<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Profile: Extisp.icio.us</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/07/04/profile-extispicius/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/07/04/profile-extispicius/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 07:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Archaeoastronomy &#187; Improve Your Visitor Count</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/07/04/profile-extispicius/#comment-147386</link>
		<dc:creator>Archaeoastronomy &#187; Improve Your Visitor Count</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Aug 2006 18:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=66#comment-147386</guid>
		<description>[...] They have to be the right sort of links. They have to show you’ve read what they’re saying. People are not going to be impressed if you link to their site randomly, or tangentially. In this case by almost randomly linking to this page at Techcrunch, simply because it has the word random in the text is not going to impress them. They will not be linking back. It’s one step away from spamming. A more appropriate link following point one Stop Caring would be to Lorelle’s excellent article on defining success. Like Techcrunch it’s well written, but it’s also relevant to what I’m talking about. I don’t honestly expect her to link back, but linking to that page improves this entry anyway – which is another very good reason to link. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] They have to be the right sort of links. They have to show you’ve read what they’re saying. People are not going to be impressed if you link to their site randomly, or tangentially. In this case by almost randomly linking to this page at Techcrunch, simply because it has the word random in the text is not going to impress them. They will not be linking back. It’s one step away from spamming. A more appropriate link following point one Stop Caring would be to Lorelle’s excellent article on defining success. Like Techcrunch it’s well written, but it’s also relevant to what I’m talking about. I don’t honestly expect her to link back, but linking to that page improves this entry anyway – which is another very good reason to link. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: piku</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/07/04/profile-extispicius/#comment-2567</link>
		<dc:creator>piku</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2005 16:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/?p=66#comment-2567</guid>
		<description>I got really tired of having to click his bookmarklet every time I loaded my del.icio.us links page, so I created a Greasemonkey script to do it for me. In all honesty, his bookmarklet was already optimized to become a greasemonkey script, so it only took me a minute or two to convert it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got really tired of having to click his bookmarklet every time I loaded my del.icio.us links page, so I created a Greasemonkey script to do it for me. In all honesty, his bookmarklet was already optimized to become a greasemonkey script, so it only took me a minute or two to convert it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.035 seconds -->
