;s what happens when you have so many teams burried within a population of 3000+ Googlites and nobody from the real world to bash them on the head with the reality bat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;ve come to the point.. just like Microsoft&#8230; that we expect too much out of them and very little will wow us now. It was inevitable, but I didn&#8217;t expect it to happen so quickly. That&#8217;s what happens when you have so many teams burried within a population of 3000+ Googlites and nobody from the real world to bash them on the head with the reality bat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dav</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/04/279/comment-page-1/#comment-1209</link>
		<dc:creator>Dav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2005 15:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/04/279/#comment-1209</guid>
		<description>McNealy&#039;s speaking style is category windbag, for sure. His funniest line though was something along the lines of:

McNealy: Google has great employees ...a lot of them used to work for us!
Schmidt: You promised you wouldn&#039;t talk about that.
McNealy: Well I did.

(p.s Macewan, high larious)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McNealy&#8217;s speaking style is category windbag, for sure. His funniest line though was something along the lines of:</p>
<p>McNealy: Google has great employees &#8230;a lot of them used to work for us!<br />
Schmidt: You promised you wouldn&#8217;t talk about that.<br />
McNealy: Well I did.</p>
<p>(p.s Macewan, high larious)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LiewCF.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/04/279/comment-page-1/#comment-1207</link>
		<dc:creator>LiewCF.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2005 07:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/04/279/#comment-1207</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Sorry, NO Google Office yet.&lt;/strong&gt;

	Sorry, there is no &quot;Google Office&quot;, at least not so soon.

...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Sorry, NO Google Office yet.</strong></p>
<p>	Sorry, there is no &#8220;Google Office&#8221;, at least not so soon.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Razvan Antonescu</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/04/279/comment-page-1/#comment-1204</link>
		<dc:creator>Razvan Antonescu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2005 06:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/04/279/#comment-1204</guid>
		<description>And that god damn toolbar is not compatible with FF beta. I mean most of their products are in beta but they don&#039;t make it compatible with others. Quite lame</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And that god damn toolbar is not compatible with FF beta. I mean most of their products are in beta but they don&#8217;t make it compatible with others. Quite lame</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/04/279/comment-page-1/#comment-1203</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2005 04:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/04/279/#comment-1203</guid>
		<description>Can we say Google hype?

I think there is far too much of it and Google is definitely trying to feed it.  However, I hope this will help people pay a little less attention the next time the rumour mill and noise starts to come out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can we say Google hype?</p>
<p>I think there is far too much of it and Google is definitely trying to feed it.  However, I hope this will help people pay a little less attention the next time the rumour mill and noise starts to come out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/04/279/comment-page-1/#comment-1201</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2005 03:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/04/279/#comment-1201</guid>
		<description>Michael (#15) - it looks to me like the whole thing was pushed by Sun. Like a high school girl who can never get dates always dreams of hanging out with football team captain, Sun is there announcing this *huge deal* in Mountain View, waving and screaming &quot;Look at us, we&#039;re not as irrelevant as you thought&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael (#15) &#8211; it looks to me like the whole thing was pushed by Sun. Like a high school girl who can never get dates always dreams of hanging out with football team captain, Sun is there announcing this *huge deal* in Mountain View, waving and screaming &#8220;Look at us, we&#8217;re not as irrelevant as you thought&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Splain</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/04/279/comment-page-1/#comment-1200</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Splain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2005 03:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/04/279/#comment-1200</guid>
		<description>haha yeah, google definately got us again.  Everyone knows they love playing these games, it just draws up hype for their products.  Most of us saw one of the first major times they did it, gmail on april fools.  That wasn&#039;t a mistake that they released it on that day, it just caused more of a talk.  Same went when the made google talk, opened the server and domain a day before it was released, knowing people would find it.  Google loves playing games, and i&#039;m sure they&#039;ll get us again like this many times in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha yeah, google definately got us again.  Everyone knows they love playing these games, it just draws up hype for their products.  Most of us saw one of the first major times they did it, gmail on april fools.  That wasn&#8217;t a mistake that they released it on that day, it just caused more of a talk.  Same went when the made google talk, opened the server and domain a day before it was released, knowing people would find it.  Google loves playing games, and i&#8217;m sure they&#8217;ll get us again like this many times in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Arrington</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/04/279/comment-page-1/#comment-1196</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Arrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2005 01:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/04/279/#comment-1196</guid>
		<description>nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: macewan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/04/279/comment-page-1/#comment-1194</link>
		<dc:creator>macewan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2005 00:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/04/279/#comment-1194</guid>
		<description>http://www.macewan.org/wp-content/images/CaliforniaDreamin.png</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.macewan.org/wp-content/images/CaliforniaDreamin.png" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.macewan.org/wp-content/images/CaliforniaDreamin.png'>http://www.mace...rniaDreamin.png</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Arrington</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/04/279/comment-page-1/#comment-1189</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Arrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 22:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/04/279/#comment-1189</guid>
		<description>Alex, I think this story could have been handled with a press release. The fact that they scheduled a webcast with the two CEOs suggested that there was, in fact, something interesting to tell us. That&#039;s the main reason I think Google &quot;got&quot; us on this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex, I think this story could have been handled with a press release. The fact that they scheduled a webcast with the two CEOs suggested that there was, in fact, something interesting to tell us. That&#8217;s the main reason I think Google &#8220;got&#8221; us on this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freeb0rn</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/04/279/comment-page-1/#comment-1187</link>
		<dc:creator>freeb0rn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 22:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/04/279/#comment-1187</guid>
		<description>This served to do exactly what Sun and Google wanted. They tested the waters to see just how far they could string people along with so little. So little information was released yet it generated enormous hype--and it seems to grow with every &quot;project&quot; Google unveils. I think if we give it a few more months--possibly a year--we&#039;ll definitely see something substantial come out of this joint venture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This served to do exactly what Sun and Google wanted. They tested the waters to see just how far they could string people along with so little. So little information was released yet it generated enormous hype&#8211;and it seems to grow with every &#8220;project&#8221; Google unveils. I think if we give it a few more months&#8211;possibly a year&#8211;we&#8217;ll definitely see something substantial come out of this joint venture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeof</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/04/279/comment-page-1/#comment-1186</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 21:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/04/279/#comment-1186</guid>
		<description>Agree with Alex - the web2 community got ourselves all hyped up ... Google didn&#039;t do it to us. On the heels of a dozen AJAX office-esque apps and the rumors of a Google calendar (since calendar.google.com seems to be a working subdomain while office.google.com is not), we kind of jumped the gun on our expectations.  Partnering with Sun to pat each other on the back is merely the forefunner.  MS Office wasn&#039;t developed in a day (or maybe it was ... dang it that&#039;s why its messed up!), we can&#039;t expect more of Google just because they know what they&#039;re doing - they&#039;re pattern is to release a little bit at a time, and they&#039;ve released a lot lately. give &#039;em time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with Alex &#8211; the web2 community got ourselves all hyped up &#8230; Google didn&#8217;t do it to us. On the heels of a dozen AJAX office-esque apps and the rumors of a Google calendar (since calendar.google.com seems to be a working subdomain while office.google.com is not), we kind of jumped the gun on our expectations.  Partnering with Sun to pat each other on the back is merely the forefunner.  MS Office wasn&#8217;t developed in a day (or maybe it was &#8230; dang it that&#8217;s why its messed up!), we can&#8217;t expect more of Google just because they know what they&#8217;re doing &#8211; they&#8217;re pattern is to release a little bit at a time, and they&#8217;ve released a lot lately. give &#8216;em time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shane</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/04/279/comment-page-1/#comment-1185</link>
		<dc:creator>shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 21:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/04/279/#comment-1185</guid>
		<description>The links did work eventually.  I watched it and it was kind of disappointing.  there were a few tasty tidbits.  Check out http://www.supergeekblog.com  for in depth coverage of the webcast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The links did work eventually.  I watched it and it was kind of disappointing.  there were a few tasty tidbits.  Check out <a href="http://www.supergeekblog.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.supergeekblog.com'>http://www.supergeekblog.com</a>  for in depth coverage of the webcast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/04/279/comment-page-1/#comment-1184</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 21:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/04/279/#comment-1184</guid>
		<description>Who said there was going to be anything interesting? Google announced a joint press conference with Sun, and they delivered a joint press conference with Sun. The fact that people had all the expectations up is not their fault.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who said there was going to be anything interesting? Google announced a joint press conference with Sun, and they delivered a joint press conference with Sun. The fact that people had all the expectations up is not their fault.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: macewan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/04/279/comment-page-1/#comment-1183</link>
		<dc:creator>macewan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 21:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/04/279/#comment-1183</guid>
		<description>I watched about 20 minutes of Scott &amp; his Sun infomercial. Quite disappointing - huge waste of time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watched about 20 minutes of Scott &amp; his Sun infomercial. Quite disappointing &#8211; huge waste of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Aman</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/04/279/comment-page-1/#comment-1181</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Aman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 20:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/04/279/#comment-1181</guid>
		<description>Frankly, this announcement was exactly what I expected.  I was counting on it being approximately equivalent to Google announcing that they really liked Firefox a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frankly, this announcement was exactly what I expected.  I was counting on it being approximately equivalent to Google announcing that they really liked Firefox a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/04/279/comment-page-1/#comment-1178</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 20:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/04/279/#comment-1178</guid>
		<description>This was what I got from it:
&quot;Hey everybody! We&#039;re going to bundle our lame toolbar into Javas JRE!!! aren&#039;t you all happy for us!!&quot;

The press: &quot;So... is there anything else? I mean are you going to put openoffice in a browser or like... make some cool new Java thing?&quot;

Google/Sun - &quot;No, don&#039;t you see how cool this is!! the JRE comes with the lame toolbar!! the JRE is downloaded 20 million times a month, that means a lot of people will have the lame toolbar!!&quot;

What a waste.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was what I got from it:<br />
&#8220;Hey everybody! We&#8217;re going to bundle our lame toolbar into Javas JRE!!! aren&#8217;t you all happy for us!!&#8221;</p>
<p>The press: &#8220;So&#8230; is there anything else? I mean are you going to put openoffice in a browser or like&#8230; make some cool new Java thing?&#8221;</p>
<p>Google/Sun &#8211; &#8220;No, don&#8217;t you see how cool this is!! the JRE comes with the lame toolbar!! the JRE is downloaded 20 million times a month, that means a lot of people will have the lame toolbar!!&#8221;</p>
<p>What a waste.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dalibor</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/04/279/comment-page-1/#comment-1172</link>
		<dc:creator>Dalibor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 19:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/04/279/#comment-1172</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve seen that coming. No web office suite yet. The reason is clear. It&#039;s about smart marketing which shuold generate demand. Demand for Google Office ( ajaxed ). We still need to come that way in terms of user awareness. Of course, some time in the future the concept of Google word processing will come out with storage and some fancy stuff ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen that coming. No web office suite yet. The reason is clear. It&#8217;s about smart marketing which shuold generate demand. Demand for Google Office ( ajaxed ). We still need to come that way in terms of user awareness. Of course, some time in the future the concept of Google word processing will come out with storage and some fancy stuff <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracey</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/04/279/comment-page-1/#comment-1171</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 19:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/10/04/279/#comment-1171</guid>
		<description>This overhyped speculation of future Google products, services and applications around the blogosphere and getting out of  hand.  

I really didn&#039;t see the impact of the Google Desktop search when it was initially announced.  

I am missing something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This overhyped speculation of future Google products, services and applications around the blogosphere and getting out of  hand.  </p>
<p>I really didn&#8217;t see the impact of the Google Desktop search when it was initially announced.  </p>
<p>I am missing something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
