<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pandora is Launching, Right Now</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/08/28/pandora-is-launching-right-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/08/28/pandora-is-launching-right-now/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 06:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Profile - Last.fm</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/08/28/pandora-is-launching-right-now/#comment-1547456</link>
		<dc:creator>Profile - Last.fm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 03:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=187#comment-1547456</guid>
		<description>[...] applications like Pandora (profile) getting some attention from the blogosphere, it&#8217;s time to shed some light on another [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] applications like Pandora (profile) getting some attention from the blogosphere, it&#8217;s time to shed some light on another [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SimonH</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/08/28/pandora-is-launching-right-now/#comment-163756</link>
		<dc:creator>SimonH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=187#comment-163756</guid>
		<description>Wow, what a difference a year makes! There is still a lot of debate on the 'Pandora vs. Last.fm' topic but for me Pandora wins hands down. Lets just see if they embrace keyword tagging on artists/songs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, what a difference a year makes! There is still a lot of debate on the &#8216;Pandora vs. Last.fm&#8217; topic but for me Pandora wins hands down. Lets just see if they embrace keyword tagging on artists/songs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch &#187; Web 2.0 This Week (Aug 28 - Sept 3)</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/08/28/pandora-is-launching-right-now/#comment-6167</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch &#187; Web 2.0 This Week (Aug 28 - Sept 3)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2005 01:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=187#comment-6167</guid>
		<description>[...] Pandora (update), Attensa, Gahbunga, Ojos, Google Purge, Writely, Skype (update) (I&#8217;m surprised this functionality hasn&#8217;t gotten more buzz), Kiko, Kiko #2, Free Wikis, Technorati (update), Findory, Iconize Me, Google Bendi, PocketMod [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pandora (update), Attensa, Gahbunga, Ojos, Google Purge, Writely, Skype (update) (I&#8217;m surprised this functionality hasn&#8217;t gotten more buzz), Kiko, Kiko #2, Free Wikis, Technorati (update), Findory, Iconize Me, Google Bendi, PocketMod [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/08/28/pandora-is-launching-right-now/#comment-516</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 03:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=187#comment-516</guid>
		<description>Actually, Pandora is a lot different than Last.fm. You see, Last.fm works on collaborative filtering whereby their system recommends artists based on the artists that other people listen to. Pandora's musicologists analyze every single song manually based on 400 musical characteristics. So, with Pandora you can build stations or playlists that are more customized and you're more likely to find exact song-level matches to the music you like. Just because two artists have similarity doesn't mean that you'll like every song by both artists. Pandora understands why you like a specific song and it recommends additional songs that you'll also like based on the characteristics of the music. Take my word for it. They are different. And no, I'm not a Pandora employee, friend or investor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Pandora is a lot different than Last.fm. You see, Last.fm works on collaborative filtering whereby their system recommends artists based on the artists that other people listen to. Pandora&#8217;s musicologists analyze every single song manually based on 400 musical characteristics. So, with Pandora you can build stations or playlists that are more customized and you&#8217;re more likely to find exact song-level matches to the music you like. Just because two artists have similarity doesn&#8217;t mean that you&#8217;ll like every song by both artists. Pandora understands why you like a specific song and it recommends additional songs that you&#8217;ll also like based on the characteristics of the music. Take my word for it. They are different. And no, I&#8217;m not a Pandora employee, friend or investor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: web2.0 track</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/08/28/pandora-is-launching-right-now/#comment-495</link>
		<dc:creator>web2.0 track</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2005 05:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=187#comment-495</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;web2.0 in China&lt;/strong&gt;

	Today I talked with Michael from Techcrunch.com.He suggested me to write my blog in English, for  a lot of them are interested in China&#8217;s web2.0 situation,yet no doubt most of them donn&#8217;t understand Chinese.
I agreed with him.So a new cate...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>web2.0 in China</strong></p>
<p>	Today I talked with Michael from Techcrunch.com.He suggested me to write my blog in English, for  a lot of them are interested in China&#8217;s web2.0 situation,yet no doubt most of them donn&#8217;t understand Chinese.<br />
I agreed with him.So a new cate&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WeBreakStuff</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/08/28/pandora-is-launching-right-now/#comment-491</link>
		<dc:creator>WeBreakStuff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 21:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=187#comment-491</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Pandora? What about Last.fm?&lt;/strong&gt;

	So part of the blogosphere is raving about Pandora. I guess I always get the &#8220;so what?&#8221; feeling when I see a web-app emerging that&#8217;s doing the same thing as one before. What I mean is, how is this any better than Last.fm?

...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Pandora? What about Last.fm?</strong></p>
<p>	So part of the blogosphere is raving about Pandora. I guess I always get the &#8220;so what?&#8221; feeling when I see a web-app emerging that&#8217;s doing the same thing as one before. What I mean is, how is this any better than Last.fm?</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gideon Marken</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/08/28/pandora-is-launching-right-now/#comment-489</link>
		<dc:creator>Gideon Marken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 17:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=187#comment-489</guid>
		<description>Michael/Kieth - you two may want to look at http://www.Last.fm/ - the foundation of song recommendations is built from a much larger, and much more interesting data pool.

I just started looking at Pandora today, and right away I can feel that  this isn't right for me. I'm sure it's great for some - but this interface...

You'll also find that Last.fm, provides a tracking service which tracks what 'you' listen to from your player. Granted, not everyone wants or needs charts of their listening habits, but once you start using the service, you find checking your stats to be fun. This is also where the data comes from for their suggestions.

Once you grasp what is going on behind the scenes to produce such stats and discover all the connections between users, songs and stations - you'll be nodding your head saying, "this is insane."

No - I don't work there :) I just think what they are doing is cool, and felt they offer a similar to Pandora. Anyone considering Pandora may want to also look over Last.fm. 

You two should consider them for a profile too. Keep up the great work - I'm enjoying your blog. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael/Kieth - you two may want to look at <a href="http://www.Last.fm/" rel="nofollow">http://www.Last.fm/</a> - the foundation of song recommendations is built from a much larger, and much more interesting data pool.</p>
<p>I just started looking at Pandora today, and right away I can feel that  this isn&#8217;t right for me. I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s great for some - but this interface&#8230;</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll also find that Last.fm, provides a tracking service which tracks what &#8216;you&#8217; listen to from your player. Granted, not everyone wants or needs charts of their listening habits, but once you start using the service, you find checking your stats to be fun. This is also where the data comes from for their suggestions.</p>
<p>Once you grasp what is going on behind the scenes to produce such stats and discover all the connections between users, songs and stations - you&#8217;ll be nodding your head saying, &#8220;this is insane.&#8221;</p>
<p>No - I don&#8217;t work there <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> I just think what they are doing is cool, and felt they offer a similar to Pandora. Anyone considering Pandora may want to also look over Last.fm. </p>
<p>You two should consider them for a profile too. Keep up the great work - I&#8217;m enjoying your blog. <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Burris</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/08/28/pandora-is-launching-right-now/#comment-482</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Burris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 12:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=187#comment-482</guid>
		<description>At first I couldn't grasp the significance of Pandora, even after reading your profile, but after trying it out just now, I'm ecstatic!

This is truly revolutionary and well worth the subscription fee.  I'm going to go couch fishing, beg, borrow, steal, and scrounge up for a year's subscription.  This is too good to pass up.

To the makers of Pandora, good job!  I always say that as music lovers, we live in a good time, and Pandora looks to enhance it a lot further.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At first I couldn&#8217;t grasp the significance of Pandora, even after reading your profile, but after trying it out just now, I&#8217;m ecstatic!</p>
<p>This is truly revolutionary and well worth the subscription fee.  I&#8217;m going to go couch fishing, beg, borrow, steal, and scrounge up for a year&#8217;s subscription.  This is too good to pass up.</p>
<p>To the makers of Pandora, good job!  I always say that as music lovers, we live in a good time, and Pandora looks to enhance it a lot further.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Conrad</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/08/28/pandora-is-launching-right-now/#comment-480</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Conrad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 09:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=187#comment-480</guid>
		<description>Yep, we're live. Enjoy!

http://www.pandora.com

Tom
CTO @ Pandora</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, we&#8217;re live. Enjoy!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pandora.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.pandora.com</a></p>
<p>Tom<br />
CTO @ Pandora</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.062 seconds -->
