<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Talk Live, Functional</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/08/23/google-talk-live-functional/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/08/23/google-talk-live-functional/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 09:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Karaoke</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/08/23/google-talk-live-functional/#comment-926108</link>
		<dc:creator>Karaoke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 19:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=175#comment-926108</guid>
		<description>As long as MSN live messenger is so easy to use and user functional G Talk doesn't stand a chance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as MSN live messenger is so easy to use and user functional G Talk doesn&#8217;t stand a chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kamlesh</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/08/23/google-talk-live-functional/#comment-692807</link>
		<dc:creator>kamlesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 04:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=175#comment-692807</guid>
		<description>We want to work on the google Talk software.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We want to work on the google Talk software.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kashmishia</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/08/23/google-talk-live-functional/#comment-249872</link>
		<dc:creator>kashmishia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Oct 2006 17:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=175#comment-249872</guid>
		<description>this group home is blocking too many of are websites we have aol butthe thing is that our instant messaging is block which me and all the girls feel is unfair  please help us</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this group home is blocking too many of are websites we have aol butthe thing is that our instant messaging is block which me and all the girls feel is unfair  please help us</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 人生得意须尽欢 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 弃婴还是孤儿？GTalk与44,000用户</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/08/23/google-talk-live-functional/#comment-182206</link>
		<dc:creator>人生得意须尽欢 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 弃婴还是孤儿？GTalk与44,000用户</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Sep 2006 03:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=175#comment-182206</guid>
		<description>[...] 即便如此，Google 依然乐此不彼的继续新产品的开发，更多的服务刚刚完成Alpha 测试，便马上打上Beta 标签推 出。对于Google 这样的公司，仅仅完成代码层次上面的测试，只能属于处于Alpha 阶段，只有对新产品/ 新服务有了明确的定位，以及推广策略以后，这样的产品才能叫做Beta. 回到GTalk 的话题上面，GTalk 本身仅仅是作为Google 的另外一项独立的服务出现在互联网上面的。Google 最近创意上的衰退我们暂时先不去考虑，而GTalk 直到推出接近整整一年以 后，才在最近被整合到Gmail 当中，显然这是一种临时性的策略转换，而并非预计当中的结果。我承认这又是一次Google 天才般的即兴表演的杰作。可惜用户无法将“天才”与“持续、专注”这两个概念联系在一块，他们总是喜欢看天才表演，而选择持续、专注、可靠的服务。何况 Google 这位敏捷的天才最近也在笨拙的玩着收购的把戏。Google 总是迷恋于收集天才， 聚集创意并且实现；然而在内部管理，各种产品的独立开发团队之间的协调上面，Google 却显得比Yahoo 稚嫩。好比酒吧中的情圣，每天夜里总是能引来喝彩并且给自己与其他人带来高潮……短暂的喝彩与高潮过后，如何处理遗留下来的事情？我不敢说Goolge 从来没有考虑过如何妥善安置这些弃婴，孤儿。然而形成已久的不断追逐，猎取新猎物的心瘾，始终无法使得Google 停下猎艳的脚步，然后产生更多的弃婴与孤儿。 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 即便如此，Google 依然乐此不彼的继续新产品的开发，更多的服务刚刚完成Alpha 测试，便马上打上Beta 标签推 出。对于Google 这样的公司，仅仅完成代码层次上面的测试，只能属于处于Alpha 阶段，只有对新产品/ 新服务有了明确的定位，以及推广策略以后，这样的产品才能叫做Beta. 回到GTalk 的话题上面，GTalk 本身仅仅是作为Google 的另外一项独立的服务出现在互联网上面的。Google 最近创意上的衰退我们暂时先不去考虑，而GTalk 直到推出接近整整一年以 后，才在最近被整合到Gmail 当中，显然这是一种临时性的策略转换，而并非预计当中的结果。我承认这又是一次Google 天才般的即兴表演的杰作。可惜用户无法将“天才”与“持续、专注”这两个概念联系在一块，他们总是喜欢看天才表演，而选择持续、专注、可靠的服务。何况 Google 这位敏捷的天才最近也在笨拙的玩着收购的把戏。Google 总是迷恋于收集天才， 聚集创意并且实现；然而在内部管理，各种产品的独立开发团队之间的协调上面，Google 却显得比Yahoo 稚嫩。好比酒吧中的情圣，每天夜里总是能引来喝彩并且给自己与其他人带来高潮……短暂的喝彩与高潮过后，如何处理遗留下来的事情？我不敢说Goolge 从来没有考虑过如何妥善安置这些弃婴，孤儿。然而形成已久的不断追逐，猎取新猎物的心瘾，始终无法使得Google 停下猎艳的脚步，然后产生更多的弃婴与孤儿。 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joycster</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/08/23/google-talk-live-functional/#comment-115473</link>
		<dc:creator>joycster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 19:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=175#comment-115473</guid>
		<description>I am new to Google talk or for that matter any talk but I would love to check it out</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am new to Google talk or for that matter any talk but I would love to check it out</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samrat Sharma &#187; Blog Archive &#187; You guys must be unfaithful</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/08/23/google-talk-live-functional/#comment-111791</link>
		<dc:creator>Samrat Sharma &#187; Blog Archive &#187; You guys must be unfaithful</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 19:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=175#comment-111791</guid>
		<description>[...] Numbers show that nearly a year after launch Google is a distant, distant 4th after MSN, Yahoo and AIM. They hold a pitiful 1% of total instant messaging market share, with 3.4 million unique users in May 2006. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Numbers show that nearly a year after launch Google is a distant, distant 4th after MSN, Yahoo and AIM. They hold a pitiful 1% of total instant messaging market share, with 3.4 million unique users in May 2006. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch en français &#187; La messagerie de Google ne décolle pas</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/08/23/google-talk-live-functional/#comment-111200</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch en français &#187; La messagerie de Google ne décolle pas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 06:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=175#comment-111200</guid>
		<description>[...] Le nombre d’utilisateurs de Google Talk est véritablement mauvais. Les statistiques d’utilisations communiquées par Comscore près d’un an après le lancement de Google Talk montrent que Google n’apparaît qu’en 4eme position après MSN, Yahoo et AIM. Ils détiennent un petit % du marché de la messagerie instantanée avec 3.4 millions d’utilisateurs actifs en Mai 2006. Jetez un œil au tableau ci-dessous pour plus de détails (D’ailleurs on peut se demander pourquoi le chat via Skype n’y apparaît pas). Notons que Comscore n’inclut pas l’utilisation de Gtalk dans Gmail ; mais même si c’était le cas les statistiques resteraient plutôt médiocres. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Le nombre d’utilisateurs de Google Talk est véritablement mauvais. Les statistiques d’utilisations communiquées par Comscore près d’un an après le lancement de Google Talk montrent que Google n’apparaît qu’en 4eme position après MSN, Yahoo et AIM. Ils détiennent un petit % du marché de la messagerie instantanée avec 3.4 millions d’utilisateurs actifs en Mai 2006. Jetez un œil au tableau ci-dessous pour plus de détails (D’ailleurs on peut se demander pourquoi le chat via Skype n’y apparaît pas). Notons que Comscore n’inclut pas l’utilisation de Gtalk dans Gmail ; mais même si c’était le cas les statistiques resteraient plutôt médiocres. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; グーグルのゴミのようなサービスとIM</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/08/23/google-talk-live-functional/#comment-110936</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; グーグルのゴミのようなサービスとIM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 00:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=175#comment-110936</guid>
		<description>[...] Google Talkのユーザー数はびっくりするほどひどい。Comscoreによると、Googleはサービススタート以来1年近く経過したというのに、利用ユーザ数はMSN、YahooそしてAIMに大きく差をあけられた4位。２００６年５月の時点でユニークビジター数は3４０万。インスタントメッセージマーケット市場全体で哀れにも1%のシェアを占めるにすぎない。くわしくは下記のComscoreチャートを見てほしい(Skype IMはチャート中のどこに当てはまるのかなと思っているのだが．．．)。ComscoreはGmail内での(Google Talkが組み込まれている)Google Talkの利用数を含んでいないが、その事実を考慮したとしてもこの数字はただただひどい。 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google Talkのユーザー数はびっくりするほどひどい。Comscoreによると、Googleはサービススタート以来1年近く経過したというのに、利用ユーザ数はMSN、YahooそしてAIMに大きく差をあけられた4位。２００６年５月の時点でユニークビジター数は3４０万。インスタントメッセージマーケット市場全体で哀れにも1%のシェアを占めるにすぎない。くわしくは下記のComscoreチャートを見てほしい(Skype IMはチャート中のどこに当てはまるのかなと思っているのだが．．．)。ComscoreはGmail内での(Google Talkが組み込まれている)Google Talkの利用数を含んでいないが、その事実を考慮したとしてもこの数字はただただひどい。 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Instant Messaging and Trashing Google</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/08/23/google-talk-live-functional/#comment-110813</link>
		<dc:creator>Techcrunch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Instant Messaging and Trashing Google</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 22:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=175#comment-110813</guid>
		<description>[...] The user numbers coming out on Google Talk are staggeringly terrible. Comscore usage numbers show that nearly a year after launch Google is a distant, distant 4th after MSN, Yahoo and AIM. They hold a pitiful 1% of total instant messaging market share, with 3.4 million unique users in May 2006. See the Comscore chart below for more details (I wonder where Skype IM falls in those stats). Note that Comscore does not include Google Talk usage within Gmail itself (where it is embedded), but even factoring that in, the numbers are just awful. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The user numbers coming out on Google Talk are staggeringly terrible. Comscore usage numbers show that nearly a year after launch Google is a distant, distant 4th after MSN, Yahoo and AIM. They hold a pitiful 1% of total instant messaging market share, with 3.4 million unique users in May 2006. See the Comscore chart below for more details (I wonder where Skype IM falls in those stats). Note that Comscore does not include Google Talk usage within Gmail itself (where it is embedded), but even factoring that in, the numbers are just awful. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: diego</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/08/23/google-talk-live-functional/#comment-14725</link>
		<dc:creator>diego</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 21:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=175#comment-14725</guid>
		<description>so tem americano loco</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so tem americano loco</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch &#187; Meebo - Instant Messaging with Ajax</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/08/23/google-talk-live-functional/#comment-9763</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch &#187; Meebo - Instant Messaging with Ajax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2006 06:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=175#comment-9763</guid>
		<description>[...] Also, Meebo should be supporting Jabber even in this public alpha product. Jabber is an open protocol and should therefore be the easiest service to implement. By supporting Jabber, Meebo would allow you to access Google Talk (profile) as well. This was pointed out in a comment by Frederico Oliveira on an UneasySilence post on Meebo earlier today. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Also, Meebo should be supporting Jabber even in this public alpha product. Jabber is an open protocol and should therefore be the easiest service to implement. By supporting Jabber, Meebo would allow you to access Google Talk (profile) as well. This was pointed out in a comment by Frederico Oliveira on an UneasySilence post on Meebo earlier today. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pim</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/08/23/google-talk-live-functional/#comment-9289</link>
		<dc:creator>Pim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 13:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=175#comment-9289</guid>
		<description>Google Talk now has server 2 server federation! (http://www.customizetalk.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=242)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Talk now has server 2 server federation! (http://www.customizetalk.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=242)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/08/23/google-talk-live-functional/#comment-6325</link>
		<dc:creator>M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2005 21:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=175#comment-6325</guid>
		<description>I don't see a reason why I would want to use Google Talk now when all my friends are on Yahoo/MSN/AIM. (With all of them having some sort of voice/video chat)

I think these guys are too late to start this thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see a reason why I would want to use Google Talk now when all my friends are on Yahoo/MSN/AIM. (With all of them having some sort of voice/video chat)</p>
<p>I think these guys are too late to start this thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: farshad</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/08/23/google-talk-live-functional/#comment-6265</link>
		<dc:creator>farshad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=175#comment-6265</guid>
		<description>aim farshad</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>aim farshad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Life.Random(Love, Motorcycles, New Ventures) &#187; About time&#8230;.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/08/23/google-talk-live-functional/#comment-5755</link>
		<dc:creator>Life.Random(Love, Motorcycles, New Ventures) &#187; About time&#8230;.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 00:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=175#comment-5755</guid>
		<description>[...] Google has just released a set of components called Libjingle that allow third party applications to interact with Google Talk. The components, which include some source code, are being released under a very liberal license allowing for free incorporation into commercial and non-commercial software. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google has just released a set of components called Libjingle that allow third party applications to interact with Google Talk. The components, which include some source code, are being released under a very liberal license allowing for free incorporation into commercial and non-commercial software. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch &#187; Google Talk Puts Gun To Skype&#8217;s Head</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/08/23/google-talk-live-functional/#comment-5473</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch &#187; Google Talk Puts Gun To Skype&#8217;s Head</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2005 19:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=175#comment-5473</guid>
		<description>[...] Google has just released a set of components called Libjingle that allow third party applications to interact with Google Talk. The components, which include some source code, are being released under a very liberal license allowing for free incorporation into commercial and non-commercial software. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google has just released a set of components called Libjingle that allow third party applications to interact with Google Talk. The components, which include some source code, are being released under a very liberal license allowing for free incorporation into commercial and non-commercial software. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/08/23/google-talk-live-functional/#comment-4162</link>
		<dc:creator>Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 15:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=175#comment-4162</guid>
		<description>I have been using Google Talk since the day it came out. I like it much better than the other IM clients out there. Now we just need to get more people to use it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been using Google Talk since the day it came out. I like it much better than the other IM clients out there. Now we just need to get more people to use it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Satish Talim</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/08/23/google-talk-live-functional/#comment-392</link>
		<dc:creator>Satish Talim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2005 01:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=175#comment-392</guid>
		<description>Renaming of Contacts is possible, if you right click on any contact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Renaming of Contacts is possible, if you right click on any contact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Kingery</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/08/23/google-talk-live-functional/#comment-389</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Kingery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 22:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=175#comment-389</guid>
		<description>Anil, I agree. It's feature set doesn't 'wow' (well except in the small download size 900k!). For me the 'wow' is Google using an open protocol so Mac/Linux etc can use clients like Gaim.
This is a 'get it out there' release. Similar to how Desktop 2 is a vastly more feature rich animal than GDS 1.x is. If they ever build in &lt;a href="http://techlifeblogged.blogspot.com/2005/08/we-need-awareness-in-googletalk.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;awareness&lt;/a&gt; the possibilities will really jump.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anil, I agree. It&#8217;s feature set doesn&#8217;t &#8216;wow&#8217; (well except in the small download size 900k!). For me the &#8216;wow&#8217; is Google using an open protocol so Mac/Linux etc can use clients like Gaim.<br />
This is a &#8216;get it out there&#8217; release. Similar to how Desktop 2 is a vastly more feature rich animal than GDS 1.x is. If they ever build in <a href="http://techlifeblogged.blogspot.com/2005/08/we-need-awareness-in-googletalk.html" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/techlifeblogged.blogspot.com');">awareness</a> the possibilities will really jump.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anil</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/08/23/google-talk-live-functional/#comment-388</link>
		<dc:creator>Anil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 19:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=175#comment-388</guid>
		<description>I am surprised by people saying that Google talk is a cool product!! It is definitely weaker than Skype or Yahoo IM for that matter. 

Google has built its loyalty based on the ability to "wow" consumers. I dont see any single feature in this product that "wows" me. I am a little shocked as to Google's innovation path or shall we just say copy Yahoo path?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am surprised by people saying that Google talk is a cool product!! It is definitely weaker than Skype or Yahoo IM for that matter. </p>
<p>Google has built its loyalty based on the ability to &#8220;wow&#8221; consumers. I dont see any single feature in this product that &#8220;wows&#8221; me. I am a little shocked as to Google&#8217;s innovation path or shall we just say copy Yahoo path?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ProgrammableWeb.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Talk</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/08/23/google-talk-live-functional/#comment-385</link>
		<dc:creator>ProgrammableWeb.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Talk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 17:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=175#comment-385</guid>
		<description>[...] Google Talk is all the buzz today. Using the non-proprietary Jabber/XMPP as the protocol is a nice disruptive Goolge-style entry into the space. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google Talk is all the buzz today. Using the non-proprietary Jabber/XMPP as the protocol is a nice disruptive Goolge-style entry into the space. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Arrington</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/08/23/google-talk-live-functional/#comment-384</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Arrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 16:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=175#comment-384</guid>
		<description>You're right, I missed that. Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, I missed that. Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Burris</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/08/23/google-talk-live-functional/#comment-383</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Burris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 15:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=175#comment-383</guid>
		<description>Just a tiny correction that you can rename contacts (right-click contact, rename option available.)  It's nifty for a beta, I just hope it doesn't suffer from too much features, which Trillian eventually got into (bloatware).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a tiny correction that you can rename contacts (right-click contact, rename option available.)  It&#8217;s nifty for a beta, I just hope it doesn&#8217;t suffer from too much features, which Trillian eventually got into (bloatware).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WeBreakStuff</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/08/23/google-talk-live-functional/#comment-380</link>
		<dc:creator>WeBreakStuff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 12:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=175#comment-380</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Google Talks Jabber&lt;/strong&gt;

	 Those of you who&#8217;ve been following the rumour and been around reading webreakstuff for a while probably have heard me talk about how Google should invest in a Jabber-based instant messaging client because 1) they have nothing to lose with havin...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Google Talks Jabber</strong></p>
<p>	 Those of you who&#8217;ve been following the rumour and been around reading webreakstuff for a while probably have heard me talk about how Google should invest in a Jabber-based instant messaging client because 1) they have nothing to lose with havin&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Somewhat Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/08/23/google-talk-live-functional/#comment-378</link>
		<dc:creator>Somewhat Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 11:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=175#comment-378</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Google Talk Jabber-based IM Client To Debut&lt;/strong&gt;

It has been confirmed by several news sources that Google's instant messenging software called Google Talk or GTalk is set to be released as soon as tomorrow (August 24, 2005). Check out this story on Instant Messaging Planet. Also check</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Google Talk Jabber-based IM Client To Debut</strong></p>
<p>It has been confirmed by several news sources that Google&#8217;s instant messenging software called Google Talk or GTalk is set to be released as soon as tomorrow (August 24, 2005). Check out this story on Instant Messaging Planet. Also check</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.095 seconds -->
