<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ajax Dictionary - ObjectGraph</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/09/19/ajax-dictionary-objectgraph/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/09/19/ajax-dictionary-objectgraph/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 20:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: adult internet station tv</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/09/19/ajax-dictionary-objectgraph/#comment-1597212</link>
		<dc:creator>adult internet station tv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 04:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/09/19/ajax-dictionary-objectgraph/#comment-1597212</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;adult internet station tv...&lt;/strong&gt;

Techcrunch » Blog Archive » Ajax Dictionary - ObjectGraph...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>adult internet station tv&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Techcrunch » Blog Archive » Ajax Dictionary - ObjectGraph&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch &#187; Web 2.0 This Week (September 18-24)</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/09/19/ajax-dictionary-objectgraph/#comment-974</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch &#187; Web 2.0 This Week (September 18-24)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2005 22:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/09/19/ajax-dictionary-objectgraph/#comment-974</guid>
		<description>[...] FilmLoop, Mefeedia, Placeopedia, ObjectGraph, Google Wifi, Feedburner (stats), Truveo, TailRank, Searchfox (update), VideoEgg, Remote Control Mail, Slawesome, Findory (update), Attensa (update). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] FilmLoop, Mefeedia, Placeopedia, ObjectGraph, Google Wifi, Feedburner (stats), Truveo, TailRank, Searchfox (update), VideoEgg, Remote Control Mail, Slawesome, Findory (update), Attensa (update). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous Coweard</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/09/19/ajax-dictionary-objectgraph/#comment-889</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous Coweard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2005 03:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/09/19/ajax-dictionary-objectgraph/#comment-889</guid>
		<description>You missed the whole point here, the corpus doesn't matter at all, the main thing is the technology behind it and how well they expxlained it.

I'm pretty positive it wasn't their plan to make a serious dictionary out of this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You missed the whole point here, the corpus doesn&#8217;t matter at all, the main thing is the technology behind it and how well they expxlained it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m pretty positive it wasn&#8217;t their plan to make a serious dictionary out of this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe Morris</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/09/19/ajax-dictionary-objectgraph/#comment-841</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2005 22:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/09/19/ajax-dictionary-objectgraph/#comment-841</guid>
		<description>Great concept. However, to repeat comments Iâ€™ve made elsewhere, and as Download Squad points out, it seems that its d-base is based on a dictionary from 1913!!! Thatâ€™s a pretty old corpus. The language has changed a lot since then. Look up â€œweirdâ€?, â€œterribleâ€?, or â€œdateâ€? and youâ€™ll see what I mean. In addition to problems with old words that have acquired new senses over the last 92 years, the ObjectGraph corpus is missing new words that have since entered the English language such as taco, tsunami, wow, and workout (referring to either exercise or the bankruptcy alternative).

Of course, using an out-of-date dictionary whose copyright has expired is perhaps the only way ObjectGraph could obtain a corpus without paying an exorbitant licensing fee to dictionary publishers. Perhaps they could link up with Wiktionary in order to obtain a more current reference base?

This may all seem pedantic to native speakers that mostly consult online dictionaries for spelling help and who will be able to navigate their way around the occasional archaism. However, English is a global language with more second language speakers than native ones and these non-native speakers will have trouble making sense of the outdated definitions. 

The interesting thing is that comparing definitions on ObjectGraph, Dictionary.com, and Wiktionary helps showcase the power of wikis for capturing information related to non-static organisms like language. To take one example, look up â€œcheesyâ€?. ObjectGraph lacks the modern sense. Dictionary.com defines the modern sense inaccurately. Only Wiktionary gets it right.

ObjectGraph provides one sense: â€œHaving the nature, qualities, taste, form, consistency, or appearance of cheese.â€?
Dictionary.com provides two senses: 1) Containing or resembling cheese; and 2) Informal. Of poor quality; shoddy.
And on Wiktionary: 1) of or related to cheese; 2) sappy; overly dramatic, emotional, clichÃ©d or silly

To repeat â€“ I like the concept â€“thereâ€™s just a bit of a clash between all the 21st century Ajax and your greatgrandmotherâ€™s English.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great concept. However, to repeat comments Iâ€™ve made elsewhere, and as Download Squad points out, it seems that its d-base is based on a dictionary from 1913!!! Thatâ€™s a pretty old corpus. The language has changed a lot since then. Look up â€œweirdâ€?, â€œterribleâ€?, or â€œdateâ€? and youâ€™ll see what I mean. In addition to problems with old words that have acquired new senses over the last 92 years, the ObjectGraph corpus is missing new words that have since entered the English language such as taco, tsunami, wow, and workout (referring to either exercise or the bankruptcy alternative).</p>
<p>Of course, using an out-of-date dictionary whose copyright has expired is perhaps the only way ObjectGraph could obtain a corpus without paying an exorbitant licensing fee to dictionary publishers. Perhaps they could link up with Wiktionary in order to obtain a more current reference base?</p>
<p>This may all seem pedantic to native speakers that mostly consult online dictionaries for spelling help and who will be able to navigate their way around the occasional archaism. However, English is a global language with more second language speakers than native ones and these non-native speakers will have trouble making sense of the outdated definitions. </p>
<p>The interesting thing is that comparing definitions on ObjectGraph, Dictionary.com, and Wiktionary helps showcase the power of wikis for capturing information related to non-static organisms like language. To take one example, look up â€œcheesyâ€?. ObjectGraph lacks the modern sense. Dictionary.com defines the modern sense inaccurately. Only Wiktionary gets it right.</p>
<p>ObjectGraph provides one sense: â€œHaving the nature, qualities, taste, form, consistency, or appearance of cheese.â€?<br />
Dictionary.com provides two senses: 1) Containing or resembling cheese; and 2) Informal. Of poor quality; shoddy.<br />
And on Wiktionary: 1) of or related to cheese; 2) sappy; overly dramatic, emotional, clichÃ©d or silly</p>
<p>To repeat â€“ I like the concept â€“thereâ€™s just a bit of a clash between all the 21st century Ajax and your greatgrandmotherâ€™s English.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.043 seconds -->
