« Previous post
Next post »

September 12, 2005

Zimbra - Web/Ajax Based Outlook

Michael Arrington

15 comments »

Company: Zimbra
Founded: 2003
Location: San Mateo, CA

We saw that really well done Ajax web applications like Writely can open people’s eyes to the future of the computing and the place that web 2.0 has in that future.

When you first view the Zimbra demo you may have a similar experience. Zimbra is, basically, a web based outlook/iCal/Thunderbird application in the same way that Writely is a web based version of Word.

At Zimbra, our goal is to make e-mail, calendar, contacts and other communications technologies the best they can be. We believe that by opening the technology to the community we will insure that we can maximize innovation, scale and the ability to co-exist with existing messaging systems.

There are some core differences between how Zimbra and Writely approach their respective markets, however. Writely is a proprietary, hosted application (although they import and export in Word and other formats). Zimbra is an open source project, and is presented only in demo form at this point - if you want to run it you have to do so on your own servers.

So while Zimbra is not something you can immediately start using, you can view a hosted demo here and a flash demo here. The source code is available on the download page here.

Zimbra also integrates tagging of messages. It’s very impressive and quite beautiful.

Additional Reading

Solution Watch (thank for the tip, Brian), Ajaxian, batalion, Digital Hobo, Deep’s Home, Alice Hill,

  • Sphere It

This entry was posted on Monday, September 12th, 2005 at 8:30 pm and is filed under Company & Product Profiles. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Trackbacks/Pings (Trackback URL)

  1. Ted Media

    September 13th, 2005 at 1:13 am

  2. netgeek.com » Blog Archive » More on mail (tags, ajax, and labels)

    September 13th, 2005 at 7:08 am

  3. 3e-lab, home of rob poitras

    September 27th, 2005 at 1:52 pm

  4. Zimbra - Blog

    October 5th, 2005 at 3:22 pm

  5. TechCrunch » The Companies of Web 2.0, Part 1

    October 5th, 2005 at 10:06 pm

  6. Sean’s weblog » JA-SIG: AJAX

    December 12th, 2005 at 5:57 am

  7. TechCrunch » Web 2.0 This Week (September 11-17)

    December 25th, 2005 at 5:50 pm

  8. אנקדוטות » I am not a number, I’m a free man

    March 15th, 2006 at 4:19 pm

  9. Zimbra: 6 million Paying Customers

    January 26th, 2007 at 12:11 am

  10. OSS Musings :: Entries :: Zimbra Email - FOSS Exchange Replacement with a breathtaking AJAX interface

    February 21st, 2007 at 2:44 pm

  11. SUCKERPOP » Blog Archive » Yahoo Acquires Zimbra.com For $350 million in Cash

    January 29th, 2008 at 1:37 pm

Comments

RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. rnhasan

    November 18th, 2006 at 3:53 pm

    ok

  2. asdferrty

    January 11th, 2007 at 8:24 am

    We had deployed Zimbra 4.0.3 Open Source edition on Ubuntu — everything was working fine until we upgraded to 4.0.5 and certain key parts stopped working. We tried to post to the “forums” and got no response to a pretty critical problem, so in order to fix this problem, we called Zimbra sales to inquire about getting *ANY* kind of support and $PAY$ for it since we were in a bind….

    The answer we got was very very very interesting - the sales guy told me that Zimbra Open Source edition should *NOT* be run in production - only Network Edition and above. This was shocking to hear from “the leader in open source messaging and collaboration” - clearly that statement is not true. Zimbra is no better than M$ apparently. The only version they feel is “production” is the pay-for versions. And the pricing from Zimbra is worse than if we went with a hosted license from Microsoft for Hosted Exchange. So in order to get any kind of support, you fork over $$$$ to get onto the Network edition (which only runs on pay-for OS, Red Hat, SUSE, OS-X, not OS’s like Ubuntu…) The sales guy told me that open source is free, so what should I expect?

    Answer: If you call yourself an open source company, I expect you to behave like one, not like - “hey, here’s a buggy free version that we won’t even begin to support you on, no matter what, and if you want a *real* version, fork over $$$ for the program and then $$$ for support and $$$ for…..”

    Support at $400 an incident? over and above what you have to pay for the network edition/hosted edition? and you don’t have a choice of OS you can run it on, except for proprietary OS’s? not gonna happen…. good luck guys, and anyone foolish enough to run the open source edition since you are walking a tight-rope with no net….

  3. Ross Dargahi

    January 23rd, 2007 at 6:18 pm

    asdferrty started a thread on the Zimbra forum at 01-11-2007, 05:26 AM, by 01-11-2007, 12:06 PM his problem had been solved:

    http://www.zimbra.com/forums/showthread.php?t=6187

    You will note by the postings on the thread that Zimbra employees got engaged and helped resolve the issue (Post #16 & #17). I would like to add that the person who solved the issue (Bobby) actually works for Zimbra support.

  4. Michael Vu

    January 27th, 2007 at 3:04 pm

    When I first saw Zimbra a few years back, I must say I was quite impressed. However, I didn’t pursue an open source implementation simply because there was no clearcut data as to what the server requirements are.

    Fast forward a few years, and it is still ambiguous. I guess Zimbra will have to wait. The demo sure looks good though.

« Previous post
Next post »